5.       ZONING - 6688 FRANKTOWN ROAD (FILE NO. D02-02-07-0033)

 

ZONAGE - 6688, CHEMIN FRANKTOWN

 

 

Committee Recommendation

 

That Council approve an amendment to the former Township of Goulbourn Zoning By-law 40-99 to change the zoning of 6688 Franktown Road from Rural Zone, (Ru) to Institutional Exception Zone, (I xx), and Rural Exception Zone (Ru-xx) as shown in Document 1 and as detailed in Document 2.

 

 

Recommandation du comité

 

Que le Conseil approuve une modification au Règlement de zonage 40-99 de l’ancien Canton de Goulbourn visant à faire passer la désignation de zonage de la propriété située au 6688, chemin Franktown de « zone rurale » (Ru) à « zone d’exception à une zone institutionnelle » (I-xx) et « zone d’exception à une zone rurale » (Ru-xx), comme l’illustre le document 1 et le précise le document 2.

 

 

 

 

Documentation

 

1.         Deputy City Manager, Planning, Transit and the Environment report dated 27 July 2007 (ACS2007-PTE-APR-0143).

 

 

 

 



Report to/Rapport au :

 

Agriculture and Rural Affairs Committee

Comité de l'urbanisme et de l'environnement

 

and Council / et au Conseil

 

July 27, 2007 / le 27 juillet 2007

 

Submitted by/Soumis par : Nancy Schepers, Deputy City Manager/Directrice municipal adjointe

Planning, Transit and the Environment / Urbanisme, Transport en commun et Environnement

 

Contact Person/Personne Ressource : Grant Lindsay, Manager / Gestionnaire, Development Approvals / Approbation des demandes d'aménagement

(613) 580-2424, 13242  Grant.Lindsay@ottawa.ca

 

West Carleton-March (5)

Ref N°: ACS2007-PTE-APR-0143

 

 

SUBJECT:

ZONING - 6688 FRANKTOWN ROAD (FILE NO. D02-02-07-0033)

 

 

OBJET :

ZONAGE - 6688, CHEMIN FRANKTOWN

 

 

REPORT RECOMMENDATION

 

That the Agriculture and Rural Affairs Committee recommend Council approve an amendment to the former Township of Goulbourn Zoning By-law 40-99 to change the zoning of 6688 Franktown Road from Rural Zone, (Ru) to Institutional Exception Zone, (I xx), and Rural Exception Zone (Ru-xx) as shown in Document 1 and as detailed in Document 2.

 

 

RECOMMANDATION DU RAPPORT

 

Que le Comité de l'agriculture et des questions rurales recommande au Conseil recommande au Conseil d’approuver une modification au Règlement de zonage 40-99 de l’ancien Canton de Goulbourn visant à faire passer la désignation de zonage de la propriété située au 6688, chemin Franktown de « zone rurale » (Ru) à « zone d’exception à une zone institutionnelle » (I-xx) et « zone d’exception à une zone rurale » (Ru-xx), comme l’illustre le document 1 et le précise le document 2.

 

 

BACKGROUND

 

The subject lands are located on the south side of Franktown Road, west of Joy’s Side Road. The subject parcel has a frontage of 260 metres along Franktown Road and is approximately 38 hectares in area. The rear of the property also has frontage on Ottawa Street. The site, which  is currently vacant, is heavily treed and has relatively flat terrain. Surrounding lands are mostly  occupied by rural residential dwellings on large properties.  A rural residential dwelling abuts the northwest corner of the property and the southwest corner of the property abuts an estate lot residential subdivision. 

 

The owner of the property, International Buddhist Progress Society of Ottawa, is proposing to rezone the property to accommodate a place of worship and related accessory uses.  A conceptual site plan has been submitted in support of the rezoning. A three-storey Buddhist temple, with a floor area of 2787 square metres, would be located approximately 160 metres from Franktown Road. At the rear of the temple would be a pagoda, used to store urns containing the ashes of those who have been cremated. No cremation would take place on-site. Several small residential rooming house units, each approximately 75 square metres in area, are proposed to provide accommodation for employees or worshippers residing on-site for a short period of time while participating in workshops or meditation sessions.

 

A gate, which is a traditional component of Buddhist temple design, is proposed to be located at the Franktown Road entrance. The proposed entrance will be located in the centre of the lot and provide access to a parking lot for approximately 110 vehicles. The remainder of the land would be left in a natural state, and used for passive recreation including walking paths, gardens, benches, meditation areas, and a picnic area. The property would be subject to a Site Plan Control Application, at which time a detailed review of the building layout, parking requirements, landscaping, grading, drainage and other issues would be undertaken (a preliminary site plan is shown in Document 3).

 

Details of Current and Proposed Zoning

 

The site is currently zoned Rural Zone (Ru) under By-law 40-99 of the former Township of Goulbourn. This zone permits single detached dwellings, agricultural uses, forestry uses, and uses accessory to such permitted uses. 

 

The applicant proposes to rezone 22 hectares of the subject property from Rural Zone (Ru) to Institutional Zone – Exception (I-xx). This new zone would be a site-specific Institutional Zone permitting a place of worship, day nursery and accessory rooming house. The total gross floor area of the residential uses would not exceed 558 square metres. The rooming house would contain at least three rooming units, common room, and washroom facilities.  Although employees of the temple would reside in the rooming house, the main purpose of the rooming house would be for the temporary accommodation of individuals visiting the temple for a conference, retreat or meditation session. In addition, the bylaw provisions would specify a parking requirement of one space per 10 square metres of assembly area for the place of worship. The parking requirement would be applicable to the ground floor area only, because although the gross floor area of the proposed temple is 2,787 square metres, only the ground floor (929 square metres) is used by the congregation for worship.  Traditionally, the second and third floors are often empty, or designed to accommodate classrooms, offices or meditation areas.

 

The rear 16 hectares of the property would be rezoned from Rural Zone to a Rural Zone- Exception (Ru-xx), permitting leisure uses accessory to the above-noted institutional uses.

 

DISCUSSION

 

Official Plan:

 

The subject site is designated as "General Rural Area" in the Official Plan. This designation permits a variety of land uses that are appropriate for the rural area, including rural housing, commercial development, small industries and farms. The intent of the designation is to accommodate land uses that are appropriate for a rural location.

 

The property is subject to the policies within Section 3.7.2 of the Official Plan. When considering applications for by-law amendments to permit non-residential uses not specific to agricultural uses, forestry, conservation and natural resource management activities, staff must determine whether the proposed use would not be better located in a village or the urban area.  Staff must also consider whether the change of use will interfere in the potential for urban boundary expansion and the proper functioning of the local road network, that potential impacts will not limit neighbouring agricultural uses, and that the proposed use can be sustained on private services.

 

Planning Rationale:

 

The subject application has been evaluated with regard to the provisions of the Official Plan, and all applicable policies have been satisfied. In order to obtain a Zoning By-law amendment for the proposed rural institutional use, the applicant must address the considerations and criteria set forth in Sections 3.7.2 of the Official Plan, which states that new institutional uses such as places of worship and schools should ideally be located within a village, but may be considered in close proximity to a village where village land is insufficient or inappropriate. The primary criteria are as follows:

 

a)  The use would not be better located in a village or urban area

 

·        Although a place of worship may seem to be more appropriate in a village, the proposed Buddhist temple is most appropriately located in the rural area due to the large amount of vacant land required and the importance of keeping the majority of the site in a natural state.

 

b) Volume and pattern of traffic anticipated from the development will not interfere with the local road network.

 

·        Due to the nature and timing of traffic associated with a place of worship, there are no concerns associated with traffic generation for the proposal, and a traffic study was not required. With the exception of the main worship session on Sunday mornings, the temple will be used by a very small number of people on other days of the week. The site location on a major road is appropriate for the proposed development.

 

c)  Potential adverse impacts from lighting, noise, dust odour or traffic are minimized.

·        The proposed institutional use will have minimal impact on adjacent landowners. As noted above, traffic is not a concern.  Nuisance from noise or lighting will not be a concern, due to the fact that only a very small portion of the property is to be developed. Most of the site will remain in a natural state, and the extensive wooded areas will serve to buffer any minor noise or light associated with the proposed development.

 

d) Possible impact on adjacent landowners and neighbouring agricultural operations is minimized.

·        There are no agricultural operations adjacent to the subject property, and the proposed temple will have minimal impact on surrounding properties. The southeast portion of the property, adjacent to a country lot subdivision, will remain undeveloped, and would be part of the area to be used for passive recreation only.  The undeveloped lands abutting the rural residential dwelling located to the west of the site will provide a 100 metre wide buffer between the property line and the proposed building.

 

e)  The development is in keeping with the surrounding rural character and landscape.

·        The proposed temple is consistent with the small-scale, low-density character of the rural area. The property is well buffered by trees and other vegetation, which will screen the proposed parking lot and buildings. 

 

f)  Requirements relating to transportation, servicing, and environmental protection have been satisfied.

·        Technical requirements have been satisfied. A traffic impact assessment was not required for the proposal, given the nature of the use and timing of church services. A Hydrogeological Study was submitted in support of the rezoning, and confirmed that there is sufficient quantity of potable water to service the proposed development, and that soils are appropriate for installation of on-site sewage disposal systems. A technical report regarding the private servicing would be required at the time of Site Plan Control Approval.

 

g)  Noxious uses are to be permitted only with suitable screening and buffering.

·        The proposed use is not a noxious use that requires buffering.

 

h)  The development will address protection of natural environment.

·        The proposed development involves disturbance of a small portion of the property. Maximum tree protection is proposed, since the intent is to retain the current natural environment and tranquility of the property.

 

The proposed development complies with all Official Plan policies of the General Rural Area, which encourage various types of rural development. Staff support this Zoning By-law amendment because the proposed use is compatible with the surrounding area and conforms to the applicable policies outlined within the Official Plan.  

 

 

 

 

RURAL IMPLICATIONS

 

The proposed Zoning By-law amendment is not expected to have any adverse impact on the existing uses within the rural area, and is considered appropriate given the surrounding context.

 

 

CONSULTATION

 

Notice of this application was carried out in accordance with the City's Public Notification and Consultation Policy.  The details are shown in Document 4.  The Ward Councillor is aware of this application and the staff recommendation. 

 

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

 

N/A

 

 

APPLICATION PROCESS TIMELINE STATUS

 

The application was processed by the "On Time Decision Date" established for the processing of Zoning By-law amendments. The application was On Hold for several months while the applicant supplied additional information requested.

 

 

SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION

 

Document 1      Location Map

Document 2      Details of Recommended zoning

Document 3      Conceptual Site Plan

Document 4      Consultation Details

 

 

DISPOSITION

 

City Clerk’s Branch, Secretariat Services to notify the owner, (International Buddhist Progress Society, 1950 Scott Street, Ottawa, Ontario K1Z 8L8), applicant, (FoTenn Consultants Inc., 223 McLeod Street, Ottawa, Ontario K2P 0Z8, Attention: Ms Natalie Hughes), OttawaScene.com, 174 Colonnade Road, Ottawa, ON, K2E 7J5, Ghislain Lamarche, Program Manager, Assessment, Financial Services Branch (Mail Code:  26-76) of City Council’s decision.

 

Planning, Transit and the Environment Department to prepare the implementing by-law, forward to Legal Services Branch and undertake the statutory notification.

 

Legal Services Branch to forward the implementing by-law to City Council


LOCATION MAP                                                                                                  DOCUMENT 1

 

 

DETAILS OF RECOMMENDED ZONING                                                       DOCUMENT 2

 

 

1.         Schedule A of Bylaw 40-99 is to be amended to show that the subject lands shown on Document 1 will be rezoned as follows:

 

            Area A - from Rural Zone (RU) to Institutional Exception Zone (I-4)

            Area B - from Rural Zone (RU) to Rural Exception Zone (RU-7)

 

2.         A new special zone (I-4) be added to subsection 12(3) including the following special provisions:

 

            (1)        Permitted Uses:

·    Place of Worship

·    Day Nursery

·        Accessory Pagoda

·    Accessory Rooming House, being a principal dwelling within the whole of a residential use building that contains at least three rooming units, and which may also contain dwelling units, but will not include full kitchen facilities.

(2)        The total gross floor area of the accessory rooming house units shall not exceed 558 square metres.

 

            (3)        Parking Requirements:

·   Place of Worship: 10 parking spaces per 100 square metres of assembly area located on the ground floor of the place of worship.

·         Day Nursery: 1 space per 5 children that can be accommodated.

·         Accessory Rooming House: 1 space per 100 square metres of gross floor area.

 

3.         A new special zone (RU-7) be added to subsection 34(3) including the following special provisions:

 

            (1)        Permitted Uses

·    Passive recreation and leisure uses accessory to the uses permitted within the I-4 Zone.


CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN                                                                                              DOCUMENT 3

 

 


CONSULTATION DETAILS                                                                                DOCUMENT 4

 

 

NOTIFICATION AND CONSULTATION PROCESS

 

Notification and public consultation was undertaken in accordance with the Public Notification and Public Consultation Policy approved by City Council for Zoning By-law amendments.

 

 The following issues were identified by nearby residents:

 

Ground Water:

 

Comments: A resident expressed concern that the proposed development may have an impact on existing wells.

 

Response:  Mississippi Valley Conservation Authority reviewed the Hydrogeological Study submitted and had no opposition to the proposed rezoning. A detailed technical report regarding the private servicing would be required at the time of the Site Plan Control application.

 

Tree Preservation:

 

Comments: Nearby residents expressed a desire to retain as much of the existing wooded area as possible.

 

Response:  Almost all of the wooded area on the subject property will be retained, since only a small portion of the central part of the property will be developed. The perimeter of the site, closest to abutting properties, will not be disturbed. The majority of the property will remain in its current state, with the addition of only walking paths, benches and a picnic area.

 

Amount of Land Being Rezoned

 

A resident expressed concern that the large amount of land being rezoned would permit uncontrolled development and an unlimited number of dwelling units.

 

Response: The proposed zoning provisions restrict permitted uses to only a place of worship, a day nursery and the accessory residential rooming house. In response to the resident’s concerns regarding the number of allowable dwelling units, the maximum gross floor area of the residential uses has been restricted to 557 square metres.