5.
Flewellyn special study
area - environmental policies
- Proposed modifications to OPA 76 AIRE
D’ÉTUDE SPÉCIALE DE FLEWELLYN - POLITIQUES ENVIRONNEMENTALES
- CHANGEMENTS PROPOSÉS À LA MPO 76 |
COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS AS AMENDED
That Council endorse the modifications to Official Plan Amendment No. 76
set forth in Documents 1 and 2 to this report, as amended by the following:
1. That the row corresponding to Item
269 in Document 1 be replaced with Item 269 in Document 3;
2. That
the City Clerk and Solicitor be directed to seek a modification to Section
4.7.3, Policy 3 such that it will read as follows:
“3. The
setback provided for in policies 1 and 2 will be implemented through the zoning
by-law and any change in the setback will require a zoning by-law amendment or
variance that is consistent with the policies in this section of the Plan.”;
3. That the City Clerk and Solicitor be
directed to seek a modification to Section 3.2.5 such that it will read as
follows:
“3.2.5 – Flewellyn
Special Study Area
Land
in the vicinity of
In
addition to the Flewellyn Special Study Area
policies, the Study Area remains subject to the Drainage By-law No. 2007 – 398
and former Township of Goulbourn Removal of Topsoil
By-law No. 45 - 86.
Policies
1. Notwithstanding the underlying
designations on Schedule A of this Plan, no new development, as defined in
Section 4.7.8, will be permitted until the Flewellyn
Special Study Area overlay is removed.
2. Uses that lawfully exist on the date that
this provision comes into force are recognized and may continue. [Mod. 33.]”
RECOMMANDATIONS MODIFIÉES DU COMITÉ
Que le Conseil appuie les modifications à la modification 76 du Plan
officiel, comme il est établi dans les Documents 1 et 2 du présent rapport, sous
réserve des modifications suivantes :
1. Que la rangée correspondant au point
269 dans le Document 1 soit remplacée par le point 269 dans le Document 3;
2. Que
le greffier et chef du contentieux soit chargé d’obtenir une modification à la
section 4.7.3, Politique 3, pour qu’elle se présente comme suit :
« 3. La
marge de reculement prévue dans les politiques 1 et 2 sera appliquée par
l’intermédiaire du règlement de zonage et tout changement à cette marge de
reculement nécessitera une modification du règlement de zonage ou une
dérogation qui soit conforme aux politiques de cette section du plan »;
3. Que le greffier et chef du contentieux soit chargé d’obtenir une
modification à la section 3.2.5 , pour qu’elle se
présente comme suit :
« 3.2.5 – Aire d’étude spéciale
de Flewellyn
Les terrains dans les environs du
chemin Flewellyn et du chemin Conley
ont été indiqués et désignés dans l’annexe A sous « aire d’étude spéciale
de Flewellyn ». L’objet de cette
désignation générale est de limiter l’aménagement jusqu’à ce que la Ville ait
terminé une étude sur les effets cumulatifs.
Cette étude indiquera les changements survenus au drainage de la région en raison, notamment,
des effets de la construction routière,
des travaux relatifs aux drains privés, de l’entretien des drains municipaux et
des fuites d’eau provenant des
carrières. La Ville fera suivre l’étude
sur les effets cumulatifs par une
réévaluation de l’aire en 2016 en ayant recours au Système d’évaluation des
terres humides de l’Ontario. Une fois
l’étude et la réévaluation terminées, la Ville modifiera du Plan dans le but
d’enlever la désignation générale d’aire d’étude spéciale de Flewellyn et confirmera les désignations et les politiques
appropriées en ce qui concerne l’utilisation des terrains de cette aire.
En plus des politiques qui régissent
l’aire d’étude spéciale de Flewellyn, l’aire d’étude
demeure assujettie au Règlement sur le drainage 2007 – 398 et au Règlement 45 -
86 sur l’enlèvement de la terre végétale de l’ancien Canton de Goulbourn.
Politiques
1. Nonobstant
les désignations sous-jacentes à l’annexe A du Plan, aucun nouvel aménagement,
comme il est défini dans la section 4.7.8, ne sera autorisé jusqu’à que la
désignation générale d’aire d’étude spéciale de Flewellyn
soit enlevée.
2. Les
utilisations qui existent juridiquement à la date d’entrée en vigueur de cette
disposition sont reconnues et peuvent continuer. [Mod.
33.] »
Documentation
1.
City Clerk and Solicitor’s Report, dated 12 May 2011
(ACS2011-CMR-LEG-0013).
2. Extract of Draft Minutes, 12 May 2011.
Report to/Rapport au :
Agriculture and Rural Affairs
Comité de l'agriculture et des affaires rurales
and Council / et au Conseil
Submitted by/Soumis par :
M. Rick O’Connor, City Clerk and Solicitor/
Greffier et
Chef du contentieux
Contact Person/Personne-ressource :
Timothy Marc, Senior Legal Counsel/Conseiller juridique principal
Legal Services/Services juridiques
(613) 580-2424 x 21444, timothy.marc@ottawa.ca
SUBJECT: |
FLEWELLYN SPECIAL
STUDY AREA ENIRONMENTAL POLICIES PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO OPA 76 |
OBJET : |
AIRE D’ÉTUDE SPÉCIALE DE FLEWELLYN POLITIQUES
ENVIRONNEMENTALES - CHANGEMENTS PROPOSÉS À LA
MPO 76 |
That the Agriculture
and Rural Affairs Committee recommend Council endorse the modifications to
Official Plan Amendment No. 76 set forth in Documents 1 and 2 to this report.
Que le Comité
de l’agriculture et des
affaires rurales recommande
au Conseil d’appuyer les changements à la Modification du Plan officiel
no 76 présentés dans
les documents 1 et 2 du présent rapport.
BACKGROUND
An information report was submitted to the
meeting of Agriculture and Rural Affairs Committee held on January 27th,
2011 to provide an update on the hearings concerning Official Plan Amendment
No. 76 (“OPA
76”), the comprehensive official plan amendment adopted by the City of Ottawa
in June, 2009 pursuant to the Planning
Act, section 26.
As noted in the Information Report, a hearing
has been scheduled for four weeks commencing June 6th, 2011 with respect
to the environmental policies within OPA 76 and the Flewellyn
Special Study Area.
DISCUSSION
City staff have had
discussions with several appellants/parties, including the Ministry of
Municipal Affairs and Housing with respect to the question of possible
resolutions and/or modifications before the Board at the upcoming hearing. The outcome of these discussions is set out
below. The proposed modifications to OPA
76 are set forth in Documents 1 and 2 to this report.
Policy resolution with Taggart/Cavanagh/GOHBA
City staff have met
with these appellants in an attempt to resolve issues prior to the upcoming
hearing. During these discussions,
Taggart and GOHBA agreed to release their appeals of most of the environmental
policies, recognizing that these policies are consistent with the requirements
of the Provincial Policy Statement. Some
minor changes to the wording of specific policies have been agreed upon to
clarify the City’s intent. Cavanagh is also prepared to release several appeals, but
remains opposed to policies restricting development in and adjacent to the Natural
Heritage System, solid waste sites, and flood plains. Cavanagh’s proposed
changes to these policies are not consistent with the requirements of the
Provincial Policy Statement and cannot be supported by staff.
Redesignation of Taggart lands
Based upon an environmental study submitted by
Taggart, staff are recommending a change to Schedule
R15 to reduce the area impacted by the Flewellyn
Special Study Area on Taggart’s property. However, staff do not support
Taggart’s recent request to re-designate the affected lands from General Rural
to Limestone Resource Area at the same time.
The re-designation of these lands was not raised as an issue by Taggart
during the Official Plan review process, and was not included as part of
Taggart’s formal appeal. Staff do not feel that the appeals resolution process is the
appropriate venue to address this proposed change in land use. The upcoming Mineral Aggregate review,
mandated by Council to inform the 2014 Official Plan review process, will be a
comprehensive study with extensive public consultation. If any changes in
mineral aggregate land use designations are determined to be necessary, the
City will amend the Official Plan accordingly.
Taggart is aware of this upcoming review and has the opportunity to
participate and provide input to any City-initiated Official Plan Amendment, or
to apply for a site-specific Official Plan Amendment at any time.
Additions to Flewellyn
Special Study Area policy
The withdrawal of the petition for the proposed
Upper Flowing Creek Municipal Drain has necessitated changes to the Flewellyn Special Study Area policy, which was developed
based on the assumption that the drain would proceed. Staff are proposing
an alternative means of determining the true extent of the significant wetland
by assessing the cumulative effects of past changes in drainage within the
study area.
In the interim, in addition to prohibition on
development, as was provided for in OPA 76 as modified by the Ministry of
Municipal Affairs and Housing, site alteration
will be restricted, as is the case with other environmental designations (e.g Natural Environment Areas, Urban Natural Features,
Significant Wetlands ) in order to meet the requirements of the Provincial
Policy Statement. No new development
will be permitted until the boundaries of the significant wetland have been
confirmed and the Special Study Area overlay has been removed. Site alteration will be controlled through
the former Township’s topsoil preservation by-law, which is still in effect for
this area.
RURAL IMPLICATIONS
The Flewellyn Special
Study Area is located within the rural area of the City. The environmental policies are of City-wide
application and as such are a consideration with respect to rural land use.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
City staff will constitute the legal counsel
and witnesses for the City in the hearing on the environmental policies and Flewellyn Special Study Area. Thus, there will be no additional cost for
the City for this hearing.
CITY STRATEGIC PLAN
The proposed modifications are consistent with
the goal in the City Strategic Plan of providing protection to the Environment.
PUBLIC CONSULTATION
In addition to the public consultation leading
up to the adoption of OPA 76, three pre-hearings were held by the Ontario
Municipal Board at which interested persons could seek status on the appeals
before the Board.
The Flewellyn Special
Study Area has been the topic of particular interest. Therefore, staff will be seeking to meet with
community representatives in advance of the meeting of Committee. In addition, this report will be distributed
to those on the electronic mailing list for the Upper Flowing Creek Municipal
Drain.
TECHNICAL IMPLICATIONS
Not applicable
DISPOSITION
Legal Services will present the proposed
modifications, as such may be endorsed by Council, to the Ontario Municipal
Board
DOCUMENTATION
Document 1 – Proposed Modifications to text of
OPA 76.
Document 2 – Proposed Modification to Schedule R15.
Item |
Section |
OPA76 as Modified and Approved by the Ministry |
City Recommendation to the OMB |
14 |
2.4.2, Natural Features and Functions |
Section 2.4.2, Natural Features and Functions, is hereby amended as
follows: a)
by deleting from
the first paragraph of the Preamble the third sentence that begins with the
phrase “The provinces and municipalities have…”; b)
by deleting from the Preamble the second and third
paragraphs; c)
by inserting after the first paragraph of the
Preamble the following new paragraphs: “The province and municipalities have examined natural features in the
past, on the basis of their size, species diversity, and other
characteristics, to determine those that are the most significant and warrant
protection through public ownership or through regulations concerning their
development. In Ottawa, most of these
significant woodlands and wildlife habitat are designated as Natural
Environment Areas and Rural Natural Features and include wetlands that, while
not provincially-significant, maintain the natural function of the area. These features, in addition to
provincially-significant wetlands, comprise a natural heritage system linked
by watercourses and valleylands that extends
throughout the urban and rural area and into adjacent municipalities. The natural heritage system in Ottawa is identified and protected by
watershed and other environmental plans, land-use designations, and policies
on how land is used to ensure that development does not result in negative
impacts on natural features or their functions. A conceptual map of the system is provided
in Annex 14 for information purposes.
This map will be updated as new information becomes available or
through the completion of watershed, subwatershed
and environmental management plans, as well as other site-specific
environmental studies. In
this regard, the diversity and connectivity of natural features and the
long-term ecological function and biodiversity of the City’s natural heritage
systems shall be maintained, restored, or where possible, improved,
recognizing linkages between and among natural heritage features and areas,
surface water features and ground water features.” [Mod 11] d)
by deleting policies 1 and 2 and adding new policies
as follows: “1. The natural
heritage system in Ottawa comprises the following significant features and
the natural functions they perform: a. Provincially
significant wetlands as identified by the Ministry of Natural Resources b. Significant
habitat for endangered and threatened species, as approved by the Ministry of
Natural Resources; c. Significant
woodlands defined in the rural area as woodlands that combine all three
features listed below in a contiguous, forested area: i. Mature stands
of trees 80 years of age or older; and ii. Interior
forest habitat located more than 100 m inside the edge of a forest patch; and iii.
Woodland adjacent to a surface water feature such as a river, stream, drain,
pond or wetland, or any groundwater feature including springs, seepage areas,
or areas of groundwater upwelling; d.
Wetlands found in association with significant woodlands; e.
Significant valleylands defined as valleylands with slopes greater than 15% and a length of
more than 50 m, with water present for some period of the year, excluding
man-made features such as pits and quarries; f. Significant
wildlife habitat found on escarpments with slopes exceeding 75% and heights
greater than 3 m; or within significant woodlands, wetlands, and valleylands; or that may be identified through subwatershed studies or site investigation; g. Life Science
Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest as identified by the Ministry of
Natural Resources; h. Earth Science
Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest as identified by the Ministry of
Natural Resources designated on Schedule K; i. Urban Natural
Features, consisting of remnant woodlands, wetlands and ravines within the
urban area; j. Forest
remnants and natural corridors such as floodplains that create linkages among
the significant features defined above, but that may not meet the criteria
for significance; k. Groundwater
features, defined as water-related features in the earth’s subsurface,
including recharge/discharge areas, water tables, aquifers and unsaturated
zones that can be defined by surface and subsurface hydrogeologic
investigations; l. Surface water
features, defined as water-related features on the earth’s surface, including
headwaters, rivers, stream channels, drains, inland lakes, seepage areas,
recharge/discharge areas, springs, and associated riparian lands that can be
defined by their soil moisture, soil type, vegetation or topographic
characteristics, including fish habitat. 2. The
natural heritage system, as defined in policy 1, is protected by: a. Establishing
watershed and subwatershed plans as the basis for
land-use planning in Ottawa through policies in Section 2 of this Plan. These
plans may use additional criteria to define significant features that reflect
unique characteristics of the area or the presence or relative abundance of
the feature within the subwatershed compared with
other subwatersheds; b. Protecting the
quality and quantity of groundwater through policies in Section 2; c. Designating
most significant features as Significant Wetlands, Natural Environment Areas,
and Rural Natural Features on schedules within the Plan and setting policies
in Section 3 to ensure they are preserved; d. Ensuring that
land is developed in a manner that is environmentally-sensitive through the
development review process in keeping with policies in Section 4 regarding
such matters as design with nature, erosion protection and protection of
surface water, protection of significant habitat for endangered and
threatened species and requirements for Environmental Impact Statements. 3. Regardless of
whether the features are designated in this Plan, an Environmental Impact
Statement is required for development proposed within or adjacent to features
described in Policy 1 above, with the exception of surface and groundwater
features. Development and site alteration within or adjacent to these
features will not be permitted unless it is demonstrated through an
Environmental Impact Statement that there will be no negative impact on the
feature or its ecological functions.
The policies regarding Environmental Impact Statements and the
definition of terms are contained in Section 4.7.8.” |
Further
amend as follows (recommended additional edits highlighted in green): Section 2.4.2, Natural Features and Functions, is hereby amended as
follows: a)
by deleting from
the first paragraph of the Preamble the third sentence that begins with the
phrase “The provinces and municipalities have…”; b)
by deleting from the Preamble the second and third
paragraphs; c)
by inserting after the first paragraph of the
Preamble the following new paragraphs: “The province and municipalities have examined natural features in the
past, on the basis of their size, species diversity, and other
characteristics, to determine those that are the most significant and warrant
protection through public ownership or through regulations concerning their
development. In Ottawa, most of these
significant woodlands and wildlife habitat are designated as Natural
Environment Areas and Rural Natural Features and include wetlands that, while
not provincially-significant, maintain the natural function of the area. These features, in addition to
provincially-significant wetlands, comprise a natural heritage system linked
by watercourses and valleylands that extends
throughout the urban and rural area and into adjacent municipalities. The natural heritage system in Ottawa is identified and protected by
watershed and other environmental plans, land-use designations, and policies
on how land is used to ensure that development does not result in negative
impacts on natural features or their functions. A conceptual map of the system is provided
in Annex 14 for information purposes.
This map will be updated as new information becomes available or
through the completion of watershed, subwatershed
and environmental management plans, as well as other site-specific
environmental studies. In
this regard, the diversity and connectivity of natural features and the
long-term ecological function and biodiversity of the City’s natural heritage
systems shall be maintained, restored, or where possible, improved,
recognizing linkages between and among natural heritage features and areas,
surface water features and ground water features.” [Mod 11] d)
by deleting policies 1 and 2 and adding new policies
as follows: “1. The natural
heritage system in Ottawa comprises the following significant features and
the natural functions they perform: a. Provincially
significant wetlands as identified by the Ministry of Natural Resources b. Significant
habitat for endangered and threatened species, as approved by the Ministry of
Natural Resources; c. Significant
woodlands defined in the rural area as woodlands that combine all three
features listed below in a contiguous, forested area: i. Mature stands
of trees 80 years of age or older; and ii.
Interior forest habitat located more than 100 m inside the edge of a forest
patch; and iii.
Woodland adjacent to a surface water feature such as a river, stream, drain,
pond or wetland, or any groundwater feature including springs, seepage areas,
or areas of groundwater upwelling; d. Wetlands found
in association with significant woodlands; e. Significant valleylands defined as valleylands
with slopes greater than 15% and a length of more than 50 m, with water
present for some period of the year, excluding man-made features such as pits
and quarries; f. Significant
wildlife habitat found on escarpments with slopes exceeding 75% and heights
greater than 3 m; or within significant woodlands, wetlands, and valleylands; or that may be identified through subwatershed studies or site investigation; g. Life Science
Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest as identified by the Ministry of
Natural Resources; h. Earth Science
Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest as identified by the Ministry of
Natural Resources designated on Schedule K; i. Urban Natural
Features, consisting of remnant woodlands, wetlands and ravines within the
urban area; j. Forest
remnants and natural corridors such as floodplains that create linkages k. Groundwater
features, defined as water-related features in the earth’s subsurface,
including recharge/discharge areas, water tables, aquifers and unsaturated
zones that can be defined by surface and subsurface hydrogeologic
investigations; l. Surface water
features, defined as water-related features on the earth’s surface, including
headwaters, rivers, stream channels, drains, inland lakes, seepage areas,
recharge/discharge areas, springs, and associated riparian lands that can be
defined by their soil moisture, soil type, vegetation or topographic
characteristics, including fish habitat. 2. The
natural heritage system, as defined in policy 1, is protected by: a. Establishing
watershed and subwatershed plans as the basis for
land-use planning in Ottawa through policies in Section 2 of this Plan. b. Protecting the
quality and quantity of groundwater through policies in Section 2; c. Designating
most significant features as Significant Wetlands, Natural Environment Areas,
and Rural Natural Features on schedules within the Plan and setting policies
in Section 3 to ensure they are preserved; d. Ensuring that
land is developed in a manner that is environmentally-sensitive through the
development review process in keeping with policies in Section 4 regarding
such matters as design with nature, erosion protection and protection of
surface water, protection of significant habitat for endangered and
threatened species and requirements for Environmental Impact Statements. 3. Regardless of
whether the features are designated in this Plan, an Environmental Impact
Statement is required for development proposed within or adjacent to features
described in Policy 1 above, with the exception of surface and groundwater
features. Development and site alteration within or adjacent to these
features will not be permitted unless it is demonstrated through an
Environmental Impact Statement that there will be no negative impact on the
feature or its ecological functions.
The policies regarding Environmental Impact Statements and the
definition of terms are contained in Section 4.7.8.” |
15 |
2.4.3, Watershed and Subwatershed Plans |
Section 2.4.3, Watershed and Subwatershed
Plans, is hereby amended as follows: a)
by adding to the first paragraph of the Preamble the
following immediately following the phrase “…the long-term health of the
watershed”: “The relationship between Watershed plans and land use plans is
demonstrated in Figure 2.6.” b)
by deleting the first four bullets from the second
paragraph of the Preamble and replacing with the following three bullets: ·
“Document the existing condition of the natural
environment heritage system within the watershed; ·
Identify the significant ·
Assess the potential impacts of existing and future
land-use activities, including cumulative impacts, and recommend measures to
avoid or mitigate these;” c)
by deleting from policy 3.a the phrase “ecological
features and resources” and replacing it as follows: “the natural heritage system”; d)
by adding to the end of policy 3.a immediately
following the phrase “including headwater areas” a new phrase as follows: “and other surface water and groundwater features”; e)
by deleting from the second sentence of policy 7.c
the word “should” where it immediately follows the phrase “A subwatershed
plan” and replacing it as follows: [Mod 13] “shall”; f)
by deleting from the fourth sentence of policy 7.c
the phrase “natural areas” where it immediately follows the phrase “will
identify the” and replacing it as follows: “natural heritage system areas”; g)
by adding to the end of the fourth sentence of
policy 7.c immediately following the phrase “to secure these areas” a new
phrase as follows” “and to ensure development has no negative
impact on the system.”; h)
by adding to the sixth sentence of policy 7.c
immediately following the phrase “Where the requirement for the subwatershed plan is waived,” a new phrase as follows: “the natural heritage system will be identified in keeping with the
policies of this Plan along with measures to ensure development has no
negative impact on the system.” ; i)
by capitalizing the word “natural” at the beginning
of the phrase “natural areas that are worthy of protection…” so as to create
a seventh sentence in policy 7.c as follows: “Natural areas that are worthy of protection will be identified and
mechanisms to secure these lands will be established.”; j)
by deleting policy 8.a and replacing it as follows: “a. The natural features and their functions
that comprise the natural heritage k)
by adding to policy 8.b immediately following the
phrase “Subwatershed objectives” a new phrase as
follows: “in such areas as forest cover which reflect the unique qualities of
the area”; l)
by adding to policy 8.b immediately following the
phrase “protection of headwater areas,” a new phrase as follows: “surface water and groundwater features,”; m)
by deleting from policy 11.a the phrase “creek
corridor widths” and replacing it as follows: “setbacks from surface water features”; n)
by deleting from policy 11.b the phrase “,such as
creeks,”; |
Further
amend as follows (recommended additional edits highlighted in green): Section 2.4.3, Watershed and Subwatershed
Plans, is hereby amended as follows: a)
by adding to the first paragraph of the Preamble the
following immediately following the phrase “…the long-term health of the
watershed”: “The relationship between Watershed plans and land use plans is
demonstrated in Figure 2.6.” b)
by deleting the first four bullets from the second
paragraph of the Preamble and replacing with the following three bullets: · “Document the
existing condition of the natural environment heritage system within the
watershed; · Identify the
significant · Assess the
potential impacts of existing and future land-use activities, including
cumulative impacts, and recommend measures to avoid or mitigate these;” c)
by deleting from policy 3.a the phrase “ecological
features and resources” and replacing it as follows: “the natural heritage system”; d)
by adding to the end of policy 3.a immediately
following the phrase “including headwater areas” a new phrase as follows: “and other surface water and groundwater features”; e)
by deleting from the second sentence of policy 7.c the
word “should” where it immediately follows the phrase “A subwatershed
plan” and replacing it as follows: [Mod 13] “shall”; f)
by deleting from the fourth sentence of policy 7.c
the phrase “natural areas” where it immediately follows the phrase “will identify
the” and replacing it as follows: “natural heritage system areas”; g)
by adding to the end of the fourth sentence of
policy 7.c immediately following the phrase “to secure these areas” a new
phrase as follows” “and to ensure development has no negative
impact on the system.”; h)
by adding to the sixth sentence of policy 7.c
immediately following the phrase “Where the requirement for the subwatershed plan is waived,” a new phrase as follows: “the natural heritage system will be identified in keeping with the
policies of this Plan along with measures to ensure development has no
negative impact on the system.” ; i)
by capitalizing the word “natural” at the beginning
of the phrase “natural areas that are worthy of protection…” so as to create
a seventh sentence in policy 7.c as follows: “Natural areas that are worthy of protection will be identified and
mechanisms to secure these lands will be established.”; j)
by deleting policy 8.a and replacing it as follows: “a. The natural features and their functions
that comprise the natural heritage
k)
by adding to policy 8.b immediately following the
phrase “protection of headwater areas,” a new phrase as follows: “surface water and groundwater features,”; l)
by deleting from policy 11.a the phrase “creek
corridor widths” and replacing it as follows: “setbacks from surface water features”; m)
by deleting from policy 11.b the phrase “,such as
creeks,”; |
33 |
3.2 Natural Environment |
Amend
the preamble to Section 3.2 by: 1.
in the first sentence deleting the words ‘South and
East of the Canadian Shield’; 2.
in the second sentence deleting the words ‘a
significant part’ and replacing them with the word ‘most’ and inserting the
word ‘heritage’ between the words ‘natural’ and ‘system’. 3.
after the first paragraph insert the following: “The designation of Significant
Wetland identifies wetlands that have been evaluated against provincial
criteria by the Ministry of Natural Resources and that have been assessed as
having provincial significance. The
other environmental designations include other wetlands, plus significant
woodlands and wildlife habitat that contribute to the City’s natural heritage
system and protect biodiversity. Not all significant features are designated
in the Plan. These features are protected by other policies within the Plan,
including requirements for an environmental impact statement for development
proposed within or adjacent to the natural heritage system defined in section
2.4.2. The natural heritage system is
also protected by policies in Section 4 regarding erosion prevention,
protection of surface water and groundwater resources, and protection of the
habitat of endangered and threatened species.” 4.
amend the fifth bullet in the former second
paragraph by adding the word ‘and’ before and the words ‘threatened species’,
replacing the word ‘vulnerable’ with the words ‘and species of concern’ and
deleting the word ‘other’. |
Further
amend as follows: Amend
the preamble to Section 3.2 by: 1.
in the first sentence deleting the words ‘South and
East of the Canadian Shield’; 2.
in the second sentence deleting the words ‘a
significant part’ and replacing them with the word ‘most’ and inserting the
word ‘heritage’ between the words ‘natural’ and ‘system’. 3.
after the first paragraph insert the following: “The designation of Significant
Wetland identifies wetlands that have been evaluated against provincial
criteria by the Ministry of Natural Resources and that have been assessed as
having provincial significance. The
other environmental designations may include other wetlands, plus significant woodlands and significant wildlife
habitat that contribute to the City’s natural heritage system and protect
biodiversity. Not all significant features are designated in the Plan. These
features are protected by other policies within the Plan, including
requirements for an environmental impact statement for development proposed
within or adjacent to the natural heritage system defined in Section 2.4.2. The natural heritage system is also
protected by policies in Section 4 regarding erosion prevention, protection
of surface water and groundwater resources, and protection of the significant habitat of
endangered and threatened species.” 4.
amend the fifth bullet in the former second
paragraph by adding the word ‘and’ before and the words ‘threatened
species’, replacing the word ‘vulnerable’ with the words ‘and species of special concern’ and
deleting the word ‘other’. |
35 |
|
Amend Section 3.2.1 Policy
1 by adding the following text at the end: “The
policies of this section will be applied to lands where the Ministry of
Natural Resources has identified new wetlands or has revised wetland
boundaries, regardless of whether the new wetlands or new boundaries are
designated in this Plan. Council may consider exceptions where the
land has the current required approvals under the Planning Act.” [Mod 27] |
Further
amend as follows (recommended additional edits highlighted in green): Amend Section 3.2.1 Policy
1 by adding the following text at the end: “The
policies of this section will also be applied to lands where the Ministry of Natural Resources
has identified new significant
wetlands or has revised significant
wetland boundaries, regardless of whether the new significant wetlands or |
40 |
|
Amend
Section 3.2.1 Policy 9 by: 1.
deleting the words “adjustment to the definition of
features and functions and”
and the words “interpretation of “ in the second sentence; and [Mod 30] 2.
deleting the words “an amendment to”
and replacing the word “required” with the word “amended” in the fifth
sentence: and 3.
inserting before the last sentence of the policy the
following new sentence: “In the period between
identification of changes to wetland boundaries by the Ministry of Natural
Resources and amendment to this Plan, the policies of this section will apply
to the Significant Wetlands as identified by the Ministry of Natural
Resources.” |
Further
amend as follows (recommended additional edits highlighted in green): Amend
Section 3.2.1 Policy 9 by: 1.
deleting the words “adjustment to the definition of
features and functions and”
and the words “interpretation of “ in the second sentence; and [Mod 30] 2.
deleting the words “an amendment to”
and replacing the word “required” with the word “amended” in the fifth
sentence: and 3.
inserting before the last sentence of the policy the
following new sentence: “In the period between
identification of changes to significant
wetland boundaries by the Ministry of Natural Resources and amendment to this
Plan, the policies of this section will apply to the Significant Wetlands as
identified by the Ministry of Natural Resources.” |
49 |
|
Amend
Section 3.2.3 by deleting Policy 5 in its entirety and adding a new policy as
follows: “5. Development and site alteration will not be permitted for any
development within 30 metres of the boundary of a designated Urban Natural
Feature unless an Environmental Impact Statement demonstrates that there will
be no negative impacts on the natural features within the area or their
ecological functions. Definitions of these terms are provided in Section
4.7.8.” |
Further amend
as follows: Amend
Section 3.2.3 by deleting Policy 5 in its entirety and adding a new policy as
follows: 5. Development and site alteration will
not be permitted |
56 |
New Section |
Amend Section 3.2 by
adding the following new section after Section 3.2.4 as follows: “
3.2.5 - Flewellyn Special Study Area Land in the vicinity of Flewellyn
Road and Conley Road have been identified and designated on Schedule A as the
‘Flewellyn Special Study Area”. The purpose of this
overlay designation is to restrict development until such time as the
appropriate local studies are completed. Once the studies have been
completed, the City will amend this Plan to remove the Flewellyn
Special Study Area overlay designation and confirm the appropriate land use
designations and policies for the area.
Policies 1. Notwithstanding the
underlying designations on Schedule A of this Plan, no new development, as
defined in Section 4.7.8, will be permitted until the Flewellyn
Special Study Area overlay is removed. 2. Uses that lawfully exist on the date that
this provision comes into
force are recognized and may continue. [Mod 33.] |
Further amend as follows: Amend Section 3.2 by
adding the following new section after Section 3.2.4 as follows: “
3.2.5 - Flewellyn Special Study Area Land in the vicinity of Flewellyn
Road and Conley Road have been identified and designated on Schedule A as the
‘Flewellyn Special Study Area”. The purpose of this
overlay designation is to restrict development until such time as the In addition to the Flewellyn Special Study
Area policies, the Study Area remains subject to the Drainage By-law No. 2007
– 398 and former Township of Goulbourn Removal of
Topsoil By-law No. 45 - 86. Policies 1. Notwithstanding the
underlying designations on Schedule A of this Plan, no new development, as
defined in Section 4.7.8, will be permitted until the Flewellyn
Special Study Area overlay is removed. 2. Uses that lawfully exist on the date that
this provision comes into
force are recognized and may continue. [Mod 33.] |
195 |
4.7.1 Integrated Environmental Review to Assess Development Applications |
Section 4.7.1, Policy 1, sentence one is amended by: 2.
deleting the phrase ‘and major site plans and major’ and replacing it
with the phrase ‘site plan and’; and” [ Mod 48] 3.
inserting the words
‘requiring an EIS, or tree retention and protection plan or landscape feature
assessment,’ after the words ‘rezoning applications’. |
Further
amend as follows (recommended additional edits highlighted in green): Section 4.7.1, Policy 1, sentence one is amended by: 4.
deleting the phrase ‘and major site plans and major’ and replacing it
with the phrase ‘site plan and’; and” [ Mod 48] 5.
inserting the words
‘requiring an Environmental
Impact Statement, |
197 |
4.7.2 Protection of Vegetation Cover |
Section
4.7.2, Policy 1 is amended by: 1. inserting the words ‘condominium affecting
vegetation cover on site,’ after the words ‘applications for subdivision,’;
and 2. deleting the words ‘tree preservation and protection plan
an a landscape planting plan. The plans will:’
at the end of the policy and replacing them with the words ‘Tree Conservation
Report and a Landscape Plan.’ and 3. deleting the word ‘watercourses’ in policy 1a and replacing
it with the words ‘surface water features’. 4. inserting after Policy 1a the following new
policies: b)
Identify
the presence of endangered or threatened
species or their habitat as identified in Ontario Regulation 230/08 of
the Endangered Species Act, 2007 and provide recommendations for protection
measures to be used; c)
Demonstrate
how components of the proposed development, such as grading plans and the
location of buildings, roads, and infrastructure, support tree conservation
and design with nature;” and d)
deleting Polices 1e, 1f and 1g. |
Further amend as follows: Section 4.7.2, Policy 1 is amended by: 1. inserting the words ‘condominium affecting
vegetation cover on site,’ after the words ‘applications for subdivision,’;
and 2. deleting the words ‘tree preservation and protection plan
an a landscape planting plan. The plans will:’
at the end of the policy and replacing them with the words ‘Tree Conservation
Report and a Landscape Plan.’ and 3. deleting the word ‘watercourses’ in policy 1a and replacing
it with the words ‘surface water features’. 4. inserting after Policy 1a the following new
policies: b)
Identify
the presence of endangered or threatened
species or their habitat as identified in c)
Demonstrate
how components of the proposed development, such as grading plans and the
location of buildings, roads, and infrastructure, support tree conservation d)
deleting Polices 1e, 1f and 1g. |
221 |
|
Amend Section 4.7.8 by inserting before Policy 1 the following
policies: “1. An Environmental Impact
Statement is required for development and site alteration proposed within and
adjacent to natural heritage features designated as Rural Natural Features
and adjacent to land designated as Urban Natural Feature, Significant
Wetland, and Natural Environment Area.
It is also required for development and site alteration within or
adjacent to other elements of the natural heritage system, as required in
Section 2, that are not designated on Schedule A or B. 2. No development or site
alteration will be permitted within the natural features described in policy
1 above, where permitted by the policies of this Plan, or on adjacent lands
unless an Environmental Impact Statement indicates it will have no negative
impact, defined as degradation that threatens the health and integrity of the
natural features or ecological functions for which an area is identified due
to single, multiple or successive development or site alteration activities. 3. Development is defined
as creation of a new lot, a change in land use, or the construction of
buildings and structures, requiring approval under the Planning Act, but does
not include activities that create or maintain infrastructure authorized
under an environmental assessment process; or works subject to the Drainage
Act. 4. Site alteration is
defined as activities, such as grading, excavation and the placement of fill
that would change the landform and natural vegetative characteristics of a
site. 5. Ecological functions
are defined as: the natural processes, products or services that living and
non-living environments provide or perform within or between species,
ecosystems and landscapes, including biological physical and socio-economic
interactions. 6. The requirements for an
EIS adjacent to natural heritage features designated on Schedule A and B in
this Plan are described in Section 3.
The requirements for an EIS adjacent to the significant habitat of
endangered and threatened species and Earth Science Areas of Natural and
Scientific Interest are described in Section 4. 7.
Where significant woodlands, significant
wildlife habitat, significant valleylands or other
natural heritage features are not designated, development and site
alterations will not be permitted for: a) any development permitted under the
policies of this Plan within the feature; b) any development permitted under
the policies of this Plan within 120 metres of the feature in the rural
area;” c) any development permitted under the
policies of this Plan within 30 metres of the feature in the urban area;” unless an Environmental Impact Statement
demonstrates that there will be no negative impacts, as defined in section
4.7.8, on the natural heritage features or their ecological functions.[Mod
53] 8. The need for an Environmental Impact
Statement and its scope will be confirmed through pre-consultation with the
City early in the development review process, based on a preliminary
screening for natural environment features within and adjacent to the study
area. Aerial photographs, Annex 14 – Natural Heritage
System, watershed and subwatershed studies, field
investigations and other information sources such as the Natural Heritage
Information Centre may be consulted.
The screening should consider the potential for endangered or
threatened species habitat, significant woodlands, valleylands,
wetlands, and wildlife habitat that are not designated in the plan, in
accordance with the Provincial Policy Statement definition of significant and
the relevant identification and evaluation factors specified in the Natural
Heritage Reference Manual for the Provincial Policy Statement.”[Mod 53] |
Further
amend as follows (recommended additional edits highlighted in green): Amend Section 4.7.8 by inserting before Policy 1 the following
policies: “1. An Environmental Impact
Statement is required for development and site alteration proposed within and
adjacent to natural heritage features designated as Rural Natural Features
and adjacent to land designated as Urban Natural Feature, Significant
Wetland, and Natural Environment Area.
It is also required for development and site alteration within or
adjacent to other elements of the natural heritage system, as required in
Section 2, that are not designated on Schedule A or B. 2. No development or site
alteration will be permitted within the natural features described in policy
1 above, where permitted by the policies of this Plan, or on adjacent lands
unless an Environmental Impact Statement indicates it will have no negative
impact, defined as degradation that threatens the health and integrity of the
natural features or ecological functions for which an area is identified due
to single, multiple or successive development or site alteration activities. 3. Development is defined
as creation of a new lot, a change in land use, or the construction of
buildings and structures, requiring approval under the Planning Act, but does
not include activities that create or maintain infrastructure authorized
under an environmental assessment process; or works subject to the Drainage Act. 4. Site alteration is
defined as activities, such as grading, excavation and the placement of fill
that would change the landform and natural vegetative characteristics of a
site. 5. Ecological functions
are defined as: the natural processes, products or services that living and
non-living environments provide or perform within or between species,
ecosystems and landscapes, including biological physical and socio-economic
interactions. 6. The requirements for an
EIS adjacent to natural heritage features designated on Schedule A and B in
this Plan are described in Section 3.
The requirements for an EIS adjacent to the significant habitat of
endangered and threatened species and Earth Science Areas of Natural and Scientific
Interest are described in Section 4. 7.
Where significant woodlands, significant
wildlife habitat, significant valleylands or other
natural heritage features are not designated, development and site
alterations will not be permitted for: a) any development permitted under the
policies of this Plan within the feature; b) any development permitted under
the policies of this Plan within 120 metres of the feature in the rural
area;” c) any development permitted under
the policies of this Plan within 30 metres of the feature in the urban area;” unless an Environmental Impact Statement
demonstrates that there will be no negative impacts, as defined in section
4.7.8, on the natural heritage features or their ecological functions.[Mod
53] 8. The need for an Environmental Impact
Statement and its scope will be confirmed through pre-consultation with the
City early in the development review process, based on a preliminary
screening for natural environment features within and adjacent to the study
area. Aerial photographs, Annex 14 – Natural Heritage
System, watershed and subwatershed studies, field
investigations and other information sources such as the Natural Heritage
Information Centre may be consulted.
The screening should consider the potential for significant habitat of endangered and threatened species |
224 |
|
Section 4.7.8, Policy 2f is amended by: 1.
deleting the word ‘that’ and replacing it with the
word ‘of’ after the words ‘cumulative effects’ in the first sentence;
and 2.
deleting the words ‘(in
light of other known projects or activities in the area) may have’ and
replacing them with the words ‘and other known projects or activities within
or adjacent to the study area. The evaluation will access residual effects,’
and 3.
deleting the word
‘measures’ after the words ‘following mitigation,’ in the second
sentence. |
Further amend as follows: Section 4.7.8, Policy 2f is amended by: 4.
deleting the word ‘that’ and replacing it with the
word ‘of’ after the words ‘cumulative effects’ in the first sentence;
and 5.
deleting the words ‘(in
light of other known projects or activities in the area) may have’ and
replacing them with the words ‘and other 6.
deleting the word
‘measures’ after the words ‘following mitigation,’ in the second
sentence. 7.
|
SEE DOCUMENT 3 The row corresponding to Item 269
in Document 1 is replaced with Item 269 in Document 3 |
|||
|
|
|
|
DOCUMENT 2
DOCUMENT 3
REVISED ITEM 269
269 |
Schedule A, Rural Policy
Plan |
Schedule A, Rural Policy
Plan, is hereby amended as follows: 24)
by adding the
lands shown on Schedule R1 to this amendment and designating them as ‘Rural
Natural Features Area’, 25)
by
changing the designation for the lands
shown on Schedule R4 to this amendment from ‘General Rural Area’ to ‘Urban
Area’, 26)
by changing the
designation for the lands shown on Schedule R5 to this amendment from
‘Agricultural Resource Area’ to ‘General Rural Area’, 27)
by changing the
designation for the lands shown on Schedule R6 to this amendment: i)
from ‘General
Rural Area’ and ‘Rural Natural Features Area’ to ‘Village’ where indicated on
Schedule R6, and; ii)
from ‘General
Rural Area’ to ‘Village’ where indicated on Schedule R6, 28)
by changing the
designation for the lands shown on Schedule R7 to this amendment from ‘Sand
and Gravel Resource Area’ to ‘General Rural Area’, 29)
by changing the
designation for the lands shown on Schedule R9 to this amendment from
‘Natural Environment Area’ to ‘General Rural Area’, 30)
by changing the
designation for the lands shown on Schedule R10 to this amendment from ‘Rural
Natural Features Area’ to ‘Natural Environment Area’, 31)
by changing the
designation for the lands shown on Schedule R11 to this amendment from ‘Rural
Natural Features Area’ to ‘Natural Environment Area’, 32)
by designating
the lands shown on Schedule R15 to this amendment as ‘Flewellyn
Special Policy Area’, 33)
by changing the
designation for the lands shown on Schedule R17 to this amendment from
‘Agricultural Resource Area’ to ‘Urban Area’, 34)
by designating
the lands shown on Schedule R17 to this amendment: i)
as
‘Agricultural Resource Area’ where indicated on Schedule R17; ii)
as ‘General
Rural Area’ where indicated on Schedule R17; and, iii)
as ‘Major Open
Space’ where indicated on Schedule R17, 35)
by changing the
designation for the lands shown on Schedule R23 to this amendment: i)
from ‘General
Rural Area’ to Significant Wetlands’ where indicated on Schedule R23; and, ii)
from
‘Significant Wetlands’ to ‘General Rural Area’ where indicated on Schedule
R23, 36)
by changing the
designation for the lands shown on Schedule R25 to this amendment: i)
from ‘Natural
Environment Area’ to ‘Significant Wetlands’ where indicated on Schedule R25; ii)
from ‘General
Rural Area’ to ‘Significant Wetlands’ where indicated on Schedule R25; and, iii)
from ‘Rural
Natural Features Area’ to ‘Significant Wetlands’ where indicated on Schedule
R25, 37)
by changing the
designation for the lands shown on Schedule R26 to this amendment: i)
from ‘Natural
Environment Area’ to ‘Significant Wetlands’ where indicated on Schedule R26; ii)
from ‘General
Rural Area’ to ‘Significant Wetlands’ where indicated on Schedule R26; and, iii)
from ‘Rural
Natural Features Area’ to ‘Significant Wetlands’ where indicated on Schedule
R26 38)
by changing the
designation for the lands shown on Schedule R27 to this amendment: i)
from ‘General
Rural Area’ to ‘Significant Wetlands’ where indicated on Schedule R27; ii)
from
‘Significant Wetlands’ to ‘General Rural Area’ where indicated on Schedule
R27; iii)
from ‘Rural
Natural Features Area’ to ‘Significant Wetlands’ where indicated on Schedule
R27; iv)
from
‘Significant Wetlands’ to ‘Rural Natural Features Area’ where indicated on
Schedule R27; and, v)
from ‘Natural
Environment Area’ to ‘Significant Wetlands’ where indicated on Schedule R27, 39)
by changing the
designation for the lands shown on Schedule R28 to this amendment: i)
from
‘Significant Wetlands’ to ‘Agricultural Resource Area’ where indicated on
Schedule R28; ii)
from ‘Rural
Natural Features Area’ to ‘Significant Wetlands’ where indicated on Schedule
R28; and, iii)
from
‘Significant Wetlands’ to ‘Sand and Gravel Resource Area’ where indicated on
Schedule R28, 40)
by changing the
designation for the lands shown on Schedule R29 to this amendment: i)
from
‘Agricultural Resource Area’ to ‘Significant Wetlands’ where indicated on
Schedule R29; ii)
from ‘Significant Wetlands’ to ‘Agricultural
Resource Area’ where indicated on Schedule R29; iii)
from ‘Rural Natural Features Area’ to
‘Significant Wetlands’ where indicated on Schedule R29; iv)
from
‘Significant Wetlands’ to ‘General Rural Area’ where indicated on Schedule
R29; v)
from ‘General
Rural Area’ to ‘Significant Wetlands’ where indicated on Schedule R29; and, vi)
from ‘Major
Open Space’ to ‘Significant Wetlands’ where indicated on Schedule R29, 41)
by changing the
designation for the lands shown on Schedule R30 to this amendment: i)
from ‘Significant
Wetlands’ to ‘General Rural Area’ where indicated on Schedule R30; ii)
from ‘General
Rural Area’ to ‘Significant Wetlands’ where indicated on Schedule R30; iii)
from ‘Natural
Environment Area’ to ‘Significant Wetlands’ where indicated on Schedule R30;
and, iv)
from ‘Rural
Natural Features Area’ to ‘Significant Wetlands’ where indicated on Schedule
R30, 42)
by changing the
designation for the lands shown on Schedule R31 to this amendment: i)
from
‘Significant Wetlands’ to ‘General Rural Area’ where indicated on Schedule R31; ii)
from ‘General
Rural Area’ to ‘Significant Wetlands’ where indicated on Schedule R31; iii)
from ‘Rural
Natural Features Area’ to ‘Significant Wetlands’ where indicated on Schedule
R31; and, iv)
from
‘Significant Wetlands’ to ‘Rural Natural Features Area’ where indicated on
Schedule R31, 43)
by changing the
designation for the lands shown on Schedule R32 to this amendment: i)
from
‘Significant Wetlands’ to ‘General Rural Area’ where indicated on Schedule
R32; ii)
from ‘General
Rural Area’ to ‘Significant Wetlands’ where indicated on Schedule R32; iii)
from ‘Rural
Natural Features Area’ to ‘Significant Wetlands’ where indicated on Schedule
R32; and, iv)
from
‘Significant Wetlands’ to ‘Rural Natural Features Area’ where indicated on
Schedule R32, 44)
by changing the
designation for the lands shown on Schedule R35 to this amendment: i)
from
‘Agricultural Resource Area’ to ‘Future Urban Area’ where shown on Schedule
R35; ii)
from ‘General
Rural Area’ to ‘Future Urban Area’ where shown on Schedule R35; and, iii)
from ‘Natural
Environment Area’ to ‘Urban Area’ where shown on Schedule R35, 45)
by changing the
designation for the lands shown on Schedule R39 to this amendment: i)
from ‘Rural
Natural Features Area’ to ‘Natural Environment Area’ where indicated on
Schedule R39, ii)
from ‘General
Rural Area’ to ‘Natural Environment Area’ where indicated on Schedule R39, 46)
by changing the
designation for the lands shown on Schedule R44 to this amendment from
‘General Rural Area’ to ‘Future Urban Area’, |
Approve amendments to Schedule A as shown on
schedules R7, R9, R10, R11, R23, R25, R26, R27, R28, R29, R30,
R31, R32, and R39 Amend Schedule
R15 to reduce the area of land designated “Flewellyn
Special Study Area”on lands owned by Taggart and
identified by Muncaster Environmental. |
Flewellyn special study area - environmental
policies -proposed modificationsto OPA 76
AIRE D’ÉTUDE SPÉCIALE DE FLEWELLYN POLITIQUES
ENVIRONNEMENTALES - CHANGEMENTS PROPOSÉS À LA
MPO 76
ACS2011-CMR-LEG-0013 CITY WIDE / À
L’ÉCHELLE DE LA VILLE
REPORT
RECOMMENDATION:
That the
Agriculture and Rural Affairs Committee recommend Council endorse the
modifications to Official Plan Amendment No. 76 set forth in Documents 1 and 2
to this report.
The Committee received a
verbal overview of the staff report and recommendations from Mr. Tim Marc,
Senior Legal Counsel, Corporate Development and Environmental Law Branch, City
Clerk and Solicitor’s Department. Mr.
Marc said he wished it to be known that despite the fact that this report was
transmitted under the banner of the City’s Legal department, the planning analysis had actually been done by Planning
and Growth Management staff.
The following five delegations spoke to the report to express their views
and/or concerns:
Ms.
Ursula Melinz*, Soloway,
Wright for Thomas Cavanagh Construction Ltd.;
Mr. Ken
McRae (copy of presentation held on file);
Mr. Terry
Hale, Goulbourn
Landowners Group, Inc. (copy of
reference map held on file);
Mr. Mike Westley, Goulbourn Landowners Group, Inc.; and,
Mr.
Domenic Idone, R. W. Tomlinson (copy of
presentation held on file).
* Ms. Melinz expressed her endorsement of the proposals as
submitted by R.W. Tomlinson.
At the
request of staff, Committee approved the following motions to incorporate
corrections and modifications to the staff report:
MOTION No. ARA 7/1
Moved by
Councillor S. Moffatt:
That Agriculture and Rural Affairs Committee recommend Council approve
that the row corresponding to Item 269 in Document 1 be replaced with Item 269
in Document 3.
CARRIED
MOTION No. ARA 7/2
Moved by Councillor S. Moffatt:
That ARAC recommend to Council that the City Clerk and Solicitor be
directed to seek a modification to Section 4.7.3, Policy 3 such that it will
read as follows:
3. The setback provided for in
policies 1 and 2 will be implemented through the zoning by-law and any change
in the setback will require a zoning by-law amendment or variance that is
consistent with the policies in this section of the Plan.
CARRIED
MOTION No. ARA 7/3
Moved by Councillor S. Moffatt:
That the Agriculture and Rural Affairs Committee recommend Council
approve that the City Clerk and Solicitor be directed to seek a modification to
Section 3.2.5 such that it will read as follows:
3.2.5 – Flewellyn Special Study Area
Land in the vicinity of
In addition to the Flewellyn Special Study
Area policies, the Study Area remains subject to the Drainage By-law No. 2007 –
398 and former Township of Goulbourn Removal of
Topsoil By-law No. 45 - 86.
Policies
1. Notwithstanding
the underlying designations on Schedule A of this Plan, no new development, as
defined in Section 4.7.8, will be permitted until the Flewellyn
Special Study Area overlay is removed.
2. Uses
that lawfully exist on the date that this provision comes into force are
recognized and may continue. [Mod. 33.]
CARRIED
Following
Committee discussion, the report recommendations, as amended by Motions ARA
7/1, ARA 7/2 and ARA 7/3 and set out in full below, were then put to Committee:
That the Agriculture and Rural Affairs Committee recommend Council
endorse the modifications to Official Plan Amendment No. 76 set forth in
Documents 1 and 2 to this report, as amended by the following:
1. That
the row corresponding to Item 269 in Document 1 be replaced with Item 269 in
Document 3;
2. That the City Clerk and Solicitor be
directed to seek a modification to Section 4.7.3, Policy 3 such that it will
read as follows:
“3. The setback provided for in
policies 1 and 2 will be implemented through the zoning by-law and any change
in the setback will require a zoning by-law amendment or variance that is
consistent with the policies in this section of the Plan.”;
3. That the City Clerk and
Solicitor be directed to seek a modification to Section 3.2.5 such that it will
read as follows:
“3.2.5 – Flewellyn
Special Study Area
Land in the vicinity of
In addition to the Flewellyn Special Study Area policies, the Study Area
remains subject to the Drainage By-law No. 2007 – 398 and former Township of Goulbourn Removal of Topsoil By-law No. 45 - 86.
Policies
1. Notwithstanding
the underlying designations on Schedule A of this Plan, no new development, as
defined in Section 4.7.8, will be permitted until the Flewellyn
Special Study Area overlay is removed.
2. Uses
that lawfully exist on the date that this provision comes into force are
recognized and may continue. [Mod. 33.]”
CARRIED
directions to staff:
That Planning and Growth Management / Legal staff respond to the R.W.
Tomlinson submissions on the Flewellyn Special Study
Area Environmental Policies via memo to City Council prior to Council’s meeting
of 25 May 2011.