4.                  ZONING - 3628 NAVAN ROAD

 

ZONAGE - 3628, CHEMIN NAVAN

 

 

Committee recommendation as amended

 

(This application is subject to Bill 51)

 

That Council reject an amendment to the former City of Gloucester Zoning By-law to change the zoning of part of 3628 Navan Road from Fg - Future Growth Area Zone to Fg(T1) – Future Growth Temporary Use One Zone as shown in Document 1 and as detailed in Document 2.

 

 

Recommandation modifiÉe du Comité

 

(Cette demande est assujettie au Règlement 51)

 

Que le Conseil rejette la modification du Règlement de zonage de l’ancienne ville de Gloucester visant à permettre de changer le zonage d’une partie du 3628, chemin Navan de Fg – zone de croissance future – à Fg (T1) – zone de croissance future, utilisation temporaire 1 – comme le montre le Document 1 et le décrit le Document 2.

 

 

Documentation

 

1.      Deputy City Manager's report Planning, Transit and the Environment dated 1 November 2007 (ACS2007-PTE-APR-0173).

 

2.      Extract of Draft Minutes, 13 November 2007.


Report to/Rapport au :

 

Planning and Environment Committee

Comité de l'urbanisme et de l'environnement

 

and Council / et au Conseil

 

01 November 2007 / le 01 novembre 2007

 

Submitted by/Soumis par : Nancy Schepers, Deputy City Manager

Directrice municipale adjointe,

Planning, Transit and the Environment

Urbanisme, Transport en commun et Environnement

 

Contact Person/Personne ressource : Karen Currie, Manager / Gestionnaire, Development Approvals / Approbation des demandes d'aménagement

(613) 580-2424, 28310  Karen.Currie@ottawa.ca

 

Innes (2)

Ref N°: ACS2007-PTE-APR-0173

 

 

SUBJECT:

ZONING - 3628 Navan road - d02-02-07-0065

 

 

OBJET :

ZONAGE - 3628, chemin navan

 

REPORT RECOMMENDATION

 

That the  recommend Council approve an amendment to the former City of Gloucester Zoning By-law to change the zoning of part of 3628 Navan Road from Fg - Future Growth Area Zone to Fg(T1) – Future Growth Temporary Use One Zone as shown in Document 1 and as detailed in Document 2.

 

RECOMMANDATION DU RAPPORT

 

Que le Comité de l'urbanisme et de l'environnement recommande au Conseil d’approuver la modification du Règlement de zonage de l’ancienne ville de Gloucester visant à permettre de changer le zonage d’une partie du 3628, chemin Navan de Fg – zone de croissance future – à Fg (T1) – zone de croissance future, utilisation temporaire 1 – comme le montre le Document 1 et le décrit le Document 2.

 

BACKGROUND

 

The subject site is a vacant 4.6-hectare property located on the south side of Navan Road and west of Mer Bleue Road. To the south of the site is an abandoned Canadian Pacific rail line and the Mer Bleue Bog. The Waste Services Inc. (WSI) waste disposal facility is situated nearby to the west.

 

The area is characterized by a variety of uses including commercial, industrial and residential, the main land use in the area being the WSI site. A watercourse known as the Ottawa Front Municipal Drain traverses the site.

 

The subject property is currently zoned Fg – Future Growth Area Zone and HFg – Holding Future Growth Area Zone. The Fg zone permits limited uses including existing legally established uses as well as agriculture, riding stables and outdoor recreational uses. The intent of the Fg zone is to preserve land for future urban development and to restrict uses in order not to impede the future development.

 

The purpose of the application is to amend the Zoning By-law in order to permit a temporary construction materials recycling operation on the site.

 

Details of Proposed Use

 

The proposed amendment would allow the sorting, processing and temporary storage of construction and demolition materials on the site. The materials to be processed will be mainly construction waste from new home construction and will consist primarily of wood, drywall, masonry and metals. The intent is to process 200 tonnes of construction and demolition waste daily. There will be no disposal of waste or the handling of liquid, hazardous or toxic material.

 

The sorting, processing and temporary storage area would be limited to approximately 1.24 hectares of the 4.6 hectares and would be located where the property widens out at the end of an existing access road, about 350 metres south of Navan Road and just north of the watercourse.

 

The construction waste will be transported via trucks to the sorting and processing area, where the material will be unloaded and sorted into separate containers for processing. Before unloading, each container will be inspected to ensure it contains only approved materials for processing.

 

Sorted materials that can be recycled would then be processed as necessary. Some recyclable materials, mainly wood products, will be processed on site using a mobile shredder. The material would then be stored temporarily on site until it is picked up for further processing elsewhere. Any non-recyclable materials remaining would be placed into containers and transported to a waste disposal site. No permanent structures of any kind are being proposed on the site.

 

DISCUSSION

 

The Official Plan designation for the site is Developing Community with the underlying designation being General Urban Area. The General Urban Area designation permits a wide range of uses including all types and densities of housing, as well as employment, retail, service, industrial, cultural, leisure, greenspace, entertainment and institutional uses.

 

The Developing Community designation identifies parts of the city that are undeveloped or substantially underdeveloped that offer opportunity for new residential development at increased intensities and opportunities to create complete, sustainable communities.

The completion of a Community Design Plan is generally required prior to any development being approved in a Developing Community.

 

The property is also situated within the 500-metre Active Solid Waste Disposal Site influence area. Any proposed uses within this influence area must demonstrate that the active waste disposal site will not have an impact on the proposed use and that there will be no impacts on continuing waste disposal operations from the proposed use. In considering development proposals within the influence area, the City will be guided by the nature of the land use and will generally consider compatible uses, such as waste-processing facilities and other industrial uses.

 

The location of the property within the Active Solid Waste Disposal Site influence area imposes strict limitations on the types of uses that can be accommodated and the development potential of the property for the foreseeable future. Many of the more sensitive and lucrative uses permitted under the policies of the Developing Community and General Urban Area designations will not be appropriate until the waste disposal site is decommissioned and rehabilitated in part or in whole.

 

The Province has recently approved WSI’s environmental assessment for its proposed expansion of the waste disposal site, which will potentially extend the life of the facility for the next 11 years. The southern portion of the proposed construction materials recycling operation borders the WSI property, and due to the potential expansion of the waste disposal facility, will be within the influence area for years to come.

 

The proposed construction materials recycling operation is compatible with the adjacent waste disposal site, which makes it an appropriate use to be located within the influence area. It is one of the few uses that can be established on the site, without undermining the intent of the Developing Community policies. The temporary nature of the operation makes it is an ideal transitional use for the area. The property can be readily adapted for redevelopment as necessary once the overall area is suitable for development in conjunction with the policies of the Official Plan and the future Community Design Plan.

 

Compatibility with Adjacent Uses

 

The uses surrounding the site are varied, which reflects the transitional nature of the area. The proposed construction materials recycling operation is in keeping with many of the existing commercial and industrial uses in the area, which include many land extensive uses, many of which are construction related. The proposed operation is compatible and will not have an impact on any of these uses, including the WSI waste disposal site.

 

Any potential impact on the residential uses in the area is anticipated to be minimal due to the scale and function of the proposed construction materials recycling operation as well as the mitigating measures included in the development.


The processing area will be located approximately 350 metres from Navan Road and 240 metres from the nearest residential dwelling unit and will be surrounded on three sides by a 6.0-metre high landscaped berm. The distance of the processing area from Navan Road as well as the berm will act to buffer the operation from any residential uses along Navan Road, providing both noise attenuation as well as visual screening. 

 

A solid wood site obscuring fence 3.0 metres in height is proposed along the front property line and for a distance of 150 metres along the east and west property lines adjacent to access driveway in order to mitigate any impact from truck traffic to adjacent residential uses.

 

The shredder to be used in the processing area is specifically designed to be used in urban and suburban settings where noise and dust can be an issue. A noise study produced by the applicant indicates that the proposed operation complies with the Ministry of the Environment guidelines and determined that noise levels generated are not in excess of existing noise levels along Navan Road and would not adversely impact the existing noise environment of the area.

 

Traffic Issues 

 

The proposed construction materials recycling operation is situated on one of many rural arterial roads within the Urban Boundary. The traffic brief provided with the application indicates that the existing vehicle traffic, for this section of Navan Road, is well below the maximum vehicle levels that a rural arterial road can accommodate.

 

It is anticipated that the proposed construction materials recycling operation will generate 30‑50 truck trips daily. This includes trucks bringing waste to the site to be sorted, off-site trips for further processing of recyclable materials and trips of non-recyclable material to the waste disposal facility.

 

When considering peak period, heavy vehicle traffic currently averages approximately 500 vehicles per day for this area; the number of truck trips associated with the proposed use is minimal. Navan Road can accommodate the anticipated traffic and continue to function well below the maximum vehicle traffic standards for an arterial road.

 

It should be noted that there is the potential that a percentage of the 30-50 truck trips associated with the proposed construction materials recycling operation, will include existing truck traffic that in the past transported construction waste to the WSI waste disposal site. A percentage of this truck traffic could potentially be redirected to the proposed operation for recycling, which could reduce the overall net increase in traffic.

 

Details of Proposed Zoning

 

The proposed Zoning By-law amendment would create an exception to the Fg –Future Growth Area Zone, which would permit the outdoor processing, temporary storage and sorting of construction and demolition materials on the site for a temporary period of three years. No permanent buildings or structures would be permitted.

 

The temporary zone will be limited to the area fronting onto Navan Road, the access driveway and processing area. The remaining portion of the property will remain zoned HFg as indicated on Document 1. Many of the mitigating features identified by the proponents have been incorporated into the temporary zone, and are outlined on Document 2.

 

Summary

 

A large percentage of waste entering landfill sites in Ottawa is associated with the construction and demolition industry. The proposed construction materials recycling operation will help both the City and Province meet their waste reduction objectives by diverting approximately 200 tonnes of construction waste material daily, including wood, drywall, masonry and metals, that would have traditionally ended up as landfill.

 

The proposed construction materials recycling operation is an ideal transitional use for the area and is appropriate for this site since it complies with the Ottawa Official Plan policies and is compatible with the adjacent uses.

 

The use will have no permanent status and will require an additional application and review to extend the use beyond the three-year temporary period. This allows the City the ability to reassess the appropriateness of the use continuing based on any possible changes in the development potential of the area and to review any potential functionality issues.

 

The Department recommends approval of an amendment to add an exception to the Fg –Future Growth Area Zone that adds as a temporary use, a construction materials recycling operation, subject to the limitations outlined in Document 2.

 

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS

 

Under the Environmental Protection Act (EPA) the proposed use is considered a Waste Processing Site and is subject to approval under the Ministry of the Environment (MOE). Under the EPA and the Ontario Water Resources Act, the applicant requires various Certificates of Approval from the MOE before operations can commence. These include Waste Processing, Air and Noise and Water Certificates of Approval. The Provincial environmental review and approvals process is extremely comprehensive and stringent and will ensure that the potential for impacts on the environment are minimal.

 

The MOE when reviewing the Waste Processing Certificate of Approval considers a range of factors including waste types and quantities, process and equipment to be utilized in the operation, design of waste storage area, vehicle access to the site, site operations including hours of operation, fencing, etc.

 

As part of the Certificate of Approval process for Air and Noise, an Emissions and Dispersion Modeling (ESDM) Report and a Noise Impact Assessment (NIA) Study were completed. Both ESDM and NIA concluded that the proposed use complies with MOE guidelines and relevant provincial and municipal regulations.

 

A Water Certificate of Approval is also required. A drainage study was prepared as part of the submission requirement, which addressed the separate control of all stormwater runoff originating from the proposed operation. The drainage study must include, a description and plan of the stormwater management system, determination of the volume of runoff (and design for storage) associated with 20-year storm and grading of ditches and surface elevations indicating direction of drainage.

 

At the time of the Zoning Amendment Report approvals from the MOE are still outstanding.

 

In consultation with the South Nation Conservation Authority, it was determined that a 15-metre setback should be maintained between the top of bank of the watercourse on the site and any development. This setback has been reflected in the proposed by-law details. 

 

The sorting, processing and temporary storage area is approximately 350 metres from the Mer Bleue Bog. The National Capital Commission (NCC) has been consulted regarding the proposed Zoning By-law amendment and have no comments on the proposed use.

 

CONSULTATION

 

Notice of this application was carried out in accordance with the City's Public Notification and Consultation Policy.  The Ward Councillor is aware of this application and the staff recommendation. A Public Information Meeting was held on September 10, 2007. Detailed comments and responses from the Public Notification and Consultation process are contained in Document 3.

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

 

N/A

 

APPLICATION PROCESS TIMELINE STATUS

 

The application was not processed by the "On Time Decision Date" established for the processing of Zoning By-law amendments due to the complexity of the issues associated with the location of the processing area adjacent to the watercourse.

 

SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION

 

Document 1      Location Map

Document 2      Details of Recommended Zoning

Document 3      Consultation Details


 

DISPOSITION

 

City Clerk’s Branch, Council and Committee Services to notify the owner, Millenn Construction Inc. 5460 Canotek Road, Unit 109, Ottawa, ON, K1H 9H2, applicant, Kevin Harper, IBI Group, 1770 Woodward Drive, Suite 200, Ottawa, ON, K2C 0P8, OttawaScene.com, 174 Colonnade Road, Unit #33, Ottawa, ON  K2E 7J5, Ghislain Lamarche, Program Manager, Assessment, Financial Services Branch (Mail Code:  26-76) of City Council’s decision.

 

Planning, Transit and the Environment Department to prepare the implementing by-law, forward to Legal Services Branch and undertake the statutory notification.

 

Legal Services Branch to forward the implementing by-law to City Council.


LOCATION MAP                                                                                                  DOCUMENT 1

 


DETAILS OF RECOMMENDED ZONING                                                       DOCUMENT 2

 

Details of Recommended Zoning

 

1.         The land as shown on Document 1 is to be rezoned from Fg, Future Growth to Fg(T1), Future Growth Temporary One

 

2.         A temporary zone, Fg(T1), will be added to Section 13 including the following requirements:

 

-                     a waste processing facility, limited to the exterior processing, temporary storage, sorting and recycling of construction and demolition material, is permitted for a temporary period of three years. The processing of liquid, hazardous or toxic materials shall not be permitted,

-                     flood or erosion control facilities shall be permitted

-                     the storage, processing or sorting of material is not permitted within 250 metres of Navan Road,

-                     no permanent structures are permitted,

-                     a temporary office trailer accessory to the main use is permitted,

-                     a building line requirement of 6.0 metres from the accessory temporary trailer office to any lot line shall be maintained,

-                     a minimum of four (4) parking spaces or one space per 20 square metres of gross floor area of office space, whichever is greater, shall be provided,

-                     15-metre minimum setback for any development from top of bank of the watercourse known as the “Ottawa Front Municipal Drain” is required,

-                     a fully sight obscuring buffer having a minimum height of 1.8 metres shall be provided between any parking area and any residential use or zone.

-                     a fully sight obscuring buffer having a minimum height of 1.8 metres shall be provided along the side property lines for a distance of 150 metres from the front property line.

-                     11.1.4.7 does not apply.

-                     11.1.4.10 does not apply.

-                     frontage (minimum) 36 metres,

-                     lot size (minimum) 4.6 hectares.

 

 


CONSULTATION DETAILS                                                                                DOCUMENT 3

 

NOTIFICATION AND CONSULTATION PROCESS

 

Notification and public consultation was undertaken in accordance with the Public Notification and Public Consultation Policy approved by City Council for Zoning By-law amendments.  One public information meeting was also held in the community.

SUMMARY OF PUBLIC INPUT

The summary of public comments includes comments from the Public Notification and Public Consultation process as well as from the public information meeting held September 10, 2007.

 

Fifteen members of the community attended the Public Information Meeting and prior to the meeting two comments on the application where received from the public, against the proposed Zoning Amendment.

 

The main concerns that came out of the public consultation process included:

 

Traffic – Concern regarding the potential increase in traffic on Navan Road from the proposed use as well as traffic issues relating trucks waiting to turn off Navan Road onto the lane.

 

Response – The traffic brief provided with the application indicates that Navan Road currently handles well below the maximum traffic amounts recommended for a rural arterial road. The current heavy truck traffic volume during the peak day period is approximately 500 vehicles per day. The proposed use will generate between 30-50 truck trips. The facility is proposing to operate weekdays between the peak periods of 7:00am and 6:00pm. Based on the potential truck trips associated with the use, the average hourly truck traffic entering the site would be between three and four trucks. When compared to the existing amount of truck traffic this increase is negligible and Navan Road will be able to accommodate this increase based on the standards for an arterial roads. The net increase may be less than 30-50 truck trips since it is anticipated that some existing truck traffic that was going nearby WSI waste disposal site will now be diverted to the proposed construction material recycling facility. Based on the information contained in the traffic brief, staff did not identify any concerns relating to traffic or from vehicles accessing the site.

 

Noise – Concern that the shredder and trucks driving down the lane will generate increased noise.

 

Response – The proposed use requires various Certificates of Approval from the Ministry of the Environment before commencing operations. A Noise and Air Certificate of Approval is required and as part of the submission requirements the applicant submitted a Noise Impact Assessment (NIA) Study. The study concluded that the machinery complied with MOE guidelines relating to noise and noise levels were well below the existing truck traffic noise from Navan Road. The mobile shredder that will be used in the recycling operation is specifically designed for operation in urban and suburban areas where noise and dust could be of concern. The processing area is approximately 350 metres from Navan Road and approximately 240 metres from the nearest residential dwelling. 

A 6.0-metre berm will be situated on three sides of the processing area. In addition, the distance from the Navan Road residences and the berm will help to mitigate any impact.

 

The majority of traffic associated noise will be from the existing traffic on Navan Road. New truck traffic produced by the operation will have to slow down in order to enter the site and due to the reduction of speed required to access the site, it is anticipated that the noise generated will be insignificant compared to the existing traffic noise.

 

Waste Disposal and Odour issues – Concern that the use is an expansion of the landfill and that there could be odours and toxic material on site.

 

Response - The site will be permitted to only process, sort and store construction and demolition material, which includes such things as wood, drywall, masonry and metals. No waste disposal is permitted and no liquid, hazardous or toxic material is permitted. All material is to be dry and only stored on site for a temporary basis. The proposed use must go through a comprehensive review and approval process with the Ministry of the Environment before operations can commence. Under the Environmental Protection Act the proposed operation is considered a Waste Processing Site. A Waste Processing Site is a site that manages or prepares waste for subsequent reuse or disposal and is not a waste disposal site or landfill. Additional Certificates of Approval are required for air, noise and water.

 

COUNCILLOR’S COMMENTS

The Councillor is aware of the application.

COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION COMMENTS

Friends of the Mer Bleue Bog

The Friends of the Mer Bleue Bog were present at the subject site for a demonstration of the operation of the shredding machine to be used by the applicant for the proposed construction materials recycling operation. The Friends of the Mer Bleue Bog feel the noise levels produced were very low and should not impact the dwelling units on Navan Road.

 

The Friends of the Mer Bleue Bog believe the proposed construction waste recycling facility is a good idea and should be mandatory for all demolition and construction companies; however, they contend it should take place within the existing WSI waste disposal site. They also feel that the proposed use will not be temporary in nature and will exist as long as the adjacent waste disposal site exists. They feel the proposed use does not comply with the Official Plan, is not compatible with adjacent uses, will add heavy truck traffic to Navan Road creating traffic issues, will drag dirt/dust onto Navan Road, it will complicate WSI’s ability to monitor air, dust, odour, water and noise problems.

 

Response – The City must review the merits of the proposed use based on the details and location applied for, which is 3628 Navan Road and not the adjacent WSI site. The application is to amend the Zoning By-law to permit the proposed construction materials recycling facility for a temporary period of three years.

 

If the amendment is approved the use will not have any permanent status beyond the three year period. Any extension of the use beyond the temporary three-year period would be subject to a new application and review process.

 

The operation being temporary in nature with no permanent buildings will not impede any future development of the area as per the Official Plan policies of the Developing Community designation as well industrial uses are permitted in the underlying designation, which is General Urban area. The site is also located within the 500-metre Active Solid Waste Disposal Site influence area. The adjacent waste disposal site will not have an impact on the proposed use and there will be no impacts on the continuing waste disposal operations from the proposed use. The proposed operation is compatible with the existing waste disposal facility and therefore conforms to the policies for sites within the 500-metre Active Solid Waste Disposal Site influence area.

 

The scale of the operation and the various measures included in the development will mitigate any potential impact of the use with the other adjacent industrial, commercial and residential uses. Various approvals through the MOE will ensure that noise, air and water issues will have to comply with the Environmental Protection Act as well as the Ontario Water Resources Act.

 

The amount of dust and debris on Navan Road associated with the proposed use is anticipated to be minimal. Access to the site is by means of a lane from Navan Road. To mitigate any potential dust or debris impacting Navan Road the applicant intends to use Blastrock, which is much larger than gravel, in the design of the access lane and processing area. Blastrock produces no or minimal amounts of dust or mud as compared to gravel. During drier periods the applicant will monitor the lane and if dust does become an issue, intends to water the lane in order to control dust. Through these measures it is anticipated that dust issues will be negligible and no debris is expected to be dragged out onto Navan Road.


ZONING - 3628 NAVAN ROAD

ZONAGE - 3628, CHEMIN NAVAN

ACS2007-PTE-APR-0173                                                                            INNES (2)

 

(This application is subject to Bill 51)

 

Mike Schmidt, Planner, provided a PowerPoint presentation, which is held on file with the City Clerk.  Karen Currie, Manager of Development Approvals East/South and Danny Page, Program Manager, Development Approvals accompanied him.

 

In response to questions from Councillor Holmes with regard to the municipality’s ability to require compulsory recycling of construction, industrial and institutional waste, Anne-Marie Fowler, Manager of Solid Waste Services, Public Works and Services stated a few jurisdictions in Canada do have by-laws.  Tim Marc, Legal Senior Counsel stated municipalities in Ontario do not have expressed authority in this area.

 

Hélène Cléroux and Carmen Côté registered to speak in opposition but were not in attendance.

 

Cherill Boyer, Friends of the Mer Bleue (FOMB) referenced the main points of a written submission, which was distributed and held on file with the City Clerk.  She noted the FOMB worked diligently with Waste Services Inc. (WSI) to resolve issues associated with the Navan Road Landfill.  She opposed the application but set out 10 conditions should approval occur.  These conditions touched on the issues of stormwater management, traffic, dust and noise, combustibility, tonnage, residual waste, drag-out dirt, accumulation of waste, termination of the operations when the adjacent landfill ceases, a property protection plan for residents, and environmental monitoring.

 

Edwin Morton, FOMB also noted his opposition to the application, suggesting it does not comply with Official Plan policies and provisions related to temporary uses, developing community, and general urban areas.  He noted industrial uses are not permitted within the developing community designation, which should develop as residential with complimentary commercial uses.  He stated a community design plan has not been completed for the subject area, which is a key tool to ensure the proper implementation of the Official Plan and is required prior to the approval of any development in this area be it temporary or otherwise. 

 

Erin Topping, Ashcroft Homes provided a written submission, which was circulated and held on file with the City Clerk.  Ms. Topping made three points:

·        Extensive work done with WSI to ensure negligible effects on the future community is undermined by this adjacent facility;

·        Determination of impacts is complicated through a second possible source;

·        The proposal could impede future development, contrary to the intent of the zoning.

 

Patrick Bolduc, a nearby resident, spoke in opposition noting the possible impact on the Mer Bleue bog and local residents (noise, dust, traffic volume and speed, toxic waste).  He suggested recycling and sorting should be done at the WSI site.

 

Janet Bradley, Borden Ladner Gervais and Kevin Harper, IBI Group, spoke on behalf of the proponent Millenn Construction Inc.  Ms. Bradley stated numerous studies were undertaken in support of this proposal and three Certificates of Approval have been sought from the Ministry of Environment (MOE) for water/drainage, noise/air and waste.  A land use plan and traffic study were also required by the City of Ottawa.  She noted the application would allow the City to deal with dry construction waste, removing 50 000 tons from landfills.  Construction and demolition materials represent 25 per cent or 192 000 tons of waste going to Ottawa landfills.  She indicated the site would be gated and suggested it is appropriate for the proposed use in terms of its configuration and location. 

 

Ms. Bradley noted leachate would not be generated, as only dry construction materials (wood, drywall) would be handled.  Materials will be sorted into bins and a shredder will be used for wood.  It is anticipated that 80 per cent of sorted materials will be recycled with only 15 to 20 per cent to be directed to landfills.  She noted the construction industry is in support of the application and suggested letters of support were also received from nearby residents.  Ms. Bradley also addressed the concerns and conditions raised by the FOMB, noting studies have discounted many arguments and meetings did take place to resolve certain issues, including the location of the shredder.  She suggested the FOMB is concerned this application represents the incremental growth of the WSI site, which she discounted.

 

Mr. Harper also submitted a response to the position of the Friends of the Mer Bleue, dated November 7, 2007.  He also provided a hand out discussing how the site would work, materials, process, diversion and recycling, environmental benefits, provincial approvals, as well as rationale for rezoning.  This documentation is held on file with the City Clerk.

 

Ms. Bradley and Mr. Harper responded to a series of questions from Councillor Bloess, noting the following:

·                    The application calls for a temporary zoning of three years that may be extended further.

·                    The operation does not require the construction of a building or shelter.  A 3-acre area will be used to sort the material and a small drainage pond will be created to monitor stormwater. 

·                    A drainage plan is required as part of the Certificate of Approval and a drain swale will be constructed at the base of the proposed six-metre berm that surrounds the entire processing site.  Regular testing of the pond will occur for a number of potential pollutants.  No treatment is required due to the nature of the material.

·                    The MOE restricts how much material can be stored on site to a maximum of ten days of material or 200 tons.  Construction and demolition materials mostly generated by new construction sites in the east end of the City will be received on site and hauled away on at least a weekly basis.

·                    Environmental and material monitoring will occur through the Certificate of Approval process by Millenn Construction, which must keep a written record, subject to annual submission to and periodic spot checks by the MOE.

·                    A Certificate of Approval has been granted for water, another is forthcoming for noise/air, and the one dealing with waste processing is dependent on this rezoning application. 

·                    Due to the nature and impact of the use and the nature of the materials being handled, the numerous steps, including an environmental assessment undertaken by WSI, are not required by the Province.

·                    With respect to traffic, the impact is negligible as compared to the nearby convenience store.  Keeping in mind the allowable tonnage, a maximum of 40 trucks would enter the site per day, representing less than three to five per cent of the daily peak truck traffic on Navan Road.  It is expected that some of the existing truck traffic from the adjacent landfill might be redirected here.

·                    Crushed blast rock would be utilized in the processing area and laneway to a depth of one metre to prevent the tracking of dust and mud.  It is expected that this will be a condition of approval from the MOE on the waste-processing site Certificate of Approval.

·                    The owner wishes to operate in an open and transparent fashion with the community and the ward councillor.  Discussion and consultation is on going and the final design submitted to the MOE reflects this feedback.

·                    A site plan is not required as no permanent buildings are proposed or permitted due to the temporary zoning.

 

Responding to questions from Councillor Bloess, Mike Wildman, Manager of Infrastructure Approvals, noted inspection, regulation, monitoring and compliance is under the authority of the Ministry of the Environment through the Certificates of Approval.  Mr. Marc noted it is unusual to place a legal condition to allow for property access to the FOMB; however, Council could require that the zoning by-law only be enacted once an agreement is signed between the owner and the FOMB.


 

Councillor Monette touched on the good work of the FOMB.  Ms. Bradley agreed to respond in writing to some of the concerns and conditions raised by the FOMB prior to consideration of this matter by Council.  She agreed to meet with the FOMB to discuss a potential agreement.

 

In response to questions from Councillor Hunter, Ms. Bradley noted planning staff has agreed that this application complies with Official Plan policies.  She noted the site is ideal for this type of operation, within the 500-metre influence area of the adjacent landfill, and frozen from development until the WSI landfill is decommissioned.  She suggested employment lands in the City are needed for other industrial uses. 

 

With respect to Ashcroft Homes’ concern that this application might impact the ability for residential development to occur on other land within the 500-metre area of influence, Ms. Bradley suggested this property, due to its configuration and proximity to the landfill, is not appropriate for residential use at this time.  Mr. Harper noted special studies were undertaken to reduce the influence area of the WSI Landfill to the west.  This site is immediately to the east and downwind.

 

Councillor Hunter noted it makes sense to have this type of facility with the number of new construction occurring in the east end.  He suggested that a portion of the laneway be paved to deal with any concerns related to displaced gravel, which can be an impediment to cyclists and motorists.  Mr. Harper concurred and stated his client would look into the suggestion.

 

Following the delegations, Chair Hume closed the public meeting portion and the Committee proceeded to questions of staff.

 

Responding to questions from Councillor Bloess, Mr. Page confirmed the following:

·                    The proposal does comply with the Official Plan, which contains a number of sections that relate to this site (compatibility, developing community, general urban, lands within the operating influence of a waste disposal facility). 

·                    With respect to the developing community designation, there will be no development until such time as a community design plan is undertaken.  The intent of the freeze is to stop the introduction of new land uses and the construction of new buildings that might prejudice the future opportunities under the community design plan.

·                    The proposed use does not involve any new buildings and is temporary in nature, which means it can cease and desist at the expiration of three years.  Accordingly, no legal non-conforming rights are accorded and the performance of the use will be monitored over the three-year period, as well as the longevity of the adjacent waste disposal facility. 

·                    There is a high degree of compatibility, both with the adjacent waste disposal facility and the nearby residences.  This use has existed here for a number of years and there has not been a history of complaints on the property.

·                    A 30-metre buffer zone must be maintained by WSI on its own property; in addition a 500-metre zone of influence exists in which land uses are restricted.

·                    The zone of influence must be sorted out before phase 2 of the community design plan can continue in this area.

 

Councillor Bloess asked whether this type of use could be undertaken at the WSI site and whether the City could direct it to that site.  Richard Hewitt, Deputy City Manager, Public Works and Services indicated two distinct business owners are involved and the City has no authority to require WSI to undertake the proposed use at its site.  Mr. Marc concurred.

 

Responding to further questions from the ward councillor, Ms. Currie explained that if structures were required a temporary use could not be applied.  She added Mr. Harper has demonstrated, and the MOE is satisfied that, structures are not required for this use.

 

With regard to traffic, Mr. Wildman stated the traffic study was reviewed by staff, who concurs with the trip generation in the order of 30 to 40 trucks per day.  Some existing truck traffic from the WSI site will be diverted to this location.  A site plan is not required but Councillor Hunter’s suggestion to pave a portion of the laneway is a potential solution to deal with the tracking of dirt or gravel.  The City’s Care and Use of City Streets By-law could also be used. 

 

On the issues of storage and combustible materials, Ms. Fowler explained it would come under the authority of the MOE but the City could require a consent agreement, which could cover a number of issues, including but not limited to residuals, information and reporting on markets for these materials, and tonnage reporting.  Mr. Wildman added that environmental monitoring is dealt with as part of the Certificates of Approvals but could be could be contemplated as part of the consent agreement.

 

Responding to questions from Councillor Bellemare on the issue of material storage, Mr. Wildman stated leachate should not be an issue as only dry construction and demolition materials will be processed on site.  Ms. Fowler confirmed the issue would be monitored by the MOE as a requirement of the Certificates of Approvals and the consent agreement could contain provisions in this regard.

 

With regard to the extension of the temporary use, Ms. Currie said that nearing the end of the initial three-year period, the landowner will apply once again for a rezoning and the same process will be followed.  The level of justification on behalf of the City will be the same as to whether to support or refuse the rezoning.


It may also be dependent at that time upon the completion of studies on the buffer, timing of the closing of the WSI site, and potential development of lands in the growth area.  Mr. Marc noted that should the extension be rejected by the City and the matter goes before the Ontario Municipal Board, the Board will be cognisant of the fact that the City enacted a temporary zoning originally (should the current application be approved) and the City will be expected to show the change in circumstances that has lead to a different view of the situation.

 

Councillor Qadri touched on the issue of market development for this kind of recycling.  Ms. Fowler noted reporting on markets could be required as part of a consent agreement and markets currently exist for wood waste. 

 

Councillor Bloess began debate by stating his reluctant support of the application.  He noted the City has lagged behind in terms of dealing with construction, demolition, industrial and institutional waste.  He touched on the work of the FOMB and the possible use of a consent agreement.  He also spoke of the temporary nature of the rezoning, as an opportunity to determine if the operation could be pursued without negatively impacting area residents.

 

Councillor Holmes indicated she would not support the application, noting renewal of temporary zoning applications are rarely rejected.  She also called into question the monitoring to be done by the MOE and touched on the Province’s inability to enforce Regulation 103-94 of the Environmental Protection Act.  She also discussed hazardous demolition materials and the development of markets for this type of recycled material.

 

That the Planning and Environment Committee recommend Council approve an amendment to the former City of Gloucester Zoning By-law to change the zoning of part of 3628 Navan Road from Fg - Future Growth Area Zone to Fg(T1) – Future Growth Temporary Use One Zone as shown in Document 1 and as detailed in Document 2.

 

                                                                                                LOST

 

YEAS (4):        S. Desroches, J. Harder, G. Hunter, P. Hume

NAYS (6):       M. Bellemare, C. Doucet, D. Holmes, B. Monette, P. Feltmate

 

Councillor Hunter noted some councillors vent that the City and Province are not doing enough for source separation of construction and demolition materials but reject this proposal, which would assist in this regard.  With regard to concerns related to environmental protection, he noted monitoring would occur.  He questioned if any justification exists or has been demonstration to reject this application.

 

Councillor Harder indicated her support for the application as it provides an Ottawa-based solution to deal with construction waste.  She suggested the status quo is not acceptable and an opportunity would be lost if this application does not go forward.

 

Councillor Doucet stated his opposition calling on the Province to take action.

 

Moved by D. Holmes:

 

That the Planning and Environment Committee recommend Council reject an amendment to the former City of Gloucester Zoning By-law to change the zoning of part of 3628 Navan Road from Fg - Future Growth Area Zone to Fg(T1) – Future Growth Temporary Use One Zone as shown in Document 1 and as detailed in Document 2.

 

                                                                                                            CARRIED

 

YEAS (6):        M. Bellemare, C. Doucet, D. Holmes, B. Monette, P. Feltmate

NAYS (4):       S. Desroches, J. Harder, G. Hunter, P. Hume

 

Mr. Marc indicated staff would prepare a motion for Council, as a motion to reject must set out the reasons for such a decision, pursuant to Bill 51.