1.             2011 DRAFT OPERATING ESTIMATES – COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT

 

PRÉVISIONS PRÉLIMINAIRES DU BUDGET DE FONCTIONNEMENT DE 2011 – COMITÉ DE DÉROGATION

 

 

 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

 

That Council, sitting as Committee of the Whole, approve the 2011 Draft Operating Estimates for the Committee of Adjustment.

 

 

Recommandation du ComitÉ

 

Que le Conseil, siégeant à titre de Comité plénier, approuve les prévisions budgétaires préliminaires de 2011 du budget de fonctionnement 2011, pour le Comité de dérogation, au Comité plénier du Conseil.

 

 

DOCUMENTATION

 

1.      Chair, Committee of Adjustment’s report dated 31 January 2011 (ACS2011-CCS-PLC-0002)

 

2.      Minutes of the Planning Committee meeting of 8 February 2011

 

 


 

 

Report to/Rapport au:

 

Planning Committee

 

and Council / et au Conseil

 

31 January 2011 / le 31 janvier 2011

 

Submitted by/Soumis par : Gilles E. Girard, Chair, Committee of Adjustment / Président du Comité de dérogation

 

Contact Person/Personne ressource : Heather MacLean, Secretary-Treasurer, Committee of Adjustment / Secrétaire-trésorière du Comité de dérogation

 (613) 580-2424 extension / poste 13049, Heather.MacLean@ottawa.ca

 

City Wide/à l'échelle de la Ville

Ref N°: ACS2011-CCS-PLC-0002

 

 

SUBJECT:

2011 DRAFT OPERATING ESTIMATES – COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT

 

 

OBJET :

PRÉVISIONS PRÉLIMINAIRES DU BUDGET DE FONCTIONNEMENT DE 2011 – Comité de dérogation

 

 

REPORT RECOMMENDATION0

 

That the Planning Committee approve and recommend to the Committee of the Whole of Council the 2011 Draft Estimates for the Committee of Adjustment.

 

 

RECOMMANDATION DU RAPPORT

 

Que le Comité de l’urbanisme approuve et recommande les prévisions préliminaires du budget de fonctionnement 2011, pour le Comité de dérogation, au Comité plénier du Conseil.

 

 

 

BACKGROUND

 

On December 8, 2010, Council, while considering the 2010-2014 Council Governance Review report, approved a 2011 Budget process as outlined in that report.  Also on that date, Council passed the following motion which directed the City Treasurer to report to Council with a more detailed timetable, including suggested Standing Committee review dates, and budget development guidelines.  This report responds to that Council motion:

 

“THAT the City Treasurer be directed to bring a report forward to the December 15, 2010 meeting of City Council that includes a more specific timetable for budget and an overview of how staff will approach the development of a draft budget.”

 

The specific timetable for the tax supported budget approved by Council on December 15, 2010 expanded on the budget timetable which was included in the Governance report as follows;

 

·         Receive a City Budget overview report and table the budget reports for each Standing Committee and Boards of Council (Library & Police) at a special meeting of Council on January 19, 2011.

·         Committees of Council will consider public delegations, review budgets and recommend a budget to Council during regularly scheduled meetings over the first three weeks in February 2011.

·         Boards and Committees of Council will consider public delegations, review budgets and recommend a budget to Council prior to March 8, 2011.

·         Five multi-ward bilingual budget consultation meetings organized by staff (centre, east, west, south, rural) will take place over the final week of February.

·         Council will deliberate and adopt the budgets from each of the Standing Committees and Boards as a Committee of the Whole on Tuesday March 8th to Thursday March 10, 2011.

 

 

DISCUSSION

 

The 2011 Draft Operating Estimates were developed based on a projected number of applications, and meet Council’s directive to be 100% cost recoverable.

 

The Committee of Adjustment is a quasi-judicial tribunal appointed by City Council, and is independent and autonomous from the City Administration.  The Committee of Adjustment was established to process, in accordance with the legislative requirements of the Planning Act, all applications received for Consents to Conveyances, Applications for Validation of Title, Applications for Power of Sale/Foreclosure, and Applications for Minor Variances/Permission from the City’s Comprehensive Zoning By-laws.

 

 RURAL IMPLICATIONS

 

There are no specific rural implications associated with this report.

 

 

CONSULTATION

 

The public consultation on the Draft Operating and Capital estimates will be conducted at the standing committee meetings, through ward meetings and the public delegations sessions to be held from March 8th to 10th by Committee of the Whole of Council. 

 

 

LEGAL/RISK MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS:

 

There are no legal/risk management impediments to implementing the recommendations in this report.

 

Applicants on individual matters before the Committee of Adjustment have the ability, as with development applications to the City, to appeal the fees imposed to the Ontario Municipal Board.

 

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

 

Financial implications are identified within the report. 

 

SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION

 

Document 1 - 2011 Draft Operating Estimates

 

DISPOSITION

 

Estimates will be amended as per this Standing Committees adoption and forwarded to the Committee of the Whole of Council for further consideration.


 

2011 DRAFT OPERATING ESTIMATES – COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT               

PRÉVISIONS PRÉLIMINAIRES DU BUDGET DE FONCTIONNEMENT DE 2011 – COMITÉ DE DÉROGATION                                                                                                                      

ACS2011-CCS-PLC-0002                        CITY WIDE / À L'ÉCHELLE DE LA VILLE

 

Phil Brown, Vice-Chair of the Committee of Adjustment, provided an overview of the 2011 draft operating budget for the Committee of Adjustment.  A copy of his presentation is held on file with the City Clerk.

 

Councillor Bloess raised concerns about the fact that all Committee of Adjustment hearings are held at Ben Franklin Place on Centrepointe Drive, suggesting it was challenging for east end residents to attend. 

 

Mr. Brown explained that there were several factors affecting why hearings were not scheduled at multiple locations.  Firstly, there is the difficulty of scheduling space in municipal facilities.  Secondly, the panels are structured on an urban/suburban/rural basis rather than an east-west basis.  There are not sufficient volumes of applications from one area of the City to justify a separate panel; if the panels were to meet less frequently, there is a risk of not meeting statutory obligations that require the matter to be heard within 30 days.  He noted that servicing multiple locations would increase the operating costs. He suggested Ben Franklin Place was relatively central, given the geographic area covered by the Committee.

 

As to whether there would be the possibility for a separate panel for the east end, Mr. Brown noted that the panels affected by such a proposal (panels 2 and 3) were the ones with the last number of applications already.  He indicated that it would require a direction from Council for the Committee of Adjustment to re-examine its panel structure.

 

Councillor Monette echoed Councillor Bloess’ concerns with respect to the location of the panels, noting he had heard concerns from his residents. He suggested reviewing the applications for a given meeting to determine the most appropriate place to hold the meeting. 

 

Councillor Blais had similar concerns with respect to the locations. He suggested the possibility of video conferencing to allow parties to participate remotely in the meetings.

 

Committee approved the Committee of Adjustment budget, as presented. 

 

That the Planning Committee approve and recommend to the Committee of the Whole of Council the 2011 Draft Estimates for the Committee of Adjustment.

 

                                                                                                CARRIED