2005 Audit Recommendations - Status Tracking | ||||||||||||||
Audit: Real Estate Management | (EMC Lead: G. Geddes / Staff Lead: S. Finnamore) | |||||||||||||
Audit Recommendation | Management Response | Comments | Budget Implications 2007 or Beyond |
Related Council Motions | Status Update | |||||||||
Audit Management Response | Action Required Based on DCM Implementation Plan | Management Timelines (Q1- Q4) | (Risks, issues regarding implementation, etc) | ($$ if known) | ||||||||||
1 | That the overall objective of property disposals be clarified, including clarification of the relative priorities regarding sale versus other potential uses for the property. | Management
agrees with this recommendation. The Disposal Policy approved in October 2001 by Council, will be reviewed for clarity of wording as part of the annual review of disposal procedures to be completed in 2006. Ultimately, Management’s goal is to present objective information to aid Council in setting priorities specific to surplus property. The review of the Disposal Policy will address the need to develop a more formal approach for land exchanges. The objective would be to ensure that any surplus real estate is viewed as an asset and utilized in a manner that recognizes its financial value and rationalizes its use in relation to the City’s overall requirements. |
New sales and negotiation handbook is being developed, which will identify potential issues for clarification. If required, these will be addressed as part of review of the Disposal Policy in 2007. | Q2 2007 | None | Yes (revisions to disposal policy will require Council approval.) | In progress. Issues identified in creation of new RESD Handbook (see recommendation #2) will also be incorporated in Disposal Policy, as required. | |||||||
4 | That Management ensure appropriate policies and procedures are put in place for Acquisitions, Leasing, Appraisals and Remediation to ensure a consistent and effective approach that reflects best practices is maintained. | Management
agrees with the recommendation. The development of an Acquisition Policy, including leasing, will be completed by Q2 2006. The need for appraisals and environmental site assessments is currently captured in the Disposal Policy and will be entrenched in other policies and practices as developed. |
Management
are developing an Acquisition Policy which will include leasing. The need for appraisals and environmental site assessments is currently captured in the Disposal Policy and will be entrenched in other policies. |
Q4 2006 (or Q1 07 for presentation to Committee and Council. Policy now completed by RESD.) | The requirement for appraisals and environmental site assessments is entrenched in the new policy. Procedures for the various lines of business will be included in the RESD Handbook. | None | Acquisition Policy to be presented to Council in Q4 2006 or Q1 2007 | Acquisition Policy to be presented to CSEDC on April 3/07 and Council April 11/07. | ||||||
6 | That the property management responsibilities currently assigned to the Real Estate Services Division be transferred to either the Program Properties Division or the Venture Properties Division of Real Property Asset Management. | Management
agrees with the intent of this recommendation. A review of the alternative service delivery options and the required resourcing will be completed by Q3 2006. Any resourcing issues, additional FTEs or contract dollars, will be addressed in time for the 2007 budget process. |
A review of ASD options and required resourcing is underway. | Q3 2006 | Property management requirements associated with the Corp. Admin. Portfolio would be best aligned with the Venture Properties Division where a combination of internal trades staff and external contractors could be accessed to deal with the various service requests. In order to address Recommendation #6, no existing RESD staff resources can be transferred to VP therefore, supervision of these added responsibilities will be reallocated to existing staff resources. | None | No | Analysis complete. Reallocation of responsibilities will begin at the beginning of Q2-2007. On-call responsibilities for corporate portfolio have been transferred to Venture Properites effective Dec 1/06. | ||||||
7 | That Real Estate Services amalgamate its leasing responsibilities within its internal structure. | Management agrees with this
recommendation. The organizational structure in place at the time of this audit aligned leasing-out activities (revenue leases) with disposals, and lease-in activities with acquisitions. The intent of this alignment was to balance workloads within RESD. As an interim step to an organizational review, revenue and acquisition leasing will be consolidated in Q1 2006, to allow for standardized business processes and increased focus of knowledge and expertise. Real Estate Services Division will be reviewing the alignment of positions during the Branch Process Review Program which is targeted to be completed in Q3 2006. |
This is will be assessed under Recommendation #6. | Q3 2006 | The transition is being made and will be complete once Recommendation #6 is complete. | Included in Recommendation #6. | No | Ongoing: Review completed, however, resourcing required, as indicated in Recommendation #6. Completion pending reallocation of internal resources, anticipated in Q2 2007. | ||||||
8 | That Management, in concert with the Information Technology Services Branch, implement the use of available corporate system tools to provide required database management support. | Management agrees with this
recommendation. The RPAM Business Case, Version 1.0, indicated that Real Estate Services Division (RES) would be included in the Project System (PS) Module implementation. However, as the Real Estate Services Division had to concurrently develop and implement the Real Estate Module, it was determined that there was not enough capacity within the Division to develop the PS Module as well. At that time, the Comprehensive Asset Management Division (CAM) was substituted for RES in the PS module implementation. A review of the potential application of the PS module to address project management-tracking requirements and costs associated with the application is planned for Q2 2006. |
A review of the potential application of the PS module to address project management-tracking requirements and costs is scheduled for this year. | Q2 2007 | As of Jan.1/06, RESD implemented time tracking which will form the platform for SAP-PS which will begin development early in 2007. | None | No | In progress. Pending outcome of Business Process Review. Anticipated completion Q2 2007. | ||||||
9 | That Management develop and implement a system of key performance indicators based on operating standards to facilitate efficient service delivery and validate potential workload issues. | Management
agrees with this recommendation. Management agrees that meaningful performance indicators are required to estimate and budget for resource requirements and to track divisional performance. The development of these indicators and appropriate planning standards will be completed by Q4 2006. |
Performance indicators and planning standards will be developed. | Q4 2006 | RESD is working with other municipalities in Ontario to develop Performance Measure Indicators. | None | No | In progress. Progress of all municipalities behind schedule, therefore, completion now anticipated in Q3 2007. | ||||||
12 | That Management pursue opportunities for more formal outsourcing of services to minimize the ongoing use of consultants and address succession planning limitations. | Management
agrees with the intent of this recommendation. To address the balance of the workload currently being provided by internal staff, RESD is currently using individual contractors, acquired through a standing offer, to meet day-to-day workload requirements. RESD’s lines of business and mandate will be reviewed as part of a Branch wide Process Review Program including an organizational assessment and staffing strategy planned for Q3 2006. |
RESD
is currently using individual contractors to meet daily work
requirements. An organizational assessment and staffing strategy is planned. |
Q3 2006 | RESD will be recommending the creation of two FTE's to save on the ongoing consultant costs since amalgamation. | Council approved the two FTE's as part of the 2007 Budget and the positions are being advertised. | No | Positions will be filled by May 07. | ||||||