1.          DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY - REQUESTS FOR DONATION OF SURPLUS VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT

 

DÉLÉGATION DE POUVOIR – DEMANDES DE DON DE VÉHICULES ET ÉQUIPEMENT EXCÉDENTAIRES

 

 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS

 

That Council:

 

1.                  Delegate to Community and Protective Services Committee the authority to waive section (41) (4) under the purchasing By-law in order to allow Committee to consider donation requests for surplus stock.

 

2.                  Subject to approval of Recommendation 1 above, the exercise of this delegated authority shall be reported to Council on an annual basis. 

 

 

RecommandationS DU Comité

 

Que le Conseil :

 

1.                  délégue au Comité des services communautaires et de protection le pouvoir de suspendre l'application du paragraphe (41)(4) du Règlement municipal sur les achats afin de lui permettre de prendre en considération les demandes de don de matériel excédentaire;

 

2.                  si la recommandation 1 ci-dessus est approuvée, de recevoir un rapport annuel sur l'exercice du pouvoir délégué. 

 

 

 

Documentation

 

1.                  Deputy City Manager, City Operations report dated 14 April 2011 (ACS2011-COS-DCM-0001).

 

 

Report to/Rapport au:

 

Community and Protective Services Committee

Comité des services communautaires et de protection

 

and Council / et au Conseil

 

14 April 2011 / le 14 avril 2011

 

Submitted by/Soumis par:

Steve Kanellakos, Deputy City Manager/Directeur municipal adjoint,

City Operations/Opérations municipales 

 

Contact Person/Personne-ressource : Steve Kanellakos, Deputy City Manager/Directeur municipal adjoint, City Operations/Opérations municipale

613-580-2424, ext./poste 25654,Steve.Kanellakos@ottawa.ca

 

City Wide/ À l’échelle de la Ville

Ref N°: ACS2011-COS-DCM-0001

 

 

SUBJECT:

DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY - REQUESTS FOR DONATION OF SURPLUS VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT

 

 

OBJET :

DÉLÉGATION DE POUVOIR – DEMANDES DE DON DE VÉHICULES ET ÉQUIPEMENT EXCÉDENTAIRES

 

REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS

 

That the Community and Protective Services Committee recommend Council:

 

1.                  Delegate to Community and Protective Services Committee the authority to waive section (41) (4) under the purchasing By-law in order to allow Committee to consider donation requests for surplus stock.

 

2.                  Subject to approval of Recommendation 1 above, the exercise of this delegated authority shall be reported to Council on an annual basis. 

 

 

RECOMMANDATIONS DU RAPPORT

 

Que le Comité des services communautaires et de protection recommande au Conseil :

 

1.                  de déléguer au Comité des services communautaires et de protection le pouvoir de suspendre l'application du paragraphe (41)(4) du Règlement municipal sur les achats afin de lui permettre de prendre en considération les demandes de don de matériel excédentaire;

 

2.                  si la recommandation 1 ci-dessus est approuvée, de recevoir un rapport annuel sur l'exercice du pouvoir délégué. 

 

 

BACKGROUND

 

Over the years the city has been approached from time to time to donate decommissioned vehicles to nonprofit charitable organizations.  These vehicles have been used for agency programs within the city of Ottawa and some have been shipped (at the expense of the requestor) to other countries for humanitarian and compassionate reasons.

 

Section 41(4) of the City’s Purchasing By-law 2000-50 states that:

 

the sale of surplus furniture, vehicles, equipment, stock, supplies and other goods and material shall be made to the highest responsive bidder and the sale shall be made in accordance with the provisions of this by-law where applicable.”

 

The Policy respecting the Disposal of Fleet Assets (received by the former Corporate Services and Economic Development Committee at its meeting of May 6, 2008) clarified the procedure respecting requests for donated vehicles as follows:

 

In some cases the City may be requested or lobbied to donate a surplus unit to a specific cause or institution. This option is to be exercised under City Council directive only. Details for this option will be carried out as per Council directive for each individual case.

 

Accordingly, each time a donation has been requested a motion has been brought forward to Council to waive Subsection 41(4) of the By-law in order to vote on the subject of the donation.

 

Since amalgamation, there have been a few occasions where there has been extensive debate at Council regarding the donation of decommissioned vehicles.  Most recently, in October of 2009, after a lengthy debate over the donation of three decommissioned ambulances a number of Councillors expressed concern that such requests should not be coming forward to full Council for deliberation. 

 

The recommendations of this report will delegate authority to the Community and Protective Services Committee to consider requests for the donation of surplus vehicles and equipment given that typically it is emergency vehicles such as ambulances and fire trucks that are requested for purposes that fall within mandate of the CPS Committee.

 

 

DISCUSSION

The recommendations in this report respond to the Council direction described above and are also in keeping with the recommendations of the Mid-Term Governance Report (approved by Council at its meeting of June 24, 2009) with respect to giving expanded delegation of authority to Standing Committees as final decision makers on items within their mandate in order to reduce the number of transactional items at City Council.

Should Council approve these recommendations, it will allow for consideration to be given to the occasional request for the donation of surplus vehicles to be dealt with outside of Council while maintaining the principles of By-law 2000-50 (41) (4) established to ensure maximum value / return for disposed units in accordance with the Purchasing By-law.   

The Corporate Policy would then be revised and read as follows:

“In some cases the City may be requested to donate a surplus unit to a specific cause or institution. This option is to be exercised under the Community and Protective Services Committee only after a written request from the requesting nonprofit charitable organization has been received by the Committee Chair. Details for this option will be carried out as per Community and Protective Services Committee directive for each individual case.”

CONCLUSION

 

It would be business as usual for the disposal of surplus City vehicles and equipment, assuring maximum value / return for disposed units in accordance with the Purchasing By-law.  This value typically ranges anywhere from 3 to 7 % of the original purchase cost of the unit involved and is credited to the fleet reserve fund which assists the City in the purchase of replacement vehicles.  In most cases, agencies seeking surplus vehicles are amenable to paying the salvage value of the vehicle but the donation provision would allow Committee to consider unique or compelling circumstances that may merit the donation of a vehicle.

 

In accordance with the process set forth in this report, the exercise of this delegated authority would be reported to Council on an annual basis, as an additional line to the yearly Replacement Plan Report detailing donations for the past fiscal year.

 

 

RURAL IMPLICATIONS

 

There are no specific rural implications associated with this report.

 

 

CONSULTATION

 

Internal consultation between Fleet Services Branch, Supply Management Division and Legal was conducted.  As this is an administrative matter no external consultation was conducted.

 

 

COMMENTS BY THE WARD COUNCILLOR

 

N/A

 

 

LEGAL/RISK MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS

 

There are no legal or risk management implications associated with this information report.

 

 

CITY STRATEGIC PLAN

 

N/A

 

 

TECHNICAL IMPLICATIONS

 

N/A

 

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

 

There are no financial implications associated with this information report.

 

 

DISPOSITION

 

Staff will action any direction received as part of consideration of this report.