1.             UPDATE ON PROVINCIAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH MANDATORY HEALTH PROGRAMS AND SERVICES GUIDELINES (MHPSG)

 

MISE À JOUR SUR LA RÉVISION PAR LA PROVINCE DES LIGNES DIRECTRICES TOUCHANT LES PROGRAMMES ET SERVICES DE SANTÉ OBLIGATOIRES (LIGNES DIRECTRICES)

 

 

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION

That Council:

 

1.         Approve the final consolidated response to the draft Ontario Public Health Standards, as submitted to the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care Technical Review Committee, by Ottawa Public Health, on March 9, 2007, on behalf of the City of Ottawa (see document 1).

 

2.         Write to the Minister of Health and Long-Term Care requesting a thorough review of the provincial public health funding formula and it’s application, in order to redress the inequitable per capita funding status with respect to Ottawa Public Health.

 

 

Recommandation du Comité

 

Que le Conseil :

 

1.         D’approuver la version finale de la réponse globale aux normes provisoires de santé publique de l’Ontario, qui a été soumise le 9 mars 2007 au Comité de révision technique du ministère de la Santé et des Soins de longue durée par Santé publique Ottawa au nom de la Ville d’Ottawa (voir le document 1);

 

2.         D’envoyer au ministère de la Santé et des Soins de longue durée une lettre lui demandant d’effectuer un examen approfondi de la formule provinciale de financement de la santé publique et de sa mise en application, en vue de remédier à l’iniquité du financement par habitant à Santé publique Ottawa.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

DOCUMENTATION

 

1.                  Deputy City Manager report dated 26 March 2007 (ACS2007-CPS-HEA-0002).

 

Report to/Rapport au :

 

Community and Protective Services Committee

Comité de la santé, des loisirs et des services sociaux

 

and Council /et Conseil

 

26 March  2007 / 26 mars 2007

 

Submitted by/Soumis par : Steve Kanellakos, Deputy City Manager/Directeur municipal adjoint,

Community and Protective Services/Services communautaires et de protection 

 

Contact Person/Personne ressource : Dr. David Salisbury, Medical Officer of Health / Médecin chef en  santé publique

Ottawa Public Health / Santé publique Ottawa

(613) 580-2424 x23681, dave.salisbury@ottawa.ca

 

City-Wide/ Portée générale

        Ref N°: ACS2007-CPS-HEA-0002

 

 

SUBJECT:

UPDATE ON PROVINCIAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH MANDATORY HEALTH PROGRAMS AND SERVICES GUIDELINES (MHPSG)

 

OBJET :

MISE À JOUR SUR LA RÉVISION PAR LA PROVINCE DES LIGNES DIRECTRICES TOUCHANT LES PROGRAMMES ET SERVICES DE SANTÉ OBLIGATOIRES (LIGNES DIRECTRICES)

 

 

REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS

 

That the Community and Protective Services Committee recommend that Council:

 

1.         Approve the final consolidated response to the draft Ontario Public Health Standards, as submitted to the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care Technical Review Committee, by Ottawa Public Health, on March 9, 2007, on behalf of the City of Ottawa (see document 1).

 

2.         Write to the Minister of Health and Long-Term Care requesting a thorough review of the provincial public health funding formula and it’s application, in order to redress the inequitable per capita funding status with respect to Ottawa Public Health.

 

 


RECOMMANDATIONS DU RAPPORT

 

Que le Comité des services communautaires et de protection recommande au Conseil :

 

1.         D’approuver la version finale de la réponse globale aux normes provisoires de santé publique de l’Ontario, qui a été soumise le 9 mars 2007 au Comité de révision technique du ministère de la Santé et des Soins de longue durée par Santé publique Ottawa au nom de la Ville d’Ottawa (voir le document 1);

 

2.         D’envoyer au ministère de la Santé et des Soins de longue durée une lettre lui demandant d’effectuer un examen approfondi de la formule provinciale de financement de la santé publique et de sa mise en application, en vue de remédier à l’iniquité du financement par habitant à Santé publique Ottawa.

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

Further to Community and Protective Services Committee direction (March 1, 2007), professional staff at Ottawa Public Health (OPH), working with Councillors Cullen and Feltmate, reviewed the draft Ontario Public Health Standards (OPHS) and submitted a response, within provincially dictated timelines. The survey tool, designed by the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC), called for a technical and detailed response which exceeds 300 pages. In short, the impression of staff at OPH is that while the draft OPHS represents an improvement over the current Mandatory Health Programs and Services Guidelines in several areas, on balance there are significant limitations.

 

RÉSUMÉ

 

En réponse à une directive du Comité des services communautaires et de protection (donnée le 1er mars 2007), des professionnels de Santé publique Ottawa (SPO), en collaboration avec les conseillers Alex Cullen et Peggy Feltmate, ont examiné les normes provisoires de santé publique de l’Ontario et fait part à la Province de leurs observations à cet égard, dans les délais prescrits par cette dernière. Conformément à l’outil d’évaluation conçu par le ministère de la Santé et des Soins de longue durée de l’Ontario (MSSLD), la Province réclamait un document de rétroaction technique et détaillé de plus de 300 pages. En gros, le personnel de SPO estime que bien que les normes provisoires de santé publique constituent, dans plusieurs domaines, une version améliorée des Lignes directrices touchant les programmes et services de santé obligatoires, elles présentent d’importantes limites.

 

BACKGROUND

 

Community and Protective Services Committee Direction

 

On March 1, 2007, Community and Protective Services Committee received the draft renewed Ontario Mandatory Health Programs and Services (now called the Ontario Public Health Standards (OPHS) and approved recommendations directing;

 

  1. Council to forward a letter to the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC) requesting that the consultation period be extended in order to allow for input from members of the board of health (i.e. Members of Council).

 

  1. Ottawa Public Health (OPH) to compile feedback on the draft Standards and submit to the MOHLTC Technical Review Committee, as the response from the City of Ottawa, pending final Council approval at its meeting of April 11, 2007.

 

  1. Ottawa Public Health staff to report back to Community and Protective Services Committee (CPSC) and Council with the final compiled results on the draft Public Health Standards, for final approval.

 

  1. Councillors Cullen and Feltmate to work with OPH to develop the City’s response and report back to Community and Protective Services Committee on April 5, 2007.

 

DISCUSSION

 

As directed by CPSC, Ottawa’s Medical Officer of Health forwarded a letter to Ontario’s Chief Medical Officer of Health on March 6, 2007, expressing concern about the short time allotted for the review of the renewed draft OPHS and requesting an extension (see document 2). A co-chair of the MOHLTC Technical Review Committee responded to this request on behalf of the Chief Medical Officer of Health, stating there would be no exception made to the consultation deadline (see document 3).

 

Notwithstanding this disappointing response, professional staff at Ottawa Public Health conducted as comprehensive and thorough a review of the draft OPHS as possible, given the time constraints. This review involved all levels of staff and management. Councillors Cullen and Feltmate provided invaluable assistance with the decision making required and a consolidated response was submitted to the MOHLTC Technical Review Committee within the allotted time (see document 1).

 

The Province’s consultation was carried out using a web-based electronic survey, where respondents were asked to rate their agreement with specific elements of each program standard on a five point Likert scale. While there was space for comments and suggestions, the use of this survey format limited the type of information collected. The heavy focus on a rating scale and prompted responses restricted, somewhat, the opportunity to provide more reflective and creative responses. Nevertheless, the consolidated response, as submitted, included extensive comments on the quality and relevance of the draft program standards, as well as detailed suggestions for revision. Overall comments on the document in its entirety were also provided.

 

The draft OPHS are well organized and represent a significant improvement over the 1997 version. There appears to be some increased flexibility in programming demands, allowing boards of health more ability to tailor programming to meet local needs. In addition, the inclusion of new and/or more fully developed standards in the areas of emergency preparedness, surveillance, evidence-based practice and emerging issues provides much needed direction on these important functions.

 

Significant limitations are noted. However, the lack of protocols in this version of the draft standards makes it extremely difficult to assess the impact of these proposed standards on local public health practice. The standards, as presented, provide direction on “what” a local board of health should do; however, there is no direction on “how” these standards are to be implemented. Further, the proposed revisions appear to significantly downplay attention to the social determinants of health and the importance of ensuring equal access to services by disadvantaged or vulnerable populations.

 

The proposed changes to the standards will unquestionably necessitate a thorough review and re-alignment of business practices. While it is difficult to accurately assess the resource requirements implied by the proposed new OPHS in the absence of protocols, it appears certain that they will not be revenue neutral. In fact, Ottawa Public Health (OPH), like almost all other Health Units in Ontario, is not adequately resourced, through the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC) cost-sharing model, to be in full compliance with even the existing 1997 Mandatory Health Programs and Service Guidelines. Per capita provincial funding for OPH is demonstrably the lowest amongst Public Health Units across the province.

 

CONCLUSION

 

Ottawa Public Health professional staff, with the assistance of Councillors Cullen and Feltmate, have completed a review of the draft Ontario Public Health Standards and submitted a comprehensive response as part of the MOHLTC consultation process.

 

It is recommended that Community and Protective Services Committee approve this consolidated response and forward to Council for review and final approval; and that Community and Protective Services Committee recommend that Council convey it’s concerns to the MOHLTC with respect to funding inequities.

 

CONSULTATION

 

Not applicable

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

 

There are no financial implications for the recommendations detailed above.

 

SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION

 

Document 1:     Final consolidated response to the draft Ontario Public Health Standards (previously distributed under separate memorandum dated 21 March 2007)

Document 2:     Letter to Ontario’s Chief Medical Officer of Health dated March 6, 2007 (previously distributed and held on file)

Document 3:     Response from MOHLTC Technical Review Committee on behalf of the Chief Medical Officer of Health dated March 7, 2007 (previously distributed and held on file)

 

DISPOSITION

 

Council will write to the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, affirming that this submission constitutes Ottawa Board of Health’s response to the provincial consultation on the draft Ontario Public Health Standards and noting profound concern with respect to provincial funding for public health in Ottawa.