Transportation Committee

Comité des transports

 

Minutes 38 / Procès-verbal 38

 

Wednesday, 6 January 2010, 9:30 a.m.

le mercredi 6 janvier 2010, 9 h 30

 

Andrew S. Haydon Hall, 110 Laurier Avenue West

Salle Andrew S. Haydon, 110, avenue Laurier ouest

 

 

Present / Présents :    Councillors / Conseillers M. McRae (Chair / Présidente), C. Leadman (Vice-Chair / Vice-présidente), G. Bédard, S. Desroches, C. Doucet, J. Legendre, M. Wilkinson

 

Regrets / Excuses:      R. Bloess, D. Thompson

 

 

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

DÉCLARATIONS D’INTÉRÊT   

 

No declarations of interest were filed.

 

 

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES /
Ratification dU PROCÈS-VERBaL

 

Minutes 37 of Wednesday, 2 December 2009 were confirmed.


Moment of Silence

 

Committee members and all present observed a moment of silence for Police Constable Eric Czapnik who was killed while on duty on 29 December 2009.

 

COMMUNICATIONS

COMMUNICATIONS

 

Responses to Inquiries: / Réponses aux demandes de renseignements:

 

TRC 06-09      Implementation of pilot east-west segregated cycling lane / Mise en oeuvre du projet pilote de voie cyclable séparée est-ouest

TRC 07-09      Cycling Safety near the Pretoria Bridge / Sécurité des cyclistes à proximité du pont Pretoria

                                                                                                            RECEIVED

 

INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES & COMMUNITY SUSTAINABILITY

SERVICES D’INFRASTRUCTURE ET VIABILITÉ DES COLLECTIVITÉS

 

PLANNING AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT

URBANISME ET GESTION DE LA CROISSANCE

 

1.         HUNT CLUB COMMUNITY PATHWAY CONNECTION TO SOUTHEAST TRANSITWAY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT STUDY RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMANDATIONS DE L'ÉTUDE D'ÉVALUATION ENVIRONNEMENTALE concernant un sentier piétonnier entre le secteur Hunt Club et le Transitway Sud-Est

ACS2010-ICS-PGM-0011                      Gloucester-Southgate (10); River/Rivière (16)

 

The Committee received an e-mail dated 5 January 2010 from the Hunt Club Community Organization in support of the staff recommendations.  A copy of their submission is held on file.

 

Councillor Wilkinson cautioned staff on the use of Plexiglas for the pathway connection, noting it burns when fire is held to it long enough.  The Chair asked staff to follow-up with the councillor to discuss this further.

 

That the Transportation Committee recommend Council approve:

 

1.         The Environmental Assessment study's recommended plan for the pathway connection between the Hunt Club community (at Cahill Drive West) and the Southeast Transitway (at the South Keys Transitway station) as detailed in this report; and

 

2.         The finalization of the Environmental Study Report for the Hunt Club Community Pathway Connection to the Southeast Transitway project and posting of the Notice of Study Completion.

 

                                                                                                            CARRIED

 

COUNCILLORS’ ITEMS

ARTICLES DES CONSEILLERS

 

Councillor / Conseiller BÉDARD

 

2.         MONTRÉAL ROAD CLOSURES

FERMETURE À LA HAUTEUR DU CHEMIN Montréal

ACS2010-CCS-TRC-0001                                                                     Rideau-Vanier (12)

 

            Councillor Legendre made note of the legal advice contained in the report and put forward the following amendment:

 

            Moved by J. Legendre

 

That the following bullet be removed from the content of the report, as it is premature and pre-supposes conclusions of the study:

 

·         File application for road closure with the City of Ottawa

 

                                                                                                            CARRIED

 

That the Transportation Committee recommend that Council direct staff in the Infrastructure Services and Community Sustainability Portfolio, Planning and Growth Management Department and the City Operations Portfolio, Public Works and Services Department to partner with the Quartier Vanier BIA and its consultants to provide support and assistance as needed to complete a study for the closure of certain streets on Montréal Road as previously identified in the City of Ottawa Official Plan.

 

                                                                                                            CARRIED, as amended

 

 


MOTIONS OF WHICH NOTICE HAS BEEN PREVIOUSLY GIVEN

MOTIONS AYANT FAIT L’OBJET D’UN AVIS PRÉCÉDENT

 

Councillor / Conseiller DOUCET

 

3.         NEED FOR SEGREGATED BIKE LANES - MOTION

NÉCESSITÉ DE CRÉER DES VOIES CYCLABLES SÉPARÉES - MOTION

ACS2009-CCS-TRC-0013                                        City Wide / a l’échelle de la ville

 

At the outset, Councillor Doucet indicated he was proposing to delete Recommendation 3, in lieu of the Downtown Ottawa Urban Design Strategy.  Councillor Leadman advised that she was going to propose an amendment and suggested that it replace the original recommendation as follows:

 

3.   That staff be directed to review the presentations recently made by Inge Molenaar (Cycling in The Netherlands and the Hague) and Roger Geller (The Portland Story Benefiting from Bicycling) and report back to Committee on the transportation and financial advantages of investing in bicycle infrastructure that these cities have experienced.

 

Councillor Doucet accepted this replacement recommendation.  In speaking to the report, the councillor recalled the many accidents that occurred in 2009 where cyclists were seriously injured or killed and emphasized that something must be done to address this issue.  He referred to the success of painted or segregated bike lanes in other cities and stated that he wanted to see more done in Ottawa to make cycling safer.

 

Alayne McGregor was opposed to Recommendations 2 and 3 because she did not believe segregated bike lanes are safe for cyclists.  Using a visual display, she related her experiences using these lanes in Montréal.  She explained that when there is a lot of bicycle traffic, cars cannot easily make turns onto side-streets and there are often near misses between cyclists and motorists and sometimes even pedestrians, who think they can just walk out into the bike lane at any time.  She maintained therefore that while many may think these facilities are safe, what they do is put cyclists into positions where they are not expected and are not seen.  A copy of her letter dated 6 January was distributed and is held on file.

 

When asked to comment on the concerns raised by the delegation, Mona Abouhenidy, Program Manager, Transportation Strategic Planning, advised that if the report recommendations are approved, staff would study the safety issues first and then identify a variety of measures to address those concerns.  She confirmed the study would have a wide scope.

 

Charles Akben-Marchand stated that having segregated bike lanes does nothing to improve safety because people need to know how to use them.  He believed education was necessary to promote a culture of cycling and to reduce confusion and frustration.  He commented on how media campaigns help cyclists and motorists understand each other and he posited that cycling safety can be improved and taught in many ways by:

 

·         Providing cycling courses for the general public

·         Expanding courses into schools via Citizens for Safe Cycling's Elementary School Bicycle Safety Program; booths at public events (like Ottawa Public Health's helmet blitzes, but with broader focus), et cetera

·         Teaming up with other government agencies and the private sector for broader impact.

 

Mr. Akben-Marchand stated that segregated cycling facilities are not the solution to cycling safety and maintained that by educating all road users, the City will best promote cycling safety.  A copy of his presentation was later distributed to members of the Committee and a copy is held on file.

 

Dianne Cox, Cycling Vision Ottawa spoke in support of the recommendations in the report.  She indicated that Cycling Vision Ottawa observes the high proportion of cycling accidents at intersections, and cities that invest in cycling infrastructure are constantly exploring engineering treatments to improve safety at these locations.  Such improvements range from distinctive, highly-visible painted markings, to bicycle traffic lights.  Intersection treatments for cyclists are often designed to continue the effect of segregation carried over from adjacent bike lanes and are therefore important for improved overall cycling safety.  She further noted that if clear markings are not provided where cyclists should be and where the motorists can see them, there will not be a noticeable increase in cycling.  Most agree that the more cyclists on the road, the safer it is for them because of the psychological changes that occur in drivers, i.e., they are more alert to them.  A copy of their written submission dated 5 January 2010 was previously distributed and a copy is held on file.

 

Councillor Wilkinson inquired what the cost of the study would be and staff explained that their intention is to report back with a terms of reference and to identify the cost of the study.  Ms. Abouhenidy added that funding is currently not available in the existing budget to implement any measures or to conduct the study, and so, if Council determines to move ahead on this, staff would have to prioritize their existing workplan.  The councillor further asked if all types of cycling lanes would be looked at as part of the study and was advised by staff that all measures will be examined, not just segregated bike lanes.  The councillor asked if the study could also examine the maintenance requirements to keep safe cycling routes available in the winter and Ms. Abouhenidy confirmed that this could be added to the scope of the study if that is the wish of the Committee and Council.

 

With respect to the issue of addressing issues at particular locations, Councillor Desroches thought staff would have already looked into the intersections and problem areas as part of the Cycling Plan development.  Ms. Abouhenidy advised that the Cycling Plan focused on developing a city-wide network of infrastructure to correspond to all cycling levels, and did not go down to the intersections level.  The councillor suggested that in the absence of that, such locations should be treated as are those involving motor vehicles and he understood this is what this study will address with a view to determining whether changes can be undertaken.

 

Councillor Legendre was supportive of the report because he understood the need to separate cyclists from motorists for safety reasons.  He referred to a particular example of the Cummings Bridge where he does not feel safe as a cyclist because the painted cycling lane is only on the uphill side of the structure and not on the downhill side.  If the City intends to promote cycling, he stated that there is a need for more crossings of major barriers, such as the Rideau River, and as one suggestion, offered that Donald Street and Somerset Street East should be linked across that river for cyclists and pedestrians.

 

In his closing remarks, Councillor Doucet was amazed about the resistance among some cyclists to segregated bike lanes.  He noted that Roger Geller, the Bicycle Coordinator for the City of Oregon stated that 50% of people surveyed said they would cycle if they could do so in a safe environment.  The councillor recognized that bicycle facilities can never be 100% safe, but emphasized that segregated bike lanes are the premier choice by all cities that consider cycling a serious form of transportation.  He believed that the study being recommended will bring more resources and focus to what needs to be done.

 

The Chair thanked Councillor Doucet for bringing this forward and requested a recorded vote on the matter.

 

That the Transportation Committee direct staff to undertake the following:

 

1.         Identify locations of potential pedestrian/cyclist/vehicle conflict using available information such as accident records and report back to Transportation Committee with a plan on how to minimize collisions at these locations in time for consideration as part of the 2011 Budget.

 

2.         As part of the above safety review, determine whether segregated bike lanes would be appropriate in these locations to improve safety and promote cycling as a mode of transportation.

 

3.         That staff be directed to review the presentations recently made by Inge Molenaar (Cycling in The Netherlands and the Hague) and Roger Geller (The Portland Story Benefiting from Bicycling) and report back to Committee on the transportation and financial advantages of investing in bicycle infrastructure that these cities have experienced.

 

                                                                                                               CARRIED, as amended

 

            YEAS (7) :      M. Wilkinson, S. Desroches, G. Bédard, J. Legendre, C. Doucet, C. Leadman, M. McRae

            NAYS (0)

 


COUNCILLOR / CONSEILLER BÉDARD

 

4.         90 GEORGE STREET – PROPOSED VALET PARKING - MOTION

            90, RUE GEORGE - SERVICE VOITURIER PROPOSÉ - MOTION

            ACS2010-CCS-TRC-0002                                                                     Rideau-Vanier (12)

 

Councillor Bédard indicated he had a technical amendment which had been agreed to by staff and the property owner, but which had not been reflected in the report.

 

Moved by G. Bédard

 

That the following condition from the “Contents of License of Occupation Agreement” (Document 1):

 

“Should the City and/or Public Utilities operating within the Public Right of Way decide to renew or repair infrastructure below the surface of the Lands, the Owner must remove the improvements and repair or renew the surface of the lands at its expense upon the time specified within written notice from the City.”

 

be replaced with:

 

"Should the City or utility companies decide to renew or repair infrastructure below the surface of the lands, the City or utility company is responsible for compacting while the owners are responsible for removing and replacing the pavers within time periods specified in written notice from the City.

 

                                                                                                               CARRIED

 

That the Transportation Committee recommend that Council approve:

 

1.         That the Director of Real Estate Partnership and Development Office be authorized to enter into a License of Occupation agreement on behalf of the City with the Owner in accordance with the terms and conditions as set out in Document 1, which terms and conditions will provide a 10 year term for the License of Occupation agreement with a nominal yearly fee of $1.00 for the 10 year term, which will be subject to renegotiation for further renewals based on applicable City land lease policy in place thereafter.

 


2.         That the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure Services and Community Sustainability provide for the issuance of the required road cut permit to allow the Owner to undertake the proposed improvements subject to all technical matters related to the works being to the satisfaction of the Deputy City Manager and subject to any securities as set out in Document 1 being posted.

                                                                                                               CARRIED, as amended

 

 

ADJOURNMENT

LEVÉE DE LA SÉANCE

 

The Committee adjourned at 10:55 a.m.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Original Signed By                                                                  Original Signed By

R. Nelson                                                                                 M. McRae

_____________________________                                      _____________________________

Committee Coordinator                                                       Chair