Report to/Rapport au:

Planning and Development Committee/

Comité de l’urbanisme et de l’aménagement

 

and Council/et au Conseil

 

14 May, 2002 / le 14, mai 2002

 

Submitted by/Soumis par:  Ned Lathrop,  General Manager/Directeur général

Development Services Department / Services d’aménagement

 

Contact/Personne-ressource:  Arlene Gregoire, Director, Building Services/

Directrice, Services du bâtiment

727-6700 ext. 425, Arlene.Gregoire@ottawa.ca

 

 

 

Ref N°:   ACS2002-DEV-BLD-0022

 

 

SUBJECT: MUNICIPAL ADDRESSING STUDY – DUPLICATE STREET NAMES/SUPPLEMENTARY REPORT

 

OBJET: ÉTUDE SUR L’ADRESSAGE MUNICIPAL – NOMS DE RUE EN DOUBLE/RAPPORT SUPPLÉMENTAIRE

 

 

REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS

 

1.                  That the Planning and Development Committee recommend Council approve the street name changes detailed in recommendations 1.1 – 1.9 of Document 3.

 

2.                  That the Planning and Development Committee recommend Council enact implementing by-laws as detailed in the Disposition.

 

RECOMMANDATIONS DU RAPPORT

 

1.                  Que le Comité de l’urbanisme et de l’aménagement recommande au Conseil d’approuver les changements aux noms de rues décrits dans les recommandations 1.1 à 1.9 du document 3.

 

2.                  Que le Comité de l’urbanisme et de l’aménagement recommande au Conseil de décréter la mise en œuvre des règlements conformément à la clause afférente.

 

 

BACKGROUND

 

As part of Council’s discussion and approval of the Duplicate Street Names report, on September 26, 2001, nine items were deferred for further review.  On December 12, 2001, City Council passed a motion to refer the approved new street name “Moses St.”, located in the former Township of Osgoode (formerly George St.), back to staff to obtain further public input on the matter.  The Council recommendations, as amended, including specific motions are included as Documents 1 and 2.  Two additional items of a technical nature were identified and have been included in this report for action.

 

DISCUSSION

 

Each of the outstanding street name issues were discussed with the affected ward Councillor to determine appropriate action necessary to consult with the community, finalize a position and report back to the Committee and City Council with specific recommendations.  Where necessary, the Councillor has met with the community to discuss optional names and obtain a consensus on a preferred option.  Staff has responded to all enquiries, and provided requested information related to the review process and optional names for consideration.  The recommended solutions have been received through the Councillors offices and directly from the community.

 

Where a street name was recommended by the Department, deferred at Planning Committee for further consideration, and subsequently received the support of the Councillor and the residents, the by-law was approved by City Council.  The following street names were reviewed and resolved by the affected Councillor:

 

1. Arthur Street, former City of Gloucester, (Committee Recommendation, as amended, - 1(a), as further amended by City Council motion 19/9.)

 

Resolution:  The instructed change from the proposed name “Holden Street” to “Barsona Place” has been formalized through the enactment of By-law 2001-400.

 

2. 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th Avenues in Stittsville (Committee Recommendation as amended - 1(c), as further amended by City Council motion 19/8.)

 

Resolution:  The names recommended in the Departmental report are now official with the enactment of By-law 2001-392.

 

3. Ralph Street (Stittsville) former Township of Goulbourn (Committee Recommendation as amended - 1 (e), as further amended by City Council motion 19/8)

 

Resolution: The motion to change the suffix of the proposed name from “Ralphpark Street” to “Ralphpark Avenue” has been implemented through the enactment of By-law 2001-392.

 

4. Old Colony Road (Manotick), former Township of Rideau (Committee Recommendation as amended - 1(f))

 

Resolution: A petition was received on August 28, 2001 indicated 93% of the affected community in support of the alternate name, “Colony Heights Road” to replace the original recommended name “Walter Christy Road.”  This change was formally implemented with the enactment of By-law 2001-396.

 

5. Anne Street (Kars), former Township of Rideau (Committee Recommendation as amended - 1(g))

 

Resolution: A petition was received on September 7, 2001, indicating unanimous support by the affected residents to change the proposed name, “Kars Manse Street” to “Kars Rectory Street” (in recognition of the Rector for the Church of England).  The name “Kars Rectory Street” has been implemented with the enactment of By-law 2001-396.

 

6. Robert Street, former City of Gloucester (Committee Recommendation as amended - 1(i))

 

Resolution: The recommended change in the proposed street name from “Robert Park Street” to “Robert Kemp Street” has been formalized through the enactment of By-law 2001-400.

 

7. Maple Lane, former Township of West Carleton (Committee Recommendation as amended - 2(a)

 

Resolution: The recommendation to proceed with the name change from “Maple Lane” to “Old Maple Lane” has been formalized through the enactment of By-law 2001-398.

 

Issues Requiring Further Action

 

Of the sixteen (16) street naming issues discussed in this report, nine (9) require further Council direction.  The steps taken to bring each of the remaining issues to a conclusion are detailed in Document 3 under Action and specific recommendations.

 

Recommendations 1.1 and 1.2 resolve minor technical concerns identified during the implementation stage of the initial 144 street name changes.  Recommendations 1.3-1.8 have been resolved with the direct involvement of the local Councillor.  Only one street remains contentious, Sunset Blvd.  This issue is discussed in Document 3 and submitted for City Council resolution.

 

CONSULTATION

 

The requirement under the Municipal Act for notification of street name changes has been satisfied with prior notification on four consecutive occasions in the local newspapers advising that the Duplicate Street Naming report would be considered by City Council on September 26, 2001.  At that meeting, Council deferred their decision affecting the streets discussed in this report.

 

As mentioned in the Discussion section, each of the outstanding streets was discussed with the affected ward Councillor to determine the appropriate action to review the issue, finalize a position and report back to the Committee and City Council.  Where necessary, the Councillor met with the community to review optional names and obtain consensus on a preferred option.  Staff responded to all enquiries, and provided requested information related to the review process and optional names for consideration.

 

A letter providing notification of this meeting was provided to each affected resident and/or business.  Notification was also provided in the local newspapers, on the City’s web page and to all members of Council.

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

 

The cost associated with the Municipal Addressing Study / Duplicate Street Names for the legal title searches, bylaw preparation, advertising, sign supply and installation will be charged to Capital Account 900571 Street Numbering and Naming.

 

The Ottawa Transition Board approved the "Street Numbering and Naming" project in 2000. Total project requirements will be funded within the approved funding envelope for transition projects (as indicated in the September 13,2001 P & D Council Report 14).

 

ATTACHMENTS

 

Document 1 – Recommendations and motions approved by City Council on September 26, 2001

Document 2 – Motion affecting “Moses Street”, formerly “George Street” in the former Township of Osgoode, approved by City Council on December 12, 2001

Document 3 - Details of Recommendations 1 and 2 of this report

Document 4 - Approach used to develop the evaluation criteria to determine which street would retain the name / Discussion of Sunset Blvd. including the evaluation form and a summary of additional information received / Summary of the elevation process

 

DISPOSITION

 

Development Services Department is required to notify the emergency services, the primary utility services, IT, Government and identified related business agencies of Council’s decision.  Affected residents and businesses will receive individual packages of instructions well in advance of the conversion of street signs and the official change date this fall.

 

Office of the City Solicitor to undertake the necessary title searches, prepare the implementing by-laws in accordance with Recommendation 2 and submit the by-laws to City Council for enactment and registration.

 

Transportation, Utilities and Public Works Department to arrange for the manufacture and installation of the required street name signs on request by the Development Services Department.

 


Document 1

 

PLANNING AND dEVELOPMENT Committee Recommendations as Amended

 

1.                  That City Council approve the 136 street name changes which received majority support from affected residents in the consultation process, as detailed in Document 1, as amended by the following:

 

a) That the name change for Arthur Street in Gloucester be referred back to staff for additional public information and report back in three months.

b) That, with respect to Porter Street (in Woodroffe North) in the former City of Ottawa, Document 1 be amended to remove the proposed name of “Louise McKinney Street” for “Porter Street” and that the residents of Porter Street in the former City of Ottawa be permitted to propose a replacement name, within three months.

c)                  Continue the review of 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th Avenue in Stittsville with a view to determining the level of support for suggested names or alternates and report back within three months;

d)                  Continue the review of Main Street (Stittsville) with a view to determining the level of support for suggested names, including Stittsville Main Street, Huntley or other alternatives and report back within three months;

e)                  Continue the review of Ralphpark Street with a view to determining the level of support as to whether it should be Avenue or Street and report back within three months;

f)                    That the recommended name of “Walter Christy Road” for the existing street name “Old Colony Road” (Manotick, former Township of Rideau) be replaced with “Colony Heights Road”;

g)                  That the recommended name of “Kars Manse Street” for the existing street name “Anne Street (Kars, former Township of Rideau) be replaced with “Kars Rectory Street”.

h)                  That Riverside Drive, Manotick be referred back to staff to determine a level of community support for an alternate name and that it be brought back within three months; and,

i) That Robert Street (Gloucester) be changed to Robert Kemp Street instead of the proposed Robert Park Street.

 

2. That City Council approve the 10 street name changes suggested by petition from the community but for which community response from
those affected was less than 51%, as detailed in Document 2, as amended by the following:

 

a)      Whereas additional information concerning the actual number of affected residents has been submitted by the community thus changing the degree of support to 62%,

b)      Be it resolved that the existing street name “Maple Lane” located in the former Township of West Carleton be changed to “Old Maple Lane”.

 

3. That City Council continue the review of Lilac Lane (Cumberland and Ottawa) and Sunset Boulevard (Ottawa and Osgoode), with a view to resolving the duplicated street names and report back within three months.

 

4. That City Council approve and enact the implementing by-laws detailed in Document 9 to change the names of the streets approved in Recommendations 1 and 2, as amended.

 

5. Whereas Daniel O’Donoghue was a foremost leader in Ottawa’s labour movement in the late 1800’s; and

Whereas Daniel O’Donoghue organized the City’s first printers’ union, helped found Ottawa’s first labour council, helped found the forerunner to the Canadian Labour Congress, was elected to the Ontario Legislature, was later appointed to the Province of Ontario’s Bureau of Industries (later the Department of Labour) and to the Federal Government’s Department of Labour;

Therefore be it resolved that the name “Daniel O’Donoghue” be referred to staff to be used for a suitable street as well as for a suitable City park, in consultation with the Ottawa and District Labour Council.

 

MOTION NO. 19/7

 

Moved by Councillor Meilleur

Seconded by Councillor Munter

 

BE IT RESOLVED THAT the name change for Prospect Avenue be referred back to staff for additional public information and report back in three months.

 

(This deferral is requested to allow community representatives to address the Committee since a procedural misunderstanding did not allow them to address the Committee on September 13, 2001).

  

CARRIED with Councillor Hume dissenting.

 


MOTION NO. 19/8 

 

Moved by Councillor Stavinga

Seconded by Councillor Arnold

 

That amendment 1c to item No. 17 in staff report No. 14 to Planning and Development Committee be replaced with the following:

 

Approve the street name changes for 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th Avenue in Stittsville as recommended in staff report No. 14 to Planning and Development Committee.

 

The amendment 1e to item No. 17 in staff report No. 14 to Planning and Development Committee be replaced with the following:

 

Approve the name change of Ralphpark Street to Ralphpark Avenue.

 

CARRIED

 

MOTION NO. 19/9

 

Moved by Councillor Bloess

Seconded by Councillor Kreling

 

That Arthur Street be renamed Place Barsona Place as per the petition presented by the residents.

 

CARRIED

 

Item 17 of Planning and Development Committee Report 15, as amended by Motions 19/7, 19/8 and 19/9 was then put to Council and CARRIED.


Document 2

MOTION NO. 24/19

CITY COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 12, 2001

 

Moved by Councillor W. Stewart

Seconded by Councillor G. Brooks

 

THAT the foregoing motion be replaced with the following:

 

WHEREAS on September 26, 2001, City Council considered and carried, a staff report entitled “Municipal Addressing Study – Duplicate Street Names”, which included a recommendation that changed the name of George Street in the former Township of Osgoode to Moses Street;

 

AND WHEREAS a number of substantive motions regarding revisions to the proposed street names and motions to defer were approved by council at that time;

 

AND WHEREAS on November 21, 2001, correspondence was received from concerned residents who reside on George Street (now Moses Street) alleging that they were misinformed by staff from the Ottawa Transition Board with regard to the precise procedure for obtaining signatures on petitions as well as the appeal process for this same exercise;

 

AND WHEREAS City staff have recently confirmed that no additional costs (e.g. new street signs) have been incurred with regard to this particular street name change;

 

AND WHEREAS it would be in the interests of all residents concerned to have this outstanding issue reviewed in an open and fair fashion and as expeditiously as possible;

 

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the decision regarding the street now called Moses Street in the former Township of Osgoode be referred back to staff to obtain further public input on this matter and to report back to Committee and Council at the earliest available opportunity.

 

 

CARRIED

 


Details of Recommendations 1 and 2 of this report Document 3

 

Recommendation 1

 

1.1 That By-law 2001-391 be amended to change “Alcide Street” to “Alcide Avenue.”

 

Action: By-law 2001-391 formally changed the name “Albert Street” to “Alcide Street,” as a natural extension of the existing Alcide Street.  While conducting field surveys, it was determine that the existing section of Alcide has the designated suffix “Avenue.”  To avoid disruption for the residents of the unaffected portion of “Alcide Avenue” it is recommended the by-law be amended to reflect the suffix “Avenue.”

 

1.2 That the legal description within Schedule “A” be amended to include “Cummings Lane.”

 

Action:  By-law 2001-394 formally changed the name “Cummings Ave” to “James Cummings Ave.”  Having determined that the existing “Cummings Lane” is directly adjacent and a natural extension of “Cummings Ave” and that Cummings Lane has been considered by the residents to be a part of Cummings Ave., to avoid confusion for emergency services, the business community and the public it is recommended that the by-law be amended to include “Cummings Lane” as part of “James Cummings Ave.”

1.3 That the existing name “Porter Street” (former City of Ottawa) be renamed “Cole Porter Street” and that an implementing by-law be submitted for enactment.

 

Action: Following consultation between Ward Councillor Cullen and the residents on Porter Street, a petition was submitted supported by a majority of the residents on the street recommending the name “Cole Porter Street.”  The name is in recognition of Cole Porter as a famous songwriter.  At their annual general meeting, the Woodroffe North Community Association indicated their support for the suggested name, “Cole Porter Street”.

 

1.4 That the existing street name “Main Street” located in Stittsville, former Township of Goulbourn, be renamed “Stittsville Main Street” and that an implementing by-law be submitted for enactment.

 

Action:  A letter was circulated to the affected residents and businesses (458) located adjacent to Main Street in Stittsville, requesting confirmation of their preference to re-name the street either “Stittsville Main Street” or “Huntley Road” (as a natural extension of the existing Huntley Rd.).  180 responses were received.  Of all the respondents, 74% were in support of the name “Stittsville Main Street.”

 

1.5: That the existing name “Riverside Drive”, Manotick (former Township of Rideau) be renamed “North Riverside Drive” and that an implementing by-law be submitted for enactment.

 

Action: Following consultation between Ward Councillor Brooks and the affected community, the name preferred by the community, “North Riverside Drive” was submitted by the Councillor.

 

1.6 That the street name “Lilac Lane” in the former Township of Cumberland be retained and that the proposed name “Magnolia Lane” for the street located in the former City of Ottawa be changed to “Old Lilac Lane.”

 

Action: The criteria for both streets are very close in terms of the number or residents/businesses affected, cost to replace signs, historical significance, etc.  The Lilac Street in Ottawa would appear to have been created and in use earlier than the street in Cumberland.  The streets in the area were built as part of a subdivision circa 1962.  A theme was established having named several of the streets after flowers in recognition of the green house that existed on the original farm. In this regard, unlike Cumberland, Ottawa has the option to re-name the street after another flower.

 

In Cumberland the established theme is the Lilac as there are significant number of lilac bushes lining the roadway.  Further, as a substandard roadway ending in a cul-de-sac, the suffix “Lane” better reflects the existing physical characteristics and the policy definition for the suffix “Lane.”

 

Given that the residents in Ottawa have indicated their strong preference to retain the street name and given the age of the roadway, the recommended alternative is to incorporate the existing name “Lilac” into the new name i.e., “Old Lilac Lane.”  The ward Councillor in Ottawa is in support of retaining the existing name within the new name.

 

1.7 That, the street name be changed from “Prospect Avenue” to “Old Prospect Road.”

 

Action: Councillor Jacques Legendre has consulted with the community regarding their concern to retain the historic significance of their street name.  Following discussions with staff, the community is prepared to consider a name that would include the existing name.  While the Department would prefer a unique name, the suggested name acceptable to the community is “Old Prospect.”  The community has recently submitted the full name “Old Prospect Road.”

 

1.8 That the street name “Moses Street” (formerly George Street, Osgoode) approved by City Council through the enactment of by-law 2001-401 be changed to “Old George Street.” and an implementing by-law be submitted for enactment.

 

Action: On September 26, 2001, City Council approved a change in the street name for George Street, Osgoode, to Moses Street.  By-law 2001-401 was enacted to implement the name change.  On December 12, 2001, in response to the community’s objection to the approved name, Council approved a motion to defer the issue for discussion.  Following meetings with the Ward Councillor, the community submitted a petition supported by twenty-one (21) of the twenty-two (22) households units and one (1) business in support of the name “Old George Street.”

 

1.9 1. That “Sunset Boulevard.” in the former Township of Osgoode retain the existing street name, and

 

2. That the street name “Sunset Boulevard” in the former City of Ottawa be changed to one of the following options:

 

Option 1: That “Sunset Boulevard” be changed to “Sunset View Boulevard”, or

 

Option 2: That an acceptable name supported by a majority of the affected residents and submitted by the community prior to consideration by City Council be adopted as the new street name.

 

Action: No additional information has been received that would affect the Department’s position for Sunset Blvd. in Greely, former Township of Osgoode to retain the name based on the rationale detailed in Document 4 of the City Council report dated September 26, 2001.  A discussion of the selection process to determine which street should retain the name has been detailed and included as Document 3.

 

In summary, the development of evaluation criteria to determine which municipal street name should be changed was undertaken with the assistance of the consulting firm RANA International, input received from three (3) public meetings and with the approval of the Ottawa Transition Board.  Weighting of one criterion over another was considered to be inappropriate for the project, as it would introduce the opportunity for bias and subjectivity in decision-making.  The only element that was clearly an overriding objective was to impact the least number of residents and businesses.  If the number impacted on both streets was effectively equal, other criterion as for example theme, history, age, etc. factored into the evaluation.  For example, Queen St. in Richmond is clearly older than Queen St. in former Ottawa, however, Ottawa has a greater number of residents and businesses that would be affected.

 

This evaluation process was applied to all of the 273 affected streets.  It was exactly this process that was applied to the review of Sunset Blvd.  The residents on Sunset Blvd. in the former City of Ottawa have consistently remained opposed to changing or amending their street name in anyway.  The Ward Councillor has consistently supported the Departmental recommendation.  Recently, on behalf of the residents, the Councillor requested the Department now consider weighting the criteria.  The residents are of the opinion the age of the street has not been duly recognized and the weighting may ultimately shift the requirement for change to the street in Greely.

 

It is the Department’s position that the intent of the deferral was to give the community an opportunity to resolve the issue or present their position to Council.  It was not intended to reconfigure the evaluation process, as this would undermine the integrity of the entire project.

 

Recommendation 2

 

To implement the decision of City Council with respect to the approved street name changes, implementing by-laws must be drafted and submitted for enactment.  As directed in the Disposition Section, the Legal Services Branch is required to prepare and submit for the draft by-laws.


DUPLICATE STREET NAMING PROJECT Document 4

Selection Process to Determine Which Street Names are to be Changed

 

·        During City Council’s deliberation of the Duplicate Street Naming project report in September 2001, Councillor Doucet requested the Department to provide a breakdown of the method under which streets were evaluated, in particular any rating that may have been applied to the criteria during the evaluation of Sunset Boulevards in Ottawa and Greely.

 

PROCESS

 

·        The Ottawa Transition Board Duplicate Street Naming project retained Rana International to undertake the public consultation process.

 

·        Their first task was to assist in the development of criteria that would be used to evaluate each affected street in determining which street would have to change the name.  The consultant facilitated a Committee workshop with representation from all emergency services agencies, each of the area municipalities, the business and residential sectors as follows:

 

o       Project Leader – Don Brousseau

o       Municipal Numbering – Don Proulx

o       Street Naming Selection – Luigi Aprile

o       Ottawa Fire Department – Perry McConnell

o       Ottawa Carleton Regional Police – Baby Lotlarewski

o       Bell Canada 911 PERS – Linda Jenkins

o       Regional Information Technology – Dave Johnston

o       Ottawa Carleton Ambulance Communications Center – Richard Lavictoire

o       Township of Osgoode – Brenda Guy

o       Township of West Carleton – Brian Carry

o       City of Nepean – Mike Levasseur

o       Township of Goulbourn – Gary Concordia

o       City of Kanata – Mike Boughton

o       City of Gloucester – Anne Marie Fowlie

o       City of Cumberland – Gord Mills

o       Village of Rockcliffe – Murray MacLean

o       Township of Rideau – John Ingraham

o       City of Vanier – Eric L’Heureaux

o       Federation of Citizens – Tanis Stoliar

o       Somerset Heights BIA – Gwen Toop

o       BOMA – Debra Crow

 

·        A list of criteria was developed with the consensus of all participants.

 

·        Weighting the criteria was considered, however, following testing of various scenarios against selected streets the Committee concluded that, notwithstanding the foremost objective to minimize impact on residents and businesses, the criteria should not be weighted.  The Committee felt that to weight streets primarily on, for example, historic significance or the date on which the street was created would be unfair to those streets that may have a significant theme or form part of a known landmark street leading to a hospital or public tourist destination where the street forms part of international publications, in which case a name change may result in a safety concern.  Further, many of the rural street names pre-date prominent downtown street names thus rendering historic pre-eminence as a factor impractical.

 

·        The draft criteria developed by the Committee was presented for discussion and feedback at 3 public meetings where the pubic at large was invited to participate.  The suggestions received were reviewed and incorporated into the final criteria, listed below in no order of priority.

 

o       Number of residential units

o       Number of businesses

o       Cost of replacing signs

o       Historical significance of street name

o       Date street created

o       Street name contributes to theme

o       Street forms boundary with or extends into municipality outside the new City

o       Landmark – well known street or safety related (i.e. hospital)

o       Other factors unique to the street

 

·        Prior to the evaluation of the first street, the Ottawa Transition Board tabled the criterion for public review and approval. (All Transition Board meetings were open to the public.)

 

·        The project teams reviewed affected streets in the context of each factor from the criteria.  Each street was researched to obtain information on the number of residents and businesses, the establishment date, subdivision approval, by-law enactment, any historic background, landmark status, theme status, submissions from the community, historians and local historical societies.  The teams evaluated each street on a case-by-case basis taking into consideration all available research information.  A majority of the decisions were clear.  Only in one case were all factors virtually equal.  In this case, the final decision was based on the fact one street has a slightly stronger theme and the suffix better defines the street’s physical characteristics.

 

·        Consistently, streets with a greater number of residents and businesses were recommended to retain their existing name.  Streets with duplicate names that had a fairly even number of residents/businesses were then evaluated on the basis of the other criteria, e.g.; historical significance, date of creation, theme, known landmarks, etc.

 

·        Where streets were identified for a name change but were otherwise notable under the criteria, based on the extensive research that generated over 600 potential names, names with local historical significance were suggested.  If the names were unacceptable to the community, every effort was made to incorporate some reference to the existing name into the new name.  If this option was not acceptable, the community was given the opportunity to suggest a name of their choosing.

 

SUNSET BOULEVARD

 

·        In the case of Sunset Boulevard, there are clearly a greater number of residents/businesses that would be affected on Sunset Boulevard in Greely.  On that basis the recommendation was for Sunset Blvd. in Ottawa to change the name.  The optional name suggested to the community would incorporate the existing name within the new name i.e., “Sunset View.”  As indicated by the community, the rationale for this name is based on the fact the original name relates to the beautiful sunsets over Dow’s Lake.  Other available suggested options included:

 

o        “Sunset Vista” to incorporate the existing Sunset reference.

o       “Dow’s Lake Road”-As a natural extension of Opeongo Road, Sunset could adopt the new name for Opeongo in recognition of the proximity to the adjacent well know lake forming part of the Colonel By canal system.  100% of the residents of Opeongo Road supported the name change.

o       Petition Option - The community would suggest a name of their choosing possible to reflect their history or in recognition of an individual or event.

 

Notwithstanding the above, the residents are not in support of any name change primarily based on the date the name was established and a general opposition to the process.

 

The comparative criteria for Sunset Blvd in Ottawa and Greely is provided below

 

EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATION

It is recommended that SUNSET BOULEVARD in GREELY, OSGOODE retain its name for the following reasons:

·         Sunset Boulevard in Greely has about 58 residential units that would be impacted by a street name change compared with about 28 in Ottawa.

·         Sunset Boulevard in Greely has about 12 businesses that would be impacted by a street name change compared with about 9 in Ottawa.

·         Sunset Boulevard in Greely has a strongly theme located in a subdivision incorporating 2 lakes and the street name reflects the name of the residential community in which it is located, Sunset Lakes.

Sunset Boulevard is located in:    1.  Ottawa        2.  Greely, Osgoode

 

EVALUATION OF STREETS  **

 

Sunset Boulevard

Greely, Osgoode

Sunset Boulevard

Ottawa

Evaluation criteria

 

 

#  of residential units

58

28

#  of businesses

12

9

Cost of replacing street signs

$300

$200

Historical significance of street name

Not available

Not available

Date street created

1950 according to residents

October 10, 1922   (165631)

Street name contributes to theme

The existing name supports and reflects a strong lake/park theme with 2 lakes incorporated into the project.

Not applicable

Street forms boundary with or extends into municipality outside the Region

Not applicable

Not applicable

Well known landmark or street/safety related

Not applicable

Not applicable

Other factors

The street name supports the name of the subdivision, “Sunset Lakes.”

View toward Dow's Lake and the Arboretum.

Comments received

A petition was received (59 names) opposing a name change.  It also indicated that with a name change there would be a substantial cost to residents and businesses.  A letter was received opposing a name change because Sunset Boulevard contributes to the neighborhood area, there are more residents and the subdivision is a growing community.

Two letters received, one with a petition (64 names) opposing a name change.

A suggestion was made to use a numerical system or North, East, South, or West to the duplicate street names.

Concerns of the cost for residents and businesses.

This street was named Sunset Blvd. because of the view of sunsets over Dow’s Lake.

Residents don't want to loose their identity in the Glebe.

The names of the streets in the Dow’s Lake area have a historical significance.

Fotal Factors

5

2

 

 

Additional Information Received From the Community

Sunset Blvd.- Ottawa

 

Criteria

Original Information

Residents’ New Information

Departmental Comments

# of residential units

28

28

No change

# of businesses

9

9

No change

Cost of replacing street signs

$200

$200

No change

Historical significance of street name

Not available

Submission from Dow’s Lake Residents’ Association indicates that there were title-holders for Sunset cira 1870 and there may have been residents on the street at this time.

Unable to confirm the date on which the first resident lived on the street.  No related historical information was provided.

 Date street created

October 10, 1922   (By-law)

January 10, 1862

Officially created by by-law in 1922.  Physically recognized on a plan of survey in 1862.

Street name contributes to theme

Not applicable

Lakeside, Lakeview and Sunset all refer to the geography of the area, namely Dow’s Lake and the views of the lake and the sunsets over its western shore.

A minor link to a theme is recognized.  However, while a couple of roadways are named in recognition of the lake, this is only one feature in the Glebe and not the theme of the Glebe neighborhood.

Street forms boundary with or extends into municipality outside the Region

Not applicable

Not applicable

 

Well known landmark or street/safety related

Not applicable

Not applicable

 

Other factors

Physical attributes of the street are the gorgeous sunsets, looking towards Dow’s Lake and the Arboretum.

While there are 58 residential units on Sunset Blvd.- Greely, the great majority of the residents have been there less than 5 years

Recognition of the lake view, as indicated by the residents, is reflected in the proposed name “Sunset View Blvd.”

Comments received

- Don’t want to lose their identity in the Glebe.

- The names of the streets in Dow’s Lake area have a historical significance.

 

·         Identity retained within the proposed name.

·         Unlike Madawaska or Opeongo, the name “Sunset” has no recognized historic significance.

 

Summary for Sunset Boulevard:

 

1)      The main thrust of the project has been to minimize impact so that the least number of residents and businesses are affected. 

2)      There are approximately double the number of residents in Greely that would be affected.

3)      There are twelve businesses in Greely in comparison to nine in Ottawa.

4)      Based on the established evaluation process, if the number of residents and businesses are equal, other criteria such as age, historical significance, theme, cost of signage, etc. are considered.

5)      In response to the request by the community to retain their local identity and acknowledge the age of the street having been in existence since 1862, the existing name has been incorporated into the recommend name, ‘Sunset View Blvd.(The proposed name is a reflection of the rationale for the original name, (as provided by a resident) being the view of the sunset over Dow’s Lake)

6)      Other suggested options:

a.       “Sunset Vista Blvd.” – An alternate name to incorporate the existing name.

b.      “Old Sunset Blvd.” – As suggested by the Ward Councillor.

c.       “Dow’s Lake Road” – Sunset Blvd. is physically a natural extension of Opeongo Road.  Opeongo residents have unanimously supported a name change to “Dow’s Lake Rd.” in recognition of the historic significance of Dow’s Lake as a component part of the Colonel By canal system.

d.      Submit a Petition - Residents have the option to choose an alternate name reflective of the community, a long time resident or another name of their choosing.

 

SUMMARY RELATING TO THE PROCESS

 

At the outset of the project, with the assistance of a professional facilitator, a Sub-Committee was formed for the purpose of developing the evaluation criteria and a review process.  The Committee included representation from all of the emergency agencies, the former municipalities and the residential/business sectors.  The draft criteria was reviewed by the public at three initial public meeting and subsequently approved by the Ottawa Transition Board prior to undertaking evaluation of the affected streets.  At that time, weighting of the individual criterion was discussed and deemed by the project Sub-Committee to introduce an unfair advantage by rendering other relevant factors mute and, therefore, not consistent with an equitable process as set out under the project charter.