STATEMENT REQUIRED FOR PLANNING
ACT MATTERS SUBMITTED POST JANUARY 1, 2007
DÉCLARATION POUR LES QUESTIONS SOUS LA LOI SUR L’AMENAGEMENT DU TERRITOIRE PRÉSENTÉES APRÈS LE 1ER
JANVIER 2007
The Chair read a statement relative to the Zoning By-law Amendments
listed as Items 1 to 4 on the agenda. He advised that only those who made oral
submissions at the meeting or written submissions before the amendments were
adopted could appeal to the OMB. He
noted that the applicant may also appeal the matter if Council does not adopt
an amendment within 120 days of receipt of the application. He noted that there were comment sheets
available for anyone wishing to submit written comments on these applications.
Infrastructure Services and
Community Sustainability
SERVICES
D’INFRASTRUCTURE ET VIABILITÉ DES COLLECTIVITÉS
PLANNING and growth management
1. ZONING
– 74 EQUESTRIAN DRIVE
ZONAGE – 74 PROMENADE EQUESTRIAN
ACS2012-ICS-PGM-0003 KANATA
SOUTH (23)
OThis item can be found
at 00:01:50 on the Planning
Committee Archived audiocast
REPORT
RECOMMENDATION
That the recommend Council approve an amendment to
Zoning By‑law 2008-250 to change the zoning of 74 Equestrian Drive from
Residential First Density Subzone T (R1T) to Residential Third Density Subzone
B exception [XXXX] (R3B[XXXX]) as shown in Document 1 and as detailed in
Document 2.
Debbie Belfie was present on behalf of the applicant, Longwood
Homes, in support of the report recommendation.
The report recommendation was put to
Committee and CARRIED, as presented.
2. ZONING
– 1730-1758 MONTRÉAL ROAD
ZONAGE – 1730-1758, RUE MONTRÉAL
ACS2012-ICS-PGM-0005 BEACON HILL
CYRVILLE (WARD 11)
OThis item can be found
at 00:02:20 on the Planning
Committee Archived audiocast
REPORT
RECOMMENDATION
That the recommend Council approve an amendment to the
Zoning By-law 2008-250 to change the zoning of 1730-1758 Montreal Road from
Arterial Mainstreet Subzone 6 (AM6) to Arterial Mainstreet Subzone 6 exception
[xxxx] (AM6 [xxxx]), as detailed in Document 2.
CARRIED
3. ZONING - 2781, 2791, 2797 BASELINE ROAD AND
2704, 2706, 2724, 2734 DRAPER AVENUE
ZONAGE – 2781, 2791, 2797, chemin Baseline et 2704, 2706, 2724, 2734,
avenue Draper
ACS2012-ICS-PGM-0017 COLLEGE
/ COLLÈGE (8)
OThis item can be found
at 00:10:30 on the Planning
Committee Archived audiocast
REPORT
RECOMMENDATION
That the recommend Council approve an amendment to the
Zoning By-law 2008-250 to change the zoning provisions of the Residential
Fifth Density Subzone A Exception Holding Zone (R5A[1700] S247-h) for 2781, 2791, 2797 Baseline Road 2704,
2706, 2724 and 2734 Draper Avenue as detailed in Document 2.
Committee received the following written
submissions with respect to this item, copies of which are held on file with
the City Clerk:
1.
E-mail
dated 8 January 2012 from Doug Kelly for Greatwise Developments
2.
E-mail
dated 9 January 2012 from Scott Pregrum, President Qualicum Graham Park
Community Association
3.
E-mail
dated 9 January 2012 from Jane O’Regan, President, Leslie Park Community
Association
4.
E-mail
dated 10 January 2012 from Valerie Sytema
5.
E-mail
dated 10 January 2012 from Christine Cowtan and Graham Bromfield
6.
E-mail
dated 10 January 2012 from Sue Lafrance
7.
E-mail
dated 10 January 2012 from Shari Scott
8.
E-mail
dated 10 January 2012 from Paul L. Hacker
9.
E-mail
dated 10 January 2012 from Richard Cobbold
10. E-mail dated 10 January 2012 from Ross
Davies
11. E-mail dated 10 January 2012 from Hugh
Mullington
12. E-mail dated 10 January 2012 from Susan
Wharton
13. E-mail dated 10 January 2012 from Joan
Houlahan
14. E-mail dated 10 January 2012 from Donna
Cahill
15. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Chris
Becker
16. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Geoff
Hynes
17. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Jack and
Mary Partington
18. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Theresa
Munro
19. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from James and
Ruth McGrath
20. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from James
Johnston
21. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Jamie
Maycock
22. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Janet
Mantler
23. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Jean
Prebble and Ron Graham
24. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Jeremy and
Jennifer Harmon
25. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Evelyn
Marcoux
26. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from James T.
Strong
27. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from John
Clipsham
28. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from John
Rossiter
29. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Joyce E.
Fraser and J. Keith Fraser
30. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Kevin
Mullington
31. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Larry
Woods
32. Letter dated 9 January 2012 from Lionel
Rowe
33. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Elayne
Adler
34. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 and Letter
dated September 2011 from Liran Raz
35. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Sue
Willson
36. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Maria
Arlotta
37. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Audrey and
Dr. Grenville Goodwin
38. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Bonnie
Viney and Wynn Redden
39. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Cynthia
Sutcliffe
40. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from David and
Marcia Hayes
41. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Lois
Feinholz
42. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Marie
Halsey
43. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Mireille
and Dimitri Nicolaou
44. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Miriam
Fraser
45. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Mohan
Mysore
46. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Peter
Pakeman
47. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Philip
Berman
48. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Randy and
Ifi Chafy
49. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Ray
Haythornthwaite
50. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Rick
Thomas
51. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Sara Ellis
52. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Stephen
Dixon
53. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Ted Gordon
54. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Tino
LaFratta
55. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Don and
Guylaine McCallum
56. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Judy
Falussy
57. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Ivan &
Hélène Martin
58. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Bill
Westwood
59. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Jim and
Monika McLaughlin
60. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Andrea
Guzzo
61. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Cathy
Macdonald
62. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Andrew and
Doris Parolin
63. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Paul and
Sue Valin
64. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Leanne and
Jamie Ferris
65. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Sherri
Coxon
66. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Roy Thomas
67. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Susan
Barron
68. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from David
Gillard
69. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Kathleen
McKinnon
70. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Sarah and
Steve Drader
71. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Stephen
and Joanne Garrod
72. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Penny
Damianakos
73. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Jennifer
Rowan
74. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Luis
Carballude
75. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Sharon
Ashley
76. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from P.G.
Farrell and Family
77. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Jim and
Monika McLaughlin
78. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Tammie
Innes
79. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Carole
Leblanc
80. E-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Beverly
Johnson
81. Letter dated 8 January 2012 from Russel A.
Molot
82. E-mail dated 6 January 2012 from Sylvia
Furman
83. E-mail dated 5 January 2012 from Lisa and
James Walker
84. E-mail dated 5 January 2012 from Karen
Davidson
85. E-mail dated 5 January 2012 from Lynn
Hamilton
86. E-mail dated 5 January 2012 from Bernice
Janse van Rensburg
87. E-mail dated 5 January 2012 from Maureen
McGovern
88. E-mail dated 5 January 2012 from Rosemary
Chiarelli
89. E-Mail dated 4 January 2012 from Greg
Delahunty
90. E-mail dated 4 January 2012 from Paul
Dokken
Doug Kelly, Lloyd Phillips and Rod Lahey,
for Greatwise Developments,
were opposed to the staff recommendations.
As outlined in Mr. Kelly’s e-mail to Committee, held on file with the
City Clerk, Greatwise requested Committee defer consideration of the report for
90 days. They agreed to have the Phase 2
Site Plan application put on hold for this same period of time, and to not
refer the Site Plan to the Ontario Municipal Board during this period.
Art Stothart was present in support of the staff recommendations,
and agreed to deferral.
Motion
No. PLC 26/1
Moved by Councillor R. Chiarelli:
BE IT RESOLVED that this item
be deferred to the 10 April 2012 meeting of the Planning Committee.
DEFERRAL CARRIED
4. RESIDENTIAL HEIGHT LIMITS IN CARSON
GROVE
LIMITES DE HAUTEUR POUR LES
UTILISATIONS RÉSIDENTIELLES DANS CARSON GROVE
ACS2012-ICS-PGM-0009 BEACON
HILL - CYRVILLE (11)
OThis item can be found
at 00:05:30 on the Planning
Committee Archived audiocast
REPORT
RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Committee recommend
Council approve an amendment to the Zoning By-law 2008-250 to reduce the maximum permitted height limits for residential uses
in the R1 and R2 Zones in Carson Grove
as shown in Document 1 and as detailed in Document 2.
Committee received
an e-mail dated 9 January 2012 from Duncan Hayes. A copy is held on file with the City Clerk.
Elizabeth
Desmarais, Planner, provided a PowerPoint presentation overview of the staff
report and recommendation. A
copy of her PowerPoint presentation is held on file with the City Clerk.
The report
recommendation was put to Committee and CARRIED, as presented, with the
following direction to staff:
DIRECTION TO
STAFF
That a discussion
of height limit reviews in residential neighbourhoods be brought forward to
Planning Committee’s consideration of the Planning and Growth Management
Workplan.
5. CASH-IN-LIEU OF PARKING - 303-305 LEBRETON STREET
SOUTH
RÈGLEMENT FINANCIER DES EXIGENCES DE STATIONNEMENT –
303-305, RUE LEBRETON SUD
ACS2012-ICS-PGM-0015 CAPITAL / CAPITALE (17)
OThis item can be found
at 00:03:40 on the Planning
Committee Archived audiocast
REPORT
RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Committee receive this
report for information.
Committee
received a letter from the Chair of the Ottawa Forests and Greenspace Advisory
Committee in support of the below-noted motion. A copy is held on file with the
City Clerk.
Motion
No. PLC 26/2
Moved by Councillor S. Blais:
WHEREAS the Staff Delegated
Authority report has approved the payment in lieu of providing three parking
spaces at 303-305 LeBreton Street South, for a residential apartment building;
AND WHEREAS the amount of
money required to be paid for the three spaces is seven-thousand eight hundred ($7,800)
dollars;
AND WHEREAS the property
owner could provide one extra parking space on site at the expense of removing
an existing mature tree;
AND WHEREAS it is preferable
to maintain the existing tree instead of providing that one extra parking space;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED
THAT since the tree is being saved, the amount of money to be paid for one of
the three approved cash-in-lieu of parking spaces be reduced from two thousand
six-hundred ($2,600) to one ($1) dollar, for a total required cash-in-lieu of
parking payment of five-thousand two-hundred and one ($5,201) dollars.
6. COMMITTEE
OF ADJUSTMENT DECISION, 22 CLEMOW AVENUE
DECISION DU COMITE DE DEROGATION – 22, AVENUE CLEMOW
ACS2012-ICS-PGM-0020 CAPITAL/CAPITALE (17)
OThis item can be found
at 00:25:00 on the Planning
Committee Archived audiocast
REPORT
RECOMMENDATION
That
the Planning Committee recommend Council approve the plans prepared by Barry J.
Hobin and Associates Architects shown in Document 1 to satisfy a condition set
out in the Committee of Adjustment decision shown as Document 2 for an infill
development at 22 Clemow Avenue subject to the following: the Owners
withdrawing their appeal filed to By-law 2011-346 designating the Clemow Estate
East Heritage Conservation District under Section 41 (1) of the Ontario Heritage Act within five
days of Council’s approval of the plans.
John Smit, Manager of Development Review,
Urban Services, provided an overview of the staff report and
recommendation. A copy of his PowerPoint
presentation is held on file with the City Clerk.
Committee heard from the following public
delegations:
William R. Price, 54 Glebe Avenue,* spoke in opposition to the report
recommendations, requesting further review of, and modifications to, the design
of the proposed building. His specific
points are outlined in the remarks held on file.
John McLeod, Glebe resident, and contributor to the development of
the Heritage Conservation District (HCD), spoke in opposition to the report
recommendation. He spoke to the significance of the vacant portion of the
subject property, which was once the side yard to the home of architect W. E.
Noffke. He challenged staff’s assertion
that the proposal was appropriate for the HCD.
He also questioned whether the current report and process actually met
the condition set by the Committee of Adjustment. He requested deferral of the
matter to allow the applicants to consult with the neighbours.
Gordon Lorimer, Barry J. Hobin &
Associates Architects, was
present for the applicants in support of the report recommendation. He noted
the applicants had reviewed their plans with the immediate neighbours and no objections
were received from immediate neighbours.
He explained that the architecture was designed in response to the HCD
guidelines, with the only issues being the landscaping and garage entrance as
outlined in staff’s report. He emphasized that they had worked to integrate the
proposed design into the community.
*Presentation and/ or comments held on file
with the City Clerk.
The report recommendation was put to
Committee and CARRIED, as presented.
7. TECHNICAL
REVIEW OF THE RESIDENTIAL PARKING STANDARD FOR WARD 6
EXAMEN TECHNIQUE DE LA NORME DE STATIONNEMENT
RÉSIDENTIEL DU QUARTIER 6
OThis item can be found
at 00:05:10 on the Planning
Committee Archived audiocast
REPORT
RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Committee receive this
report for information.
Motion
No. PLC 26/3
Moved by Councillor S. Qadri:
BE IT RESOLVED that this item
be deferred to the 24 January 2012 meeting of the Planning Committee.
8. PERMANENT SIGNS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY
BY-LAW 2005-439 – REVIEW AND TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS
RÈGLEMENT
2005-439 RÉGISSANT LES ENSEIGNES PERMANENTES SUR LES PROPRIÉTÉS PRIVÉES –
EXAMEN ET MODIFICATIONS TECHNIQUES
ACS2012-ICS-PGM-0013 City Wide/
à l'échelle de la Ville
OThis item can be found
at 00:06:00 on the Planning
Committee Archived audiocast
REPORT
RECOMMENDATION
That
the Planning Committee recommend Council approve amendments to the Permanent
Signs on Private Property By-law No. 2005-439, as amended, as detailed in
Documents 1 and 2.
Committee received a letter dated 6
December 2011 from Michel Gervais, Director General, Vanier Community Service
Centre. A copy is held on file with the
City Clerk.
Andrew Sacret, FoTenn Consultants, was present on behalf of Hydro One
Networks and Infrastructure Ontario, in support of the report recommendation.
The report recommendation
was put to Committee and CARRIED as presented.
9. URBAN BOUNDARY WITNESS STATEMENTS
DÉCLARATIONS DES TÉMOINS AU
SUJET DES LIMITES DE LA ZONE URBAINE
ACS2012-ICS-PGM-0026 City Wide/
à l'échelle de la Ville
OThis item can be found
at 00:06:45 on the Planning
Committee Archived audiocast
REPORT
RECOMMENDATION
That Planning Committee and
Council receive the report for information.
CITY OPERATIONS
OPÉRATIONS MUNICIPALES
COMMUNITY AND SOCIAL SERVICES
SERVICES SOCIAUX ET AUX COMMUNAUTÉS
10. INVESTMENT
IN AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR ONTARIO (IAH)
PROGRAMME D’INVESTISSEMENT DANS LE LOGEMENT
ABORDABLE DE L’ONTARIO (PILAO)
ACS2012-COS-CSS-0001 City Wide/
à l'échelle de la Ville
OThis item can be found
at 01:00:00 on the Planning
Committee Archived audiocast
REPORT
RECOMMENDATIONS
That
the Planning Committee recommend Council approve:
(1)
That the City submit to the Minister of
Municipal Affairs and Housing the Program Delivery and Fiscal Plan as
outlined in this report, to support the following program components under the Investment
in Affordable Housing for Ontario Program (IAH): (1)
Rental Housing, (2) Homeownership and (3) Ontario Renovates;
(2)
That
upon receipt of approval of the Program Delivery and Fiscal Plan from the
Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, that the City accept up to $25.8M in
funding from the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing and direct Housing Services Staff to proceed with the
following:
A.
i. Action Ottawa Request for Proposals,
(RFP’s) that meet the requirements of
the IAH Service Manager Administration Agreement between the City and the Minister
of Municipal Affairs and Housing, Action Ottawa Guidelines, and that are based
on local housing priorities identified in this report to allocate IAH
funding for Year 2, 3 and 4 of the IAH program;
ii.
The Administrator of Housing
Services submit to the Minister of
Municipal Affairs and Housing the proposal of each affordable housing rental
project selected by the Action Ottawa Selection Committee following the RFP
process and request the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing’s approval of
same, as required under the IAH Service Manager Administration Agreement in
order that the City may allocate IAH funding to a selected affordable housing
rental project;
iii. To secure the
provision of affordable rental housing units with a 35 year affordability term,
staff are directed to register on title to each IAH Rental Housing
funded project for which the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing has
issued a Conditional Letter of Commitment, a Contribution Agreement between the
City and the housing provider/proponent named in the Conditional Letter of
Commitment that satisfies the terms of the Conditional Letter of Commitment,
the IAH Service Manager Administration Agreement, Section 107 of the Municipal Act, 2001 (for a
not-for-profit housing provider/proponent),
and the City’s Municipal Housing Facilities By-law 2006-1 (for a private sector
housing provider/proponent);
iv. Include $4M in 2012 of the 100% City
funding from the Housing and Homelessness Investment Plan No. 7 Envelope, “New
Affordable housing Projects (Capital)” as part of the 2012 IAH Action Ottawa
Request for Proposals;
v.
Allocate
$5M from the Housing
First and Housing Reserve Fund to support the creation of new affordable
housing through additional conditional grants in lieu of building permit and school
board fees, non-exempt planning fees, accessibility grants and to provide a
project contingency fund, subject to the said conditional grants being
included in a Contribution Agreement between the City and each housing
provider/proponent selected by the Action Ottawa Selection Committee following
the RFP Process;
B.
That
staff proceed with Requests for Proposals, under the Homeownership Component of
the Investment in Affordable Housing (IAH) in accordance with the
terms of the IAH Service Manager Administration Agreement to select one or more
housing developers to provide housing and administrative support for applicants
who satisfy the eligibility requirements of the
IAH Homeownership Component Guidelines;
C.
That
staff proceed with the development of the Ottawa Renovates Program component in
accordance with the IAH guidelines to commence in Year 3 (2013) of the program;
D.
That the Administrator of
Housing allocate to a housing provider/proponent selected by the Action Ottawa Selection Committee following the RFP
Process additional funding that may become available under the Investment
in Affordable Housing for Ontario Program (IAH) due to any
notional reallocation by the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing;
E.
That in the event of any notional
reduction resulting from unspent Year I IAH funding, that the
Administrator of Housing Services be authorized to recommend to the Minister of
Municipal Affairs and Housing capital projects that have been submitted or
approved under a Council Approved RFP
process for funding under the IAH program.
Committee received the following
written submissions, copies of which are held on file with the City Clerk:
·
E-mail dated 4 January 2012 from Alan Asselstine
and Jerry Beausoleil, Hunt Club Community Organization (HCCO)
·
Written Submission dated 10 January 2012 from
Diane Morrison, Ottawa Mission; Paul Soucie, Shepherds of Good Hope; and Perry
Rowe, Salvation Army
·
Written Submission dated 10 January 2012 from
John Dickie, Eastern Ontario Landlord Organization (EOLO)
Aaron Burry, General Manager of
Community and Social Services; Janice Burelle, Administrator of Housing
Services; and Stephen Arbuckle, Manager of Social Housing and Shelters
Management provided an overview of the staff report and recommendations. A copy of their PowerPoint presentation is
held on file with the City Clerk.
Committee heard from the following
public delegations:
Diane Morrison, Executive
Director of the Ottawa Mission,* spoke on behalf of herself and Paul
Soucie, Executive Director of the Shepherds of Good Hope, who accompanied her,
and Perry Rowe, Executive Director of the Salvation Army (Booth St.) She spoke in support of the report
recommendations, as outlined in the comments held on file.
John Dickie, President of EOLO,*
spoke in opposition to some aspects of the staff recommendations, as outlined
in detail in the comments held on file.
* Presentation and/or comments held
on file with the City Clerk.
Motion
No. PLC 26/4
Moved by Councillor A. Hubley
WHEREAS the City of Ottawa has overall responsibility for the
planning and development of solutions that best address the needs of City of
Ottawa residents to obtain affordable housing;
And WHEREAS the vast majority of funding of social initiatives
rests with higher levels of Government;
And WHEREAS the Investing in Affordable Housing for Ontario (IAH)
Program limits the operational components that may be considered by City
Council in terms of how these local needs can be addressed
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City recommend to the Ministry
of Municipal Affairs and Housing that IAH programs allow for additional
flexibility in the following areas:
(1)
Provide the ability to
re-allocate funding between capital and operating components within the term of
the IAH program;
(2)
Allow Service managers the
flexibility to set the maximum subsidy for rent supplements to attract market
rental landlords;
(3)
Allow unspent operating funding
to carry over into future fiscal years;
(4)
Provide for a phase out period
after the 10 year subsidy ends for clients in receipt of rent supplements and
housing allowances.
AND THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Committee Chair support the
need for additional flexibility in IAH programs as it pertains to housing
allowances and rent supplements by sending a letter to the Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs
and Housing, the Federal Department of
Human Resources and Skills Development, and the members of Provincial
Parliament for Ottawa West Nepean and Ottawa-Vanier, to advocate for the
stated changes.
CARRIED
The report recommendations were
then put to Committee and CARRIED, as amended by Motion No. PLC 26/4, with the
following directions to staff:
DIRECTIONS TO STAFF:
1. That staff work with the administrators
of the Centralized Waiting List to provide more transparency and provide
Councillors with more information on the composition of the waiting list,
including the factors driving people onto the waiting list.
2. That staff provide members of Planning
Committee with any reference documentation available on the complex
administration of Social Housing in Ontario in order to guide future decision
making on housing matters.
CITY
MANAGER’S OFFICE
BUREAU
DU DIRECTEUR MUNICIPAL
11. QUARTERLY
PERFORMANCE REPORT TO COUNCIL, q3: July 1 TO September 30, 2011
rapport TRIMESTRIEL SUR LE rendement
présenté au conseil POUR LE 3E TRIMESTRE, DU 1ER JUILLET AU 30 SEPTEMBRE 2011
ACS2011-CMR-
PLC-0026 city-wide /
À l’Échelle de la ville
OThis item can be found
at 00:07:55 on the Planning
Committee Archived audiocast
REPORT
RECOMMENDATION
That
the Planning Committee receive this report for further review and discussion of
the service areas’ performance results, as outlined in document 1.
services du greffier municipal et du contentieux
City Clerk and solicitor department
12. STATUS UPDATE PLANNING COMMITTEE
OUTSTANDING INQUIRIES AND MOTIONS FOR THE PERIOD ENDING 5 DECEMBER 2011
2011 RAPPORT DE SITUATION - DEMANDES DE
RENSEIGNEMENTS ET MOTIONS DU COMITÉ DE L’URBANISME POUR LA PÉRIODE SE TERMINANT
LE 5 DÉCEMBRE 2011
ACS2012-CMR-CCB-0004 city-wide / À l’Échelle de la ville
OThis item can be found
at 00:08:15 on the Planning
Committee Archived audiocast
REPORT
RECOMMENDATION
That the Planning Committee receive this report for
information
COUNCILLORS’ ITEMS
Councillor
/ ConseillÈRe J. HARDER
13. REQUEST
FOR OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO DELETE SIDEWALK REQUIREMENT ON MADRID AVENUE,
WATERLILY WAY AND KENTON AVENUE
DEMANDE DE MODIFICATION AU PLAN OFFICIEL AFIN DE
SUPPRIMER L’OBLIGATION D’AMENAGER UN TROTTOIR SUR L’AVENUE MADRID, LA VOIE
WATERLILY ET L’AVENUE KENTON
ACS2011-CMR-PLC-0024 barrhaven (3)
OThis item can be found
at 00:09:00 on the Planning
Committee Archived audiocast
REPORT
RECOMMENDATION
Councillor / ConseillÈRe D. HOLMES
14. EXEMPTION
FROM THE DEMOLITION CONTROL PROCESS FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 355 AND 357
BOOTH STREET
EXEMPTION AU PROCESSUS DE DÉMOLITION POUR LA PROPRIÉTÉ
SITUÉE AU 355 ET 357, RUE BOOTH
ACS2011-CMR-PLC-0025 SOMERSET
(14)
OThis item can be found
at 00:09:36 on the Planning
Committee Archived audiocast
REPORT
RECOMMENDATION
DEMANDES DE RENSEIGNEMENTS
Councillor B. Monette
What
measures can the Planning and Growth Management Department undertake to
encourage and work with developers to implement rental buildings that are affordable
for the average family that do not qualify for social housing and how can we
ensure the the suburbs are included in the rollout phase.
ADJOURNMENT
LEVÉE DE LA SEANCE
Committee adjourned at 11:55 a.m.
Original signed by Original
signed by
Caitlin
Salter-MacDonald Councillor
P. Hume
Committee Coordinator Chair
