Report
to/Rapport au:
Transportation
Committee/Comité des transports
and
Council/et au Conseil
9 May 2005/le 9 mai 2005
Submitted by/Soumis par: R.G. Hewitt
Acting Deputy City Manager/Directeur
municipal adjoint intérimaire,
Public Works and Services/Services
et Travaux publics
Contact/Personne-ressource: G. Diamond,
Director/Directeur,
Transit Services/Service du
transport en commun
842-3636 ext. 2271,
gordon.diamond@transpo.ottawa.on.ca
|
Ref N°: ACS2005-PWS-TRN-0004 |
SUBJECT: REDUCED FARE TRANSIT PASS
FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES
OBJET: RÉDUCTION DES
TARIFS DES LAISSEZ-PASSER DE TRANSPORT EN COMMUN OFFERTS AUX PERSONNES
ATTEINTES D’INVALIDITÉ
REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS
A.
That, at its meeting on 18 May 2005, Transportation
Committee receive and table the “Reduced
Fare Transit Pass for People with Disabilities” Report.
B.
That, at its meeting on 1 June 2005, Transportation
Committee consider and approve the following recommendations:
1. That, subject to 2006 budget approval, the Transportation Committee recommend to Council the implementation of a reduced fare transit pass for low-income people with disabilities as a pilot project from July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007. Passes would be priced at the Seniors’ pass rate (currently $25.75) and would have the same conditions of use on OC Transpo conventional transit and Para Transpo. The reduced price pass would replace the free service on regular transit for wheelchair, scooter and walker users. The total net cost of this recommendation for the one-year pilot project would be approximately $660,000 with $330,000 for July to December 2006 and the same amount for January to June 2007.
2. That staff work with the Accessible Transit Pass Work Group
of the Persons with DisAbilities: A
Community Coalition to seek funding partners for the development and
implementation of an evaluation program.
RECOMMANDATIONS
DU RAPPORT
A. Qu’à sa réunion du
18 mai 2005, le Comité des transports reçoive et présente le rapport intitulé Réduction des tarifs
des laissez-passer de transport en commun offerts aux personnes atteintes
d’invalidité.
B. Qu’à sa réunion du 1er juin 2005, le
Comité des transports examine et approuve
les recommandations suivantes :
1.
Que, sous réserve de
l’approbation du budget de 2006, le Comité des transports recommande au Conseil
de mettre en place sous forme de projet pilote un laissez-passer à tarif réduit
pour les personnes atteintes d’invalidité à faible revenu durant la période du
1er juillet 2006 au 30 juin 2007.
Ce laissez-passer serait offert au même tarif que le laissez-passer pour
aînés (actuellement 25,75 $) et les mêmes conditions d’utilisation
s’appliqueraient à bord des véhicules de transport conventionnel d’OC Transpo
et de Para Transpo. Le laissez-passer à
tarif réduit remplacerait le service gratuit offert à bord des véhicules de
transport régulier aux personnes se déplaçant en fauteuil roulant, en scooter
ou à l’aide d’une marchette. Le coût total de
cette recommandation pour le projet pilote d'une durée d'un an s'élèverait à
quelque 660 000 $, soit 330 000 $ de juillet à décembre 2006 et le même montant
de janvier à juin 2007.
2. Que le personnel collabore avec l’Accessible Transit Pass
Work Group of the Persons with Disabilities, une coalition communautaire, dans le
but de trouver des partenaires financiers pour l’élaboration et la mise en
œuvre d’un programme d’évaluation.
BACKGROUND
At its meeting of March 19,
2003, the Transportation and Transit Committee directed staff to initiate a
pilot project whereby conventional transit services on the OC Transpo
fixed-route network would be offered free of charge to people using a
wheelchair, walker or scooter.
The program
was intended to provide incentive for customers with impaired mobility to
try-out the expanded accessible transit network, and to help reduce the demand
for ParaTranspo services. The free
service was offered only to those using a mobility device because this provided
a simple, visible mechanism for identifying eligible customers without
introducing a new regulatory process or fare media, and because it offered the
service to the principal target group of ParaTranspo customers.
At its meeting of October 7,
2004, the Health, Recreation and Social Services Committee ACS2004-CCV-HSS-0003 heard recommendations
regarding the provision of Mental Health Services in Ottawa, including:
3.
Provide a subsidy system for bus passes and waive user fees for those
living with chronic mental illness;
The
committee subsequently approved the following motion:
That recommendations 3 and 4 be
referred to staff for a report on the cost implications of a subsidized bus
pass and recreation services for people with cognitive disabilities and Ontario
Disability Support Program recipients for the 2005 budget process;
The Accessibility Advisory Committee, at its meeting of November 17, 2004, received a report entitled Proposal for a Reduced Fare Transit Pass for Persons with disAbilities, presented by the Accessible Transit Pass Work Group of the Persons with disAbilities: A Community Coalition. Subsequently, the Committee approved the following motion:
That the Accessibility Advisory Committee support the
idea of a pilot project for the subsidized Transit Pass for persons with
disabilities.
The Coalition’s report (Appendix A) makes several recommendations in support of such a program.
A staff information report, analysing the expected revenue and ridership impact of this subsidized transit pass was presented to Transportation Committee on January 19, 2005. On that occasion, Transportation Committee approved the following two motions:
That
the following motions for an Accessible Transit Pass be referred to the 2005
budget deliberations for consideration:
1.
Whereas Ontario Disability
Support Program (ODSP) recipients meet a stringent disability test as
determined by the Provincial Government;
Whereas the maximum benefit for a single ODSP recipient is $930 a
month (or $11,160 a year – well below the Statistics Canada poverty line of
$18,371 a year);
Whereas for people with disabilities, accessible public transit is
fundamental for ensuring inclusion in the community;
Whereas a regular OC Transpo bus pass now costs $63 a month, out of
reach for many ODSP recipients;
Whereas an OC Transpo Seniors Bus Pass costs $25.75 a month, with no
income criteria being applied;
Therefore be it resolved that the OC Transpo budget be increased by $350,000 in 2005 in order to provide an OC Transpo Disabled Bus Pass to ODSP recipients at a cost of $25.75 a month, effective July 1, 2005, similar to the Seniors Bus Pass.
2. That the stipulation that holders of the reduced price pass be required to “top up” if requesting Para Transpo Service be removed.
During the 2005 Budget discussion in January 2005, a motion was approved referring the subsidized transit pass proposal back to Transportation Committee for discussion in the context of the up-coming report on Transit Service and Fare Policies.
Accordingly, the previous staff report has been updated to include discussion of the proposal in the context of the larger picture of transit policies. It has also been possible to add some information from a recent report on a similar program in Edmonton.
DISCUSSION
The Coalition initially estimated a net saving to the City of approximately $37,000.
Staff has met with members of the
Coalition on several occasions to discuss the proposal. These discussions have focussed on two
areas: how the passes could be administered; and the financial impact of the
proposed program.
Administration
Transit Services does not have
personnel qualified to determine either the medical eligibility or the
financial eligibility of Ottawa residents for this program. However, staff at the transit Sales Centres
are in a position to confirm a person’s eligibility, if a qualified external
authority has already been able to pre-determine and pre-authorize each
individual’s eligibility.
It would be possible for potential
customers to be provided with a secure, serialized authorization form, which could be signed by
qualified personnel to verify that the customer is an ODSP recipient. This form would entitle the customer to
receive an Accessible Pass Photo ID at an OC Transpo Sales Centre. Customers would be required to present the
authorized form plus two other pieces of identification at a Sales Centre in order
to receive the Accessible Pass Photo ID. Short-term ODSP recipients would not
be eligible.
The Photo ID would have a duration
of two years, after which time customers would have to renew their eligibility
with a new authorization form from ODSP.
Contact information for all
Accessible Pass Photo ID holders would be maintained by Transit Services
staff. In the event that a person
previously eligible for the Accessible Pass has a change in financial or
medical status, and no longer qualifies, the authorizing agency would notify
Transit Services who in turn would contact the customer to retrieve their Photo
ID card before the scheduled two year expiry/renewal date.
Monthly accessible pass
vouchers would be distributed at the OC Transpo Sales Centres, and at a few
other pass vendor locations convenient to this clientele. Any person could purchase a monthly
accessible pass voucher, but the voucher would only be accepted as fare payment
when it is accompanied by a matching Accessible Pass Photo ID.
This administrative proposal
would only succeed with the participation of the potential authorizing
agencies, including ODSP and other community social service agencies who work
with ODSP recipients on a regular basis.
Transit Services staff believe it would be possible to create an
administrative process which does not place new demands on OC Transpo Sales
Centre staff, and which would allow Transit Services to easily determine when a
person’s qualifying status has changed.
Staff estimate that the new
administrative costs of $10,000 to print passes and maintain the registration
list could be entirely offset by charging the standard $6.25 fee for a photo
ID. This fee would be charged each time
a customer requires a new card (i.e. every two years).
Financial Impact
Survey data contained in the
Coalition’s report as well as additional information about usage of the current
free service by people with mobility devices, suggest that the total combined
effect of eliminating the existing free service and introducing the Accessible
Transit Pass as recommended above would be a $715,000 net annual loss of
transit revenue.
Projected sales and usage of an Accessible Transit Pass are discussed in terms of seven different customer groups, as detailed in Table 1 below. Through subsequent discussions between staff and the Coalition, it appears that the primary differences between the Coalition’s projections and those of staff are a result of different estimates of cash, ticket and pass revenues currently generated by the ODSP market. These are the revenues which would be reduced by offering the new pass at a price equivalent to that of the Seniors’ pass. The Coalition’s calculations focused only on the sector of ODSP recipients who have a mental illness.
Staff’s estimate of the probable number of Accessible Pass users (3,900) is the same as the Coalition’s projection, and at 25 percent of the market is identical to the experience in Edmonton, where a similar program with similar pass values was introduced in July 2004. The Edmonton pass is priced at $29, compared with $59 for a regular pass, and is not valid on the Edmonton specialized transit service.
The Coalition was briefed on the staff estimates and understands that the calculations affect more than just recipients with mental illness.
TABLE 1
TRANSIT REVENUE IMPACT
Customer Group |
Transit Revenue Impact |
Comment |
Of the customers with mobility devices who currently use transit for free: |
|
Est. 500 people use
transit from time to time and about 100 use transit each day. |
i) people who currently ride for free – who are eligible for and would purchase an Accessible Transit Pass. |
$15,000 revenue gain |
Est. 50 pass users |
ii) people who currently ride for free – who are not eligible for a reduced pass but would continue to use transit and would pay with cash or tickets or would purchase a regular transit pass. |
$45,000 revenue gain |
Est. 450 people |
iii) people who currently ride for free – who may be eligible or not eligible for a reduced pass, but would no longer use conventional transit. |
Revenue neutral |
|
Of the customers with disabilities who currently pay to use transit: |
|
|
iv) people who currently buy a monthly pass
- who are eligible for and would
purchase an Accessible Transit Pass. |
($875,000) revenue loss |
Est. 2,350 pass users |
v) people currently paying with tickets or cash - who are eligible for and would purchase an Accessible Transit Pass. |
($50,000) revenue loss |
Est. 950 pass users |
vi) people currently paying with tickets or cash – who are eligible for but would not purchase an Accessible Transit Pass. |
Revenue neutral |
|
Of the people with disabilities who do not use transit: |
|
|
vii) people not using transit – who are eligible and would purchase an Accessible Transit Pass. |
$150,000 revenue gain |
Est. 550 pass users |
TOTAL: |
($715,000) revenue loss |
3,900 possible pass
users |
In view of the significant cost of this program as proposed by the Coalition, staff examined other options. These are shown in Table 2. The break-even price for the pass would be $58. However, this discount would not provide sufficient incentive to make the program worthwhile given the administrative efforts that would be required for implementation.
TABLE 2
FINANCIAL IMPACT OF
DIFFERENT PRICES
FOR ODSP PASS
Proposed ODSP Pass Price $ |
Revenue Loss $ |
25.75 |
715,000 |
35.00 |
495,000 |
45.50 |
269,000 |
58.50 |
0 |
Although the revenue loss of the program would be reduced were the price to be set higher than the Seniors’ pass, a higher price is not recommended for two reasons. First, the top-up required for Para Transpo, which is highly desirable to encourage use of conventional transit where possible, would mean that ODSP recipients who have no option but to use Para Transpo would gain little or no benefit from the pass. Second, if the top-up was not applied, the costs on Para Transpo could escalate with the addition of wheelchair, scooter and walker users who currently enjoy free conventional transit.
CONCLUSION
Implementation of a reduced fare transit pass for persons with disabilities, along the lines proposed by the Coalition, is administratively feasible. However, it would cost approximately $715,000 per year in lost transit revenues. Approximately $50,000 would be saved annually by the City through reduced provincial subsidy payments for bus passes. A recent preliminary report on the Edmonton pilot project suggests that the cost could be higher than estimated here (see Appendix B).
The Coalition has indicated they would contact Government agencies and non-profit organizations to seek out funds for the development and implementation of an evaluation plan. It is therefore recommended that staff work with the Coalition to obtain funding to cover these costs.
It is also recommended that the reduced price pass be implemented at the same price and with the same validity as the Seniors’ pass. Currently, this would mean that the price would be $25.75, compared with a regular pass of $63. Similar to the Seniors’ pass, the pass would be valid on express routes and a top up would be required on Para Transpo. This would encourage customers to use conventional transit where possible instead of the more expensive Para Transpo.
While this would have a net cost of approximately $665,000 per year, or $330,000 in 2006, it supports the third principle of the Transit System Management Policies, i.e. to recognize the City’s support for people with disabilities or financial restrictions.
CONSULTATION/PUBLIC
NOTIFICATION
No formal public consultation or notification has been conducted by staff; however, public and customer feedback was solicited by the Coalition as discussed during the preparation of their report during their presentations to the Accessibility Advisory Committee and the HRSS Committee. A memo of support for the Coalition’s proposal is attached as Appendix C.
At Transportation Committee on January 19, 2005, when this subject was discussed, a number of different points of view were expressed. There was strong support from the Accessible Advisory Committee for the reduced price pass, including the replacement of free transit on conventional transit for wheelchair, scooter and walker users. However, concerns were expressed by Disabled and Proud about the impact of the program on those who currently receive free access to conventional transit.
At the same meeting the Persons with
DisAbilities Community Coalition, which represents a broad range of agencies
who serve people with disabilities, strongly supported the program.
TRANSPORTATION MASTER PLAN
The proposed new discounted pass would have the
effect of increasing the accessibility of the transit system for people with
disabilities, and of increasing mobility and transit ridership.
FINANCIAL
IMPLICATIONS
The 2005 budget identified continued budget pressures for 2006 and 2007, even after considering rate of inflation increases in fees and service charges and taking into account assessment growth from new properties. Without adding any new programs or capital projects, the 2006 tax increase is estimated at approximately seven percent.
As in the 2005 budget, there
are basically four means of funding additional program requests: identify new sources of revenue, through
offsetting program reductions, increase existing fees, and increase taxes.
This request is not offset
by new sources of revenue, by program reductions or by increases to existing
fees.
This request for a pilot project would result in an additional tax increase of 0.04 percent in 2006 with no increase in FTEs. It is expected that there would be sufficient experience with the pilot project during 2006 such that a budget item could be submitted for 2007 for this initiative. The full implementation of this reduced fare would result in an additional tax increase of 0.08 percent on an annual basis with no increase in FTEs.
SUPPORTING
DOCUMENTATION
Appendix A –
Proposal for a Reduced Fare Transit Pass for Persons with disAbilities
Appendix B – Edmonton Discounted Transit Pass Pilot Project
Appendix C – Memo of support from the Accessibility Advisory Committee
APPENDIX A
(Accessible
Transit Pass)
Prepared by the Accessible Transit Pass Work Group
of the Persons with disAbilities: A Community Coalition
Work Group Members: Lisa
Jamieson, CMHA Ottawa Branch; Brian Tardif, Citizen Advocacy; Terry Gilhen,
Disabled Persons Community Resources; Linda Osmond, Catholic Family Services;
Dave Tafel, Schizophrenia Society of Ottawa; Joann Michels, Carlington ACTT
program and Carlington Community Health Services; Donald Shultz, Psychiatric
Survivors of Ottawa; Jamie Grimes, Causeway.
Work Group Resource: Kathy Riley, OC Transpo, Accessibility Specialist
Approved
by the Accessibility Advisory Committee of the City of Ottawa
on
November 17, 2004
Public transit is a critical part of our
City’s infrastructure that supports the quality of life for Ottawa residents.
Public transportation enables people to move throughout their day, to do what
needs to be done. The need for accessible public transportation
is well understood by people living with disabilities and the people and
organizations that support them. Accessible public transit provides the
critical link between employment and employment-related activities, education,
health care, recreation, community supports and family and friends. For people
with disabilities, accessible public transit is fundamental for ensuring
inclusion in the community. Public
transportation is the key to countering isolation and enabling independence.
Yet, for the many people with disabilities, public transportation remains
inaccessible.
The importance of transportation for people
with disabilities was the impetus that spurred the creation of the Community
Coalition. During the Para Transpo
strike in 2001, a number of organizations united to respond to the crisis. These groups became the founding members of
the Community Coalition. One of the
first tasks the Coalition undertook was to survey Ottawa residents with
physical and sensory disabilities to gain an overview of their community life
experiences. The resulting report, Maximizing our Assets (2002),
confirmed the importance of accessible public transportation.
Considerable gains have been made in the
accessibility of Ottawa’s transportation in the past few years. Ottawa “offers the highest level of para transit service per capita of any
Canadian city”. A number of accessible taxis
have been put on the road, the O Train and its stations are accessible and 43
percent of the OC Transpo bus fleet is accessible, with even more accessible
buses coming on line in 2005. In April
2003, a pilot project was undertaken by OC Transpo that extended free public
transit access to people using wheelchairs, scooters and walkers.
We applaud the City
of Ottawa and OC Transpo for the strides it is making toward accessibility in
the public transit system. We also
acknowledge the efforts of all the groups and individuals involved in helping
to influence these positive changes.
The initiative offering conventional transit free of charge to riders using
wheelchairs, walkers and scooters is the first step towards providing all
Ottawans with disabilities improved access to public transportation. The next step is to expand the eligibility
criteria to be inclusive and equitable for residents with diverse
disabilities. Thus we proposed that a
new pilot project be introduced to replace the existing one.
The Persons with disabilities: A Community Coalition
envisions an accessible transit program for OC Transpo that offers a reduced
fare pass to people with disabilities who are in financial need.
The Official Plan for
the City of Ottawa puts forward a vision for the City “to be recognized as a
municipal model of excellence by assisting Council in preserving and/or
enhancing the quality of life for our citizens through ensuring that programs
are managed for best value and optimal quality” (Ottawa Official Plan). Furthermore, the City of Ottawa’s
Accessibility Plan incorporates “the principles of the Ottawa 20/20 Growth
Management Plan in promoting a caring and inclusive city by helping every
citizen have improved access to basic needs such as housing, transportation,
health services, and enhancing residents’ participation and awareness in
healthy activities and diversity opportunities.”
This proposal, for a
reduced fare “accessible transit pass”, reflects our Coalition’s vision to
provide an equitable and inclusive public transportation program for people
with disabilities. This proposal
provides an opportunity to support the broader goals of the City of Ottawa’s
vision in the Official Plan and make Ottawa a national leader in transportation
accessibility. It provides a more
equitable means of demonstrating concrete support for the City’s Accessibility
Plan and enhancing residents’ participation in healthy and diverse
opportunities.
A number of smaller Ontario municipalities
have special passes and/or reduced fares on conventional transit for people
with disabilities. We reviewed the programs of Kingston, North Bay, Thunder
Bay, Sudbury and Guelph. As well, the
City of Edmonton has recently initiated a pilot project to provide subsidized
transportation to individuals receiving Alberta disability pensions. A review of these programs has helped us to
develop a proposal for the City of Ottawa. (See Appendix 1).
Proposed
Eligibility
The proposed eligibility criterion for an
accessible transit pass is for an adult with a recognized disability who has an
income under the poverty line (low income cut off). Individuals who can demonstrate
receipt of disability benefits from the Ontario Disability Support Program
would automatically qualify, as this program verifies both disability and
income. People receiving CPP Disability may have to demonstrate income
eligibility, as it is possible that their CPP Disability income could be
supplemented with private insurance or other assets. The reduced fare pass would be only for the individual with the
disability and not the whole benefit unit (household).
As well, people with disabilities who are
working poor or who have a private disability pension which is under the low
income cut off would also be eligible.
These individuals would need to provide proof of disability (e.g.
doctor’s letter) as well as proof of income (e.g. income tax forms) in order to
qualify. For an individual to be
eligible, his/her income would be less than $18,371 (2000 Stats Canada
data).
Individuals with permanent disabilities
should not be required to re-confirm medical eligibility. However, financial eligibility would still
need to be re-confirmed.
Definition
of Disability
We propose to the use the definition of
disability as provided by Bill 118 Accessibility for Ontarians with
Disabilities Act (same definition that is currently in the ODA). Since municipalities and public transit are
required to comply with this legislation, it seems the most appropriate
definition to use. A disability is
defined as:
(a)
any degree of physical disability,
infirmity, malformation or disfigurement that is caused by bodily injury, birth
defect or illness and, without limiting the generality of the foregoing,
includes diabetes mellitus, epilepsy, a brain injury, any degree of paralysis,
amputation, lack of physical co-ordination, blindness or visual impediment,
deafness or hearing impediment, muteness or speech impediment, or physical
reliance on a guide dog or other animal or on a wheelchair or other remedial
appliance or device,
(b) a
condition of mental impairment or a developmental disability,
(c)
a learning disability, or a dysfunction
in one or more of the processes involved in understanding or using symbols or
spoken language,
(d) a
mental disorder, or
(e)
an injury or disability for which
benefits were claimed or received under the insurance plan established under
the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act, 1997; ("handicap")
Proposed
Rate
The monthly transit pass rate for an
accessibility pass should be equivalent to the seniors’ rate of $25.75. This pass should permit access during peak
hours, as a number of people with disabilities are attending employment related
activities, sheltered employment or part time work and need to travel during
business hours.
Administration
The verification of eligibility could be done
by OC Transpo staff at the 4 Sales and Information Centres (Place D’Orléans,
St. Laurent, Rideau Centre and Lincoln Fields).
Currently OC Transpo uses a cost recovery
administration system for its other passes, by charging a fee for the photo
card. Although the administration costs
for an accessibility pass would be greater than for existing passes, it would
be contrary to the intent of this proposal if the photo card fee was any higher
than it is for current passes.
The pass could consist of a photo
identification card with an accessible transit pass designation on it, similar
to the seniors pass. One way to
administer the pass would be to have a photo card that would be punched each
month that a pass was purchased. This
would ensure that customers could only buy one pass per month, thereby reducing
potential misuse of the pass. Once the
person has obtained this accessible transit photo card they would purchase a
reduced fare pass at the locations where bus passes are sold. The photo identification card would have to
be renewed (every 2 years) to confirm continuing eligibility.
A policy for replacement of loss cards would
have to instituted that was responsive to users’ circumstances while
maintaining the integrity of the program.
Evaluation
In order to determine the full impact of this
pilot project, a formal evaluation component should be planned and implemented,
from the outset. The evaluation method
should be sufficiently broad to examine the health and social benefits of a
reduced-fare accessible transit pass.
We are pursuing other funding sources to fund the development of an
appropriate evaluation framework and the implementation of the evaluation.
The Work Group began with the assumption that
extending a reduced fare pass to people with disabilities did not necessarily
mean that there would be losses in fare revenue for OC Transpo. We know, anecdotally, that many people with
disabilities do not purchase a bus pass because they cannot afford one. Theoretically, if sufficient numbers of
people with disabilities who currently do not purchase a transit pass did buy
an affordable pass, then the accessibility program would have no impact on fare
revenue.
The Coalition’s Work Group conducted a survey
of services in the mental health and developmental disability sectors to
develop an estimate of potential users of a reduced fare pass. (To date only
the mental health data has been fully submitted and compiled.) Fifteen different mental health services,
representing more than 2,998 separate clients, responded. From this survey, it is estimated that 36%
of mental health service clients are currently buying a bus pass. Service
providers estimated that an additional 42% of clients (1,249 people) would buy
a pass if it were more affordable. The
majority of respondents indicated that an “affordable” pass should cost the
same as the seniors pass: $25.75.
The survey respondents indicated that their
clients use, and would use, public transit for medical appointments, support
groups, work, pre-employment activities, schooling, volunteering, recreation
and the other activities of daily living such as groceries (or food banks),
laundry, banking and visiting friends and family.
The survey results, from just one service
sector, revealed that a considerable number of people with disabilities are
likely to become regular transit riders if they could purchase a reduced fare
pass. The estimated numbers from this
simple survey suggest that, while our initial hypothesis of no impact on fare
revenues may not be valid, that the anticipated reduction in fare revenues for
OC Transpo may not be as great as some assume, particularly when the additional
potential revenues are considered.
A preview of the initial data from the
developmental disability sector paints a different transit usage pattern. Data from 2 supportive housing programs and
1 work program suggest that more than half of the clients (26 out of 50)
already buy a pass and that only 3 out of 50 would buy a pass if it were more
affordable. Anecdotal evidence supports
the view that many adults with developmental disabilities are already buying a
bus pass.
Potential
Fare Revenue Losses and Gains
This proposal seeks to replace the existing pilot
project that offers free public transit for people using wheelchairs, scooters
and walkers. An expanded, more
inclusive accessible transit program with reduced fares means that
approximately 200 people utilizing the existing program will be required to pay
a reduced monthly transit fee. The
potential revenue from this change would be approximately $61,800
annually.
Additional revenue will be realized by the
reduction in the 20% transfer payments that the City currently makes to the
province to cover the medical transportation allowance under ODSP. Just 11%, or 1,744 of the 15,216 ODSP
recipients in Ottawa receive an allowance for travel to medical appointments (data
provided by ODSP Statistical Analysis Unit).
The City would realize a savings of approximately $7.60 in transfer
payments to province for each ODSP recipient who currently receives a medical
transportation allowance for the current bus pass amount. (estimated 350 people, based on ODSP data which
indicates 400 recipients have med tran allowances of $63 or more). The City would also save transfer payments
for those on ODSP who are currently receiving medical transportation allowances
between $26 and $63, as these
individuals would be able to purchase a reduced fare pass. (estimated another
1,000 people at a savings of $3.80 each) .
Thus, based on the survey estimates and the
potential savings and revenue, this proposal may have minimal direct costs
associated with it while offering incredible opportunities to people with
disabilities. Obviously, it is very
challenging to predict the potential uptake of a reduced fare transit pass and
so the full impact to OC Tranpso fare revenues is, at present, unclear. By
offering the reduced fare passes as part of a pilot project, it will enable the
community, OC Transpo and City Council sufficient time to study the impact and
to determine the actual costs of the program.
We know that many individuals and families on
Ottawa are struggling with low incomes.
Adults with disabilities are even more likely to be living in
poverty. For these individuals, their
disability and the accompanying low income make access to public transit
particularly difficult. Using 2001
Statistics Canada data, we know that nearly 17,000 adults with activity
limitations in Ottawa have incomes under the poverty line. Using this data, we can see that adults
with disabilities are almost twice as likely to be living in poverty
than the general population.
But the Stats Canada data does not reveal the full picture of
disabilities and poverty in Ottawa.
The Activity Limitation statistics fails to include people living in
institutions, including “facilities for persons with a disability, shelters for
persons lacking a fixed address, and lodging and rooming with assistance
services." So for instance, none
of the 1,200 people living in the City’s domiciliary hostels would be captured
the data presented below. Thus, the
poverty rate of people with disabilities would actually be greater than 24%.
Number of Adults with Activity
Limitation in Ottawa Number of Adults with Disabilities & Incomes below
LICO LICO
rate for Adults with an Activity Limitation in Ottawa (vs. general population) 69,835 16,760 24% vs 13% Data source: Statistics Canada, 2001, via Social Planning
Council (ages 15-64)
Recent data from the Ontario Disability
Support Program indicates that there are 15,216 core beneficiaries in the
Ottawa area. We know that all of these
individuals/benefit households would have incomes under the Low Income Cut Off.
People receiving ODSP benefits who live in
group homes and domiciliary hostels receive only $112 per month for a personal
needs allowance (room and board is paid directly to the home). Anecdotal evidence suggests that many adults
with developmental disabilities are purchasing express passes at $78 /month, so they can attend work and day
programs. This leaves just $34 dollars for the rest of the month for all
other necessities (toiletries, recreation, clothing). Other anecdotal information suggests that some families of adults
with developmental disabilities are helping with transportation costs because
otherwise it would be impossible to afford.
Other people with disabilities have similar unfathomable financial strain. For most receiving ODSP benefits, rents will be considerably higher than the $414 per month housing allowance. Depending on housing costs, there is very, very little left over for food and other bills. Those who do purchase bus passes at full fare will often do so by taking money from their food budget. Thus, they must rely on food banks to get them through the month.
The above
situation provides just one example of the potential health and social benefits
of a reduced fare bus pass for people with disabilities. More money for food will result in reduced
food bank visits and/or potential health gains from a better diet. Less strain on already meager incomes will
reduce financial pressures and result in less financial crises such as rent and
utility arrears. Access to
transportation will mean that people can follow through with medical advice to
attend medical appointments, drop-ins and support groups, recreation programs
or meet with friends and families. Being able to have access to public transit
will reduce isolation. This can achieve
direct health care savings, as isolation leads to a decline in health.
Accessible transit will enable people with disabilities to participate in the
community in a number of ways.
Volunteering, going back to complete school and pre- employment
activities all may be the gains that could not be attained without a reduced
fare transit pass. Ultimately, reduced
fare accessible public transit will bring the City much closer to its vision of
becoming an inclusive and accessible community.
Possible
Funding Partners
It is requested that OC Transpo, and thus the
City of Ottawa, initially cover the administration costs associated with this
pilot program. We suggest that some of
the Gas Tax Revenue be earmarked for this pilot project.
We will approach funders to request funds for
the development of an evaluation plan and then the implementation of an
evaluation of the pilot program. The evaluation would study the health and social
benefits associated with a reduced fare program for people with
disabilities. We are planning to
approach the United Way, Trillium and
the Community Accessibility Program of the Ministry of Citizenship.
With an evaluated pilot project that demonstrates
concrete gains, we believe that we would then be in a strong position to
approach the Federal and Provincial government for a funding partnership to
support the program on an on-going basis.
This proposal for a reduced fare transit pass
for people with disabilities is based on the Coalition’s vision of an
accessible transit plan that is inclusive and equitable. It is in keeping with the City of Ottawa’s
20/20 Vision Statement and with the City’s Accessibility Plan. We believe that it is a plan that can be
accomplished, and must be accomplished, if Ottawa residents with disabilities
are truly able to participate fully in our community.
Appendix 1 Disabled Bus Passes in Other Communities
Information Gathered August 2004
City |
Disabled Pass Fees |
% of Regular fee |
Qualifications |
Administration/Comments |
Guelph Pop. 110,000 Contact: Disability Resource Coordinator – Betty Richard 519 822-1260 ext. 2488 also see – Director of Transportation (program started in 2000 as a 1 year pilot and has been going ever since) |
Disabled pass $30/ month no discount for tickets |
54%of the regular month pass of $55 |
To qualify: 18-64 have a disability, as defined by Stats Canada have a professional reference letter confirming disability provide proof of income - for singles, $12,000 |
Subsidies for the difference between the regular fares and the disabled fares are provided by the City and by the United Way. They are serving approximately 244 people a month, with approx. 2,900 discounted passes being purchased each year. Applications administered through Disability Resource Coordinator – considerable work, particularly with updates, reapplications as people are moving all the time. There is a committee that reviews applications (including ODSP & Family Support Services) Approved applications are sent a letter, and they are put on a list – people can get their pass at 2 locations –one is ARC industries For people applying for ODSP, they can be granted a 3 mth temporary pass If person doesn’t purchase a pass for 3 months they are taken off list and someone from the waiting list can get a pass Only available on regular transit service and does not apply to Guelph Mobility Services as this is already being subsidized at approx. $13 per ride |
Kingston |
Disability pass $44/ monthly pass (same as seniors rate) also can be used to purchase discounted tickets |
67% of regular monthly fare of $65 |
ODSP recipients CPP Disability |
Administered by March of Dimes, with no funding – this form of administration not sustainable and so it is being transferred to City |
City |
Disabled Pass Fees |
% of Regular fee |
Qualifications |
Administration/Comments |
Thunder Bay Population 100,000 Contact: TB Transit Louise Nastor (807) 684-2188 |
$55 monthly fee, for disabilities (same fee for students and seniors – called “discount” category ) |
84% of regular fee of $65 per month |
Disabled persons with a valid Disabled Person Transit ID card – cost $5 – one time, doesn’t have to be renewed. Person has to show ODSP or CPP-D stub, (they keep a copy on file) handicapped parking permits not acceptable. Card has photo on it, have to show it to purchase discount pass and show it on the bus along with the discounted pass Starting a program where attendants can ride free if to help with getting on and off bus – requires doctor’s letter |
This discounted fare has been around for 15 years or so, and originally was started as a disabled pass (back then seniors rode for free). Then to simplify, all seniors, students and disabled all put together. Some disabled people receive their passes through the Public Guardian or a Lutheran Agency which handle money for their clients. The agencies send a list of people for whom they are purchasing the pass, and then the transit company bills those agencies. Overtime, they have raised the “discounted” price, but holding the line on the regular fare. There used to be a greater discount for the discount pass. There are concerns about the administration requirements.
Estimated about 310 disabled people use the pass, but uncertain – they sell about 600 discounted passes per month, about half they estimate to be for disabled. Annually, they sell more passes in the discounted category (6,856) than they do in the regular adult category (5,000) |
Sudbury |
Seniors and Disabled $40/month or a $20 annual pass can be bought (like an ID) that allows the disabled to pay a reduced fee for cash and ticket fares |
61% of regular fee of $65 for monthly pass |
|
City |
City |
Disabled Pass Fees |
% of Regular fee |
Qualifications |
Administration/Comments |
North Bay |
“Reduced” $50/month |
66% of regular $75 monthly pass |
This category includes seniors and “approved disabled” applicants who have completed a form and been approved by City Administrator – City ID card is used to purchase monthly pass –no cost of ID card? |
City of North Bay |
Edmonton 12 month Pilot project July 04- June 05 |
$29 per month – AISH recipients have to authorize the ministry to deduct $29 per month from their bank account |
49% or the regular pass of $59 /mth |
Severely Handicapped Recipients – AISH – provincial income support |
$400,000 approved to cover the anticipated fare box revenue loss Joint project of the City of Edmonton/ETS and the Alberta Human Resources and Employment |
City of Ottawa population: 774,072
% of people with disabilities (based on Canadian data, Stats Canada 2001) – age 15 to 64 – 10%
(overall disability rate in Ontario – Stats Canada, 2001 – 13.5% of
total population)
Ottawa population, ages 15-64 with activity limitations: 13%
% of all people, ages 15-64 who
live under the LICO in Ottawa: 13%
% of people with disabilities who live under LICO: 24%
ODSP Caseload in Ottawa – in 2004 - 15,216 core beneficiaries
CPP-Disability caseload in Ottawa area: 7,300 adults. We do not currently have figures on how many CPP Disability recipients are also receiving ODSP (duplicate counting). Also, a number of people of CPP-Disability would have incomes over the Low Income Cut Off, as they may have other sources of income.
% of Ontario-wide ODSP Caseload that has a “mental disability” 54% (18%
of this are people with developmental disabilities)
Family Size/Low
Income Cut Off
1 - $18,371
2 - $22,964
3 - $28,560
4 - $34,572
5 - $38,646
6 - $42,719
7 - $46,793
Mental
Health Sector
Annual revenue from current pass purchasers ($63) |
Potential annual revenue from an Accessible Pass ($25.75) |
$820,260 |
$721,200 |
Annual Difference |
-$99,060 |
The City of Edmonton is in
the middle of a one-year trial program very similar to that being considered in
Ottawa. Edmonton City Council approved $400,000 to fund a discounted monthly
transit pass for persons receiving the provincial income support program known
as Assured Income for the Severely Handicapped (AISH). The pilot project began
in July 2004 and will finish in June 2005. All participants had to enroll in
the program by the end of May 2004. Each AISH recipient in the program can
purchase a monthly transit pass, valid on conventional transit services only,
for $29.
There are 10,000 people
receiving AISH benefits in Edmonton, of which 2,540 registered in the program.
A further 4,000 AISH recipients use transit but chose not to join the program.
An initial survey of
participants and non-participants in December 2004 indicated that revenue
losses associated with the program appear to be higher than the $400,000
originally estimated. No firm figure is available as to how much greater the
losses are at this time. Reasons for the expected revenue shortfall can be
attributed to the following:
-
More high-end cash and ticket users, who typically spend up to $50 per
month on transit, switched to the $29 discounted pass than expected;
-
Fewer than expected low-end cash and ticket users, who spend less than
$29 per month on transit, switched to the new discounted pass and therefore
less new revenue was generated;
-
There was a very small shift of non-users to the new pass and therefore
very minimal new revenue was produce;
-
A smaller than expected number of Disabled Adult Transit Service (DATS)
users switched to the discounted pass than forcast.
The survey indicated that
over 60% of participants are using transit more than they did prior to having
the discounted pass available. Probably most telling about the support for the
special pass is that 94% of users said the program is very important to them.
Among non-participants who did not register for the one year pilot program,
just over half said they would now be interested in joining. Many from this
group use transit more than 10 times a week and would represent a further
revenue loss if they were participating in the program. Of all those who
elected not to join the program, 22% said they did not use transit enough to
make it worthwhile for them.
M E M O / N O T E D E S E R V I C E |
|
APPENDIX C
To / Destinataire |
Helen Gault
Manager, Transit Service Planning and Development Transit Services, TUPW |
File/N° de fichier: AAC - 17 November 2004 |
From / Expéditeur |
Coordinator,
Accessible Advisory
|
|
Subject / Objet |
Subsidized Transit Pass
|
Date: 16
December 2004 |
The Accessibility Advisory Committee, at its meeting of 17 November 2004, received a presentation with respect to a proposed pilot project on the subsidized transit pass for persons with disabilities. The Committee commended Ms. Lisa Jamieson from the Community Mental Health Coalition and Mr. Brian Tardif from Citizens Advocacy who worked on this proposal with Ms. Kathy Riley, Accessible Transit Specialist, OC Transpo. Subsequently, the Committee approved the following motion:
That
the Accessibility Advisory Committee support the idea of a pilot project for
the subsidized Transit Pass for persons with disabilities.
Should you require additional information, please contact me at extension 28934.
c.c: Members of Council
Gwen Bell, Chair,
Accessibility Advisory Committee
Accessibility Advisory
Committee
Kathy Riley, Accessible
Transit Specialist
Rosemary Nelson,
Coordinator, Health, Recreation and Social Services
Anne-Marie Leung, Coordinator,
Transportation Committee
Ms. Lisa Jamieson, Community
Mental Health Coalition
Mr. Brian Tardiff, Citizen
Advocacy
Mr. David Tafel