6.             ZONING – 460-480 BRIGITTA STREET

 

ZONAGE –  460-480, RUE BRIGITTA

 

 

 

Committee recommendation

 

(This application is subject to Bill 51)

That Council approve an amendment to the former Township of Goulbourn Zoning By-law to change the zoning of 460-480 Brigitta Street from Residential Type 5 Special Exception 6 (R5-6 Zone) to Residential Type 5 Special Exception 7 (R5-7 Zone) and as shown in Document 1 and as detailed in Document 3.

 

 

Recommandation du Comité

 

(Cette demande est assujettie au Règlement 51)

Que le Conseil approuve une modification au Règlement de zonage de l’ancien Canton de Goulbourn afin de changer la désignation de zonage du 460-480, rue Brigitta de zone résidentielle de type 5 assortie d’une exception spéciale 6 (zone R5-6) à zone résidentielle de type 5 assortie d’une exception spéciale 7 (zone R5-7), tel qu’il est indiqué dans le Document 1 et expliqué en détail dans le Document 3.

 

 

DOCUMENTATION

 

1.                  Deputy City Manager's report Planning, Transit and the Environment dated
27 July 2007 (ACS2007-PTE-APR-0156).

 

2.         Extract of Draft Minutes, 28 August 2007


Report to/Rapport au :

 

Planning and Environment Committee

Comité de l'urbanisme et de l'environnement

 

and Council / et au Conseil

 

27 July  2007/le 27 juillet 2007

 

Submitted by/Soumis par : Nancy Schepers, Deputy City Manager /

Directrice municipale adjointe,

Planning, Transit and the Environment /

Urbanisme, Transport en commun et Environnement

 

Contact Person/Personne Ressource : Grant Lindsay, Manager / Gestionnaire, Development Approvals / Approbation des demandes d'aménagement

(613) 580-2424, 13242  Grant.Lindsay@ottawa.ca

 

Kanata South (23)

Ref N°: ACS2007-PTE-APR-0156

 

 

SUBJECT:

ZONING – 460-480 Brigitta Street (FILE NO. D02-02-07-0012)

 

 

OBJET :

ZONAGE –  460-480, rue Brigitta

 

 

REPORT RECOMMENDATION

 

That the Planning and Environment Committee recommend Council approve an amendment to the former Township of Goulbourn Zoning By-law to change the zoning of 460-480 Brigitta Street from Residential Type 5 Special Exception 6 (R5-6 Zone) to Residential Type 5 Special Exception 7 (R5-7 Zone) and as shown in Document 1 and as detailed in Document 3.

 

RECOMMANDATION DU RAPPORT

 

Que le Comité de l’urbanisme et de l’environnement recommande au Conseil d’approuver une modification au Règlement de zonage de l’ancien Canton de Goulbourn afin de changer la désignation de zonage du 460-480, rue Brigitta de zone résidentielle de type 5 assortie d’une exception spéciale 6 (zone R5-6) à zone résidentielle de type 5 assortie d’une exception spéciale 7 (zone R5-7), tel qu’il est indiqué dans le Document 1 et expliqué en détail dans le Document 3.

 

 

BACKGROUND

 

The subject site is a 7791 square metre parcel of land located on the west side of Eagleson Road, at the corner of Romina Street and Brigitta Street, known as 460‑480 Brigitta Street (formerly 5264 Fernbank Road) as shown in Document 1.

The site is part of the Bridlewood Trails Subdivision (D07-16-03-0046) which was draft approved on June 30, 2005.  The draft plan of subdivision combines residential, employment, commercial, mixed use, and open space uses. The subject site is a block on the first phase of the registered plan of subdivision.

The purpose of the application is to rezone the block to permit the construction of a six-storey Continuing Care Retirement Facility that would include a range of dwelling units and health services as shown on the proposed site plan (Document 2).  The development will consist of two buildings to be constructed in phases.  Phase 1 will be constructed at the corner of Eagleson Road and Romina Street.  Phase 2 will be constructed immediately north of Phase 1 at a later date.  The main floor will consist of a kitchen and dining area, an exercise room, a games room, a living room, a library, a wellness centre and other amenities for the residents.  Assisted Care units will be located on the second and third floors.  The Assisted Care units have their own communal dining kitchen area located on the same floor, separate from the communal dining and kitchen area located on the ground floor.  The other floors will be designed with a variety of independent living quarters including studio units, studio suite units, as well as one-and two-bedroom units.

 

A Continuing Care Retirement Facility allows residents to take advantage of the full range of services available and ease the transfer to a different type of facility as his or her condition and needs change without needing to look for a new facility, relocate, or adapt to a new setting.  As seniors age, their physical situation may change yet they may want to remain in the same building for convenience or the social network they have gained.  For example, the resident may begin in the independent living units, move to assisted living as he or she needs help with activities of daily living, and eventually move to the nursing home as ongoing care becomes necessary.

 

Current and Proposed Zoning

 

The site is currently zoned R5-6 within Zoning By-law 40-99, as amended.  The R5-6 zone permits an Apartment Dwelling, a Stacked Townhouse Dwelling and a Townhouse Dwelling.  The current zoning does not permit institutional uses or any form of senior citizen type housing.

 

The applicant proposes to rezone the property to add Nursing Home, Retirement Lodge, and Senior Citizen Apartment as permitted uses in order to design and operate a Continuing Care Retirement facility as described above.

 

The Zoning By-law amendment is also requesting a change in parking requirement standards.

 

 

DISCUSSION

 

The site is designated Arterial Mainstreet in the City of Ottawa’s Official Plan. Section 3.6.3 Mainstreets, Policy 3 states:

A broad range of uses is permitted on Traditional and Arterial Mainstreets, including retail and service commercial uses, offices, residential and institutional uses.

As noted above, this facility will be a combination of residential and institutional uses.

The Official Plan policies for Mainstreets in general, intends for development to achieve a compact, mixed-use, pedestrian-oriented development pattern. The Official Plan characterizes Arterial Mainstreets (as compared to Traditional Mainstreets), as having an urban fabric of larger lots, larger buildings, varied setbacks, lower densities and a more automobile-oriented environment often within a divided cross section of four or more lanes.  Arterial Mainstreets are intended to gradually transition to a more urban pattern of land use and more intensive forms of development. Unlike other developments on Arterial Mainstreets, this development will immediately fulfil the goals of a compact pedestrian-oriented development pattern as opposed to gradually evolving from a more low profile and automobile-oriented environment. The proposed building is six storeys in height, the building is set close to the street and the majority of the parking is being proposed underground. This will set the tone for the creation of an “urban” streetscape along Eagleson Road as compared to the typical “suburban” streetscape with buildings setback from the street behind an extensive amount of surface parking.

The proposal also conforms to the applicable policies of Section 4 of the Official Plan “Review of Development Applications,” in particular Section 4.3 Walking, Cycling, Transit Roads and Parking Lots and Section 4.11 Compatibility.

In keeping with Section 4.3, and the Arterial Main Street policy calling for “pedestrian-oriented” development, the buildings will have good access to transit along Eagleson Road and Romina Street, and the surrounding planned network of public sidewalks, and recreational pathways.  The sidewalks and pathways will connect to the adjacent residential development within the same subdivision, future local commercial development on Romina Street, the planned commercial and employment area south of Romina Street, and to the surrounding residential communities of SoHo and the neighbouring Emerald Meadows community. A transit stop is planned for Eagleson Road immediately adjacent to Phase 2 of this development. On site pathways and building design will provide for a direct pedestrian link from the bus stop to the front entrance of the facility.

A number of different criteria are considered when evaluating the compatibility of a new use. Of particular concern in this location are traffic, parking requirements, building height and massing and pattern of the surrounding community.  The development fronts onto an arterial street which has capacity to handle the traffic generated from this site. Parking requirements are discussed in more detail in the following section.

The site is bounded by streets on three sides and a stormwater management facility is located on the fourth property line to the north. Eagleson Road is to the east and the Monahan Drain is immediately east of Eagleson Road. Romina Street, a new local collector street, runs along the south property line with future planned commercial use fronting on the south side.

A new local road, Brigitta Street is located to the west with a new stacked townhouse condominium development presently under construction on the west side. Street townhouses are presently under construction to the north west. The development is compatible with the open space nature of the existing land uses to the north and east and with the future local commercial to the south.

The stacked townhouses to the west are three storeys in height compared to the six storeys of the subject proposal. Stacked townhouses are considered medium density housing, the street townhouses would be considered low density with the subject proposal, the lower end of high density. In this neighbourhood context the location of these three types of residential uses provide an appropriate transition from high to medium to low density.

The impact on the stacked townhouses is softened considerably by the design of the retirement facility. Both buildings are to be built in an ‘L’ shape which will create a courtyard adjacent to Brigitta Street and the stacked townhouses as shown in Document 2. While the ends of each of the buildings are 7.5 metres from the Brigitta Street property line, the majority of the building will be over 30 metres from this lot line.

The site and building design reflected in the companion site plan proposal is in keeping with the Urban Design Guidelines for Development along Arterial Mainstreets. A brief summary of how the site and building design is in keeping with specific Guidelines is found in Document 3. In addition to the City’s Arterial Mainstreet Design Guidelines, the development conforms to the streetscape design guidelines developed specifically for Romina Street developed as a condition of subdivision approval.  These guidelines envisioned higher density residential uses on the subject site and a possible “landmark style” building at the intersection that would function as a focal point for the community. The design and use of this building would provide such a landmark at the entrance to this new community.

 

Zoning Details

 

The Zoning By-law 40-99 of the former Township of Goulbourn defines the proposed new uses as follows:

 

“Nursing Home” means a building or part thereof in which the proprietor supplies for hire or gain, lodging with or without meals and, in addition, provides nursing, medical, or similar care and treatment, if required, and includes a rest home or convalescent home, but does not include any other establishment otherwise defined or classified herein.

 

“Retirement Lodge” means a building or part thereof in which the proprietor supplies for hire or gain lodging primarily for retired persons where each private bedroom or living unit has a separate private bathroom and separate entrance from a common hall but where common facilities for the preparation and consumption of food are provided, and common lounges, recreation rooms and medical care facilities may also be provided.

 

“Senior Citizen Apartment” means a dwelling, apartment principally intended and designed to meet the specific needs of seniors and containing some single rooms with communal dining facilities.

In the past, senior citizen apartments, retirement residences (lodges), and nursing homes have been constructed and operated separately throughout a community.  The current direction in facility design is to integrate the uses into one development.  The Bridlewood Trails Seniors Residence is designed with all three uses within the same building. This design will ease the transfer of residents to a different type of facility as his or her condition and needs change without needing to look for a new facility, relocate, or adapt to a new setting.  The ground, fifth and sixth floors are designed with a variety of independent living quarters including studio units, studio suites units, one-bedroom units, one-bedroom-den units, two-bedroom units.  

 

These types of units fall under the definition for Senior Citizen Apartment because they contain apartment type living units with separate bathrooms and separate entrance from a common hall but share common dining, kitchen facilities, lounges.  Some units fall under the definition of Retirement Lodge because some medical facilities and care may be provided if needed. 

The Assisted Care (Physical and Cognitive Care) units, located on second and third floors fall under the definition for Nursing Home because they have their own shared communal dining and kitchen area located on the same floor and they provide a greater range of health assistance services.

 

Proposed Change in Parking Provisions Standards

 

Currently, By-law 40-99 of the former Township of Goulbourn contains a separate parking space requirement for each of the three uses subject to this amendment application.  Senior Citizen Apartment requires 0.5 parking spaces per dwelling or guest room plus 0.25 spaces per dwelling or guest room allocated for visitor parking, Retirement Lodge requires 0.5 parking spaces per dwelling or guest room, and Nursing Home requires one parking space for every four beds.  The by-law further states that when a building or lot accommodates more than one use, the parking requirement for the building or lot shall be the sum of the requirements for the separate uses.  Using these parking requirements, the retirement facility as proposed would require 85 parking spaces for Phase 1 and 90 for Phase 2 for a total of 175.

 

The Draft Comprehensive Zoning By-law is proposing that parking for these types of uses and facilities be 0.25 spaces per dwelling unit or rooming unit plus one per 100 square metres of gross floor area used for medical or personal services.  Based on these newly proposed parking standards, Phase 1 would generate the need for 49 parking spaces and Phase 2, 45 spaces for a total of 94 parking spaces. Staff are recommending a compromise between these two methods of calculating parking requirements; that parking be provided at a rate of .35 spaces per lodging unit or dwelling unit (see Document 4). Using this zoning provision, required parking for Phase 1 would be 58 spaces and Phase 2, 60 spaces for a total of 118 spaces.

 

The former Township of Goulbourn By-law 40-99 was prepared at a time when there was no transit service in the Village of Stittsville. 


It was generally accepted that the parking requirements should be higher than other suburban locations given that some residents of a senior citizen facility and their visitors and the staff would have to rely more heavily on personal vehicles than in a more urban location.  The parking rates in By-law 40-99 for Senior Citizen Apartment and Retirement Lodge were set with this in mind.

 

The Bridlewood Trails Seniors Residence will have access to a well-integrated bus transit system compared to the shuttle service that was provided for Stittsville residents when the Goulbourn parking standards were created.  A division of OC Transpo, Para Transpo, offers a well-equipped service for door-to-door transit when conventional transit is not available. The difference in services between Stittsville when the Goulbourn standards were created and the transit services available at Bridlewood Trails Seniors Residence are significantly different.

The change being requested represents a compromise between that being proposed with the new comprehensive Zoning By-law and the current zoning requirement. This change is appropriate given the location of this development adjacent to existing and proposed transit services and in recognition of the planned network of sidewalks and pathways in the immediate area.

 

Building Height

 

Concern was raised by residents from the Emerald Meadows community and the Bridlewood Community Association with the six-storey height of the proposed Retirement Care Facility. The Emerald Meadows residents are separated from Eagleson Road by the Monahan Drain and associated open space area and do not have direct frontage on Eagleson Road. Because of the distance of the existing residents from Eagleson Road and this development proposal, the massing of this six-storey building will not have a negative visual impact on the adjacent neighbourhood. To ensure that buildings on this site are not higher than has been proposed through the companion site plan proposal, staff are recommending that a building height maximum be added to the zoning by law for this property. A maximum building height of six storeys is included in the zone details attached as Document 4.

 

Conclusion

 

Staff are recommending the approval of this Zoning By-law amendment. The proposal conforms to the Official Plan policies for Arterial Main Streets and the Review of Development Applications.  The form of the development is also appropriate as it is in conformity with the Urban Design Guidelines for Development along Arterial Mainstreets and the approved Streetscape Design Guidelines for Romina Street.

 

The change in the parking requirement is appropriate for this location given existing and planned transit services to this area. This reduction in parking requirements combined with provision of parking underground will also provide the opportunity to maximize the landscaped area around the building for the enjoyment of the residents and to provide a visually attractive streetscape at this entrance to this new neighbourhood.


 

Concurrent Application

 

A site plan application is also being considered for this site. The details of the site plan have been provided in the background section of this report.

 

CONSULTATION

 

Notice of this application was carried out in accordance with the City's Public Notification and Consultation Policy.  Details of the consultation can be found in Document 5.  The Ward Councillor is aware of this application and the staff recommendation.

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

 

N/A

 

APPLICATION PROCESS TIMELINE STATUS

 

The application was not processed by the "On Time Decision Date" established for the processing of Zoning By-law amendments to provide time for an informal public information meeting to be held and to review the details of the related site plan.

 

SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION

 

Document 1      Location/Zoning Map

Document 2      Continuing Care Facility Proposed Site Plan

Document 3      Arterial Main Street Guidelines

Document 4      Details of Recommended zoning

Document 5      Consultation Details

 

 

DISPOSITION

 

City Clerk’s Branch to notify the owner, Shawn Malhotra, Claridge Homes, 210 Gladstone Ave., Ottawa ON K2P 0Y6 applicant, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive, Kanata ON K2M 1P6; OttawaScene.com, 174 Colonnade Road, Unit #33, Ottawa, ON  K2E 7J5, Ghislain Lamarche, Program Manager, Assessment, Financial Services Branch (Mail Code:  26‑76) of City Council’s decision.

 

Planning, Transit and the Environment Department to prepare the implementing by-law, forward to Legal Services Branch and undertake the statutory notification.

 

Legal Services Branch to forward the implementing by-law to City Council.


LOCATION MAP                                                                                                  DOCUMENT 1

 


PROPOSED SITE PLAN


                                                                                                                                   DOCUMENT 2


ARTERIAL MAINSTREET DESIGN GUIDELINES                                        DOCUMENT 3

 

The following is a brief description of how the development conforms to the policies of Section 4.11 of the Official Plan and fulfils many of the City’s Design Guidelines for Development along Arterial Mainstreets:

 

Guideline 6 - The building will be located as close as permitted to Eagleson Road under the current R5-6 Zone;

Guideline 7 - The building and site will be developed by the same builder as the adjacent residential subdivision.  Close attention has been given to ensure that the building will be compatible with the physical character of the surrounding neighbourhood including clustering higher density residential uses along the “Mainstreet” of Romina Street;

Guideline 8 - The building conforms to the recommended building height to road corridor width of 1:2.5 (medium-high);

Guideline 10 - The development adds to the concentration of density of units, height and mass at the gateway to the community and along the “Mainstreet” of Romina Street;

Guideline 13 - The development conforms to the recommended transition in scale and density of the built form from Eagleson Road and from Romina Street to the surrounding lower density residential development being constructed by Claridge Homes.  As originally planned through the subdivision design and zoning, densities decrease slightly as you move away from Eagleson Road and “Mainstreet” Romina Street.  Townhouses are being built towards the north end of the subdivision;

Guideline 16 - The building is oriented so that the principal entrance faces towards the Brigitta Street and the adjacent residential uses, and turns it’s “back” towards the busier arterial road while still maintaining a street presence on Eagleson Road.


DETAILS OF RECOMMENDED ZONING                                                       DOCUMENT 4

 

 

1.         The text of By-law Number 40-99 is amended by adding the following:

 

            R5-7 Zone

                        The following applies to land zoned R5-7 despite those permitted uses and zone provisions that are to the contrary:

                        Additional Uses Permitted

                        (i)         the following uses will also be permitted in the R5-7 zone and may be located in the same building :

                                    1.         senior citizen’s apartment;

                                    2.         nursing home;

                                    3.         retirement lodge,

                        (ii)        the following uses are permitted as an integral part of the uses in (i) above:

                                    1.         place of worship

                                    2.         convenience store

                                    3.         coffee shop

                                    4.         hair salon

                        Zone Provisions

                        (iii)       clause 9(2)(a) entitled “Density” does not apply;

                        (v)        the minimum required lot frontage is 24.0 metres;

                        (vi)       the minimum required front yard depth is 4.5 metres;

                        (vii)      the minimum required exterior side yard width is 4.5 metres;

                        (viii)      the minimum required interior side yard width is 3.5 metres;

(ix)              the minimum required rear yard depth is 5.5 metres;

(iv)              clause 9(2)(h) entitled “Dwelling Unit Area” does not apply;

                        (x)        the minimum required landscaped open space is 25% of the lot area;

(xi)              the maximum permitted lot coverage is 60%;

(xii)             the maximum building height is 6 storeys;

                        (xii)      the parking space requirement for the uses in (i) and (ii) above is 0.35 spaces per lodging room or dwelling unit;

                        (xiii)      all land zoned R5-7 and used for dwelling, apartment not being a senior citizen’s apartment and dwelling, stacked townhouse is considered one lot for by-law purposes;

                        (xix)     clause 3(3)(a) “residential buffer strip” does not apply;

                        (xx)      clause 3(16)(i) does not apply to restrict a shuttle bus operated by staff of a senior citizen’s apartment, nursing home or retirement lodge for the benefit of the residents.

                                   

2.         Schedule A, Map 1 of By-law 40-99 is amended by rezoning the land indicated in Document 1 to this report from R5-6 to R5-7.

 

 


CONSULTATION DETAILS                                                                                DOCUMENT 5

                                                                                                                                                          

 

NOTIFICATION AND CONSULTATION PROCESS

 

Notification and public consultation was undertaken in accordance with the Public Notification and Public Consultation Policy approved by City Council for Zoning By-law amendments.  An informal public information meeting was also held in the community.

 

 

PUBLIC COMMENTS

 

A number of written comments and phone calls were received from residents from the Emerald Meadows Community east of Eagleson Road. Concerns were raised with the rapid urbanization of this area of Kanata, increase in traffic and traffic congestion, visual impact of two six-storey buildings, and the environmental impact on the Monaghan Drain.

 

A letter in support of the application was also received. The author noted that this was a good location as aging residents could potentially locate near their relatives or existing residents could seek assisted living arrangements without leaving their community.

 

 

SUMMARY OF PUBLIC INPUT

Rapid Urbanization

 

Residents expressed concern with the speed that this area of Kanata is urbanizing when it was designated agricultural land a few years ago.

 

Response

 

This land and that between Eagleson Road and Terry Fox Drive and from Fernbank Road south to Terry Fox Drive was designated General Industrial in the former Township of Goulbourn Official Plan adopted by Township Council in 1996. The Goulbourn Zoning by law 40-99, adopted in 1999, zoned this property General Industrial.

 

In addition, a great deal of planning work has been done in this area in recent years. The subject site is a small part of a much larger subdivision that was draft approved in June of 2005. The northern half of the subdivision was zoned to permit residential uses and is registered. In July of 2005 an amendment to the Official Plan introduced the Arterial Main Street designation to the west side of Eagleson Road. Subsequent to this the southern half of the subdivision was rezoned to permit big box retail, highway commercial and business park uses in conformity with the existing Enterprise Area policies and the newly added Arterial Main Street policies.


Although this land has been used until very recently for agricultural purposes it has been zoned and designated to permit urban uses for a number of years and in more recent years has undergone various planning application approvals to further change, define and intensify the permitted land uses.

 

Traffic

 

Concern was raised by the public that the proposed zone changes would result in increased traffic, traffic congestion on Eagleson Road, as well as, within existing neighbourhoods.

 

Response

 

The traffic study prepared by engineering consultants on behalf of the proponent have concluded that the existing roadway network is sufficient to accommodate the development. As part of the subdivision works the Eagleson Road and Romina Street intersection is required to be designed to accommodate turning movements for the subject site and the subdivision at large.

 

These new proposed uses are residential and institutional. Traffic generated by the new use will primarily be generated by the employees required to run the facility. There may be some residents that own their own vehicle but that is expected to be minimal. The employees will draw from various areas in the city and will result in a minimal traffic increase in the adjacent neighbours.

 

The Eagleson Environmental Assessment (EA) is presently underway. This EA process is developing the design for the future upgrade of this arterial road. Although the timing of these road improvements is not known at this time, this EA process is taking into consideration all of the recent planning approvals in determining the appropriate design and capacity of this road.

 

Environmental Impacts

 

Concern was raised by residents on the impact of this development on the Monahan Drain.

 

Response

 

Through the subdivision approval process, engineering studies were completed to determine the appropriate stormwater management approach to meet City standards and be in compliance with the Monahan EA. Ministry of Environment approvals were required and have been obtained for the necessary work done on the portion of the Monahan Drain contained within the block of land north of the subject site. Work within this block will not have any negative impact on the Drain downstream.

 

Building Height

 

Concern was raised by residents from the Emerald Meadows community on the six-storey height of the proposed Retirement Care Facility.

 

Response

 

The Emerald Meadows residents are separated from Eagleson Road by the Monahan Drain and associated open space area and do not have direct frontage on Eagleson Road. The massing of this six-storey building will not have a negative visual impact on the adjacent neighbourhood. The residents expressed this concern at the public information meeting. The proponent prepared a drawing for the concerned residents to show how the proposed building would look from the Emerald Meadows neighbourhood. It was acknowledged upon review of the drawing that the little impact would be felt.

 

PUBLIC MEETING COMMENTS

 

Concerns discussed at the public information meeting largely centered around the building height. A response to this concern is outlined above under “summary of public input”.

 

COUNCILLOR’S COMMENTS

The Ward Councillor is aware of this application.

 

COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION COMMENTS

Comments were received from the Bridlewood Community Association (BCA). The BCA raised concerns with the height of the building and the lack of sidewalks on Eagleson Road. It was felt that the building height (six storeys) was not consistent with other buildings along Eagleson Road and the fact that the building did not front onto Eagleson was not consistent with the Arterial Mainstreet design goals. The negative impact of the building height on the Emerald Meadows community was also noted.

 

Response

 

Sidewalks internal to the subdivision will be built by the proponent as part of the subdivision works. The sidewalks along Eagleson Road are being designed as part of the Eagleson EA and will be built by the City when the road is upgraded.

 

The impact of the building height on the Emerald Meadows community is discussed above under “summary of public input”.

The six storey building height although not consistent with the existing buildings along Eagleson Road is in conformity with the Arterial Mainstreet policies. The existing buildings were built before the Arterial Mainstreet designation was applied and therefore were not subject to the policies nor design guidelines associated with this designation.


Although the main entrance to the facility is shown on Brigitta Street and not Eagleson Road there are a number of active entrances facing Eagleson Road and the site design will enable direct access from the bus stop or possible future on street parking spaces on Eagleson Road via a pathway which leads directly along the north edge of the Phase 1 building to the front entrance on Brigitta Street and eventually into a breezeway that will connect the two buildings when Phase 2 is built.

 

 

ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTS

Comments were received from the Ottawa Accessibility Advisory Committee. Questions were raised with the grade, design of the entrance door, and the number and location of handicapped parking spaces.

 

Response

 

These issues will be addressed through the review and approval of the companion site plan application.


 

Zoning - 460-480 Brigitta Street

zonage - 460-480, rue brigitta

ACS2007-PTE-APR-0156                                                           KANATA SOUTH (23)

 

(This application is subject to Bill 51)

 

Email correspondence in opposition dated August 24, 2007 received from Major Justin Schmidt-Clever is held on file with the City Clerk.

 

That the Planning and Environment Committee recommend Council approve an amendment to the former Township of Goulbourn Zoning By-law to change the zoning of 460-480 Brigitta Street from Residential Type 5 Special Exception 6 (R5-6 Zone) to Residential Type 5 Special Exception 7 (R5-7 Zone) and as shown in Document 1 and as detailed in Document 3.

 

                                                                                                            CARRIED