1. Arts
Investment Strategy and festivals sustainability plan Stratégie d’investissement
dans les arts ET plan de viabilité des festivals |
That Council approve the following:
1.
Support the overall Arts
Investment Strategy (Document 1) and Festivals Sustainability Plan (Document
2), which include the following components:
·
increased municipal arts,
festival, fair and special event funding;
·
expanded advocacy directed to
senior levels of government and aimed to increase provincial and federal
funding for local arts and festival organizations;
·
increased cultural partnerships
that include the local arts and festival sector, the National Capital
Commission, the City of Gatineau and federal cultural institutions in Ottawa;
·
increased partnerships between
local arts, festival, fair and special event organizations and the private
sector;
·
analyze the feasibility of
developing an Arts Stabilization Project for Ottawa, and an Ottawa Arts
Investment Service including an Arts Endowment Fund;
·
increased integration of Ottawa’s
local festivals, fairs and special events into Ottawa Tourism’s annual
destination marketing program;
·
development of a policy for
“in-kind” and invoiced services provided to festivals, fairs and special
events; and
·
amendment to the City of Ottawa’s
current sponsorship policy to accommodate community requests.
2.
Consider, during the 2007 budget
process, an increased municipal funding plan of $2.5M for local arts,
festivals, fairs and special events over a four-year time period, in order to:
·
meet existing and emerging
community needs;
·
achieve average competitiveness
with Canada’s six other largest single cities and;
·
achieve the greatest capacity of
leveraging investment from other levels of government and alternate sources in
a timely manner.
·
2007 - $1.5M (to be allocated as
follows: $650,000 for Festivals, Fairs and Special Events and $850,000 for Arts
Investment)
·
2008 - $400,000
·
2009 - $400,000
·
2010 - $200,000
4.
That the Festival, Fairs and
Special Events funding program ($713,000) be reinstated, as identified in, and
subject to approval of, the 2007 Draft Budget.
5. Identify
opportunities and advocate for increased provincial and federal allocations for
Ottawa’s local arts/festival sector.
6.
Identify opportunities to increase
cultural partnerships that include the local arts and festival sectors, the
National Capital Commission (NCC), the City of Gatineau and federal cultural
institutions located in Ottawa.
7.
Increase private sector support of
the arts by implementing an ArtsVest matching grants program in Ottawa in 2008,
in collaboration with the Council for Business and the Arts in Canada.
8.
Build partnerships between the
local business and local arts sectors in collaboration with the Ottawa Chamber
of Commerce, le Regroupement des gens d’affaires, the Council for the Arts in
Ottawa, Arts Ottawa East and Ottawa Festivals.
9.
Analyze the feasibility of
developing an Arts Stabilization Project for Ottawa and an Arts Investment
Service, including an Arts Endowment Fund, in support of Ottawa’s local arts
sector in collaboration with the Council for the Arts in Ottawa, the Department
of Canadian Heritage, the Ontario Trillium Foundation and other local arts
service organizations.
10.
Direct Cultural
Services staff to work with Business Development staff, Ottawa Festivals and
Ottawa Tourism to ensure that the City’s Festivals, Fairs and Special Events
are integrated wherever possible into Ottawa Tourism’s annual destination
marketing program.
11.
Direct Events Central
staff to continue tracking the City of Ottawa’s “in-kind” services and
“invoiced” services in 2007 to provide an analysis and a report back prior to
the 2008 budget respecting a policy for “in-kind” and “invoiced” services.
12. Direct
Events Central staff to report back with an amendment to the City of Ottawa’s
current sponsorship policy to accommodate community requests including requests
from Fairs, Festivals and Special Events seeking City sponsorship.
13. WHEREAS the existing Festivals, Fairs,
Special Events Programs supports major local festivals, fairs and special
events that have a City wide impact, are held for 2 consecutive days or more
and have a budget of over $30,000;
AND WHEREAS there
are large community events which take place across the City including local Canada
Day Events;
THEREFORE
BE IT RESOLVED that staff be directed to develop and implement a pilot funding
program for large Community events in 2007 with report back to Council;
BE IT
FURTHER RESOLVED that $25,000 be redirected from the $650,000 proposed
allocation for Fairs, Festivals and Special Events for this purpose;
BE IT
FURTHER RESOLVED that staff consult with non-profit community groups that
operate large special events to determine needs and bring back to Committee a
report with recommendations for large community events prior to the 2008
budget.
Que le Conseil approuve les
recommandations :
1. d’appuyer la Stratégie générale
d’investissement dans les arts (Document 1) et le Plan de viabilité des
festivals (Document 2), qui regroupent les initiatives suivantes :
· augmenter le financement
municipal des arts, des festivals, des foires et des activités spéciales,
· exercer davantage de pressions
sur les ordres supérieurs de gouvernement en vue d’accroître le financement
provincial et fédéral alloué aux organismes d’Ottawa spécialisés dans les arts
et les festivals,
· renforcer les partenariats
culturels prévoyant la participation du secteur local des arts et des
festivals, de la Commission de la capitale nationale (CCN), de la Ville de
Gatineau et des institutions culturelles nationales situées à Ottawa,
· renforcer les partenariats
entre le secteur privé et les organismes locaux oeuvrant dans les arts, les
festivals et l’organisation de foires et d’activités spéciales,
· évaluer la possibilité
d'élaborer à Ottawa un projet de stabilisation des arts et de mettre sur pied
un service d’investissement à l’appui du secteur local des arts, y compris un
fonds de dotation,
· assurer une plus grande
intégration des foires, activités spéciales et festivals locaux d’Ottawa dans
le programme annuel de marketing des destinations de Tourisme Ottawa,
· élaborer une politique pour les
services facturés et en nature offerts aux festivals, aux foires et aux
activités spéciales,
· modifier la politique de
commandite actuelle de la Ville d’Ottawa afin de répondre aux demandes de la
collectivité.
2. d’envisager, dans le cadre du processus
budgétaire de 2007, une augmentation du plan de financement municipal de
2,5 millions de dollars (répartie sur quatre ans) pour les arts, les
festivals, les foires et les activités spéciales à Ottawa, afin :
· de répondre aux besoins
existants et émergents de la communauté,
· d’atteindre le niveau moyen de
concurrence des six autres grandes villes du Canada,
· d’acquérir la capacité maximale
d’attirer des investissements des gouvernements provincial et fédéral ainsi que
d’autres sources, et ce, en temps opportun;
· 2007 – 1,5 million de
dollars (650 000 $ versés aux festivals, aux foires et aux activités
spéciales et 850 000 $ consacrés à l’investissement dans les arts),
· 2008 – 400 000 $,
· 2009 – 400 000 $,
· 2010 – 200 000 $;
4. de rétablir le programme de financement
des festivals, des foires et des activités spéciales (713 000 $),
conformément aux prévisions budgétaires de 2007 et sous réserve de
l’approbation de celles-ci;
5. de cerner les occasions et de plaider
en faveur d’accroître l’attribution de ressources à l’appui du secteur des arts
et des festivals d’Ottawa par les gouvernements fédéral et provincial;
6. de cerner les occasions de renforcer
les partenariats culturels prévoyant la participation du secteur local des arts
et des festivals, de la CCN, de la Ville de Gatineau et des institutions
culturelles fédérales situées à Ottawa;
7. de travailler avec le Conseil pour le
monde des affaires et des arts du Canada à la mise en place d’un programme de
subventions de contrepartie ArtsVest à Ottawa en 2008 afin d’accroître le
soutien du secteur privé à l’égard des arts;
8. de collaborer avec la Chambre de
commerce d'Ottawa, le Regroupement des gens d’affaires, le Conseil des arts
d'Ottawa, Arts Ottawa Est (AOE) et Ottawa Festivals d’Ottawa pour créer des
occasions d’établir des partenariats entre les entreprises de la capitale et le
secteur local des arts et des festivals;
9. de collaborer avec le Conseil des arts
d'Ottawa, le ministère du Patrimoine canadien et la Fondation Trillium de
l’Ontario pour évaluer la possibilité d'élaborer à Ottawa un projet de
stabilisation des arts et de mettre sur pied un service d’investissement à
l’appui du secteur local des arts, y compris un fonds de dotation;
10. de charger le personnel de Services
culturels de collaborer avec le personnel de Développement des affaires,
d’Ottawa Festivals d’Ottawa et de Tourisme Ottawa afin de veiller à ce que les
festivals, les foires et les activités spéciales organisés par la Ville soient
intégrés, dans la mesure du possible, au programme annuel de marketing de
Tourisme Ottawa;
11. de charger le personnel du Centre de
services des fêtes et festivals de continuer à faire le suivi des services en
nature et des services facturés en 2007 de la Ville d’Ottawa en vue de
produire, avant le dépôt du budget de 2008, une analyse et un rapport traitant
d’une politique relative aux services en nature et aux services facturés;
12. de charger le personnel du Centre de
services des fêtes et festivals de faire rapport sur une modification proposée
à la politique actuelle sur les commandites afin de répondre aux demandes de la
communauté visant l’obtention de commandites de la Ville et notamment aux
demandes des organismes oeuvrant
dans les foires, les festivals et les activités spéciales.
13. ATTENDU QUE les
programmes actuels de soutien aux festivals, aux foires et aux activités
spéciales appuient les importantes activités locales de ce genre qui ont un
impact à l’échelle de la Ville, qui se déroulent sur deux jours consécutifs ou
plus, et qui ont un budget de plus de 30 000 $;
ATTENDU QUE d’importantes activités
communautaires ont lieu dans divers secteurs de la Ville, y compris les
activités locales organisées à l’occasion de la fête du Canada;
IL EST RÉSOLU
QUE l’on charge le personnel d’élaborer et de mettre en œuvre un programme
pilote de financement des grandes activités communautaires qui auront lieu en
2007 et qu’il fasse ensuite rapport au Conseil;
IL EST EN OUTRE RÉSOLU QUE l’on prélève à cette fin
25 000 $ de l’enveloppe proposée de 650 000 $ devant servir
au financement des festivals, des foires et des activités spéciales;
DOCUMENTATION
1. Deputy City Manager’s report dated 19 January 2007 (ACS2007-CPS-CSF-0001).
2. Extract
of Draft Minute, 1 February 2007 to be distributed prior to Council.
Report to/Rapport au:
Community and Protective
Services Committee
Comité des services communautaires et de protection
and Council / et au Conseil
19 January 2007 / le 19 janvier 2007
Submitted by/Soumis par: Steve Kanellakos, Deputy City Manager, Community
and Protective Services / Directeur municipal adjoint, Services communautaires
et de protection
Contact Person/Personne ressource: Colleen
Hendrick, Director / Directrice
Cultural
Services and Community Funding / Services culturels et financement
communautaire
(613) 580-2424 x24366, colleen.hendrick@ottawa.ca
Susan
Jones, Director / Directrice
By-law
Services / Services des règlements municipaux
(613)
580-2424 x 25536, susan.jones@ottawa.ca
City Wide |
Ref N°: ACS2007-CPS-CSF-0001 |
SUBJECT: |
Arts Investment Strategy and festivals
sustainability plan |
OBJET : |
Stratégie
d’investissement dans les arts ET plan de viabilité des festivals |
REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS
That the Community and Protective Services Committee recommend that
Council:
1. Support the overall
Arts Investment Strategy (Document 1) and Festivals Sustainability Plan
(Document 2), which include the following components:
·
increased municipal arts,
festival, fair and special event funding;
·
expanded advocacy directed to
senior levels of government and aimed to increase provincial and federal
funding for local arts and festival organizations;
·
increased cultural partnerships
that include the local arts and festival sector, the National Capital
Commission, the City of Gatineau and federal cultural institutions in Ottawa;
·
increased partnerships between
local arts, festival, fair and special event organizations and the private
sector;
·
analyze the feasibility of
developing an Arts Stabilization Project for Ottawa, and an Ottawa Arts
Investment Service including an Arts Endowment Fund;
·
increased integration of Ottawa’s
local festivals, fairs and special events into Ottawa Tourism’s annual
destination marketing program;
·
development of a policy for
“in-kind” and invoiced services provided to festivals, fairs and special
events; and
·
amendment to the City of Ottawa’s
current sponsorship policy to accommodate community requests.
2. Consider, during the
2007 budget process, an increased municipal funding plan of $2.5M for local
arts, festivals, fairs and special events over a four-year time period, in order
to:
·
meet existing and emerging
community needs;
·
achieve average competitiveness
with Canada’s six other largest single cities and;
·
achieve the greatest capacity of
leveraging investment from other levels of government and alternate sources in
a timely manner.
·
2007 - $1.5M (to be allocated as
follows: $650,000 for Festivals, Fairs and Special Events and $850,000 for Arts
Investment)
·
2008 - $400,000
·
2009 - $400,000
·
2010 - $200,000
4. That the Festival,
Fairs and Special Events funding program ($713,000) be reinstated, as
identified in, and subject to approval of, the 2007 Draft Budget.
5. Identify opportunities
and advocate for increased provincial and federal allocations for Ottawa’s
local arts/festival sector.
6. Identify opportunities
to increase cultural partnerships that include the local arts and festival
sectors, the National Capital Commission (NCC), the City of Gatineau and
federal cultural institutions located in Ottawa.
7. Increase private sector
support of the arts by implementing an ArtsVest matching grants program in
Ottawa in 2008, in collaboration with the Council for Business and the Arts in
Canada.
8. Build partnerships
between the local business and local arts sectors in collaboration with the
Ottawa Chamber of Commerce, le Regroupement des gens d’affaires, the Council
for the Arts in Ottawa, Arts Ottawa East and Ottawa Festivals.
9. Analyze the feasibility
of developing an Arts Stabilization Project for Ottawa and an Arts Investment
Service, including an Arts Endowment Fund, in support of Ottawa’s local arts
sector in collaboration with the Council for the Arts in Ottawa, the Department
of Canadian Heritage, the Ontario Trillium Foundation and other local arts
service organizations.
10. Direct
Cultural Services staff to work with Business Development staff, Ottawa
Festivals and Ottawa Tourism to ensure that the City’s Festivals, Fairs and
Special Events are integrated wherever possible into Ottawa Tourism’s annual
destination marketing program.
11. Direct
Events Central staff to continue tracking the City of Ottawa’s “in-kind”
services and “invoiced” services in 2007 to provide an analysis and a report
back prior to the 2008 budget respecting a policy for “in-kind” and “invoiced”
services.
12. Direct
Events Central staff to report back with an amendment to the City of Ottawa’s
current sponsorship policy to accommodate community requests including requests
from Fairs, Festivals and Special Events seeking City sponsorship.
RECOMMANDATIONS DU
RAPPORT
Que le Comité des services communautaires et de protection recommande au
Conseil :
1. d’appuyer
la Stratégie générale d’investissement dans les arts (Document 1) et le
Plan de viabilité des festivals (Document 2), qui regroupent les
initiatives suivantes :
· augmenter le financement municipal
des arts, des festivals, des foires et des activités spéciales,
· exercer davantage de pressions
sur les ordres supérieurs de gouvernement en vue d’accroître le financement
provincial et fédéral alloué aux organismes d’Ottawa spécialisés dans les arts
et les festivals,
· renforcer les partenariats
culturels prévoyant la participation du secteur local des arts et des
festivals, de la Commission de la capitale nationale (CCN), de la Ville de
Gatineau et des institutions culturelles nationales situées à Ottawa,
· renforcer les partenariats
entre le secteur privé et les organismes locaux oeuvrant dans les arts, les festivals et l’organisation de
foires et d’activités spéciales,
· évaluer la possibilité
d'élaborer à Ottawa un projet de stabilisation des arts et de mettre sur pied
un service d’investissement à l’appui du secteur local des arts, y compris un
fonds de dotation,
· assurer une plus grande
intégration des foires, activités spéciales et festivals locaux d’Ottawa dans
le programme annuel de marketing des destinations de Tourisme Ottawa,
· élaborer une politique pour les
services facturés et en nature offerts aux festivals, aux foires et aux
activités spéciales,
· modifier la politique de
commandite actuelle de la Ville d’Ottawa afin de répondre aux demandes de la
collectivité.
2. d’envisager,
dans le cadre du processus budgétaire de 2007, une augmentation du plan de
financement municipal de 2,5 millions de dollars (répartie sur quatre ans)
pour les arts, les festivals, les foires et les activités spéciales à Ottawa,
afin :
· de répondre aux besoins
existants et émergents de la communauté,
· d’atteindre le niveau moyen de
concurrence des six autres grandes villes du Canada,
· d’acquérir la capacité maximale
d’attirer des investissements des gouvernements provincial et fédéral ainsi que
d’autres sources, et ce, en temps opportun;
· 2007 – 1,5 million de
dollars (650 000 $ versés aux festivals, aux foires et aux activités
spéciales et 850 000 $ consacrés à l’investissement dans les arts),
· 2008 – 400 000 $,
· 2009 – 400 000 $,
· 2010 – 200 000 $;
4. de
rétablir le programme de financement des festivals, des foires et des activités
spéciales (713 000 $), conformément aux prévisions budgétaires de
2007 et sous réserve de l’approbation de celles-ci;
5. de
cerner les occasions et de plaider en faveur d’accroître l’attribution de
ressources à l’appui du secteur des arts et des festivals d’Ottawa par les
gouvernements fédéral et provincial;
6. de
cerner les occasions de renforcer les partenariats culturels prévoyant la
participation du secteur local des arts et des festivals, de la CCN, de la
Ville de Gatineau et des institutions culturelles fédérales situées à Ottawa;
7. de
travailler avec le Conseil pour le monde des affaires et des arts du Canada à
la mise en place d’un programme de subventions de contrepartie ArtsVest à
Ottawa en 2008 afin d’accroître le soutien du secteur privé à l’égard des arts;
8. de
collaborer avec la Chambre de commerce d'Ottawa, le Regroupement des gens
d’affaires, le Conseil des arts d'Ottawa, Arts Ottawa Est (AOE) et Ottawa
Festivals d’Ottawa pour créer des occasions d’établir des partenariats entre
les entreprises de la capitale et le secteur local des arts et des festivals;
9. de
collaborer avec le Conseil des arts d'Ottawa, le ministère du Patrimoine
canadien et la Fondation Trillium de l’Ontario pour évaluer la possibilité
d'élaborer à Ottawa un projet de stabilisation des arts et de mettre sur pied
un service d’investissement à l’appui du secteur local des arts, y compris un
fonds de dotation;
10. de
charger le personnel de Services culturels de collaborer avec le personnel de
Développement des affaires, d’Ottawa Festivals d’Ottawa et de Tourisme Ottawa afin
de veiller à ce que les festivals, les foires et les activités spéciales
organisés par la Ville soient intégrés, dans la mesure du possible, au
programme annuel de marketing de Tourisme Ottawa;
11. de
charger le personnel du Centre de services des fêtes et festivals de continuer
à faire le suivi des services en nature et des services facturés en 2007 de la
Ville d’Ottawa en vue de produire, avant le dépôt du budget de 2008, une
analyse et un rapport traitant d’une politique relative aux services en nature
et aux services facturés;
12. de
charger le personnel du Centre de services des fêtes et festivals de faire
rapport sur une modification proposée à la politique actuelle sur les
commandites afin de répondre aux demandes de la communauté visant l’obtention
de commandites de la Ville et notamment aux demandes des organismes oeuvrant dans les foires, les festivals et
les activités spéciales.
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
City Council motions in 2002 and 2003
directed staff to develop a plan that would bring arts and festival funding in
Ottawa to a competitive level with Canada’s 6 other largest single cities. Development of an Arts Investment Strategy
for Ottawa was initiated in 2005 in response to Council direction.
An Arts Investment Strategy community working
team was established in April 2005 and included representatives from Ottawa’s
arts and festival umbrella organizations, the City of Ottawa’s Arts, Heritage
and Culture Advisory Committee and discipline-specific leaders.
In April 2006, City Council approved the
establishment of and terms of reference for an Arts Investment Strategy
Steering Committee whose mandate was to:
a)
provide
high-level guidance, advice and support for the Strategy, as further
development and consultation was carried out;
b)
provide
direction to the continued development of the Strategy;
c)
assist
in making links to other levels of government, the private sector and other
agencies; and
d)
oversee
Arts Investment Strategy transition into the City’s Corporate Strategic Plan,
once City Council direction had been given in early 2007.
The Arts Investment Strategy Steering Committee was formed in April, 2006 including representation from City councillors, arts and festival umbrella organizations, the City’s Arts, Heritage and Culture Advisory Committee, the City’s Business Advisory Committee, an arts patron, and provincial and federal government funders.
In April 2006, City Council directed the
Community and Protective Services Department, in consultation with Ottawa
Festivals and community groups, to develop a Sustainability Support Plan for
Festivals, Fairs and Special Events.
The Festival Sustainability Steering Committee was formed including
representation from Ottawa Festivals (OF); Ottawa Tourism; the Ottawa-Gatineau
Hotel Association; as well as representatives from Festivals, Fairs, Special
Events, and local Canada Day events.
The Arts Investment Strategy recommends concrete steps for the City to take in order to achieve the quality of life impacts for Ottawa that arts and festival sectors generate in other major Canadian cities, and to realize the economic potential of the local sector. This broad, partnered investment strategy is aimed at closing the revenue gap for Ottawa’s local arts and festival sector over an eight year period by implementing short and longer-term strategies to generate new arts and festival sector operating revenues from a wide range of sources. These strategies include an increased municipal funding plan of $2.5M (in order to achieve average competitiveness with Canada’s 6 other largest single cities), expanded advocacy aimed at increasing provincial and federal funding, increased private sector and National Capital cultural partnerships, and study of a proposed Arts Stabilization Project and an Arts Investment Service for Ottawa.
The Festivals Sustainability Plan recommends the reinstatement of Festivals, Fairs and Special Events program funding as identified in the 2007 Draft Budget. The plan supports the allocation of increased municipal funding as outlined in the Arts Investment Strategy and it proposes ways to work collaboratively with Ottawa Tourism to ensure festivals, fairs and special events are promoted. The plan also proposes that City policies for “in-kind” and “invoiced” services and sponsorship be developed to accommodate community requests including requests from Fairs, Festivals and Special Events.
RÉSUMÉ
Dans les motions du
Conseil municipal de 2002 et 2003, on demandait au personnel d’élaborer un plan
qui amènerait le financement des arts et des festivals à Ottawa à un niveau
compétitif avec les six autres plus grandes villes du Canada. La mise au point
d’une stratégie d’investissement dans les arts pour Ottawa a débuté en 2005 en
réponse à la demande du Conseil.
Une équipe de travail
de la collectivité sur la Stratégie d’investissement dans les arts a été créée
en avril 2005 et est composée de représentants d’organismes cadres du
secteur des arts et des festivals d’Ottawa, de membres du Comité consultatif
sur les arts, le patrimoine et la culture de la Ville d’Ottawa, ainsi que de
chefs de file de diverses disciplines.
En avril 2006,
le Conseil municipal a approuvé la mise sur pied d’un Comité directeur sur la
Stratégie d’investissement dans les arts, dont le mandat est le suivant :
e) fournir
aux responsables conseils et appui pour l’avancement de la Stratégie une fois
que les travaux auront progressé et que les résidents auront été consultés;
f)
aider à orienter le travail d’élaboration de la
Stratégie;
g) faciliter
les échanges avec les autres ordres de gouvernement, le secteur privé et
d’autres organismes;
h) surveiller
l’intégration de la Stratégie d’investissement dans les arts au Plan
stratégique global de la Ville, conformément à la décision que prendra à cet
égard le Conseil municipal au début de 2007.
En avril 2006,
on a créé le Comité directeur de la Stratégie d’investissement dans les arts.
Ce comité est formé de conseillers municipaux, de représentants d’organismes
cadres du secteur des arts et des festivals, de membres du Comité consultatif sur
les arts, le patrimoine et la culture de la Ville, de membres du Comité
consultatif sur les affaires de la Ville, d’un mécène des arts et de bailleurs
de fonds des gouvernements provincial et fédéral.
En avril 2006,
le Conseil municipal a chargé le personnel de Services communautaires et de
protection d’élaborer, de concert avec Ottawa Festivals d’Ottawa et des groupes
communautaires, un plan de viabilité des festivals, des foires et des activités
spéciales. Le Comité directeur pour la viabilité des festivals a donc été créé
et regroupe des membres de Festivals d’Ottawa, de Tourisme Ottawa, de
l’Association des hôtels d'Ottawa-Gatineau, ainsi que des représentants
d’organismes chargés de l’organisation de festivals, de foires et d’activités
spéciales dans la région et des célébrations de la fête du Canada.
La
Stratégie d'investissement dans les arts a pour but d'établir les mesures
concrètes que prendra la Ville afin d'obtenir pour Ottawa les résultats sur le
plan de la qualité de vie que le secteur des arts et des festivals génère dans
d’autres grandes villes canadiennes et de constater les possibilités
économiques du secteur local. Cette vaste stratégie d'investissement, réalisée
en partenariat, vise à éliminer en huit ans le manque à gagner observé dans le secteur
local des arts et des festivals en mettant en œuvre des stratégies à court et à
long terme ayant pour objectif de générer de nouvelles recettes de
fonctionnement pour les arts et les festivals, lesquelles proviendraient de
nombreuses différentes sources. Parmi les stratégies envisagées, notons un plan
de financement municipal accru de 2,5 millions de dollars (afin
d’atteindre la compétitivité moyenne avec les six autres plus grandes villes du
Canada), une plus grande intervention visant à accroître l’attribution de fonds
par les gouvernements fédéral et provincial, un plus grand nombre de
partenariats culturels dans le secteur privé et la capitale nationale, ainsi
qu’une étude sur la proposition d’un projet de stabilisation des arts et un
Service d’investissement dans les arts pour Ottawa.
Le Plan
de viabilité des festivals préconise le rétablissement du programme de
financement des festivals, des foires et des activités spéciales, comme le
prévoient les prévisions budgétaires de 2007. Par l’entremise de ce Plan, la
Ville appuie une augmentation du financement municipal dans les arts, comme le
précise la Stratégie d’investissement dans les arts, et propose des façons de
collaborer avec Tourisme Ottawa pour veiller à la promotion des festivals, des
foires et des activités spéciales prévus dans la capitale nationale. Le
document suggère également d’élaborer des politiques municipales sur les
services en nature et les services facturés ainsi que sur les commandites de
façon à répondre aux demandes du secteur des foires, des festivals et des
activités spéciales.
1. Arts
Investment Strategy (AIS):
Development of an Arts Investment Strategy for
Ottawa was initiated in 2005 in response to Council direction.
An Arts Investment Strategy community working
team was established in April 2005 and included representatives from Ottawa’s
arts and festival umbrella organizations, the City of Ottawa’s Arts, Heritage
and Culture Advisory Committee and discipline-specific leaders. This working team played an active
consultative role during the research phase and contributed directly to the
development of the Arts Investment Strategy discussion paper.
In April 2006, City Council approved the
establishment of and terms of reference for an Arts Investment Strategy
Steering Committee whose mandate was to:
a) provide high-level guidance,
advice and support for the Strategy, as further development and consultation
was carried out;
b) provide direction to the
continued development of the Strategy;
c) assist in making links to other
levels of government, the private sector and other agencies; and
d) oversee Arts Investment
Strategy transition into the City’s Corporate Strategic Plan, once City Council
direction had been given in early 2007.
The Arts Investment Strategy Steering
Committee was established in April 2006 with 3 Councillors, representatives
from arts and festival umbrella organizations, a representative from the City’s
Business Advisory Committee, a representative from the City’s Arts, Heritage
and Culture Advisory Committee, an arts patron, and provincial and federal
government representatives. The
Steering Committee has developed the strategy and its recommendations based on
broad community consultation and expert advice.
The Arts Investment Strategy is attached as
Document 1.
2.
Festivals Sustainability Plan (FSP):
City Council directed the Community and
Protective Services Department, in consultation with Ottawa Festivals and
community groups, to develop a sustainability support plan for Festivals, Fairs
and Special Events. The Festival
Sustainability Steering Committee was formed including representation from
Ottawa Festivals (OF); Ottawa Tourism; the Ottawa-Gatineau Hotel Association;
as well as representatives from Festival, Fair, and Special Event organizations
and local Canada Day events. All
members agree that both the community and the City have a role to play in
sustaining Festivals, Fairs and Special Events. 27 representatives from the festivals, fairs and events sector
participated in a public consultation session and there was general support for
the overall draft recommendations.
The report of the Festival Sustainability
Plan Steering Committee is attached as Document 2.
DISCUSSION
Arts
Investment Strategy
The Arts Investment Strategy recommends
concrete steps for the City of Ottawa to take in order to invest, to spark
investment and to sustain investment in Ottawa’s local arts and festival
sector. This broad, partnered
investment strategy is aimed at closing the revenue gap for Ottawa’s local arts
and festival sector over an eight year period.
Summary of Research
Extensive research was carried out during the
development of the Strategy. A 2003
cross-Canada per-capita study comparing 2003 operating/project funding invested
in local arts/festival sectors from municipal, provincial and federal
government sources in Canada’s 7 largest single cities was undertaken. Ottawa ranked last in municipal per-capita,
last in provincial arts agency per-capita, second last in Canada Council for the
Arts per-capita and second in Department of Canadian Heritage per-capita.
When all 2003 governmental funding sources
were combined, Ottawa ranked last at $12.20.
Second last was Toronto at $24.14.
Calgary, Edmonton and Winnipeg ranked in the middle at $25.09, $25.56
and $26.26 respectively. Vancouver was
second at $47.16 per-capita and Montreal ranked first at $48.20 (please refer
to Table 3 in Document 1).
The 2003 municipal funding per-capita study
was updated to report on 2005 figures.
In this study, Ottawa continued to rank last at $3.64 municipal
per-capita funding in comparison to Canada’s 6 other largest single cities
(please refer to Table 4 in Document 2).
Ottawa’s Unique Context
Ottawa’s dual status of national capital and
local city presents challenges and opportunities for the local arts and
festival sector. Ottawa’s national,
cultural institutions have national mandates and are accountable to taxpayers
across the country. They are not
mandated to support the local cultural sector.
Ottawa’s local arts and festival institutions support the local cultural
sector, help to keep Ottawa’s creative talent here, connect with Ottawa’s
diverse and distinct neighbourhoods and communities and tell Ottawa
stories.
Major challenges currently exist for local
arts and festivals to operate in Ottawa alongside the national cultural sector
with its national mandate, its larger resources and its broader
infrastructure. Competition naturally
results in the areas of funding, venues, audiences, volunteers, participants,
talent attraction and retention, media attention, private sector sponsors, and
fundraising events/activity. Challenges
can turn into “capital city” opportunities only if adequate and competitive
funding, resources and support are in place for development and sustainability.
Economic Impact
A
creative city is a competitive city in the global marketplace, and a tolerant,
attractive home for diverse residents.
A creative city must be able to sustain a concentration of artists,
creative people, cultural organizations and creative industries within its
boundaries. Municipalities that adopt
and support culture as an essential industry have gained positive economic
benefits for their communities. The
cultural sector in a city creates job growth, turns ordinary cities into
‘destination cities’, creates interconnections between arts and business,
revitalizes urban areas, attracts skilled workers and creates spin-off
businesses.
Recommended Arts Investment Strategy
The Arts Investment Strategy aims to eliminate the arts and festival sector revenue gap within eight years time (by 2014), by implementing short and longer-term strategies to generate new arts and festival sector operating revenues from a wide range of sources.
A municipal investment plan is the essential catalyst that will create increased capacity for investment and support from provincial and federal government sources, the private sector, individual philanthropists and foundations.
These new
leveraged sources of investment will, in turn, build the capacity of the local
arts and festival sector to generate increased earned revenue; expand
fundraising income; and achieve more effective planning, governance, marketing
and operational systems. Financial
sustainability and the resulting quality of life and economic impacts will
result in Ottawa becoming a more dynamic and liveable city for residents, and a
more attractive location for business and tourists.
The goals of the Arts Investment Strategy
are:
Municipal Investment Plan
In
order to meet existing and emerging community needs, to achieve average
competitiveness with Canada’s six other largest single cities and to achieve
the greatest capacity of leveraging investment from other levels of government
and alternate sources in a timely manner, Recommendation Two identifies an
increased municipal funding plan of $2.5M for local arts, festivals, fairs and
special events over a four-year time period.
This proposed municipal investment plan would:
a)
initiate
the Arts Investment Strategy for Ottawa and confirm the City of Ottawa’s
leadership role;
b)
build
the capacity that will allow for the implementation of Recommendations Three
through Nine; and
c)
increase
Ottawa’s municipal arts/festival funding per-capita from $3.84 in 2006 to $5.94
in 2010.
The average per-capita measure of the six
other largest single Canadian cities in 2005 was $6.66. When the highest and lowest per-capita
measures are removed from the mix, in order to even out the average and avoid a
potentially flawed comparison, the resulting average per-capita measure is
$5.95. The $2.5M municipal investment
plan would bring Ottawa’s per-capita measure to average competitiveness, based
on 2005 cross-Canada per-capita measures, at $5.94 by 2010. It will not, however, achieve average
cross-Canada competitiveness, if other Canadian cities implement additional
funding increases from 2007 to 2010.
Recommendation Three proposes that the
increased $2.5M four-year municipal funding plan for local arts, festivals,
fairs and special events be scheduled over a 4-year period, subject to annual
budget approvals, as follows:
· 2007
- $1.5M
· 2008
- $400,000
· 2009
- $400,000
· 2010
- $200,000
The following funding allocations have been
recommended by both the Arts Investment Strategy Steering Committee and the
Festival Sustainability Plan Steering Committee:
· In 2007, $650,000 for Festivals, Fairs and
Special Events, including $337,000 to meet existing community needs, $250,000
for the creation of a Sustainability and Emergency Fund Program, and $63,000 to
provide ongoing support and development of member organizations of Ottawa
Festivals. Also, in 2007, $850,000 for
the Arts Investment Strategy, including $440,000 to meet existing community
needs, $200,000 to meet existing and emerging needs targeted to arts, service
provisions, facility and asset management, $65,000 to increase organizational
capacity, $75,000 to support diverse communities, $50,000 to support rural
areas and $20,000 for a feasibility study related to the development of an Arts
Stabilization Project and as an Arts Investment Service for Ottawa.
By
leading with an increased annual municipal investment in 2007, the greatest
leveraging capacity can be achieved.
Table 1 below outlines the resulting municipal per-capita impact by year
from 2006 to 2010.
Table 1 - Proposed Municipal Investment Plan
(2006 to 2010)
Year |
Population |
Total Arts/Festival Operating and
Project Funding |
Total Arts/Festival Operating and Project
Funding as Per-Capita Measure |
2006 |
897,400 |
$3,445,783 |
$3.84 |
2007 |
931,703 |
$4,945,783 |
$5.30 |
2008 |
954,594 |
$5,345,783 |
$5.60 |
2009 |
977,485 |
$5,745,783 |
$5.88 |
2010 |
1,000,376 |
$5,945,783 |
$5.94 |
Other Sources of
Funding and Partnerships
Increased Support From Other Levels of
Government
The
average combined government dollars disbursed in 2003 to the local arts and
festival sector in Canada’s 7 largest single cities was $35,283,945. Combined government dollars disbursed in
2003 to Ottawa’s local arts and festival sector was $10,242,248. The average combined government per-capita
in 2003 in these same 7 cities was $29.80.
Ottawa’s combined government per-capita in 2003 was $12.20.
An AIS government investment focus group
was held in October 2006 with representatives from the Department of Canadian
Heritage; the Canada Council for the Arts; the Ontario Ministries of
Citizenship, Culture, Sport and Recreation; the Ontario Ministry of Tourism;
the Ontario Arts Council; the Ontario Trillium Foundation and the City of
Ottawa
At this Government Investment focus group, municipal funding was identified as the keystone piece that leverages provincial and federal funding. Increased municipal funding will provide the initial investment required for the local arts/festival sector to further develop its products, talent and infrastructure. This, in turn, allows local arts and festival organizations to compete more favourably at provincial and federal levels for funding. Increased investment leads to greater development, which leads to stronger artistic merit, organizational effectiveness and community impact. This builds competitiveness in the sector and opens the door for greater investment opportunities.
Recommendation Five identifies the need to seek out opportunities and advocate for increased provincial and federal allocations for Ottawa’s local arts/festival sector on an annual basis.
Increased
Support from the Private Sector
According to the City of Ottawa’s extensive 2005 Revenue/Income Study, private sector and fundraising revenue represents 26% of the total collective income generated by the local arts and festival sector.
An AIS private sector focus group was held in October 2006 with participants from the private sector, OCRI, the City’s Economic Development Division, Ottawa’s Business Advisory Committee, the University of Ottawa and arts/festival community leaders.
Recommendation Seven is a specific proposed action that refers to the implementation of an ArtsVest matching grants program in Ottawa in 2008, in collaboration with the Council for Business and the Arts in Canada (CBAC). ArtsVest is a matching grants program created by the CBAC in partnership with the Ontario Ministry of Culture and the Ontario Trillium Foundation. Its goal is to help develop new, mutually beneficial partnerships between business and arts organizations that will in turn benefit Ontario communities.
Recommendation Eight identifies a broader
initiative aimed at building partnership and development related to Ottawa’s
local business and local arts sectors. There is a need to work in greater partnership with
corporations and the business sector in order to understand how the arts can
offer greater value in exchange for sponsorship. This information then needs to be shared with the full
arts/festival sector, since the more value that the arts can deliver to
sponsors, the more revenue that will be returned. There is a need to treat sponsorship revenue as earned income and
to better understand how these revenues can be earned.
Suggested initial partners for collaboration in this regard are local business and arts umbrella organizations including the Ottawa Chamber of Commerce, le Regroupement des gens d’affaires, the Council for the Arts in Ottawa, Arts Ottawa East and Ottawa Festivals.
Increased
Cultural Partnerships
An AIS cultural partnership focus group was held in October 2006 with participants from the National Capital Commission, the National Arts Centre, the National Gallery of Canada, the Canadian Museum of Civilization, the Canadian War Museum, the City of Gatineau, le Conseil régional de la culture de l’Outaouais, the City of Ottawa and arts/festival community leaders.
Participants determined there are opportunities to develop increased cultural and marketing partnerships which include the local arts and festival sectors, the National Capital Commission (NCC), the City of Gatineau and federal cultural institutions located in Ottawa. Tourism Ottawa and Tourisme Outaouais are important partners as well.
Recommendation Six identifies the need to seek out these partnership opportunities.
Long-Term
Sustainability
Longer-term sustainability is addressed through two potential initiatives – the development of an Arts Stabilization Project for Ottawa, and the establishment of an Investment Service in support of Ottawa’s local arts sector.
In November 2006, two AIS focus groups were held focusing on different components of longer-term sustainability. The first AIS focus group determined that a feasibility study to assess the development of an Arts Stabilization Project for Ottawa should be carried out. Arts organizations that participate in Arts Stabilization projects work with professionals in different areas of expertise to build a more stable administrative and financial base, and to acquire skills that help them cope with current and future challenges. Once this work is successfully completed, they can be rewarded with Working Capital Awards to help sustain their achievements. Arts Stabilization Projects represent the interests of the larger community through the make-up of their Boards and the diversity of their revenue bases.
The second AIS focus group discussed the possible establishment of an Ottawa arts investment service. Philanthropic initiatives can serve to deliver an important source of revenue to arts organizations that have charitable status. The Arts Investment Strategy Steering Committee was asked to consider the feasibility of establishing an Arts Endowment Fund for Ottawa. In addition, the establishment of an investment transfer service was discussed.
Recommendation Nine identifies the need to analyze the feasibility of developing an Arts Stabilization Project for Ottawa and an Arts Investment Service, including an Arts Endowment Fund, in support of Ottawa’s local arts sector in collaboration with the Council for the Arts in Ottawa, the Department of Canadian Heritage, the Ontario Trillium Foundation and other local arts service organizations.
Festivals, Fairs and Special Events will be sustainable,
as demonstrated in the cross-Canada research, through a combination of adequate
funding investment and clearly defined in-kind services and sponsorship
policies.
The
Festivals, Fairs and Special Events Funding Program budget is $626,084 and has
remained static since its inception in 2003.
Since 2004, this Funding Program was removed from the base budget
funding and has been funded on a one-time basis through the citywide reserve
fund. The Festival Sustainability
Steering Committee supports Recommendation Four calling for the reinstatement
of the Festivals, Fairs, and Special Event Funding Program, which has a budget
of $713,000 including $86,916 for program support.
Recommendation
Three proposes $650,000 in additional funding for Festivals, Fairs and Special
Events in 2007. As indicated in the
Arts Investment Strategy allocation proposal, the Festivals Sustainability Plan
supports the additional 2007 funding allocation of $337,000 to meet existing community needs, $250,000 for the
creation of a Sustainability and Emergency Fund Program to provide greater
stability to the Festival, Fair and Special Event industry; and $63,000 for
Ottawa Festivals to provide ongoing support and development to member
organizations.
As Ottawa Tourism is responsible for marketing
the City of Ottawa as a tourist destination, they are proposing to consult with
Ottawa Festivals each
year to ensure that the City's Festivals, Fairs and Special Events are
integrated wherever possible into Ottawa Tourism’s annual destination marketing
program. Cultural Services staff will
work with Business Development staff, Ottawa Tourism and Ottawa Festivals to
help ensure this integration (Recommendation Ten).
Many cities invest funds related to in-kind
services for festivals, fairs and special events. While preliminary data indicates that the City of Ottawa has
invested over $700,000 for in-kind services in 2006, more research and study
need to be done in this area. The Festival Sustainability Steering Committee
supports the need for a Citywide policy for “in kind” services and “invoiced”
services. Event Central staff, however, will first need to continue tracking
the City of Ottawa’s in-kind services and charged services in 2007 in order to
analyze this information before developing a framework for in-kind and invoiced
services (Recommendation Eleven).
Frequently, the Community and Protective
Services Department receives requests from community and event organizers to
sponsor local events. While the City of
Ottawa does have a Corporate Sponsorship and Advertising Policy “to assist in the provision of City services and projects”,
this policy does not address City sponsorship of an event. The Festival Sustainability Steering
Committee supports the need for a Citywide sponsorship policy that accommodates
these types of community requests (Recommendation Twelve).
PUBLIC CONSULTATION
A total of 220 individuals and organizations have been involved in Arts Investment Strategy consultations. Participants helped to develop and supported the strategy and draft recommendations.
An additional 27 festivals, fairs, and special events organizers participated in a public consultation session on the Festivals Sustainability Plan. There was general support for the overall draft recommendations.
Further details
on public consultation appear in Documents 1 and 2.
Funding for the Arts Investment Strategy has
not been included in the 2007 draft operating estimates. If approved by City Council, the additional
requirement in 2007 will result in a 0.2% tax increase.
The 2007 Draft Budget includes a previously
one-time funded amount of $713,000 for Festivals, Fairs and Special Events,
including $87,000 for program support.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION
Document 1: Arts Investment Strategy
Document 2: Festivals Sustainability Plan
DISPOSITION
The Community and Protective Services Department will implement any direction received from Council.
That Community and Protective Services Committee recommend that Council:
1. Support the overall Arts Investment Strategy which includes the following components:
· increased municipal arts, festival, fair and special event funding;
· expanded advocacy directed to senior levels of government and aimed to increase provincial and federal funding for local arts and festival organizations;
· increased cultural partnerships that include the local arts and festival sector, the National Capital Commission, the City of Gatineau and federal cultural institutions in Ottawa;
· increased partnerships between local arts, festival, fair and special event organizations and the private sector; and
· analyze the feasibility of developing an Arts Stabilization Project for Ottawa, and an Ottawa Arts Investment Service including an Arts Endowment Fund.
2. Consider, during the 2007 budget process, an increased municipal funding plan of $2.5M for local arts, festivals, fairs and special events over a four-year time period, in order to:
· meet existing and emerging community needs;
· achieve average competitiveness with Canada’s six other largest single cities and;
· achieve the greatest capacity of leveraging investment from other levels of government and alternate sources in a timely manner.
3. Implement the proposed increased $2.5M four-year municipal funding plan for local arts, festivals, fairs and special events according to the proposed allocation and timeline identified in the report, and subject to annual budget approvals, as follows:
· 2009 - $400,000
4. Identify opportunities and advocate for increased provincial and federal allocations for Ottawa’s local arts/festival sector.
5. Identify opportunities to increase cultural partnerships that include the local arts and festival sectors, the National Capital Commission (NCC), the City of Gatineau and federal cultural institutions located in Ottawa.
6. Increase private sector support of the arts by implementing an ArtsVest matching grants program in Ottawa in 2008, in collaboration with the Council for Business and the Arts in Canada.
7. Build partnerships between the local business and local arts sectors in collaboration with the Ottawa Chamber of Commerce, le Regroupement des gens d’affaires, the Council for the Arts in Ottawa, Arts Ottawa East and Ottawa Festivals.
8.
Analyze the feasibility of developing
an Arts Stabilization Project for Ottawa and an Arts Investment Service,
including an Arts Endowment Fund, in support of Ottawa’s local arts sector in
collaboration with the Council for the Arts in Ottawa, the Department of
Canadian Heritage, the Ontario Trillium Foundation and other local arts service organizations.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Arts Investment Strategy recommends concrete steps for the City of Ottawa to take in order to invest, to spark investment and to sustain investment in Ottawa’s local arts and festival sector. This broad, partnered investment strategy is aimed at closing the revenue gap for Ottawa’s local arts and festival sector over an 8-year period, in order to:
Awareness of the value of Ottawa’s local arts and festival sector must be raised in order to create a climate in which the sector can attract new revenues of a certain magnitude. New revenues need to come from the broadest possible range of sources, and not from increased taxpayer support alone.
The Arts Investment Strategy aims to eliminate the arts and festival sector revenue gap within eight years time (by 2014), by focusing on implementing short and longer-term strategies to generate new arts and festival sector operating revenues from a wide range of sources.
The goals of the Arts Investment Strategy are:
Assumptions and Analysis:
Municipalities that adopt and support culture as an essential industry have gained positive economic benefits for their communities. Cultural industries create job growth, turn ordinary cities into ‘destination cities’, create interconnections between arts and business, revitalize urban areas, attract skilled workers and create spin-off businesses.
A 2005 cross-Canada municipal per-capita study compared 2005 operating/project funding (not capital funding) invested in the arts/festival sector from municipal government sources in Canada’s 7 largest single cities. Ottawa ranked last in municipal funding at $3.64 per-capita as compared to Vancouver ($11.89), Montreal ($7.03), Winnipeg ($6.14), Toronto ($5.77), Edmonton ($4.87) and Calgary ($4.30) (please refer to Table 1 below).
City |
2005
Population |
Total
Municipal Arts/Festival Operating and Project Funding in 2005 |
Total
Arts/Festival Grants as Per-Capita Measure in 2005 |
Vancouver |
583,267 |
$11.89 |
|
Montréal |
1,874,000 |
$13,182,110 |
$ 7.03 |
Winnipeg |
650,100 |
$ 3,989,552 |
$ 6.14 |
Toronto |
2,607,637 |
$15,049,950 |
$ 5.77 |
Edmonton |
712,391 |
$ 3,469,600 |
$ 4.87 |
Calgary |
956,078 |
$ 4,113,992 |
$ 4.30 |
Ottawa |
865,550 |
$ 3,154,374 |
$ 3.64 |
AVERAGE |
1,178,432 |
$ 7,126,650 |
$ 6.23 |
The City must play a leadership role in order to be the catalyst that sparks and leverages broader investment from other sources. It is recognized that municipal funding is a keystone investment that leverages funding from other government levels, earned revenue, private sector contributions, fundraising income and individual donations. In order for a broad, partnered investment strategy to be successful, the City must take the first steps towards competitive investment.
In order to achieve average competitiveness with Canada’s 6 other largest single cities, and in order to achieve the greatest capacity for leveraging investment from other levels of government and alternate sources in a timely manner, the City must increase its current arts and festival funding budget by $2.5 million over a four year time period.
The average per-capita measure of Canada’s 7 largest cities (including Ottawa) in 2005 was $6.23. When the highest and lowest per-capita measures (as well as Ottawa’s per-capita measure) are removed from the mix, in order to even out the average and avoid a potentially flawed comparison, the resulting average per-capita measure is $5.95.
The $2.5M municipal investment plan will bring Ottawa’s per-capita measure to average competitiveness, based on 2005 cross-Canada per-capita measures, at $5.94 by 2010. It will not, however, achieve average cross-Canada competitiveness, if other Canadian cities implement additional funding increases from 2007 to 2010.
A municipal investment plan is the essential catalyst that will create increased capacity for investment and support from provincial and federal government sources, the private sector, individual philanthropists and foundations.
These new
leveraged sources of investment will, in turn, build the capacity of the local
arts and festival sector to generate increased earned revenue; expand
fundraising income; and achieve more effective planning, governance, marketing
and operational systems. Financial
sustainability and the resulting quality of life and economic impacts will
result in Ottawa becoming a more dynamic and liveable city for residents, and a
more attractive location for business and tourists.
Financial Implications:
Funding for the Arts Investment Strategy
has not been included in the 2007 draft operating estimates. If this request is approved by City Council,
the additional requirement in 2007 will result in a 0.2% tax increase.
Public Consultation / Input:
Since 2005, extensive public consultation and input have shaped the development of the Arts Investment Strategy for Ottawa. An AIS community working team (April 2005 to April 2006) and a Council-approved AIS Steering Committee (April 2006 to June 2007) have provided broad community direction and guidance. In the fall of 2006, 6 focus groups were held aimed at gaining specific expert feedback on 6 potential arts investment strategies. A total of 60 investors, community leaders, business leaders, and government representatives participated in these focus groups.
In January 2007,
95 individuals (including a very broad range of representatives from
arts and festival organizations, the private sector, arts industry,
foundations, universities, business improvement associations, senior government
levels, patrons, Ottawa taxpayers, citizen coalitions and the media)
participated in 2 AIS public open houses.
The Arts Investment Strategy has been discussed at 7 City of Ottawa Arts, Heritage and Culture Advisory Committee meetings from May 2005 to November 2006. During this time period, 26 AHCAC members have provided feedback to the development of the Strategy. The Business Advisory Committee and the City’s Economic Development Division have participated in focus groups and on the Steering Committee. The New Canadian Coalition for Arts and Culture, a developing organization that is linked with the Ottawa-Carleton Immigrant Services Organization, has been consulted.
In summary, a
total of 220 individuals and organizations have been involved in Arts
Investment Strategy consultations.
BACKGROUND
On November 27, 2002 and April 23, 2003 respectively, the following motions were carried at City Council:
“That staff review once again historical Arts funding for Ottawa in comparison to other cities and recommend changes in Arts funding to bring Ottawa, on a per-capita basis, in line with other Canadian cities and to recommend a timeline to achieve our goal and to present this report to this Committee in early 2003.” (November 27, 2002)
“Whereas arts and heritage policy statements mean little without a funding strategy; be it resolved that the 20/20 Arts and Heritage Plan include an investment direction based on the following: a) increasing the per-capita funding for arts and heritage on an annual basis until Ottawa’s per-capita arts funding is on a competitive basis with the 6 other large Canadian cities.” (April 23, 2003)
The Council-approved Ottawa 20/20 Arts Plan included the following policy statement:
“The City will increase per-capita arts funding annually until Ottawa’s per-capita arts funding is competitive with the 6 other large Canadian cities. The City will also work with partners to develop and sustain municipal, corporate and other public investment in the local arts sector in order to provide adequate and diversified support and resources.” (April 23, 2003)
The Council-approved Ottawa 20/20 Arts Plan’s 5 strategic directions represent 20-year goals. The City will work together with community partners, artists of all disciplines, other levels of government and the private sector to:
Ottawa carries with it a dual status - that of national capital and local city. As Canada’s 4th largest single city, Ottawa has its own neighbourhoods, its own stories to tell, its own artist-citizens, its own home-grown festivals, and the need for its own properly resourced and supported artistic infrastructure, both operating and capital.
Ottawa’s dual status poses significant challenge as well as unique opportunity for the local sector. The national mandates and achievements of Ottawa’s national cultural institutions are applauded and encouraged. Within an international context, capital cities carry essential national cultural mandates, promoting their cultural achievements to the world.
Major challenges currently exist for local arts and festivals to operate in Ottawa alongside the national cultural sector with its national mandate, its larger resources and its broader infrastructure. Competition naturally results in the areas of funding, venues, audiences, volunteers, participants, talent attraction and retention, media attention, private sector sponsors, and fundraising events/activity.
The local sector can meet these challenges and turn them into “capital city” opportunities if adequate and competitive funding, resources and support are in place for development and sustainability.
Although under-resourced and unstable, the City has a strong creative talent base. Ottawa is home to national and international award-winning artists in the literary, media, performing and visual arts. Forms, styles and genres run the full continuum from traditional to folk to classical to contemporary to popular to alternative to underground. Vibrant, local artistic work reflects Ottawa’s bilingual and diverse city.
In addition to artists and arts organizations that create, produce and present work in all disciplines, Ottawa has a dynamic local arts education and training sector that builds young talent for the future and performs extensive outreach activity, connecting artists with the neighbourhoods in which they live, with marginalized communities and with at-risk populations. Service organizations support, connect, develop and advocate for the local arts and festival scene. A wide and diverse range of home-grown festivals presents local, national and international talent, garnering local, national and international media attention and placing Ottawa on the creative map.
According to a March 2006 Hill Strategies study focused on “Artists in Large Canadian Cities”, Ottawa was home to 4,395 artists (actors, artisans, conductors, dancers, musicians, visual artists, producers, writers etc.) in 2001. In comparison to Canada’s 6 other largest single cities, Ottawa experienced the smallest percentage of growth in resident artists from 1991 to 2001. Ottawa’s 11% increase over 10 years represents an increase of 430 artists. During this same time period, the national average percentage increase was 29% and the other 6 largest Canadian single cities experienced percentage increases as reflected in Table 2 below.
The Hill Strategies “Artists in
Large Canadian Cities” Study also reports that the average annual earnings for artists in Ottawa
in 2001 was $29,700. This average
earnings is 26% less than the average earnings for the overall labour force,
despite the fact that, in Canada, the percentage of artists holding a
university degree, certificate or diploma is double that of the overall labour
force.
A creative city is a competitive city in the global marketplace, and a tolerant, attractive home for diverse residents. A creative city must be able to sustain a concentration of artists, creative people, cultural organizations and creative industries within its boundaries. A November 2002 report entitled “Competing on Creativity: Placing Ontario’s Cities in North American Context” prepared for the Ontario Ministry of Enterprise, Opportunity and Innovation and the Institute for Competitiveness and Prosperity indicates that:
“The most successful city-regions are the ones that have a social
environment that is open to creativity and diversity of all sorts. The ability to attract creative people in
arts and culture fields and to be open to diverse groups of people of different
ethnic, racial and lifestyle groups provides distinct advantages to regions in
generating innovations, growing and attracting high-technology industries, and
spurring economic growth.”
(M. Gertler, R. Florida, G. Gates and T. Vinodrai; November 2002; page ii -
Executive
Summary)
Municipalities that adopt and support culture as an essential industry have gained positive economic benefits for their communities. Cultural industries create job growth, turn ordinary cities into ‘destination cities’, create interconnections between arts and business, revitalize urban areas, attract skilled workers and create spin-off businesses.
The Council for Business and the Arts in Canada, in conjunction with McKinsey and Company, recently completed a research and analysis project related to the potential drivers for partnership between the corporate and cultural sectors. The following are key findings:
Development of an Arts Investment Strategy (AIS) for Ottawa was initiated in 2005 in response to Council direction. Following extensive research and consultation, an AIS discussion paper was developed in partnership with the community. This discussion paper summarized all research to date, and presented potential investment strategies for further community consultation and development.
These potential investment strategies included a municipal investment plan, increased provincial and federal government investment, establishment of a targeted private sector program, increased cultural partnership and feasibility work related to an Arts Stabilization Project for Ottawa and an Ottawa Arts Endowment Fund.
Arts
Investment Strategy Information Report to HRSS, November 2005
On November 17, 2005, the Health, Recreation and Social Services Committee received an Arts Investment Strategy information report that:
Establishment
of Arts Investment Strategy Steering Committee, April 2006
In April 2006, City Council approved the establishment of and terms of reference for an Arts Investment Strategy Steering Committee whose mandate was to:
Summary of
Research Results
The following research studies were completed in 2005 and 2006 during the development of the Arts Investment Strategy:
Detailed
Revenue/Income Study
The revenue/income study analyzed revenue data contained in the most recent audited financial statements of the 158 local, not-for-profit arts, festival and fair organizations that applied in 2005 for municipal funding (please refer to Annex 1). Key findings are as follows:
2003
Cross-Canada Government Funding Per-Capita Study
The 2003 cross-Canada per-capita study compared 2003 operating/project funding (not capital funding) invested in the arts/festival sector from municipal government sources, provincial arts funding agency sources, the Canada Council for the Arts and the Department of Canadian Heritage in Canada’s 7 largest single cities (Toronto, Montreal, Calgary, Ottawa, Edmonton, Winnipeg and Vancouver).
Among Canada’s 7 largest single cities, Ottawa ranked last in municipal funding at $3.41 per-capita, last in provincial arts agency funding at $2.56 per-capita, second last in Canada Council for the Arts funding at $3.95 per-capita and second in Department of Canadian Heritage funding at $2.27 per-capita.
When all of the governmental sources were combined, Ottawa ranked last at $12.20 per-capita. The 6 other largest single cities ranked as follows when comparing combined government funding sources: Montreal ($48.20), Vancouver ($47.16), Winnipeg ($26.26), Edmonton ($25.56), Calgary ($25.09), and Toronto ($24.14).
The
average combined government dollars disbursed in 2003 to the local arts and
festival sector in major Canadian cities was $35,283,945. Combined government dollars disbursed in
2003 to Ottawa’s local arts and festival sector was $10,242,248. The average combined government per-capita
in 2003 was $29.80. Ottawa’s combined
government per-capita in 2003 was $12.20
(please refer to Table 3 below).
CITY |
Combined Municipal, Provincial Arts Funding Agency,
Canada Council for the Arts and Canadian Heritage Arts/Festival $ Disbursed
in 2003 |
2003 Population |
Municipal 2003 Percapita |
Provincial Arts Funding Agency 2003 Percapita |
Canada Council for the Arts Funding 2003 Percapita |
Canadian Heritage Arts-Festival Funding 2003 |
Combined Municipal, Provincial Arts Funding Agency,
Canada Council for the Arts and Canadian Heritage Arts/Festival 2003
Percapita |
Montreal[1] |
$89,776,039 |
1,862,608 |
5.99 |
24.04 |
16.08 |
2.09 |
48.20 |
Vancouver[2] |
$26,810,475 |
568,442 |
9.34 |
10.73 |
23.57 |
3.52 |
47.16 |
Winnipeg[3] |
$16,926,697 |
644,500 |
5.01 |
10.74 |
9.17 |
1.34 |
26.26 |
Edmonton[4] |
$17,047,558 |
667,000 |
4.07 |
15.22 |
5.09 |
1.17 |
25.56 |
Calgary[5] |
$23,141,644 |
922,315 |
3.92 |
16.35 |
3.78 |
1.05 |
25.09 |
Toronto[6] |
$63,042,954 |
2,611,661 |
5.13 |
6.62 |
11.20 |
1.18 |
24.14 |
Ottawa[7] |
$10,242,248 |
839,566 |
3.41 |
2.56 |
3.95 |
2.27 |
12.20 |
AVERAGE
|
$35,283,945 |
1,159,442 |
5.27 |
12.32 |
10.41 |
1.80 |
$29.80 |
The 2001
population figures are sourced from the 2001 Statistics Canada Census. The 2003 population figures are sourced from
municipal planning departments in each city.
All Canadian Heritage funding relates to the 2003-2004 project fiscal
year.
2005
Cross-Canada Municipal Government Funding Per-Capita Study
The 2005 cross-Canada municipal per-capita study compared 2005 operating/project funding (not capital funding) invested in the arts/festival sector from municipal government sources in Canada’s 7 largest single cities.
Ottawa again ranked last in municipal funding at $3.64 per-capita as compared to Vancouver ($11.89), Montreal ($7.03), Winnipeg ($6.14), Toronto ($5.77), Edmonton ($4.87) and Calgary ($4.30) (please refer to Table 4 below).
City
|
2005
Population |
Total
Municipal Arts/Festival Operating and Project Funding in 2005 |
Total
Arts/Festival Grants as Per-Capita Measure in 2005 |
Vancouver |
583,267 |
$11.89 |
|
Montréal |
1,874,000 |
$13,182,110 |
$ 7.03 |
Winnipeg |
650,100 |
$ 3,989,552 |
$ 6.14 |
Toronto |
2,607,637 |
$15,049,950 |
$ 5.77 |
Edmonton |
712,391 |
$ 3,469,600 |
$ 4.87 |
Calgary |
956,078 |
$ 4,113,992 |
$ 4.30 |
Ottawa |
865,550 |
$ 3,154,374 |
$ 3.64 |
AVERAGE |
1,178,432 |
$ 7,126,650 |
$ 6.23 |
During the period of 2002 to 2006, Ottawa’s arts and festival funding per-capita measure has increased by 7% from $3.58 (2002) to $3.84 (2006). In actual dollars, Ottawa’s municipal arts/festival funding budget decreased by $104,985 in 2003, increased by $158,828 in 2004, increased by $132,600 in 2005 and increased by $291,409 in 2006 (please refer to Table 5 below).
Table 5 -
Ottawa Arts/Festival Funding as Per-Capita Measure (2002 to 2006)
Year |
Population |
Total
Arts/Festival Operating and Project Funding |
Total
Arts/Festival Operating and Project Funding as Per-Capita Measure |
2002 |
828,460 |
$2,967,931 |
$3.58 |
2003 |
839,566 |
$2,862,946 |
$3.41 |
2004 |
854,333 |
$3,021,774 |
$3.54 |
2005 |
865,550 |
$3,154,374 |
$3.64 |
2006 |
897,400 |
$3,445,783 |
$3.84 |
Ottawa’s 2006 arts/festival funding investment of $3,445,783 was disbursed to 220 local recipients working in the literary, media, performing and visual arts; and reflecting Ottawa’s bilingual and diverse city.
2005 Needs
Assessment Study
In 2005, an arts and festival needs assessment study was implemented by staff to determine the size of the existing gap between arts and festival sector operating revenues and revenues required for efficient and sustainable operation. Many arts and festival organizations reported that revenue shortages forced them into crisis management which impacted adversely on efficiency and quality. The not-for-profit arts and festival sector funded by the City was surveyed. The 2005 revenue/income study determined that total sector annual operating revenues measured $40 million. The needs assessment study estimated that it would require $15 million additional annual operating revenues to move the current sector from a state of crisis and instability towards health and sustainability. The operating gap, therefore, was determined to be $15 million or 37% of current revenues.
Current Revenue = $40 million |
Gap = $15 million |
The $15 million gap is identified by local arts and festival
organizations as new money required to ensure adequate staffing at equitable
wages, to maintain equipment and long-term assets and to adequately support
existing programs. It does not address
growth, emerging needs or additional, expanded programs.
On January 17, 2007, the City released its
first public report on external performance benchmarking entitled Where
We Stand, containing 112 performance measures across various municipal service
areas. This report is a complement to
the joint Ontario Municipal Benchmarking Initiative (OMBI) 2005 Performance
Benchmarking Report released on January 8, 2007. OMBI is a co-operative of 15 Ontario municipalities committed to
continuously improving the way services are delivered to citizens.
Where We Stand shows how Ottawa
performed relative to 14 other Ontario municipalities, notably the County of
Brant, Regional Municipality of Durham, Regional Municipality of Halton, City
of Hamilton, City of London, District of Muskoka, Regional Municipality of
Niagara, Regional Municipality of Peel, City of Greater Sudbury, City of
Thunder Bay, City of Toronto, Regional Municipality of Waterloo, City of
Windsor and Regional Municipality of York.
The following 2 cultural performance measures
were identified and studied within the OMBI exercise:
1. How much does it
cost to provide culture services? (2005 gross culture cost per-capita); and
2. How much does it
cost each resident to provide culture through arts grants? (2005 arts grants
per-capita)
Where We Stand indicates that there
is a variation in costing methods.
While clear definitions were determined at the outset of the process,
interpretation of these definitions varied amongst the municipalities. These variations are being discussed among reporting
municipalities and will be addressed in future reporting.
OMBI Measure: 2005 Gross
Culture Cost Per-Capita
This performance measure refers to the cost
per person to operate cultural programs within a municipality. There were 9 OMBI municipalities that
reported on this measure. Performance
results, among this sampling, indicate that Ottawa’s gross culture cost
per-capita is below that of 2 other Ontario municipalities (Hamilton and
Toronto) and higher than that of 6 other municipalities (Thunder Bay, Windsor,
London, Region of Waterloo, Sudbury and the Region of Halton). Ottawa’s cost is $1.50 above the
median. Table 6 below identifies the
performance results for the 9 municipalities that provided information relative
to this performance measure.
Municipality
|
2005 Population |
2005 Gross Culture Cost Per-Capita (in $) |
Toronto |
2,698,400 |
$20.39 |
Hamilton |
518,745 |
$19.04 |
Ottawa |
865,560 |
$15.14 |
Thunder Bay |
112,488 |
$14.23 |
Windsor |
217,249 |
$13.64 |
Median |
|
$13.64 |
London |
351,900 |
$9.45 |
Region of Waterloo |
497,900 |
$6.37 |
Sudbury |
155,339 |
$2.72 |
Region of Halton |
427,500 |
$1.49 |
Ottawa’s per-capita gross cost of $15.14 for 2005 includes the gross
expenses related to delivering the City’s arts, heritage, and festival services
and programs, operation of 21 cultural facilities, and indirect cost
allocations from the City’s internal centres of expertise (ie. Finance, Human
Resources, IT, Facility and Property Management etc.). It is important to note the gross culture
cost above includes the costs of directly operating the following City
programs:
· Archives
programs;
· Arts
Court - centre for performing visual and literary arts;
· City-wide
events (Doors Open);
· Community arts programs (outreach arts
programs to at-risk children and youth, special needs programs, youth arts
leadership programs and summer park arts programming);
· 7 directly operated and 3
community-operated galleries;
· Heritage
Programs (ie. Museum Day, Heritage Day etc.);
· 3 Museums (Billings Estate Museum,
Cumberland Heritage Village Museum, and Pinhey’s Point Historic Site);
· Nepean Creative and Visual Arts
Centres (instructional arts programs, ie. painting, drama, dance, pottery
etc.);
· Public Art Program (exhibitions,
circulating civic art collection, site-specific art commissions);
· Stafford Studios providing work space
for visual artists; and
· Theatre and performance programs
(Centrepointe Theatre, the Chambers and Orleans Theatre).
The gross culture cost above also includes
the City’s cultural funding to arts, heritage and festival programs and
administration costs.
9 of the 15 OMBI municipalities reported on the cultural performance
measures. Of these 9 municipalities, 2
are municipalities that exist within two-tier local government. The Region of Halton and the Region of
Waterloo are upper-tier local governments.
The lower-tier municipalities in these regions provide the majority of
cultural services; however, their costing information is not included within
this OMBI comparison.
Where We Stand notes
that the City of Ottawa is the only
municipality that includes an Archives Program within its costing for culture,
although other municipalities operate municipal archival programs. Some municipalities did not include costing
within their culture costing expenses related to arts instructional programs
that they deliver through other municipal departments. In addition, some municipalities did not use
the indirect cost allocation for each measure.
Municipalities vary in the types of cultural programs delivered and how
they are delivered. All of the above
reasons make it difficult to compare cities related to gross culture cost.
OMBI Measure: 2005 Arts Grants
Per-Capita
This performance measure refers to the cost per person to provide
culture through arts grants within a municipality. 7 OMBI municipalities reported on this measure. Performance results, among this sampling,
indicate that Ottawa’s arts grants per-capita is lower than that of 2 other
Ontario municipalities (Thunder Bay and Toronto) and higher than that of 4
other municipalities (London, Sudbury, Region of Waterloo and Windsor). Ottawa’s cost is identified as being $0.25
above the median. Table 7 below
identifies the performance results for the 7 municipalities that provided
information relative to this performance measure.
Municipality
|
2005 Population |
2005 Arts Grants Per-Capita (in $) |
Toronto |
2,698,400 |
$6.03 |
Thunder Bay |
112,488 |
$4.46 |
Ottawa |
865,560 |
$3.29 |
London |
351,900 |
$3.04 |
Median |
|
$3.04 |
Windsor |
217,249 |
$2.95 |
Sudbury |
155,339 |
$1.58 |
Region of Waterloo |
497,900 |
$0.62 |
Ottawa’s arts grants per-capita of $3.29 for
2005 refers to municipal funding allocated to non-profit arts organizations,
divided by population, and includes Cultural Funding program costs and Centre
of Expertise indirect costs. It is also
important to note that Toronto’s 2005 arts grants per-capita measure includes
funding to festivals.
The 2005 AIS per-capita cross-Canada comparison
identifies Ottawa’s arts and festival funding per-capita measure for 2005 as
$3.64. This per-capita figure includes
municipal funding allocated to non-profit festival and fair organizations, as
well as to arts organizations. In
addition, compensation, program costs and indirect costs are not included
in any of the national per capita comparators and are not included in this
$3.64 per-capita figure. These
variances explain the different per-capita measures identified in the OMBI and
the AIS studies.
Conclusion
In terms of arts and festival investment, the per-capita comparison that compares Ottawa to Canada’s six other largest Canadian single cities remains credible and an appropriate measure. As Canada’s 4th largest single city, Ottawa must be able to compete with Canada’s six other largest single cities in the areas of talent attraction/retention, business attraction/retention, creativity and ‘destination’ development/marketing. If Ottawa hopes to benefit from the positive economic and social benefits resulting in these areas from arts and festival non-profit industries, increased municipal arts and festival investment is essential. Competitiveness is key to achieving broad benefit and impact.
Closing
the $15M Revenue Gap – The Business Case for Ottawa
The Arts Investment Strategy aims to eliminate the arts and festival sector revenue gap within 8 years time (by 2014), by implementing short and longer-term strategies to generate new arts and festival sector operating revenues from a wide range of sources.
The goals of the Arts Investment Strategy are:
Awareness of the value of Ottawa’s local arts and festival sector must be raised in order to create a climate in which the sector can attract new revenues of a certain magnitude. New revenues need to come from the broadest possible range of sources, and not from increased taxpayer support alone.
The City must play a leadership role in order to be the catalyst that sparks and leverages broader investment from other sources. It is recognized that municipal funding is a keystone investment that leverages funding from other government levels, earned revenue, private sector contributions, fundraising income and individual donations. In order for a broad, partnered investment strategy to be successful, the City must take the first steps towards competitive investment.
In order to achieve average competitiveness with Canada’s 6 other largest single cities, and in order to achieve the greatest capacity for leveraging investment from other levels of government and alternate sources in a timely manner, the City must increase its current arts and festival funding budget by $2.5 million over a four year time period.
A municipal investment plan is the essential catalyst that will create increased capacity for investment and support from provincial and federal government sources, the private sector, individual philanthropists, and foundations.
These new leveraged sources of investment will, in turn, build the capacity of the local arts and festival sector to generate increased earned revenue; expand fundraising income; and achieve more effective planning, governance, marketing and operational systems. Financial sustainability and the resulting quality of life and economic impacts will result in Ottawa becoming a more dynamic and liveable city for residents, and a more attractive location for business and tourists.
Based on the AIS research completed, revenue/income information from other cities, revenue and expense studies undertaken by various agencies, and expertise from the AIS Steering Committee and focus group participants, Table 8 below provides estimated targets for each anticipated source of new Arts Investment Strategy revenue over an 8-year period. These strategies would close the $15M gap over 8 years.
Table 8 - Estimated New Revenue
for Arts/Festival Sector (2007-2014)
Source of New Revenue |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
2011 |
2012 |
2013-2014 |
Municipal funding |
$1.5M |
$400K |
$400K |
$200K |
|
|
|
Provincial/federal funding |
|
|
$1.5M |
$1.5M |
$1.5M |
$500K |
|
Private sector investment, consumer spending, fundraising
revenue and philanthropy |
|
$200K |
$300K |
$1.5M |
$1.5M |
$1.5M |
$2.5M |
Total |
$1.5M |
$600K |
$2.2M |
$3.2M |
$3M |
$2M |
$2.5M |
Recommendation One seeks support for the overall Arts Investment Strategy approach and package.
Best
Practice: Toronto’s Great Arts = Great City Initiative
In 2001, the Toronto Arts Council Foundation underwrote the cost of a study to determine the size of the existing gap between Toronto’s arts sector operating revenues and revenues needed for efficient operation. The total sector annual operating revenues reached $215 million. The study estimated it would require $45 million additional annual revenues to reach reasonable levels of operational effectiveness. The gap, therefore, was identified as $45 million, or 21% of current revenues.
The Toronto Arts Initiative was launched, aimed at permanently eliminating, within 10 years time (by 2012), the arts sector revenue gap. The Initiative focused on implementing long-term strategies to increase arts advocacy, heighten arts awareness, and generate new arts sector operating revenues from a wide range of sources.
The resulting “Great Arts = Great City” 10-year plan for Toronto identified specific roles, actions and strategies required in order to close the revenue gap. Partners included the City of Toronto, the Province of Ontario, the Government of Canada, the Toronto Arts Council, the Toronto Arts Council Foundation, the arts sector, foundations, corporations, the media and the public.
Elements of the resulting “Great Arts = Great City” plan included increased municipal, provincial and federal investment in the arts sector; as well as the development of a Toronto Arts Coalition, a Toronto Arts Advisory Panel, a Toronto Arts Database, a Toronto Arts Newsletter, Toronto Arts Online, Toronto Arts Awards, a Toronto Arts Fund, a Toronto Arts Auction and a Toronto Arts in the Workplace program. Initiative operating costs were estimated at 10% of total revenue.
On February 4, 2003, the “Great Arts = Great City” Initiative was formally launched at Toronto City Hall. A wide range of artists, arts managers, supporters, media and 30 municipal councillors participated in the event. In February 2004, a report card outlined progress made during the first 11 months of work, provided revised estimates for each anticipated source of revenue and identified the following priorities for 2004:
AN OTTAWA MUNICIPAL INVESTMENT PLAN
In order to meet existing and emerging community needs, to achieve average competitiveness with Canada’s 6 other largest single cities and to achieve the greatest capacity of leveraging investment from other levels of government and alternate sources in a timely manner, Recommendation Two identifies an increased municipal funding plan of $2.5M for local arts, festivals, fairs and special events over a 4-year time period. This proposed municipal investment plan would:
The average per-capita measure of Canada’s 7 largest cities (including Ottawa) in 2005 was $6.23. When the highest and lowest per-capita measures (as well as Ottawa’s per-capita measure) are removed from the mix, in order to even out the average and avoid a potentially flawed comparison, the resulting average per-capita measure is $5.95.
The $2.5M municipal investment plan will bring Ottawa’s per-capita measure to average competitiveness, based on 2005 cross-Canada per-capita measures, at $5.94 by 2010. It will not, however, achieve average cross-Canada competitiveness, if other Canadian cities implement additional funding increases from 2007 to 2010.
Recommendation Three proposes that the increased $2.5M four-year municipal funding plan for local arts, festivals, fairs and special events be scheduled, subject to annual budget approvals, according to the following timeline:
·
2007 - $1.5M
By leading with a greater annual municipal investment in 2007, the greatest leveraging capacity can be achieved. Table 9 below outlines the resulting per-capita impact by year from 2006 to 2010. Population figures are those currently being used by the City’s Department of Planning and Growth Management.
Table 9 -
Proposed Municipal Investment Plan (2006 to 2010)
Year |
Population |
Total
Arts/Festival Operating and Project Funding |
Total
Arts/Festival Operating and Project Funding as Per-Capita Measure |
2006 |
897,400 |
$3,445,783 |
$3.84 |
2007 |
931,703 |
$4,945,783 |
$5.30 |
2008 |
954,594 |
$5,345,783 |
$5.60 |
2009 |
977,485 |
$5,745,783 |
$5.88 |
2010 |
1,000,376 |
$5,945,783 |
$5.94 |
In terms of funding allocation, the following breakdown of funding allocations has been recommended by both the Arts Investment Strategy Steering Committee and the Festival Sustainability Plan Steering Committee:
Allocation
Proposals for 2007
$1.5M additional municipal funding for arts, festival, fair and special event organizations is recommended to be allocated as follows:
A) $650,000 for Festivals, Fairs and Special Events Investment/Sustainability reflecting the following commitments:
i. $337,000 Additional funding to meet existing community needs within the
Festival, Fair and Special Event Program to be assessed, allocated and monitored as per the existing Council-approved policy.
ii. $250,000 Establishment of a Sustainability and Emergency Fund to be
managed by Ottawa Festivals. This Fund will assist Festivals, Fairs and Special Events that are members of Ottawa Festivals with repayable loans that help to address cash flow problems and unforeseen circumstances resulting in temporary financial loss. The City contribution will be matched by Ottawa Festival member contributions to create a Fund that will be held by an independent financial institution. This Fund will be used as collateral and loan terms will be arranged between the festival or event requiring funding and the financial institution.
iii. $63,000 Additional funding for the Ottawa Festivals
service organization to provide ongoing support and development to member organizations. A service agreement will be developed between the City and Ottawa Festivals.
B) $850,000 for the Arts Investment Strategy reflecting the following commitments:
i. $440,000 Additional funding to meet existing community needs within the
Arts Funding Program to be assessed, allocated and monitored as per the existing Council-approved policy.
ii. $200,000 Additional funding to meet existing and emerging needs within the
Arts Service Agreement Program targeted to arts service provision, facility and asset management.
iii. $65,000 To establish a matching funding program that increases
organizational capacity by building fundraising capacity, governance and management capacity, marketing/promotion capacity and creative capacity in local arts organizations.
iv. $75,000 To establish a funding program that supports artistic activity in
distinct and diverse communities.
v. $50,000 To establish a funding program that supports artistic activity in
rural areas.
vi. $20,000 To contribute towards a feasibility study related to the
development of an Arts Stabilization Project for Ottawa, and an Investment Service in support of Ottawa’s local arts sector, including an Arts Endowment Fund.
Allocation
Proposals for 2008
$400,000 additional municipal funding for arts, festival, fair and special event organizations is recommended to be allocated as follows:
A) $150,000 for Festival, Fairs and Special Events Investment/Sustainability to meet existing community needs within the Festival, Fair and Special Event Program to be assessed, allocated and monitored as per the existing Council-approved policy.
B) $250,000 for the Arts Investment Strategy.
Allocation
Proposals for 2009
$400,000 additional municipal funding for arts, festival, fair and special event organizations is recommended to be allocated as follows:
A) $150,000 for Festival, Fairs and Special Events Investment/Sustainability to meet existing community needs within the Festival, Fair and Special Event Program to be assessed, allocated and monitored as per the existing Council-approved policy.
B) $250,000 for the Arts Investment Strategy.
Allocation
Proposals for 2010
$200,000 additional municipal funding for arts, festival, fair and special event organizations.
INCREASED PROVINCIAL AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FUNDING
FOR OTTAWA’S LOCAL SECTOR
The
average combined government dollars disbursed in 2003 to the local arts and
festival sector in Canada’s 7 largest single cities was $35,283,945. Combined government dollars disbursed in
2003 to Ottawa’s local arts and festival sector was $10,242,248. The average combined government per-capita
in 2003 in these same 7 cities was $29.80.
Ottawa’s combined government per-capita in 2003 was $12.20.
Competitive government investment in Ottawa’s local arts/festival sector is required in order to achieve the quality-of-life and economic impacts that a healthy and sustainable local cultural sector provides.
An AIS Government Investment focus group was held in October 2006 with representatives from the Department of Canadian Heritage; the Canada Council for the Arts; the Ontario Ministries of Citizenship, Culture, Sport and Recreation; the Ontario Ministry of Tourism; the Ontario Arts Council; the Ontario Trillium Foundation and the City of Ottawa. Key messages were as follows:
At the Government Investment focus group, municipal funding was identified as the keystone piece that leverages provincial and federal funding. Increased municipal funding will provide the initial investment required for the local arts/festival sector to further develop its products, talent and infrastructure. This, in turn, allows local arts and festival organizations to compete more favourably at provincial and federal levels for funding. Increased investment leads to greater development which leads to stronger artistic merit, organizational effectiveness and community impact. This builds competitiveness in the sector and opens the door for greater investment opportunities.
Recommendation four identifies the need to seek out opportunities and advocate for increased provincial and federal allocations for Ottawa’s local arts/festival sector.
INCREASED PRIVATE SECTOR SUPPORT FOR OTTAWA’S LOCAL
SECTOR
According to the City of Ottawa’s extensive 2005 revenue/income study, private sector and fundraising revenue represents 26% of the total collective income generated by the local arts and festival sector. This includes revenue achieved through corporate sponsorship, individual donations, private foundations and fundraising events/initiatives. In order to make up for lower combined government revenues, the sector has sought out and obtained increased levels of private support.
In comparison, the Council for Business and the Arts in Canada’s 2000 Survey of Performing Arts Organizations indicates that private support (sponsorship, individual donations, corporate donations and special events) for performing arts companies in Ontario represents 18.8% of total collective revenue, and the national performing arts average is 18.5%.
Based on this data and comparison, solid private support for the arts exists in Ottawa. It is a challenge, however, for the local community to continue this exemplary work without adequate and competitive government funding. In order to survive, local arts and festival organizations have reduced expenses to levels that have resulted in instability and crisis.
An AIS Private Sector focus group was held in October 2006 with participants from the private sector, OCRI, the City’s Economic Development Division, Ottawa’s Business Advisory Committee, the University of Ottawa and arts/festival community leaders.
Key messages were as follows:
Recommendations Six and Seven each identify actions aimed at further increasing private sector support of the local arts/festival sector in Ottawa.
Recommendation Six is a specific proposed action that refers to the implementation of an ArtsVest matching grants program in Ottawa in 2008, in collaboration with the Council for Business and the Arts in Canada (CBAC). ArtsVest is a matching grants program created by the CBAC in partnership with the Ontario Ministry of Culture and the Ontario Trillium Foundation. Its goal is to help develop new, mutually beneficial partnerships between business and arts organizations that will in turn benefit Ontario communities.
After a successful first pilot run in Oakville in 2003, ArtsVest was brought to 4 other communities in Ontario: Peterborough, Prince Edward County, Sudbury and Waterloo Region. The results have been significant. A total of 44 arts organizations partnered with 126 businesses, 86 of which were first-time sponsors of the arts, to generate a total of $470,000 in matching funds for the arts community. An initial investment of $200,000, provided by the Ontario Trillium Foundation and the Ontario Ministry of Culture, leveraged $270,029 in new sponsorship dollars.
Funding from the
Ontario Trillium Foundation will take ArtsVest to 6 other Ontario communities
by 2008. The next 3 selected ArtsVest
communities for 2006-07 are Owen Sound and District, Sarnia-Lambton and Thunder
Bay. The Arts Investment Strategy
Steering Committee hopes to have Ottawa identified for this program in 2008.
Recommendation Seven identifies a broader
initiative aimed at building partnership and development related to Ottawa’s
local business and local arts sectors. There is a need to work in greater partnership with
corporations and the business sector in order to understand how the arts can
offer greater value in exchange for sponsorship. This information then needs to be shared with the full
arts/festival sector, since the more value that the arts can deliver to sponsors,
the more revenue that will be returned.
There is a need to treat sponsorship revenue as earned income and to
better understand how these revenues can be earned.
Suggested initial partners for collaboration in this regard are local business and arts umbrella organizations including the Ottawa Chamber of Commerce, le Regroupement des gens d’affaires, the Council for the Arts in Ottawa, Arts Ottawa East and Ottawa Festivals.
The National Capital Region’s local arts and festival sector and its national cultural institutions and agencies have common interests as well as different mandates. Areas of common interest include:
a) the development of Ottawa/Gatineau as a vibrant cultural centre;
b) the creation of increased cultural synergies, achievement and innovation;
c) the development of a strong cultural resource base (human and physical resources);
d) a local population that strongly supports culture;
e) increased intellectual vivacity that understands and accepts artistic risk-taking and its related edges; and
f) promotion of increased visitation to the region.
National institutions have national mandates and are accountable to all taxpayers across the country; whereas, cities are devoted to improving local quality of life and are accountable to local taxpayers. Federal cultural institutions measure themselves within an international context. NCC programs are provided primarily within the core areas of the capital; whereas, local programs are provided within urban, suburban and rural areas.
Artists come from cities, and yet today there are more opportunities for artists to connect globally. Residents in Ottawa have the privilege of accessing the work of national and international artists within national venues. In order to realize the Council-approved Ottawa 20/20 Arts Plan strategic directions, local artists must be able to live and work in Ottawa.
It is artists and arts organizations working in all disciplines within
a city that spark the development of creative neighbourhoods, that provide arts
training to the city’s young people, that help to develop local emerging
artists, and that connect to the growth of the local creative industry sector,
increasing overall innovation and competitiveness.
In Ottawa, the “town” and the “crown” operate somewhat in isolation; however, there are solid partnerships that currently exist. Library and Archives Canada partners actively with the local community. The National Arts Centre’s 4th Stage continues to present and partner with local talent. There are local organizations using the Canadian Museum of Civilization, the National Gallery of Canada and the Canadian War Museum as venues. The NCC is actively partnering with various local festivals.
Many cultural capitals around the world have strongly developed national and local cultural sectors. They exist in parallel, working to fulfill different mandates, but they also intersect, where mandates allow.
An AIS Cultural Partnership focus group was held in October 2006 with participants from the National Capital Commission, the National Arts Centre, the National Gallery of Canada, the Canadian Museum of Civilization, the Canadian War Museum, the City of Gatineau, le Conseil régional de la culture de l’Outaouais, the City of Ottawa and arts/festival community leaders.
Participants determined that there are opportunities to develop increased cultural and marketing partnerships which include the local arts and festival sectors, the National Capital Commission (NCC), the City of Gatineau and federal cultural institutions located in Ottawa. Tourism Ottawa and Tourisme Outaouais are important partners as well.
Recommendation five identifies the need to seek out these partnership opportunities.
The Arts Investment Strategy combines short, medium
and longer-term strategies into a proposed package aimed at closing the revenue
gap for Ottawa’s local arts and festival sector over an 8-year period, and
moving the sector towards sustainability.
Longer-term sustainability is addressed through 2 potential initiatives – the development of an Arts Stabilization Project for Ottawa, and the establishment of an Investment Service in support of Ottawa’s local arts sector.
An Arts Stabilization Project is an independent, non-profit organization operated by a board of directors, whose mandate is to improve the financial health and sustainability of professional arts organizations within a city or region over a certain period of time.
Arts Stabilization initiatives have had considerable success in the United States, England and Canada. Communities that have fostered stabilization programs have seen local artistic output flourish and now have much healthier arts organizations.
Arts organizations that participate in Arts Stabilization projects work with professionals in different areas of expertise to build a more stable administrative and financial base, and to acquire skills that help them cope with current and future challenges. Once this work is successfully completed, they can be rewarded with Working Capital Awards to help sustain their achievements.
Arts Stabilization Projects represent the interests of the larger community through the make-up of their Boards and the diversity of their revenue bases.
The Department of Canadian Heritage (DCH) provides grants to Stabilization Projects. DCH funding combines with funding raised by the Stabilization Project from other government levels and the private sector.
Services must include the delivery of
technical expertise in organizational development, governance practices,
financial management and planning for individual organizations. Optional services include deficit
reduction and building working capital reserves.
Working capital
is defined as the difference between current assets (cash and other assets
which could be readily converted into cash) and current liabilities (payables,
debts and other obligations which must be met in the short-term). Adequate working capital is an indicator of
financial health. Without working
capital, arts organizations suffer from persistent cash crunches and have
trouble meeting financial obligations.
There are 10 other current and past
Stabilization Projects in Canada including:
• Alberta Performing Arts Stabilization Fund
• The Arts Stabilization Fund
Saskatchewan Inc.
• Arts Stabilization Manitoba Inc.
• Arts Sustainability Victoria
• Bay Area Arts and Heritage
Stabilization Program
• Creative Trust (Toronto)
• Foundation for Heritage and the Arts
(Halifax))
• The
Island Arts and Heritage Stabilization Program (PEI)
• New
Brunswick Arts and Heritage Stabilization Program, and
• Vancouver Arts Stabilization Team
An
Investment Service in Support of Ottawa’s Local Arts Sector
Philanthropic initiatives can serve to deliver an important source of revenue to arts organizations that have charitable status. The Arts Investment Strategy Steering Committee was asked to consider the feasibility of establishing an Arts Endowment Fund for Ottawa. In addition, the establishment of an investment transfer service was discussed.
The two possible functions for an Investment Service were determined to be:
An Endowment Fund serves as a reliable and predictable source of income over a long time, and therefore, can be important to the long-term financial stability of an organization. Of the 158 local, Ottawa-based arts/festival organizations included in the 2005 revenue/income study, 24 have established endowment funds with the Ontario Arts Foundation Arts Endowment Program. Under this program, money raised by eligible arts organizations specifically for endowment purposes was matched dollar for dollar, up to a maximum, from the Arts Endowment Fund. June 30, 2004 marked the end of the matching portion of this Provincial program. In addition, there are a few specific endowment funds in support of the arts that are managed by the Community Foundation of Ottawa.
The May 2006 federal budget eliminated capital gains taxes on the donation of stocks and bonds to charities. This elimination was expected to increase the donation of these financial instruments to arts organizations. There is a need for greater awareness and education around this potential source of giving and receiving.
Preliminary study, research and consultation suggest that a proposed Arts Investment Service for Ottawa might focus on the more complex approaches to fundraising that are not available to the majority of Ottawa arts and festival organizations, e.g. monthly giving; payroll deductions; legacies; endowments; and gifts of property, stock and insurance. In addition, a United Appeal for the Arts, modelled on the workplace-giving model of the United Way/Centraide annual campaign, should be studied for feasibility.
There were 2 AIS focus groups which were held in November 2006, each focusing on a different component of philanthropy and longer-term sustainability. The first focus group undertook some initial discussion around the potential of developing an Arts Stabilization Project for Ottawa. Expert guidance and input were provided to focus group participants by the Executive Director and the Program Development/Evaluation Director of Creative Trust, Toronto’s Arts Stabilization Project. Focus group participants included arts community leaders and representatives from the Department of Canadian Heritage, the Ontario Trillium Foundation and the Ontario Ministry of Culture.
The focus group determined that a feasibility study to
assess the development of an Arts Stabilization Project for Ottawa should be
carried out. It was suggested that the
Council for the Arts in Ottawa should play a leadership role in this
feasibility phase, in partnership with the Department of Canadian Heritage and
the City of Ottawa. Importance was
placed around the need to perform this feasibility work in a manner that
addressed Ottawa’s unique status, community and needs.
The second focus group discussed and analyzed the possible establishment of an Ottawa arts investment service that would advocate for and receive capital for the local arts sector, with investment proceeds being disbursed to arts programs as designated by donors. Stock transfer, endowment funds and other forms of philanthropic investment were discussed. Participants included arts/festival community leaders, patrons, bankers, and representatives from the Department of Canadian Heritage and the Ontario Trillium Foundation.
Key messages included the following:
1. The most immediate need for the local arts/festival community is adequate operating funding, ie. increased per-capita government funding.
2. A service that provides awareness around stock transfer is required, considering the May 2006 federal budget elimination of capital gains tax on gifts of listed securities to public charities.
3. A new Ottawa Arts Endowment Fund would need to be discussed and determined in full partnership with the community.
4. The Community Foundation has solid infrastructure in place to receive and disburse investments and donations; however, the advocacy and marketing role related to private giving to the arts is a current gap in Ottawa.
5. The feasibility of establishing an Arts Investment Service for Ottawa should be studied.
Recommendation Eight identifies the need to analyze the feasibility of developing an Arts Stabilization Project for Ottawa and an Arts Investment Service, including an Arts Endowment Fund, in support of Ottawa’s local arts sector in collaboration with the Council for the Arts in Ottawa, the Department of Canadian Heritage, the Ontario Trillium Foundation and other local arts service organizations.
Measuring
Results
It is recommended that, following Council direction on the proposed Arts Investment Strategy for Ottawa, an annual report card be established that identifies progress for the year, revises estimated targets as required, and identifies priorities for the following year. In addition, cross-Canada arts and festival funding per-capita measures and local arts/festival revenue/income breakdowns will provide significant data that can be attached to the measurement of Arts Investment Strategy results.
rural implications
The overall Arts
Investment Strategy includes strategies to increase investment for the arts in
rural Ottawa. A seed-funding program
that supports artistic programs and projects in rural areas is recommended for
development and implementation in 2007 if the Strategy is approved. Partnerships with artists, arts
organizations, festivals, fairs and special events in rural areas will be
further developed during the implementation of the Arts Investment Strategy, if
approved by City Council.
CONSULTATION
Arts
Investment Strategy Community Working Team
An Arts Investment Strategy community working team was established in April 2005 and included representatives from Ottawa’s arts and festival umbrella organizations, the City of Ottawa’s Arts, Heritage and Culture Advisory Committee and discipline-specific leaders. This working team played an active consultative role during the research phase and contributed directly to the development of the Arts Investment Strategy discussion paper.
The discussion paper was distributed in the summer of 2005 to 350 local non-profit, arts and festival organizations. Significant feedback and comments were received.
Arts
Investment Strategy Steering Committee
The Arts Investment Strategy Steering Committee, established by City Council in April 2006, has served as a consultative as well as a decision-making body for the Arts Investment Strategy. The Steering Committee is composed of 13 community leaders. Political, business, government, arts/festival and philanthropic leadership are represented on the Committee. The Steering Committee membership is listed in Annex 3.
During the period of April 2006 to January 2007, the AIS Steering Committee has had 8 meetings, and individual members have participated both in AIS focus groups and AIS public open houses. In addition, the AIS Steering Committee has linked and consulted with the Festival Sustainability Steering Committee.
The Steering Committee’s Council-approved mandate is for a term of 14 months, beginning in April 2006 and extending to June 2007.
Arts
Investment Strategy Focus Groups – Fall 2006
The Arts Investment Strategy Steering Committee held 6 focus groups in the fall of 2006 aimed at gaining specific expert feedback on the 6 potential arts investment strategies that were presented in the November 2005 Arts Investment Strategy information report to the Health, Recreation and Social Services Committee.
Focus group invitations were sent to representative individuals, based on their expertise and connection to the specific investment strategy being studied. Participation included investors, community leaders, business leaders and government representatives. Each focus group included a designated host to increase strategic awareness and commitment. The goals of the focus groups were to discuss, analyze and refine the 6 potential arts investment strategies. In addition, concrete and realistic starting points for related action plans were developed.
A total of 60 key experts within various fields were consulted during this focus group processed. A listing of these experts is identified in Annex 4.
The focus groups were organized as follows:
1.
Government Investment in Ottawa’s
Local Arts/Festival Sector (September 20)
2.
Increased Cultural Partnership in the
National Capital (October 23)
3.
Private Sector Sponsorship of the
Local Arts/Festival Sector (October 27)
4.
Arts Stabilization and Advancement (November
7)
5.
An Investment Service in Support of
Ottawa’s Local Arts Sector (November 9)
On November 10, 2006, a final focus group session brought representatives from the first 5 focus groups together to share results and to develop a consolidated Arts Investment Strategy approach for final public consultation.
Arts
Investment Strategy Open Houses – January 2007
There were 2 Arts Investment Strategy public open houses held on January 10th (English presentation) and January 11th (French presentation) at Ottawa City Hall. Draft AIS Steering Committee recommendations were presented and the discussion revolved around the proposed public, private and non-profit arts investment strategies. A total of 95 individuals participated including a very broad range of representatives from arts and festival organizations, the private sector, arts industry, foundations, universities, business improvement associations (BIAs), senior government levels, patrons, Ottawa taxpayers, citizen coalitions, and the media.
Open house presentation documents were also forwarded electronically to many additional local residents who requested this information. Feedback and comments received at the 2 Open Houses and via e-mail served to further finalize the Arts Investment Strategy.
Arts,
Heritage and Culture Advisory Committee (AHCAC)
The City’s Arts, Heritage and Culture Advisory Committee has participated in the development of the Arts Investment Strategy since work began in 2005. The initial community working team, established in April 2005, included representatives from the Advisory Committee. The AHCAC Chairperson participated in several AIS focus groups and remains a full member of the AIS Steering Committee.
On November 23rd, a presentation was made to the Arts, Heritage and Culture Advisory Committee outlining key messages from each of the 6 AIS focus groups. Comments and feedback were received and incorporated into further development of the Strategy. Several AHCAC members participated in the AIS open houses held in January 2007.
On January 25th, the Arts Investment Strategy report will be presented to the Arts, Heritage and Culture Advisory Committee. Comment and feedback will be summarized within a separate submission to the Community and Protective Services Committee.
Business Advisory
Committee (BAC) and Economic Development
The City’s Business Advisory Committee is represented by 1 member on the AIS Steering Committee. In addition, the BAC recommended several individuals for participation in the private sector sponsorship AIS focus group. A member of the City’s Economic Development Division also attended the private sector focus group and the final focus group session.
New Canadian
Coalition for Arts and Culture
The Arts Investment Strategy Project Manager met with the New Canadian Coalition for Arts and Culture, a developing organization that is linked with the Ottawa-Carleton Immigrant Services Organization, and provided information on the Arts Investment Strategy. Coalition members participated actively in the AIS public open houses.
FINANCIAL
IMPLICATIONS
Funding for the
Arts Investment Strategy has not been included in the 2007 draft operating
estimates. If approved by City Council,
the additional requirement in 2007 will result in a 0.2% tax increase.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION
Annex 1 Revenue Sources, Local Arts and Festival Sector, 2005 Study
Annex 2 Arts and Festival Cross-Canada Municipal
Government Funding, Comparison of 2003
and 2005
Annex 3 Arts Investment Strategy Steering Committee Membership
Annex 4 Arts Investment Strategy Focus Group
Participant List
DISPOSITION
Community and Protective Services, in partnership with the Arts Investment Strategy Steering Committee, will implement any directions approved by Council.
Annex 1
ARTS AND FESTIVAL MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT FUNDING |
||||||
PERCAPITA COMPARISON - 2005 |
|
|
|
|||
(A study that compares 2003 and
2005 dedicated operating/project funding |
||||||
(not capital funding) invested in
the arts/festival sector from municipal |
||||||
government sources in Canada's 7
largest single cities) |
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CITY |
2003 Municipal Arts/Festival Funding |
2003 Population |
Municipal 2003 Percapita |
2005 Municipal Arts/Festival Funding |
2005 Population |
Municipal 2005 Percapita |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vancouver |
$5,310,532 |
576,226 |
9.22 |
$6,933,970 |
583,267 |
11.89 |
Montreal |
$11,148,430 |
1,871,000 |
5.96 |
$13,182,110 |
1,874,000 |
7.03 |
Winnipeg |
$3,228,655 |
642,800 |
5.02 |
$3,989,552 |
650,100 |
6.14 |
Toronto |
$13,406,860 |
2,613,832 |
5.13 |
$15,049,950 |
2,607,637 |
5.77 |
Edmonton |
$2,717,900 |
667,000 |
4.07 |
$3,469,600 |
712,391 |
4.87 |
Calgary |
$3,611,650 |
922,315 |
3.92 |
$4,113,992 |
956,078 |
4.30 |
Ottawa |
$2,862,946 |
839,566 |
3.41 |
$3,154,374 |
865,550 |
3.64 |
AVERAGE |
$6,040,996 |
1,161,820 |
5.25 |
$7,126,650 |
1,178,432 |
6.23 |
Colleen Hendrick, Director, Cultural Services and Community Funding Branch, City of Ottawa
Cynthia Blumenthal, Member, City of Ottawa Business Advisory Committee
Stuart
Conger
Councillor Alex Cullen, Ward 7, Bay, City of Ottawa
Ginny Cunning, Regional Services Co-ordinator, Regional Services Branch, Southeast
Ontario Ministries of Citizenship and Immigration, Culture, Tourism, Sport and Recreation
Councillor Clive Doucet, Ward 17, Capital, City of Ottawa
Peter Honeywell, Executive Director, Council for the Arts in Ottawa
Valerie Hopper, Manager, Arts and Heritage Programs
Department of Canadian Heritage, Ontario Region
Nick Masciantonio, Chair, Arts, Heritage and Culture Advisory Committee, City of Ottawa
Councillor Bob Monette (April to December 2006)
Ward 1, Orléans, City of Ottawa
Catherine O’Grady, Representative, Ottawa Festivals
Executive Producer, Ottawa Jazz Festival; Artistic Producer, Children’s Festival
Christine Tremblay, Executive Director, Arts Ottawa East
Project Manager (non-voting)
Cathy Shepertycki, Project Manager
Cultural Planner, Arts Development, City of Ottawa
Annex 4
1. Susan Annis
Executive Director, Cultural Human Resources Council
2. Julian Armour
Chair, Ottawa Festivals
Artistic Director, Ottawa Chamber Music Society
3. Mary Beach
Manager, Ottawa Office, Ontario Ministries of Citizenship, Culture, Sport and Recreation
4. Marie Boulet
Director, Capital Interpretation, National Capital
Commission
5. Jacques Briand
Head, Cultural Animation Division, Office of Arts, Culture and Literature
City of Gatineau
6. Peter D.R. Brown
Program Development and Evaluation Director
Creative Trust, An Arts Stabilization Project, Toronto
7. Steven Campbell
Director of Community Partnerships, Ontario Arts Council
8. Joanne Charrette
Director of Public Affairs, National Gallery of Canada
9. Marie Ève Chassé
Associate General Manager, Théâtre Action
10. Michel Cheff
Director, Special Initiatives, Office of the President and CEO
Canadian Museum of Civilization
11. Former Mayor Bob Chiarelli
City of Ottawa
12. Stuart Conger
Arts Patron
Member, City of Ottawa Arts Investment Strategy Steering Committee
13. Mela Constantinidi
Director, Ottawa Art Gallery
14. Colin Cooke
President, Ottawa Chamber Music Society
15. Charline Cormier
Treasurer, Odyssey Theatre
16. Councillor Clive Doucet
Member, City of Ottawa Arts Investment Strategy Steering Committee
Ward 17, Capital, City of Ottawa
17. Michel Dozois
Producer, Community Programming, National Arts
Centre
18. Françoise Gagnon
Manager, Government and Community Relations,
TELUS
19. Jean-Paul Gagnon
Program Manager, Champlain District and Francophone Province-Wide Program, Ontario Trillium Foundation
20. Roger Gaudet
Head, Theatre Section, Canada Council for the Arts
21. Jonathon Harris
Consultant, Ottawa Office, Ontario Ministry of Tourism
22. Colleen Hendrick
Chair, City of Ottawa Arts Investment Strategy Steering Committee
Director, Cultural Services and Community Funding Branch, City of Ottawa
23. Debbie Hill
Manager, Cultural Services, City of Ottawa
24. Merrilee Hodgins
Artistic Director, The School of Dance
25. Peter Honeywell
Member, City of Ottawa Arts Investment Strategy Steering Committee
Executive Director, Council for the Arts in Ottawa
26. Valerie Hopper
Member, City of Ottawa Arts Investment Strategy Steering Committee
Manager, Arts and Heritage Programs, Department of Canadian Heritage, Ontario Region
27. Elizabeth Howarth
General Director, Opera Lyra Ottawa
28. Sarah Jennings
Board Vice-Chair of Special Relations, Opera Lyra Ottawa
29. Micheline Joanisse
Development/Communications Co-ordinator, Arts Ottawa East
30. Diana Kirkwood
Arts Patron
Board Member, Great Canadian Theatre Company
31. Dr. Mark Kristmanson
Director, Capital Events and Programs, National Programming Branch
National Capital Commission
32. Réjean Lampron
Executive Director, Conseil régional de la culture
de l’Outaouais
33. Lise Laneville
Manager, Arts and Heritage Sustainability Program, Arts Policy
Department of Canadian Heritage
Manager, Programmes and Interpretation, Canadian War Museum
Artistic Director, Ottawa School of Speech and Drama
Principal, CommuniquéDirect Studios
Chair, Arts, Heritage and Culture Advisory Committee
Member, Arts Investment Strategy Steering Committee
37. Penny McCann
Director, SAW Video
38. Kathy McKinlay
Executive Director, Education and
Research
Ottawa Centre for
Research and Innovation (OCRI)
39. Sandra
Merriam
Arts Court General
Manager, City of Ottawa
40. Mark
Monahan
Executive/Artistic
Director, Cisco Systems Bluesfest
41. Karen
Morrison
City of Ottawa
Business Advisory Committee
Steering Committee Report
REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS
That the Community and Protective Services Committee recommend that Council approve an Ottawa Festivals Sustainability Plan including the following:
1. That the Festivals, Fairs and Special Events funding program ($713,000) be reinstated, as reflected in, and subject to approval of, the 2007 Draft Budget.
2. That the following elements of the plan be approved, in principle, subject to Council approval of the Arts Investment Strategy:
a. Increasing the Festivals, Fairs and Special Events Funding Program base-funding budget by $337,000
b. Providing additional funding of $63,000 to the Ottawa Festivals organization to increase the role it plays both in promoting Ottawa Festivals, Fairs and Special Events and in developing the expertise and capacity of individual organizations.
c. Providing one-time funds in the amount of $250,000 to Ottawa Festivals to create and manage a Sustainability and Emergency Fund Program (OFSEF), subject to Ottawa Festivals’ ability to secure matched funds as identified in this report. The purpose of the OFSEF Program is to deal with critical cash flow needs of Festivals, Fairs, and Special Events who are members of Ottawa Festivals and to provide repayable loans to assist member organizations that experience unforeseen emergency circumstances resulting in temporary financial loss.
3. That Cultural Services staff work with Business Development staff, Ottawa Festivals and Ottawa Tourism to ensure that the City’s Festivals, Fairs and Special Events are integrated wherever possible into Ottawa Tourism’s annual destination marketing program.
4. That Events Central staff continue tracking the City of Ottawa’s “in-kind services” and “invoiced services” in 2007 to provide for an analysis and a report back prior to the 2008 budget respecting a policy for “in-kind” and “invoiced services”.
5. That Events Central staff report back with an amendment to the City of Ottawa’s current sponsorship policy to accommodate community requests including requests from Fairs, Festivals and Special Events seeking City sponsorship.
Festivals, Fairs, and Special Events enrich the lives
of local residents through the presentation of a wide variety of activities
that celebrate or increase our level of understanding and appreciation of the unique character of our community. These services also celebrate our cultural
heritage; the unique and diverse character of our citizens; and contemporary
artists and art forms.
Following 3 emergency funding requests from special events organizers in 2006, Council approved a motion directing staff in consultation with Ottawa Festivals to report back to the Health, Recreation and Social Services Committee (now the Community and Protective Services Committee) with a sustainability plan for Festivals, Fairs, and Special Events. The motion directed that the sustainability plan include corporate governance, financial, strategic and organizational sustainability.
The Festivals, Fairs and Special Events Sustainability Plan that is being proposed in this report has been endorsed by all members of the Festivals Sustainability Steering Committee comprised of community representatives of the Festivals, Fairs and Special Events sector, tourism and hotel sectors and City staff.
Based on the research findings and discussions with members of the Steering Committee, sustainability of this sector can only be achieved when:
1. Communities take responsibility for their own capacity building
2. Communities are responsible for developing their own marketing and communication plan
3. Cities must invest in the Festivals, Fairs and Special Events industry through their funding program, in-kind services programs and sponsorship programs
BACKGROUND
Local festivals, fairs and special
events celebrate people, recognize local artists, culture, talent and gather to
celebrate the beauty of Ottawa’s four unique seasons.
On almost any given weekend in Ottawa there is a festival, fair or a
special event where residents and visitors have an opportunity to participate,
be entertained and to celebrate.
Community volunteers who believe in enriching the lives of their
community organize many of these events.
Festivals, fairs and special events add vibrancy, attract tourists, and
enhance the quality of life of residents in Ottawa. Events make Ottawa an
exciting and attractive place to reside that fosters entrepreneurship and
business development thereby boosting the local economy.
Festivals, Fairs and Special Events contribute to the enhanced profile
of the City by marketing and branding Ottawa as a tourist destination; by
enriching or prolonging a visitor’s stay in Ottawa; and by establishing Ottawa
as a unique and dynamic centre of cultural events.
Research also demonstrates that
Festivals, Fairs, and Special Events contribute to the local economy in many
ways such as merchants purchasing goods and services, by creating employment
opportunities for producers, artists, publicists, technicians, animators,
students and volunteers. This sector
attracts both visitors and local audiences to their activities and is part of
the cultural mix that can help to attract and retain creative people and
businesses to permanently relocate to Ottawa.
Since 2003, there have been several events that have experienced financial hardships. These groups have asked City Council for emergency funding. In 2006, there were 3 requests for emergency funding. These emergency funding requests have resulted in the Corporate Services and Economic Development Committee approving the following direction on April 4, 2006:
That
Corporate Services and Economic Development Committee direct that staff of the
Community and Protective Services Department, in consultation with the
Festivals Network, develop a sustainability support plan that includes
corporate governance, financial, strategic and organizational sustainability;
and report back to the Health, Recreation and Social Services Committee.
Following approval of this motion, a Festivals Sustainability Steering Committee was formed including the following representation: Ottawa Festivals (OF); community stakeholders from Festivals, Fairs, and Special Events organizations; Ottawa Tourism; Ottawa-Gatineau Hotel Association; and City staff from Cultural Services; By-Law Services; and Economic Development. Please refer to Annex 1 for a list of Committee Members.
The Festivals Sustainability Steering Committee reviewed the City’s current role in supporting local Festivals, Fairs and Special Events. Other Canadian municipalities were contacted to identify how each municipality sustained their festivals, fairs and special events. Based on the research findings and discussions with members of the Steering Committee, sustainability of this sector can only be achieved when:
1. Communities take responsibility for their own capacity building
2. Communities are responsible for developing their own marketing and communication plan
3. Cities invest in the Festivals, Fairs and Special Events industry through their funding program, in-kind services programs and sponsorship programs
This report will identify the components of a sustainability plan for our local Festivals, Fairs and Special Events. The plan will address issues related to corporate governance, financial, strategic and organizational sustainability for Festivals, Fairs and Special Events.
Festivals, Fairs, and Special Events enrich the lives of local residents through the presentation of a wide variety of activities that celebrate or increase our level of understanding and appreciation of the unique character of our community. Events can celebrate our cultural heritage, and shine the spotlight on contemporary artists and art forms. Events can highlight sporting competitions, entertain, and rally people together for a specific cause or purpose. Each event is different. Events range in size, from a small street party to Canada Day on Parliament Hill as well as in duration, from a few hours to a few weeks. Each event also ranges in activity, parade or outdoor concert and in number of participants, age and attendance. For a complete list of event definitions please refer to Annex 2.
In 2001, Wall Communications Inc. and Decima Research Inc. conducted an
Economic Impact Study of Ottawa Festivals on behalf of Ottawa Festivals
examining the economic impact of four festival events that took place in Ottawa
during the same year. The four events
were the Ottawa Bluesfest, the Canadian Central Exhibition, the Ottawa
International Jazz Festival and the Ottawa Folk Festival.
The Wall Communications and Decima Research Inc report above concluded
that the total gross economic impact of the four events added $41.2 million to
the National Capital Region in 2001. Of this, $26.5 million was directly
attributable to the existence of the events.
The above report also noted that the spending attributable to these
festivals by non-local visitors was $3.9 million in lodging; $1.5 million in
on-site expenditures; and $4.2 million in off-site expenditures for a total of
$9.6 million by non-local visitors. Local residents contributed additional
dollars in the amount of $16.9 million that is directly attributable to the
existence of the events.
In addition, a 2003 report was prepared for the Ontario Trillium
Foundation on the Economic Impacts of 97 Festivals and Events. This report
included 8 local Ottawa festivals.
The Ontario Trillium Foundation Report concluded that:
The Report above
acknowledges that the impacts of festivals and events extend well beyond what
can be measured in economic terms. They
contribute to the quality of life across Ontario by strengthening communities,
providing unique activities and events, building awareness of diverse cultures
and identities, and acting as a source of community pride.
Ottawa Festivals, a not for profit organization, represents an industry
comprised of 35 member festivals, special events, and fairs with combined
budgets of over $27 million and with attendance of over 3 million.
Ottawa Festivals’ organizations mobilize significant local community
support of over 15,000 festival volunteers throughout the festival season. The 2006 statistics on volunteerism in this
sector, based on information provided within the application forms of 20 local
events organizations that have applied to the City’s Festivals, Fairs and
Special Events funding program, indicate that over 8,700 volunteers
collectively provide over 150,000 volunteer hours annually. This represents a value of over $2.6 million
from Ottawa residents who support the sector through their active participation
in our local events.
Member festivals partner with over 580 local and national organizations
that support the festival industry through sponsorship. The festival industry
is an active part of Tourism, the 3rd largest employment sector in
the City of Ottawa. Through operation
of the provincially supported Job Creation
Partnership Program, Ottawa Festivals’ events provide $1.5 million in
participant wages to individuals seeking employment in this industry.
Festivals, Fairs, and Special Events contribute to the City of Ottawa, 20/20 principles of making Ottawa:
· A Creative City Rich in Heritage, Unique in Identity
· A City of Distinct, Liveable Communities
· An Innovative City Where Prosperity is Shared Among All
While Festivals, Fairs, and Special Events contribute to the well being of a City they are also faced with many unique challenges. These challenges include financial, organizational, and unforeseen circumstances.
Cash flow is a major challenge for many organizations as cash flow fluctuates to extremes throughout the fiscal year. Every year these organizations start with a $0 revenue base. They rely heavily on the public sector, private sector, sponsorship agreements, donations, membership fees, fundraising events, government grants (all levels), and ticket sales to generate funds. Costs begin on day one with salaries, rental fees, utilities, and many other logistical requirements such as vendors, electricians, stage set-up, sound systems, paying for performing artists, etc. Many of these contracts cannot be signed until partial/full costs are paid.
Many of these organizations have a difficult time building capacity as they have difficulty retaining skilled volunteers and staff. Staff salaries are not competitive causing high levels of staff turn-over and creating lost time in rehiring and retraining, resulting in the loss of consistency for clients dealing with the organization. Being located in the Nation’s Capital means that the local organizations lose staff members, board members, sponsors, audience, talent base, etc. to the larger national organizations and events who can afford to provide higher salaries, benefits, marketing, etc.
A recent cross-Canada survey conducted by City staff demonstrates that Ottawa ranks lowest in arts/festival per capita funding across the 7 largest Canadian cities. Inadequate funding has resulted in organizational instability; staff/member turnover has led to unnecessary organizational stress and to inadequate salary and performance fee compensation.
Many of these events are also subject to unpredictable and uncontrollable circumstances. Outdoor events are subject to bad weather and even reports of “potential” bad weather can cause low attendance and increased costs for the acquisition of shelters. Competing events, timelines, venue shortage (parks), etc. create instability and last minute challenges.
Reductions to the Federal Government’s sponsorship programs for the festivals and special events industry has also affected many organizations.
Following several recent requests for emergency funding, Council directed staff to work with the Festivals, Fairs and Special Events community to develop a sustainability plan.
The membership on the Steering Committee includes the following representation: the Ottawa Festivals (OF); Ottawa Tourism; Ottawa-Gatineau Hotel Association; representatives from Festivals, Fairs, and Special Events and local Canada Day events; as well as City staff from Cultural Services; By-Law Services; and Economic Development. Please refer to Annex 1 for a list of the Committee membership.
The Committee met five (5) times since October 2006. With a limited timeframe, the Committee’s accomplishments included:
Ottawa Festivals (formally the Ottawa Festival Network), a not for profit member-based organization, was established in 1996 and has 35 member festivals. Ottawa Festivals leads Ottawa's multi-million dollar festival industry while continuing its decade-long commitment to showcasing and promoting sport, art, culture and entertainment in Canada's Capital Region. Ottawa Festivals’ goal is to promote and enhance festivals, special events, and fairs by increasing their role within the tourism industry in assisting festival members in generating economic benefits to the City of Ottawa. OF wants to expand their mandate to provide festival members with tools and resources required to have the expertise and to be better equipped to generate social, cultural and economic benefits.
The Ottawa Festivals membership is looking to the Board of Directors and staff of the OF organization for leadership and guidance. Ottawa Festivals wants to be even more involved in the tourism industry by working with partners including Ottawa Tourism, Chamber of Commerce, Ottawa Centre for Research & Innovation, and the National Capital Commission. Ottawa Festivals can achieve this goal through the enhancement and development of their programs and services.
Ottawa Festivals plans to enhance their role as a resource / centralized hub for festival information and to further promote festivals and their social, cultural, and economic impact. Ottawa Festivals will promote festivals and events as part of the branding of Ottawa as a great tourist destination and thereby having greater economic impact. Ottawa Festivals will also strengthen their industry by providing expertise that will enhance the skill set of staff and the roles that Board of Directors can play in tourism advancement.
The Ottawa-Gatineau Hotel Association (OGHA) is the voice of the National Capital Region’s hotel industry. OGHA has 52 member hotels representing more than 10,000 rooms and over 5,000 employees. Members include all of the leading local hotels, suite hotels and motels with fifty (50) or more guest rooms in Ottawa and Gatineau.
“OGHA is an association of hoteliers in the
Ottawa-Gatineau region dedicated to enhancing industry profile, service
excellence and tourism growth.”
Members of the OGHA recognize the value of Festivals and Events to enriching the experience of residents and visitors to Ottawa. According to the OGHA, local Festivals, Fairs and Events do not attract sufficient numbers of out-of-town visitors to Ottawa. However, in recognition of their contribution to Tourism, local hotels do provide significant support to local Festivals and Events by providing free or reduced hotel rates valued at over $800,000 annually.
Destination Marketing Fee (DMF)
In March 2004, City Council approved funding for the Festivals, Fairs and Special Events program on a “one-time only basis in the 2004 budget”. Staff was directed to “work with industry to establish a hotel room fee such that proceeds of that fee will be used to fund Festivals and OTCA as examples, in 2005”. Since 2004, the City has continued to fund the Festivals, Fairs, and Special Events program on a one-time basis each year considering that either a hotel room fee or a Provincially legislated Hotel Tax could be used to leverage funds for the Festivals, Fairs and Special Events industry.
The OGHA’s destination marketing fee (DMF) is a voluntary initiative that was established in 2004 to generate funds to market Ottawa as a destination to potential visitors provincially, nationally and internationally. DMF funds cannot be used for sponsorship of, or for financial support for, events, activities or sponsorship that is not directed externally to attract visitors to Ottawa.
Destination Marketing Fee agreements with participating hotels requires that the funds only be spent on destination marketing initiatives with the goal of increasing Ottawa’s export economic activity in the tourism sector, Ottawa’s third largest economic sector. Currently there are 41 participating hotels that have signed DMF agreements subject to the funds being used as described above.
The DMF has proven to be a very successful program and it is now in place in a number of Ontario Cities. According to the OGHA, the DMF has provided Ottawa Tourism with increased, but still inadequate, funding to allow them to tell potential visitors and convention planners why they should visit Ottawa. Even with the $6 million in DMF funds, Ottawa Tourism has only 25% of what the Toronto and Montreal agencies have to invest in marketing their cities.
In addition, the City of Ottawa’s attempt to have the Provincial Government legislate a Hotel Tax remains unsuccessful, as the Province is unwilling to legislate a Hotel Tax in Ottawa where a voluntary hotel room fee already exists.
Ottawa Tourism is the organization responsible for marketing and developing Ottawa and the Capital Region as a premiere tourism and convention destination. In recent years, Ottawa Tourism’s main focus has been on marketing four (4) festivals: Bell Capital Cup, Winterlude, Ottawa Tulip Festival, and the Ottawa Race Week End. The City of Ottawa and the Destination Marketing Fee (DMF) fund Ottawa Tourism.
Through
sponsorship dollars, the private sector plays a significant role in sustaining
Festivals, Fairs and Special Events. Based on the 2005 Audited Statements provided
by the 26 eligible Festivals, Fairs, and Special Events organizations to the
City’s Funding Program the following revenue breakdown was established:
Table 1: Revenue Summary (2005) of Local Festivals, Fairs and Special
Events Funded by the City
Revenue Source 2005 Revenue (%)
Earned Revenue (Ticket Sales) $8,176,391
(46%)
Private/Fundraising (Sponsorships and Fundraising) $6,117,426 (35%)
Government (all levels Municipal, Provincial and Federal) $3,166,454 (18%)
Other $ 141,475 (1%)
__________ _____
This Table indicates that these 26 funded organizations generate
significant revenue (46%) during or after the event occurs. This table also demonstrates the
significance of the cash-flow issues.
The private sector is the second largest contributor (35%) to events.
In addition, a separate survey of OGHA member hotels indicates that in 2005, thirty-two (32) hotels provided $810,500 in support of 23 local and national festivals and events. Extrapolating to the full OGHA membership suggests that hotels provided in excess of $1 million in support for Festivals and Events in 2005. These are contributions from the hotels' operating budgets.
As indicated
above, government funding from all levels is substantially low with very few
organizations able to qualify for provincial and federal funding programs. The City of Ottawa contributes on average
3.5% towards the total revenues of local festivals, fairs and special
events. Research on Arts and Festival
investments demonstrate that where there is low municipal investment, there is
also lower investments from both the provincial and federal government.
Role of the
Provincial Ministry of Tourism
On December 20, 2006, the Provincial Ministry of Tourism announced its investment of $2.5 million into Celebrate Ontario, a new one-time funding initiative to support the growth of existing high-profile international festivals and events. Funds are to be used by successful applicants in the development and marketing of programming enhancements.
In addition, the Ministry is enhancing its current Tourism Event Marketing Partnership program by an additional $500,000 to provide financial support to events and festivals in Ontario to cover the costs of advertising for a targeted tourism market.
City of
Ottawa’s Role in Supporting Festivals, Fairs and Special Events
The City of Ottawa also plays a key role in direct funding, providing support and in-kind services to local Festivals, Fairs and Special Events. It is important to note that there are several Branches within the City that are involved in Festivals, Fairs, and Special Events. Annex 4 summarizes the Branches which provide City services to these organizations.
The City’s Partnership Funding
Program (Cultural Services and Community Funding Branch)
The Partnership Funding Program for Festivals, Fairs and Special Events was approved by City Council in December 2002. The 2006 Funding Program budget was $626,084 and has remained static since its inception in 2003. The Partnership Funding Program objectives are to support major local festivals, special events and fairs that:
· Present the distinct, diverse and vibrant character of Ottawa to local residents and tourists
· Offer programming that is of high merit and quality
· Enhance local quality of life and contribute to Ottawa’s overall economic health
Eligible events organizations must be not-for-profit; Ottawa based festivals, fairs or special event organizations, held annually or biannually in Ottawa. Organizations must be in existence for two or more years, manage an event that runs two or more consecutive days and has a budget of $30,000 or more. All organizations must have a governance structure that is accountable with an active Board of Directors that meets regularly. Fundraising events, local community neighbourhood events, sporting and recreation tournaments are not eligible to this Funding Program.
Applicants to the Funding Program are evaluated through a nationally recognized peer assessment process that uses Festivals, Fairs and Special Events experts as jurors to assess and make funding recommendations.
As is best practice across the country, strict conflict of interest and confidentiality guidelines apply. In addition, a rigorous reporting process is in place for all successful applicants. Failure to provide the required reporting to the City results in ineligibility for subsequent municipal funding.
Since 2004, Festivals, Fairs and Special Events funding was removed from the base budget and has been funded on a one-time basis through the Citywide reserve fund. In 2006, 15 festivals, 5 fairs and 1 service organization received funding. Please refer to Annex 5 for a list of Festivals, Fairs and Special Events organizations funded by the City in 2006.
The same 2002
Council Report that approved the Partnership Program for Festivals, Fairs and
Special Events also directed staff to “develop a
strategy and an implementation plan for the creation on a one-stop Bureau for
Major Festivals, Fairs, and Special Events…” This motion was followed by the
2004/05 Opportunity Log Work Plan which directed staff to recover costs for
special event services. Specifically,
the direction was as follows: “Currently, Fire, Paramedics, By-Law Services,
TUPW and others provide support to City-sponsored events free of charge. The associated costs are absorbed (sometimes
at overtime rates) within their current operating budgets. Review would examine the feasibility of full
or partial costs recovery.” This led to the creation of Events Central and the beginning of tracking all
City service costs (invoiced and in-kind) related to Festivals, Fairs and
Special Events.
·
Attract special events to the Ottawa area by offering an efficient
service and ensuring a fair and transparent application process for all special
event organizers in a centralized location.
·
Have one centralized location for coordination of all City
services through the Special Event Advisory Team (SEAT).
·
Track all City costs related to Events Central events and examine
proposed costing models and solutions.
·
Assist with the coordination of events planned for City sites, as
well as events lead by the City (i.e. Grey Cup, JUNO Awards, FIFA World Cup).
·
Provide, coordinate, consult with other City Branches on special
event initiatives and sponsorship.
·
Work closely with the Ottawa Gatineau Film and Television Development
Corporation in assisting with film and TV production requests.
·
Work in partnership with the National Capital Commission and the
City of Gatineau to ensure a better harmonization and coordination of the
support services offered by each organization and explore potential solutions
and common strategies to respond to issues related to events.
Many festivals, fairs, special events, and block
parties take place in the City of Ottawa in any given year. The primary role of
the Special Event Advisory Team, or SEAT, which is composed of both internal
and external stakeholders, is to provide to the client logistical support and
guidance in order to ensure success of the event in conjunction with the
various regulatory policies of the City.
In general, SEAT is a tri-partner group consisting of the organizer, the
City, and a representative of the community at large to help link all
for-profit and not-for-profit event organizers to the different City
services. The degree to which each City
Branch is involved in these activities varies from one event to another and
depends on need, which is based on activities at the event.
A tracking process was developed to provide a snapshot of how special events impact the City on a financial and a resource basis. The information gathered to date does not however provide a complete indication of costs as the tracking process relies on full, accurate and consistent reporting from all Branches which can be a challenge for a variety of reasons, including the lack of by-law authority to charge fees in some cases. The costs being tracked include those for which the organizer is “invoiced” as well as those for which the organizer is not invoiced, commonly referred to as “in-kind” services (e.g. support with road closures, barricades etc.). Generally staff has endeavoured to accommodate certain services within the existing budget, but this is not always possible depending on the nature of the event. In 2006, Events Central tracked the costs of 67 different Festivals, Fairs, and Special Events. Preliminary reports indicate that over $700,000 of in-kind City services were provided to those events which represents a significant level of City support to the local Fairs, Festivals, and Special Event industry. More than half of these in-kind services go towards both local and the National Downtown Capital Canada Day celebrations.
In the absence of a formalized approach for in-kind support, there
is some concern that various City services may be charging or waiving fees in
an inconsistent manner. Other than
funding for two (2) FTE positions, Events Central has no budget associated with
the delivery of its service.
A new "Community Group
Program" is currently being developed by the City’s Corporate Risk
Management team in consultation with the Cultural Services Division to ensure
that all cultural groups, including Festivals, Fairs and Special Events, are
considered for inclusion within the new program which will offer competitive
insurance rates for all community organizations. This initiative is being developed and will be subject to Council
approval. It is estimated that this report will come forward to Committee and
Council in the spring of 2007.
In addition to the City's
insurance program, a subsequent initiative is being conducted by Ottawa
Festivals, the umbrella service organization, with various insurers in order to
establish a competitive insurance package rate for its membership.
How Ottawa Compares to Other Canadian Cities
Staff contacted representatives from Vancouver, Edmonton, Toronto, and Montreal and inquired about the type of program, support and funding that is available to local Festivals, Fairs and Special Events. The research demonstrated that each city delivers, funds and supports major festivals and events in a different manner. Some cities primarily fund non-profit festival organizations to deliver events while others provide primarily in-kind support. Some cities directly produce and deliver major festivals and events while others fulfill all of these functions no matter what the event.
The Funding
Program budget is $626,084 and has remained static since its inception in
2003. Since 2004, this Funding Program
was removed from the base budget and has been funded on a one-time basis
through the Citywide reserve fund. The
Festivals Sustainability Steering Committee supports the reinstatement of the
Festivals, Fairs, and Special Event Funding Program of $713,000. This amount includes program support funding
that was also moved from the base budget in 2004.
Recommendation 2: Approve the following elements of the Festival Sustainability Plan in principle, subject to approval of the Arts Investment Strategy: increasing the Festival, Fairs and Special Events base-funding budget ($337,000), providing additional funding of $63,000 to the Ottawa Festivals organization to increase its role in promotion and development and creating and managing a Sustainability Fund ($250,000 one-time).
In 2003, staff completed a cross-Canada municipal, provincial and federal arts/festival funding per capita comparison. This study compared 2003 dedicated operating/project funding (not capital funding) invested in the arts/festival sector from municipal government sources, provincial arts funding agency sources, and the Canada Council for the Arts in Canada’s seven largest single cities (Toronto, Montreal, Calgary, Ottawa, Edmonton, Winnipeg and Vancouver). Results indicated that:
1. Ottawa
ranks last among Canada’s seven largest single cities in municipal
arts/festival per-capita funding.
2. Ottawa
ranks last per-capita among Canada’s seven largest single cities in
arts/festival funding disbursed from provincial arts funding agency sources.
3. Ottawa
ranks second last per-capita among Canada’s seven largest single cities in
arts/festival funding disbursed from the Canada Council for the Arts.
4. Ottawa
ranks last per-capita among Canada’s seven largest single cities in combined
arts/festival funding disbursed from municipal sources, provincial arts funding
agencies and the Canada Council for the Arts.
Research in 2003 indicated that all cities surveyed have increased their funding to Festivals, Fairs, and Special Events while Ottawa has removed funding from the base budget and has not increased the funding envelope. In 2003, Ottawa’s contribution is lowest at $3.41 per capita. Recent updated comparisons for 2005 indicates that Ottawa remains last with per capita municipal contributions at $3.64
The Arts Investment Strategy Report is recommending an increased municipal funding plan of $2.5 million for local arts, festivals, fairs and special events over a four-year time period, subject to annual budget approvals, in order to:
Of this $2.5 million, $650,000 would be targeted for Festivals, Fairs
and Special Events Sustainability. As
proposed in the Arts Investment Strategy, this reflects the following
commitments in 2007:
i. $337,000 Additional funding to meet existing community needs within the Festivals, Fair and Special Events Funding Program to be assessed, allocated and monitored as per the existing Council-approved policy.
ii. $250,000 Establishment of a Sustainability and Emergency Fund (OFSEF) to be managed by Ottawa Festivals. This Fund will assist Festivals, Fairs and Special Events that are members of Ottawa Festivals with repayable loans that help to address cash flow problems and unforeseen circumstances resulting in temporary financial loss. The City contribution will be matched by Ottawa Festival member contributions to create a Fund that will be held by an independent financial institution. This Fund will be used as collateral and loan terms will be arranged between the festival or event requiring funding and the financial institution.
iii. $63,000 Additional funding for the Ottawa Festivals service organization to provide ongoing support and development to member organizations. A service agreement will be developed between the City and Ottawa Festivals.
In order to meet the needs of their membership, Ottawa Festivals is
proposing a Sustainability and Emergency Fund Program that will provide
increased support to local Festivals, Fairs and Special Events that are
members. The Ottawa Festivals’ plan
will also include expanding their membership criteria in order to increase
their membership. Their proposal
includes the following components:
1. Increasing Ottawa Festivals’ role in order to develop the expertise and capacity of individual organizations
2. Create a Sustainability Fund for Festivals, Fairs, and Special Events
3. Create an Emergency Fund for Festivals, Fairs, and Special Events
By increasing the role that Ottawa Festivals plays as an organization in developing the expertise and capacity of individual organizations they will be able to create a peer-mentoring program. This mentoring program will be able to address the issues that some organizations face related to corporate governance, strategic and organizational issues.
The Ottawa Festivals Sustainability and Emergency Fund is intended to bring greater stability to the Festivals, Fairs and Special Events industry. The fund will provide a needed tool to assist Festivals, Fairs and Special Events with their cash flow needs and will also provide a source of emergency funding when unforeseen events create significant financial loss. Both funds will be in the form of a repayable loan from a financial institution where the fund is being held. The fund would be used as collateral and loan terms would be arranged between the festival or event requiring funding and the financial institution.
The Ottawa Festivals Sustainability Fund:
The Ottawa Festivals Emergency Fund:
The Festival Sustainability Steering Committee as well as the majority of the Ottawa Festivals membership endorses the concept of these two funds being managed by Ottawa Festivals. It is intended that the creation of this OFSEF Program will result in organizers no longer making direct requests to Council for emergency funding. Please refer to Annex 3 for additional details on the proposed Ottawa Festivals Sustainability and Emergency Fund Program (OFSEF).
As Ottawa Tourism is responsible for marketing the City of Ottawa as a tourist destination, they are proposing to consult with Ottawa Festivals each year to ensure that the City's Festivals, Fairs and Special Events are integrated wherever possible into Ottawa Tourism’s annual destination marketing program. Cultural Services staff will work with Business Development staff, Ottawa Tourism and Ottawa Festivals to help ensure this integration.
Many cities invest funds for in-kind services. While preliminary figures reflect that the
City of Ottawa has invested over $700,000 for “in-kind” services, more work
needs to be done in this area. The
Festival Sustainability Steering Committee supports the need for a Citywide
policy for “in-kind services” and “invoiced services”. However Events Central staff will first need
to continue tracking City of Ottawa’s “in-kind” services and “invoiced”
services in 2007 and analyse this information before being able to develop a
framework for in-kind and invoiced services.
Frequently, the Community and Protective Services Department receives requests from the community and event organizers to sponsor local events. While the City of Ottawa does have a Corporate Sponsorship and Advertising Policy “to assist in the provision of City services and projects”, it does not deal with the City being requested to be a sponsor of an event. The Festival Sustainability Steering Committee supports the need for a Citywide sponsorship policy that addresses these types of community requests.
As demonstrated in the cross-Canada research, Festivals, Fairs, and
Special Events will be sustainable when the City of Ottawa provides clearly
defined in-kind services and sponsorship policies and adequate funding is
invested in these organizations.
City Council directed the Community and Protective Services Department in consultation with Ottawa Festivals and community groups to develop a sustainability support plan for Festivals, Fairs and Special Events. All members agree that both the community and the City have a role to play in sustaining Festivals, Fairs and Special Events.
Ottawa Festivals has been identified as the lead agency to develop a
peer mentoring and capacity building program as well as a Sustainability and
Emergency Fund program. Ottawa Tourism
has agreed to consult with Ottawa Festivals when developing their
destination-marketing program. The City of Ottawa needs to invest in the
Festivals, Fairs and Special Events industry through the development of an
in-kind services and sponsorship programs, and recognizing the need for
continued and increased funding investments to the industry.
Sustainability for the Festivals, Fairs and Special Events community
means stability for their organizations allowing for growth within the industry
and the ability to continue to significantly contribute to Ottawa’s quality of
life.
CONSULTATION
The Festivals Sustainability Steering Committee was formed including
representation from Ottawa Festivals
(OF); Ottawa Tourism; Ottawa-Gatineau Hotel Association; representatives from
Festivals, Fairs, and Special Events and local Canada Day events. On Tuesday January 9, 2007, 27 organizers
participated in a public consultation session and there was general support for
the overall draft recommendations.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION
Annex 1: City of Ottawa Festivals Sustainability Steering Committee Membership
Annex 2: Terminology
Annex 3: Ottawa Festivals Network Inc. Sustainability and Emergency
Fund Program (OFSEF)
Proposal
Annex 4: City Branches involved with Special Events
Annex 5: 2006 Funding Results: Festivals, Fairs, and Special Events
DISPOSITION
The Community and Protective Services Department will implement any
direction received from Council.
Annex
1
City of Ottawa
Festivals Sustainability Steering Committee Membership
Community Representatives
|
D.
City Staff Representatives
|
1.
Julian Armour |
1.
Colleen Hendrick (Co-Chair) |
1. John Brooman |
2.
Susan Jones (Co-Chair) |
3.
Barbara Stacey |
3.
Mike Murr |
3.
Gene Swimmer |
4.
Laura Cyr |
5.
Mark Monahan |
5.
Aldo Chiappa |
6.
Joyce Trafford |
6.
Nathalie
Rochefort Strategic
Initiative and Business Planning (CPS) |
7.
Michele Green |
|
8.
Dick Brown |
|
9.
Jacques
Burelle |
|
Annex 2
TERMINOLOGY
Special Events
The term “special event” generally encompasses a wide range of
activities that take place in parks, streets and other City-owned (or NCC
owned) spaces, including runs, walks, demonstrations, picnics, parades, block
parties, and a variety of festivals, fairs and celebrations.
The event
definitions are as follows:
Festival (Cultural – Arts or Heritage)
Combination of gated and free events: i.e. Italian Week, Caribe EXPO,
Pride Week, etc.
Community-based fair: managed by an agricultural society in good standing with the Provincial Agricultural Society Association, held within a specific geographic area within the City of Ottawa. Fairs are incorporated not-for-profit organizations. Event is gated (not free) and programming strives to both celebrate and educate on issues of agriculture, rural heritage, farming (growers and livestock) and home crafts (contests and prizes). Local residents, specifically farmers, actively participate both in the operations of the organization/event as well as vendors, contestants etc. i.e. Carp Fair, Metcalfe Fair, etc.
i.e. neighbourhood block parties and neighbourhood events
2. Civic events:
Special event originating in Ottawa and held for the benefit of its
residents and that the City of Ottawa – on its own or in partnership with other
organizations – has initiated and / or has a significant role in
organizing. Celebration linked to a
civic holiday that is generally also performed by other municipalities across
Canada. Free event that fosters civic
pride. Residents often have a sense of
ownership and entitlement to the event. i.e. Remembrance Day, Canada Day, etc.
(Most City of Ottawa civic events are supported through the City of Ottawa contributions to its partnership organizations such as Business Improvement Associations, Recreation Associations, etc, who are the primary organizers)
Other
Types of Events
Annex 3
OTTAWA FESTIVALS NETWORK INC.
SUSTAINABILITY AND EMERGENCY FUND PROGRAM (OFSEF) PROPOSAL
The
following proposal is intended as a Festival, Fairs and Special Events sector
self-help and preventative Sustainability and Emergency Program. The program would be solely managed by the
independent not-for profit organization, Ottawa Festivals Network Inc. Initial
funds would be contributed by the Festivals, Fairs and Events organizations
with matching funding being provided by the City of Ottawa.
The
Program’s implementation is contingent upon the approval of the Arts Investment
Strategy Report recommendations.
In April and June 2006, Council received emergency funding requests from three separate festival organizations that negatively impacted the image of the Ottawa Festivals, Fairs and Special Events sector.
In a responsible
and pro-active fashion, Ottawa Festivals, the Ottawa umbrella service
organization representing over 35 local events organizations, developed a
“Sustainability and Emergency Fund Program”, in order to independently manage
future requests for emergency or cash flow assistance.
The Ottawa Festivals’ “Sustainability and Emergency Fund Program” (OFSEF) is one component of an overall strategy to increase stability within the Festival, Fair and Special Event industry.
Objectives of
the OFSEF Program
The OFSEF Program will administer 2 distinct funds:
1.
The Ottawa Festivals
Sustainability Fund
· Provides festivals with a leveraging tool to assist in their ongoing cash flow needs
· Will ensure festivals can manage the year-round cycles in a more strategic and entrepreneurial manner
· Repayable loan
2.
The Ottawa Festivals Emergency
Fund
· Provides secured loans to eligible festivals, fairs and events that, due to unforeseen circumstances, have incurred a substantial loss and are in need of temporary funding in order to return to financial stability
· Repayable loan
Eligibility to the OFSEF Program
To be eligible, organizations must be:
· Members of Ottawa Festivals
· Not-for-profit festivals, fairs and special events organizations
· Have contributed to the OF Program Fund to which they are applying (Sustainability Fund and Emergency Fund respectively). Contributions are based on a sliding scale
The OFSEF Program requires a two-year phased-in approach with the
combined dollar investment from events organizations being matched by the City
of Ottawa.
The City of Ottawa contribution, as reflected in the Arts Investment Strategy, requires the following City investment to be matched by Ottawa Festivals:
2007
$150,000 towards the Sustainability Fund
$100,000 towards the Emergency Fund
Total City contribution to OFSEF $250,000. Requires matching funds from Ottawa Festivals
2008
$175,000 towards the Sustainability Fund
$75,000 towards the Emergency Fund
Total City contribution to OFSEF $250,000. Requires matching funds from Ottawa Festivals
Future
Growth of the OFSEF Program
After the first two years of contributions from events organizations
and the municipality, the fund will continue to grow through interest,
contributions of new members, fundraising initiatives through Ottawa Festivals
and potential sponsorship. Other
private and government sources of funding will be identified so that the fund
can continue to grow.
All funding will be in the form of a loan from a financial institution where the fund is being held. The fund would be used as collateral and loan terms would be arranged between the festival or event requiring funding and the financial institution.
The same financial institution will hold the account for both OFSEF
Program funds. Interest rates would be negotiated between Ottawa Festivals and
the financial institution and all interest earned would remain with the OFSEF
Program.
· Participation in the Ottawa Festivals Sustainability and Emergency Fund Program would not obligate the City of Ottawa to fund an organization that is not otherwise eligible to the City funding program.
· The OFSEF Program would be managed independently from the City of Ottawa
· The City would not be involved in the credit (loan) agreements concluded between OF members and the financial institution. The City would not act as guarantor on the loans sought by members with financial institutions.
· Participation in the fund or any default in repayment to the fund would not directly impact an organization’s ability to receive funding from the City of Ottawa.
· All contributions to the fund would be calculated in proportion to an organization’s budget, thus making the capacity to participate in the fund equal between organizations.
· Ottawa Festivals, through the OFSEF Committee, will administer the two OFSEF Program funds and will report to the Board of Directors of Ottawa Festivals on all decisions concerning loans secured by the Program.
· The OFSEF Program will be carefully managed and documented by the staff of Ottawa Festivals. Written records will be maintained of all activities and decisions.
· Each year, Ottawa Festivals will provide a progress report to the City of Ottawa. After the first three years, Ottawa Festivals will provide the City of Ottawa with a detailed report documenting the impact of this project, allocations, financial status of the two funds and a plan for the future of the Program.
· The financial institution that is holding the OFSEF Program accounts will be responsible for making all final loan arrangements. The bank will report to the committee through the staff of Ottawa Festivals.
The OFSEF Committee
·
The OFSEF Committee will be named by the Board of Directors of Ottawa
Festivals and will report all activity to the Board in writing within five
working days of any activity.
·
The Committee will be comprised of three Ottawa Festivals Directors
(not including the President of Ottawa Festivals who would serve on an appeal
committee as required) and two representatives from the broader community. Committee members will be chosen for their
solid financial and management expertise.
·
Any committee member who is associated financially in any way with,
serves on a board of, or has any vested interest in a festival applying to the
emergency fund may not remain on the committee.
·
One City of Ottawa representative would be invited to sit on the
committee, in a non-voting advisory capacity only.
·
The Board of Directors of Ottawa Festivals will be responsible for
monitoring this committee.
·
Two signatures from Ottawa Festivals representatives with signing
authority will be required to authorize a loan.
Signatures of 75% of Ottawa Festivals directors will be required to withdraw any money directly from the Fund, either to return it to a member organization that has withdrawn from the Fund or to transfer the entire Fund to another financial institution.
Withdrawing
from the OFSEF Program
Organizations may withdraw from the Fund at any time and their original
contribution will be immediately refunded. However, no interest will be paid on
their contribution and the organization will no longer be eligible to apply to
either of the OFSEF Program Funds.
The
Appeals Committee and Procedure
Organizations who are not approved for funding will receive an explanation in writing and have one opportunity of appealing the decision. The separate appeal committee, made up of three people including the President of Ottawa Festivals, will review all appeals. The decision of the appeal review is final. Organizations must wait at least two months after having their appeal rejected before applying again to the Ottawa Festivals Emergency Fund.
Festivals, Fairs and Special
Events organizations will contribute according to the following formula:
In 2007, organizations
contribute $150,000: maximum contribution = $150,000 x (cash budget of
individual organizations ÷ total cash budget
of all participating events organizations)
In 2008, organizations contribute $175,000: maximum contribution = $175,000 x (cash budget of individual organization ÷ total cash budget of all participating events organizations)
Total dollar amount residing in the Sustainability Fund by spring 2008: $650,000 +
Applications
Amount
of Funding
All
participating organizations could apply for a loan roughly equal to double
their total accumulated contribution. All loans would be secured by the reserve
fund.
Festivals, Fairs and Special Events may receive a loan through the
Ottawa Festivals Sustainability Fund for a maximum duration of eight
months. These groups will be eligible
to apply for funding no sooner than one month after any previous loan through
this fund has been fully repaid. These
groups must contribute a minimum of $1,000 to participate in the Ottawa Festivals
Sustainability Fund.
Criteria
The Ottawa Festivals Sustainability Fund is intended to provide cash
flow assistance as required to organizations who have contributed to the Fund,
up to their maximum entitlement.
Festivals, Fairs and Special Events
organization contributions:
In 2007, participating organizations contribute 0.5% of their cash budget (total $75,000 +)
This figure is based on an estimated total cash budget of participating Festivals, Fairs and Special Events of more than $15,000,000.
In 2008, participating organizations contribute an additional 0.35% of
their cash budget (total $50,000 +)
Total dollar amount residing in the Emergency Fund by spring 2008: $300,000 +
Participating organizations must contribute the required percentage of
their cash budget to participate in the OFSEF Emergency Fund.
Applications
To apply for a loan secured by the OFSEF Emergency Fund, organizations
will be required to submit:
In addition, a mechanism must be provided whereby the OFSEF Program has
priority for repayment and can garnish the funds if necessary. This letter of agreement must be signed by
the senior manager of the organization and two Directors from the board of the
organization applying for funding, including the President.
Amount of Funding
All participating
organizations could apply for a loan up to 10% of their cash budget, to a
maximum of $100,000. The OFSEF Committee would determine final amounts.
Organizations would negotiate the terms of the loan, which would be secured by
the program.
Duration
of Funding
Organizations can apply for funding through the Ottawa Festivals Emergency Fund in the form of a loan for a maximum period
of twelve months. The OFSEF Committee
will decide repayment schedules and timeframes. Festivals, Fairs and Special Events organizations will be
eligible to apply for funding no sooner than six months after any previous loan
through the Emergency Fund has been fully repaid.
Criteria
The Ottawa Festivals Emergency Fund is intended to provide funding in the form of a secured loan for organizations that experience unforeseen circumstances over which they have no control that result in significant financial loss.
This could include, but would not be limited to:
· Extended periods of bad weather
· Fire or theft
· Injury of key personnel or other serious accident
· A local, national or international health crisis or perceived emergency
· Cancellation or elimination of a public sector granting program
· An unsuccessful season resulting in significant financial loss
The OFSEF Program is not intended to provide loans to organizations
that have ongoing and long-term management, governance or planning weaknesses.
Annex 4
City Branches involved with
Special Events
Annex 5
2006 Funding
results: Festivals, Fairs and Special Events
1.
Canada Dance Festival Society $30,000
2.
Carnival of Cultures $14,000
3.
Ottawa Bluesfest $41,000
4.
Ottawa Chamber Music Society
$115,000
5.
Ottawa Folk Festival $47,000
6.
Ottawa Fringe Festival $25,000
7.
Ottawa International Animation Festival $26,000
8.
Ottawa Children’s Festival $44,000
9.
Ottawa International Jazz Festival $84,000
10. Ottawa
International Writers’ Festival $17,000
11.
Arts Bureau for the Continent (ABC) Festival
$2,000
12.
Caribe EXPO $2,000
13.
Italian Week $5,000
14.
Ottawa Dragon Boat Festival
$15,000
15. Pride Week
Festival $1,000 – A
PPPP
1. Carp Fair $10,000
2. Metcalfe Fair $12,500
3. Navan Fair $10,500
4. Richmond Fair $12,000
5. SuperEX $17,000
1. Ottawa Festival Network $30,495.62
Canadian Tulip
Festival was ineligible to apply in 2005. $65,588.38 was applied to line of
credit approved by Council in February 2003.
Total $626,084
Arts Investment
Strategy and festivals sustainability plan
Stratégie
d’investissement dans les arts ET plan de viabilité des festivals
ACS2007-CPS-CSF-0001 CITY
WIDE / À L'ÉCHELLE DE LA VILLE
The
following submissions in support of the report recommendations were circulated
in advance of the meeting:
a. Ottawa Business Journal letter dated 25
Jan 07
b. Heritage Ottawa E-mailed comments dated
31 Jan 07
c. R. Mahon, Chancellor’s
Professor, Institute of Political Economy, University of Ottawa E-mailed comments
dated 31 Jan 07
d. D.W. Jones E-mailed comments dated 1
Feb 07
e. TD Canada Trust letter dated 25 Jan 07
f. P. Collenette letter dated 25 Jan 07
g. Cisco Systems Canada Co. letter dated
30 Jan 07
h. Ottawa Community Immigration Services
Organization letter dated 30 Jan 07
i. Arts, Heritage and Culture Advisory
Committee memo dated 26 Jan 07
j. Ottawa Tourism letter dated 31 Jan 07
Copies
of these are held on file. E-mails of
support were also sent to individual Councillors and copied to the Coordinator. These too are held on file.
Colleen
Hendrick, Director of Cultural Services and Community Funding introduced
members of the Arts Investment Strategy and the Festivals Sustainability Plan
Steering Committees. Following a
detailed overview of the report by the Director and members of the Steering
Committees, the following public delegations were received:
Catherine O’Grady, Member, Arts Investment Strategy Steering
Committee indicated that this document clearly puts
forward the will and the commitment of the arts community and Council should
support this desperately-needed investment in the community. As suggested by the former Mayor of
Winnipeg, Glen Murray, it is a city’s job to generate wealth and she believed
it is this City’s responsibility to provide the infrastructure that will
attract the types of businesses and people who work in information technology
because they are ones drawn to cities that offer a vibrant culture. To do that, the City needs to build
theatres, concert halls, galleries, et cetera, giving artists a place to keep
those wealth generators in our community.
Max Keeping remarked that people who are looking to move to this city look at what it has to offer. He believed there is vibrancy to Ottawa and Council needs to ensure that it has a strong cultural arts community by investing in arts and festivals. In particular, he asked committee members to keep in mind the kids in the community who are economically disadvantaged, and recognize that they have little hope of ever having access to recreation or the arts. The City, as a community, should ensure that it provides that access and he maintained the importance of exposing these kids to culture. He believed Ottawa should supplement what the federal government does and take the necessary steps to ensure this capital is the kind of town where every person who lives here has the opportunity to enjoy what the arts and culture community has to offer.
Richard Mahoney, Board member, Cisco Ottawa Bluesfest and Partner,
Fraser Milner and Casgrain echoed some of the
previous comments about the importance of arts and culture to the community in
terms of quality of life and economics and believed that the funds recommended
to be allocated over the next four years would be efficiently used. Mr. Mahoney indicated that City funding to
arts organizations helps them to leverage additional funding from the federal
and provincial governments. He would
like to see an appropriate amount from the City that reflects the need. He believed the City could help local
organizations by building a sustainable plan, because not only will that help
to bring jobs and a vibrant life to the city, it will help each of those
organizations as they put in their applications for additional funding support
from other levels of government.
Sandra Gillis, Board member, Jazz Festival believed the strategy was a reflection of extensive consultation
amongst the vast groups of stakeholders and is a well researched and well
documented plan. If implemented, the
plan would provide dividends for years.
She believed it was important to recognize the distinction between arts
festivals and festivals and the kinds she was referring to were arts festivals
like the Jazz Festival and the Chamber Music Festival. She knew that the proposed investment in the arts will
leverage millions of dollars from the senior levels of government and corporate
sponsors, and will result in positive economic impacts many times greater than
the initial investment being requested.
She noted that the most successful cities are hobs of creativity which
generate innovation, attracts and grows high tech and other high value
industries and spurs economic growth and prosperity.
Alex MacDonald, Crichton Cultural Community Centre stated that more and more artists of every discipline are making
the decision to move out of the city and she believed that approving the report
today will put steps in motion to help to reverse that trend. She believed Council should support the AIS
because it speaks directly to the impact that increased municipal funding will
have in retaining artists and she added her voice to the many others who saw
the need to nurture those young artists by investing in local arts
organizations so that the local voice will have the impact that it should have
on strengthening this arts sector in Ottawa.
She believed that municipal investment is the primary lever for all
other public and private investments.
She indicated that the Centre provides for and facilitates the professional creation,
development, production and public presentation of works of art by professional
artists; they do this on a shoestring budget and with countless volunteer
hours. Given that Ottawa is investing
less than half of the average investment of other Canadian cities of this
stature in the arts sector, she appealed to the Committee to make this
investment.
Lynn Miles spoke as a local artist and a singer who has travelled all over the world and in her travels, she believed people are attracted to vibrant cities because they offer the culture and entertainment they are looking for. For many sectors, this includes the high tech sector and these people have the money to spend so they migrate to cities that offer the kind of life and culture they enjoy. She indicated that the city of Austin, which attracts high sector jobs, generates nearly $700M each year in economic activities and $11M in tax revenues from music alone.
Russ Mills, Chair of the Board, Opera Lyra spoke in support of the report and provided the following comments:
- Opera Lyra generates the majority of its revenues through the private sector by ticket sales, donations, sponsorships, foundations or event-based fundraising; the funding provided by the City has helped them to create a significant impact on the local community by way of job creation, attracting tourists and bringing musical beauty and joy to thousands of adults and children each year;
- for Ottawa to maintain a quality professional opera company, linked to the community and responsive to its interests, it will take increased funding; their success in attracting new monies from the community, as well as from other granting agencies, is greatly dependent on the level of leadership shown by the City;
- the funding they receive from the City generates over $2M of direct spending by the company; ticket sales generate many times their value in additional spending (restaurants, accommodations, suppliers and other services);
- in cities where municipal investment in the arts is higher, other levels of government also make higher investments; currently in Ottawa, arts organizations attract lower federal and provincial investments than their peers across Canada;
- aside from increased municipal arts funding, the other recommendations in the report would be key in allowing local groups to be more self-sustaining.
Robert Corbeil, Executive Manager, Théâtre Action spoke about how revenues generated by the culture and theatre sectors are reinvested in the city. He explained that art and culture give the city its soul and when they are supported, it encourages artists to remain in the city. Further, arts organizations give ‘colour’ to the city and that cultural activities give a ‘soul’ to the city and increases the rate of keeping local talent in the city. He remarked that marketing is to the private sector what arts and culture is to the city; businesses that are first to invest in marketing, are the first to make their money and therefore, the City should invest in culture. The City has an added responsibility because it is a capital and should show leadership through its support of the arts.
Richard Lebel, La Nouvelle Scène congratulated staff and all those consulted in
the preparation of this report. He made
the following points:
·
Every dollar
invested in theatre translates into economic activity of between $1.46 and
$2.23; investing an additional $2.5M over four years would translate into $9.2
million in added economic activity
·
La Nouvelle Scène has been the birthplace of over 30 theatre
productions since opening in 1999; it has been the starting point for
approximately 15 national tours, and a “friendly port of call”
for over 10 foreign productions
·
La Nouvelle Scène is Ottawa’s only professional Francophone theatre centre
and has positioned itself as an important link in Canada’s Francophone
community; its clientele has been pegged at 40,000 spectators a year (including
cross-country touring)
·
While
they support the report recommendations, they further
suggest the funding be increased to $3.5M; if the
City increases its investment accordingly, it will strengthen what is currently
being done—which is very valuable—and tangibly increase all the related
potential, cultural, social, individual and economic impacts
Additional details covered in his presentation
are detailed in his submission, a copy of which is held on file.
Inouk Touzin, independent theatre artist spoke about the dream he had for Ottawa, where the City provides the necessary funding to supports arts and culture. He noted that Ottawa is a multi-cultural community and should have strong cultural policy to promote diversity. He believed that if the City does not support this strategy, thereby showing their belief in the arts and what that means to the city, then it is a poor reflection on the city as the capital of Canada. He did not believe there was a valid reason to reject the report recommendations, stating it is the City’s role is to show they believe in the arts and to provide the necessary funds. He believed Ottawa is not attracting its fair share of arts funding from the senior levels of government and so he urged the committee to believe and to support the increased budget.
Steven Campbell, Director, Community Partnerships, Ontario Arts Council provided the following comments:
- artists and arts organizations from Eastern Ontario that apply to the OAC have a success rate of 65%, compared to an overall OAC success rate of 56%;
- the report highlights some of the economic reasons for supporting the arts and the impact of the arts in Ontario is significant - $18 billion dollars a year;
- for every OAC dollar invested, a $20 impact is yielded on the province’s economy;
- there is increased recognition that communities that encourage and attract creative people generate both economic growth and social cohesion;
- municipal funding is an essential element of the funding mix and like any other infrastructure, the arts are an essential part of the city;
- extensive research from Ontario and around the world shows that arts education enhances academic achievement and increases social and psychological success;
- sustainable funding for the arts in Ottawa is important and so is leadership, partnership, research and advocacy.
In response to questions posed by Committee members, he provided the following details:
· when an organization seeking assistance from the OAC has the support of the municipal government, they see it as an indication of solid support and this plays a factor in the assessment process
· the OAC does not fund Federal institutions; the investment in the Ottawa region is higher on a per capita basis than the rest of the province, indicating that the City thinks local culture and supporting artists where they live is important.
John Koensgen, actor remarked that he has been fortunate to be able to live in Ottawa and, although it has been good for him as an artist over the years, he acknowledged that it has not always been easy. He maintained that Ottawa has lacked performance venues and financial supports for many years and this has resulted in theatre not growing in the city, thereby affecting the ability to retain and foster emerging artists in the community. He referred to the success of the Great Canadian Theatre Company, which was able to succeed with the financial assistance of the City. Mr. Koensgen remarked that the Preston Street BIA can attest to the economic impact the GCTC has had on their community. In closing, he explained that increasingly, more and more actors who start in Ottawa, end of leaving in order to make their living. He urged the Committee to support the arts investment strategy for all the young actors who could be calling Ottawa their home. Such an investment would help to enrich the lives of all who live here and to encourage and attract industry and tourism.
Dean George Lang, Faculty of Arts, University of Ottawa indicated that he contributes regularly and as much as he can from his budget, to activities that spill over into the city. He echoed many comments already stated that when there are activities in the city, which are attractive to the arts and artists, it spills back over on the community. Art is a cultural good that is not only a part of peoples’ lives, but it generates money and attracts people to live here.
Mark Monahan, Ottawa Bluesfest presented members with a letter from the Cisco Systems from the Vice-President of the capital region in support of the recommendations today. A copy of the letter is held on file. Mr. Monahan indicated that Bluesfest has been very successful in attracting private sector investment because many companies want to be associated with bigger events; they want to gain exposure in the community, and be great community partners. With respect to the impact City funding can have on arts organizations, he stated that in 2006, they received $41,000 from the City and as a result, were able to leverage $50,000 each from the province and the federal governments. He noted that the province recently announced changes to a tourism fund, which could provide access to $200,000 for out-of-town marketing. While he believed they should pursue this financial support, he explained that with limited staff, he did not have the time to fill out the paperwork, nor manage the marketing campaign. However, with sustaining funding from the City, he would be able to hire people in the community to assist with the administration required.
Joyce Trafford, Carp Fair spoke about the history of agricultural fairs and the importance they have had on their communities and the surrounding areas. Combined, Ottawa’s four country fairs total 529 years of existence. Agricultural fairs have become family traditions and are a real community event. They attract the support and assistance from countless volunteers and contribute an enormous amount into the economical impact of their community (i.e., restaurants, gas stations, banks, et cetera). And, while agricultural fairs generate a lot of revenue, there are many expenses incurred by organizing a fair, maintaining the grounds and developing new programs year after year. Each fair is thankful for the support they have received from the City and their local sponsors and supporters, but in order to continue to bring rural education, agricultural programs and events at the high standards people are accustomed to, the City must make a greater investment into the financial support of these agricultural fairs.
Diane Cantu, President, Board of Directors for the Ottawa School of Art stated that their organization was founded in 1879 and they take their partnership with the City very seriously. They try to give as much value for the dollar for that support as they can and supporting the arts investment strategy will provide them with the means to strengthen that partnership and will empower them to reach out to the diverse community. She provided details on the programs they offer, including: training for seniors, children and teens in special workshops and outreach programs in the community; training for new and professional artists and providing art training for under-served communities. Ms. Cantu advised that they also initiated and conduct “Art Bus”, a program which takes people on tours to local galleries in Ottawa and Gatineau. The provide jobs by employing over 50 local professional artists to work and teach at the School and their community art gallery and boutique are venues for their members to sell their work. The OSA provides over $15,000 in bursaries every year to students with limited financial means. She was very pleased to have such a well researched and articulated plan, with a clear proactive vision on the table and they looked forward to working with the City to make this plan a reality.
Dr. Robin Riddihough, Chair, Ottawa Community Theatres Coalition and President, Ottawa Little Theatre explained that community or amateur theatre is an essential component of the spectrum of live theatre; it is where young actors sharpen their skills, where older professionals go to keep up their creativity and where audiences grow and learn about the excitement of live performance. It is a creative recreation and leisure for many thousands of Ottawa residents. He indicated that Ottawa has more than 15 community theatres and in 2006, they involved an estimated 550 volunteers (on and off stage), put on more than 35 separate productions running for over 280 performances and sold over 110,000 tickets. He believed this indicated that community theatre is a vigorous part of the community at large. However, community theatre increasingly has had to compete with other recreational activities such as home theatre and computer games and theatre groups have been increasingly running annual deficits. The support provided by the City is critically important and is the stepping-stone to leveraging additional funding. He urged the Committee to support the AIS. Additional details are contained in his written presentation, a copy of which is held on file.
Penny McCann, SAW Video stated that as an artist, she is well established in Ottawa, and is from a generation that has received vital and valued support for their work from the City. She too spoke about the difficulty remaining in Ottawa as a struggling artist and felt for the newest generation that is trying to move forward in their careers. She introduced a young artist, Ariel Smith, who moved to Ottawa two years ago and who participated in the youth video training program of SAW Video. Ms. Smith received grants for her work from the City and from the Ontario Arts Council.
Ariel Smith indicated that being an
active producing member at SAW Video and the Independent Filmmakers Cooperative
of Ottawa has been integral in her professional development and training, as
well as providing opportunities for employment and the creation of new works
through commissioning projects and grants.
She has found a home in Ottawa, stating it is a supportive community,
which has been instrumental in her growth as an artist. She believed that talented young artists,
who are the future of the arts community of Ottawa and who represent the
culturally diverse, energetic, exciting, progressive and cutting edge cultural
fabric of this city, much be nurtured and provided with more opportunities in
order to fully realize their ideas and potential. There is an amazing hub of emerging talent in the city and she
encourage Council to invest in it and to give it the chance to grow and
continue to put Ottawa on the cultural map.
Tony Pan, General Manager, Le Groupe Dance Lab indicated that Le Groupe Dance Lab is an active member of the arts community in Ottawa and around the world, with a history that began in 1967 as Canada’s foremost modern dance company: Le Groupe de la Place Royale. He made the following statements:
- the Dance Lab has kept Ottawa on the radar screen for dance comparable to Vancouver, Toronto, and Montreal; this is a position Ottawa should be very proud of, and one that can only be sustained by support for development of contemporary dance;
- they hold three shows per month including a youth outreach program, thus providing regular and frequent opportunities for the Ottawa public to see, learn and participate in dance creation in progress;
- the Lab offers their studios at no cost for rehearsals and workshops to independent artists and groups who normally cannot afford such infrastructure; they maximize their funding and resources, exemplifying the concept ‘value for money’;
- supportive local businesses
reflect their faith in who the Lab is and what they do; sponsorships and
donations liberate and enable arts groups to devote funding to enriching and
enhancing programming;
- by not investing in culture, Ottawa
will no longer be an artistic contender (provincially, nationally or
internationally) whereas investing in culture might develop a creative and
competitive city.
A copy of his
written presentation is held on file.
Judy Kirsh, retired Arts Coordinator of the Arts Canterbury program indicated that a number of graduates of the program have moved away
from Ottawa because the city lacks the local artistic infrastructure that
allows them to work and develop here.
They are drawn to other cities such as Toronto, Montreal, Vancouver,
Edmonton and Winnipeg where the arts receive not only more financial support,
but also more recognition of their importance to the growth of the city. She noted that one goal of the AIS is to
"keep Ottawa's artists here and reduce the current talent drain to other
major Canadian centres." She
echoed many other comments made about the benefits to the city that would be
realized if local artists remain in Ottawa, adding that it would help create an environment that would
attract more creative people, as well as businesses and capital. The city would become
more dynamic, by attracting companies that want their employees to live in just
such a community. She encouraged the
Committee and Council to support a strong local
artistic community by approving the AIS.
A copy of her written submission is held on file.
Chris White, independent artist and Artistic Director with Ottawa Folk
Festival believed
that the arts sector in Ottawa is doing as well because of the dedication,
vision and the talent of various people, organizations and groups of
volunteers, who are determined to have a vibrant scene in this city, despite
obstacles. He believed the City has has
been too willing to compromise and let arts organizations and artists somehow
try to survive on their own or with minimal support. Approving the AIS is a great opportunity for Council to show
leadership and to set a course and direction and will quickly become obvious
that a relatively small amount of support can yield large results.
Nick Masciantonio, Chair, Arts, Heritage and Culture Advisory Committee conveyed the Advisory Committee’s support for the Strategy. He remarked that the development of the AIS has been a joint effort by staff, the industry and artists; it is a well researched, well documented and thoroughly discussed strategy to empower community groups, festival organizations, and artists to do more. He believed that taxpayers, who rightfully expect accountability for their investments, will see economic returns – measurable and realistic - from this Strategy. As a member of the AIS Steering Committee, he indicated his concern, and that of the Advisory Committee, that the local arts infrastructure is not sustainable in its current state and Ottawa is suffering from a talent drain. He believed that cities that can sustain a critical mass of creative people, artists, cultural institutions and organizations are competitive cities in a global marketplace. Further, creativity links with innovation in the business world and tends to attract and support more high-tech industries; artists provide the talent base for the creative industry including film, television, broadcasting, publishing and web casting. Along with performers, many high-tech and specialized skills are required for these industries and there are tremendous universities and colleges on both sides of the Ottawa River specializing in these fields. He urged the Committee and Council to invest in the city’s economic and cultural future.
Randy McIntyre, Berkshire Securities Office stated that he was an active participant in the business life of Ottawa, as well as an active supporter of the cultural sector. He appreciates art for its aesthetic qualities and has come to recognize its impact on society in a social health context and in terms of its economic impact. While the Committee will be debating the merits of the AIS, he reminded them that the report is not called the “Arts Spending Strategy. Spending implies that once money has been expended, there remains little residual value; however, investment implies that the money once expended may be expected to derive lasting value and that is an important distinction for the Committee to keep in mind. He went on to state that in terms of affordability, investment in the arts represents a relatively inexpensive proposition; a small amount of direct investment leads to considerably larger amounts of economic impact.
He indicated that he current level of funding (approximately $3.5M), results in a direct investment of $40M in Ottawa’s cultural sector. What this figure does not take into account is the indirect economic impact of culture, including hotels, restaurants/bars, caterers, parking lots, retailers, costumers, supply houses, and construction trades. The Canada Council states that direct spending on arts is magnified by a factor of three and the $40M in direct spending results in a further $120M in economic activity. Therefore, investment in the arts is not only a good social investment, but is critical to the economic health of the community. As an investment advisor, he assured the Committee that it can expect a full return on this investment. A copy of his presentation is held on file.
Eileen Overend expressed support for the proposed Strategy
and the recommended enhanced funding.
She believed it is a win-win solution for both the City and the arts
community. From the perspective of one
who is a member of an arts organization, Ms. Overend indicated that
integrating the work of cultural events in the city would enhance the life of
the city. She agreed with the
recommendation of the Steering Committee to much more vigorously advocate for
increased provincial and federal funding.
Arts organizations are often caught in a catch-22 situation because if
they are unable to obtain federal support, they cannot get municipal funding
either. And, if there is no municipal
funding, they cannot get federal, provincial or private sector funding.
Sylvie Dufour, Théâtre du Trillium believed approval of the Strategy was the
right direction to be heading for the future.
She indicated that their theatre is dynamic nationally and provincially
and they support local artists which in turn stimulates local hiring. Each of their productions/activities is a
privileged opportunity and allows her to go forward as a stage director and
ensure it a space of creativity. They
have had good success throughout the year and have been able to create links
with other members in the community.
She wanted people to understand what the stage is and their labs and
discussions assist in this regard. She
emphasized that theatre is playing an important role in the development of the
artistic environment.
Marion Steele, Pride Festival indicated that the 30 annual festivals draw
people to the Nation’s capital each year and the objective of bringing tourism
to a city, is to prosper from the dollars they spend when they vacation
here. She believed that there is no
greater potential for economic growth than by establishing a successful arts
plan that ultimately reaches that target market. She spoke of the important role the City plays in their annual
event, noting that logistical festival planning is paramount in order to
establish a successful recreation and tourism program. She recalled the emergency funding the City
provided to themselves and to other festivals (including the Tulip Festival)
when they really need it or were in jeopardy of shutting down. Ms. Steele emphasized that without the Committee’s
approval of the recommendations in the AIS medium-sized festivals will not be
able to sustain themselves. She
indicated that the pool of sponsorship dollars and grant monies has not
expanded proportionately with festival growth in the city. In closing she remarked that if implemented
correctly, this proposal could single handily support this entire community and
put Ottawa and all the multiple cultural diverse festivals on to the “must see”
tourism pathway.
Peter Stewart, Executive Director, Orleans Chamber of Commerce and
Chair, Heart of Orléans BIA stated that as the newest BIA in Ottawa, they feel an important part
of their mandate will be more than just to beautify St. Joseph Boulevard but
will be to encourage a successful environment for their businesses. He indicated that one of the ways to achieve
this will be to create a vibrant neighbourhood that people will want to visit
for dining and entertainment, not just for shopping. And, while they recognizes that the Orléans Arts Facility will
play an integral part in enhancing the community, the BIA is not just counting
on that new facility to create a more vibrant neighbourhood. Local businesses benefit from the spin-off
activities of the programming offered because patrons need places to dine
before, during and after events. In
addition, such events require a variety of services provided on a local
level. An essential part in organizing
an event is the logistical support of the City and the involvement of the
special events advisory team is very beneficial for local event
organizers. This and logistical support
from various departments such as Parks and Recreation, can make the life of an
event organizer that much easier. He
noted that many of the people who organize events are volunteers and are doing
so outside of their regular employment.
The BIA is committed to creating a vibrant Orléans with a successful mix
of activities and services. The City’s
support, both financially and logistically towards the arts and events can play
a big role in this regard.
Sandra Bason, President, Ottawa Choral Society thanked the City for their annual
grant money, noting it helps greatly towards their yearly concert series. She pointed out how hard they struggle to
make ends meet, even though they are all volunteers. She commended the many individuals who developed this report,
noting there are dozens of pages of compelling reasons for implementing the
recommendations the Council of the day made in 2003. She maintained that the report very clearly states the needs and
outlines the ways and means in a concrete way.
As noted in the report, the municipal portion ($2.5M) to fund the gap of
$15M is required to sustain, not expand, existing programs. She hoped the Committee would look at this
investment for what it is: a
revenue-generating proposal. She noted
that everyone recognizes that the increased cost of living and doing business
does go up steadily, so it should not come as a surprise that the cost of
running artistic organizations increases.
And so, while this investment will cost money, the returns on the City’s
investment will do more than offset the costs.
Peggy Ducharme, Downtown Rideau BIA, Board Member, Ottawa Arts Court
Foundation
indicated that part of the success in ensuing years would be the facilitation
of the arts community and the business community in other sectors. She noted that some of the best success they
have had in their district has been with the entrepreneurial artistic community
coming to them with their ideas and assistance of how they can make that
happen. Ms. Ducharme believed it was
important to keep in context when comparing Ontario to the rest of Canada, that
it is the only province that did have a significant downloading to the
municipal level and the effect of that was pitting social services against
cultural communities. She spoke of the
need to protect the public investment and ways to accomplish that is to monitor
and track and having criteria and guidelines because if the City is creating a
large pot of funding from which arts organizations can draw, the question will
arise: How do we decide who gets what
as well as how can they be moved away from sustainable funding?” She believed these issues would have to be
resolved as the Strategy moves forward.
John Melville, New Canadian Coalition for Arts and Culture, Ottawa Community Immigrant Services Organization (OCISO) gave a PowerPoint presentation related to new Canadians investing in Ottawa. He believed that the support that OCISO can continue to give to new Canadian community groups will move this city forward, not only as a leader in Ontario, but on the world stage. He commented that at least 180,000 people currently living in Ottawa are foreign-born. They bring resources, theatrical professionals, event planners, filmmakers, dance, et cetera and are part of what Ottawa is and will be. He indicated that some of the graphic designers that are here come from Taiwan, Japan and Eastern Europe and while they are investing their own dollars, the money is putting Ottawa to the forefront. He believed there was a need to change the society we live in and in this regard, the arts are a way to respond to events taking place in the world and to express and develop an understanding of these issues. He encouraged Committee members to support the AIS.
Maxine Bergevin, Arts Administration Program, University of Ottawa believed that now more than ever there is a need to make
involvement with the arts more accessible within a public setting - to youth
and the general public alike. Moving
back to Ottawa after pursuing her education in fine arts and media in Toronto,
Ms. Bergevin recollected that she had been filled with a sense of opportunity
and longing to become a thriving member of the workforce. However, in order to make a sizeable and
significant contribution to society, she soon realized that she would have to
create her own opportunities because the outlook for a media artist to produce
and show their work in Ottawa is quite scarce.
The future remains quite uncertain for her since current opportunities
to become involved in the arts sector, within an established enterprise is
primarily on a volunteer or unpaid work intern bases. She believed that many artists just want to be given the
opportunity to integrate themselves within the community; they want to
contribute by making Ottawa a vibrant city and one in which they can find pride
and feel fulfilled living in.
Andrew Lister, Ottawa Chamber Music Society reiterated several points already brought forward with regards to the economic spin-offs and improvements to the quality of life resulting from this additional investment in the arts and festivals. He suggested that if the Committee and Council reject the AIS, it would send the message to the community that arts and festival organizations will have to do just as much, but with less money. This would be tantamount to decreasing the funding these groups can leverage from other levels and from within the community. Further, as leaders of the community, he believed it is Council’s mandate to leave the city stronger and a “no tax increase” proposal will certainly leave the city as Council found it, if not worse, given the effects of inflation on current budgetary levels. He urged Committee to support the strategy, keeping in mind that the arts and the quality of life they bring to the city, is an important part of that.
Sandra MacInnis, Executive Director, Team Ottawa Orléans referred to a report presented
last June by the External Advisory Committee on Cities and Communities, whose
purpose was to outline recommendations and strategies to assist Canadian cities
in remaining sustainable in an increasingly competitive global
marketplace. The three pillars of
sustainability are: social, economic
and environmental dimensions. But,
equally important in that document was the need to create a sense of community
through the expression of cultural beliefs, developing civic pride and creating
distinctive spaces. She recognized that
sustainability is one of the fundamental issues faced by the east end of the
city, however they will soon benefit from the construction of the Orléans Arts
Centre, a development they feel will be a catalyst for economic development in
at region. She noted, however, that for
this to happen, there must be a climate of confidence created in which an art’s
economy and other spin-off economies can develop and this will not happen
without an increase in investment at the local level. She added that to continually shrink budgets for arts groups
jeopardizes their organizational viability and ultimately their ability to
provide the services required to help foster a sense of place and civic
pride. And, without this critical
element, private sector investment may well evaluate that risk as too high, and
choose not to open a restaurant, build a hotel, or develop a boutique. She noted that decisions made today must
include a conscious definition of the kind of community in which people wish to
live, including the arts, festivals and above all the social and economic
diversity that results from the proliferation of cultural values.
David Iverson, First Baptist Church indicated that like all churches, they are strong supporters of the arts community. It is hoped that the church would become part of the Concert Hall complex to be constructed at Elgin and Laurier and they have had discussions with the Chamber Music Society in this regard. As part of this, they believe the arts community should be fully supported and should be applauded for the initiative brought forward today. Mr. Iverson went on to state that payment by the Chamber Music Society and others to rent space from the church assists in the costs associated with maintaining the building, which has heritage status. In turn, this allows the church to maintain a strong social program and to contribute funds to the McLeod Stewart Emergency Food Centre. In the long term, the funds they get by renting out space at the church helps to reduce the funding required by the city for other social projects. This is a side benefit that people may not realize when investing in the arts and investing in social programs.
Mushifiq Hashimi, Mushifq Arts Company Inc. believed that without the arts there would be no peace and his company spends a lot of time on their art, without any funding, and with no money to promote them.
Julian Armour, President, Ottawa Festivals closed the public delegations by congratulating staff and all those involved for bringing forward a strategy that is in fact a study with enormous credibility, as it goes beyond the financial aspect of it and speaks to building an industry and strengthening the city. He believed that if approved, this strategy would transform the arts and festival industry. All they are asking is for Ottawa to be funded at the average of other major municipalities in Canada, noting that being average will provide the ability to create absolute excellence. Mr. Armour indicated there is so much potential in Ottawa and not only is it the capital of a major industrialized nation, it is one of the few safe, clean and beautiful cities. Ottawa has tremendous history and having the federal government here is an asset that should be built upon. He indicated that other great cities around the world are using culture as a major pillar of building a great city and as economies transform, they see culture stepping in and filling the gap.
In closing, Mr. Armour stated that tourism is a huge industry and if the City encourages its arts and festivals, it would have greater ability to market those and attract more tourism. Supporting the arts would also help to keep those individuals and organizations here, thereby attracting and retaining employees, and when they retire, people will continue to live in the community thereby providing continuing support to municipal taxes.
When
asked why the report recommends an almost doubling of funding assistance to
festivals, Mr. Armour explained that based on the statistics they received
from the Ontario Arts Council, what is being recommended is in fact the
average, noting that 10% of any organizations’ budget comes from the
municipality. It must also be
recognized that there have been no increases to funding for festivals for five
years and it was already well behind to begin with.
In
speaking to the report, Councillor Bédard noted it refers to major events,
fairs and festivals and does not include local community events/festivals. The Director confirmed this fact noting
there is some discussion about introducing a pilot project to look at larger community
festivals and celebrations. The
councillor inquired about the $40M being generated and Ms. Hendrick explained
that this is what the arts groups spend.
The councillor felt the economic impact should be included, especially
when what is being considered is a trivial amount compared to what such an
investment would generate. When asked
what the City would get back for this investment, the Director advised that the
cumulative impact is 80% of what is invested and public sector investment comes
back in property taxes.
With
regard to the sustainability of festivals, Councillor Leadman asked whether the
goal is to make them self-sufficient.
In response, the Director advised it was not and clarified that
sustainability is to address the shortfall and the needs in that sector. From the Steering Committee’s point of view,
the City’s funding has always been needed in terms of what it provides to the
community, et cetera and it did not make the assumption that sustainability
means no City funding.
In
response to a question posed by the councillor about the ability to leverage
additional funding, the Director explained that the municipality has to convey
to the provincial and federal governments that Ottawa is not getting its fair
share and that more must be done to support local arts organizations. She reiterated the fact that when
municipalities contribute and have comprehensive strategies to fund the arts
sector, the senior levels contribute more.
Councillor Leadman inquired how staff plan to address the management of
festivals, noting there is an accountability that is required and there is an
expectation of taxpayers that when Council supports such a strategy, it should
be able to say how much can be leveraged with other funding agencies, et
cetera. The Director indicated that the
report does identify opportunities where there would be a lot more support for
festivals and events and one of the recommendations is to create funding for
emergencies, et cetera; it takes a preventative approach. She went on to state that the Steering
Committee believed this model is very much of a preventative response, taking
ownership for that industry.
While
she supported the report, Councillor Feltmate put forward an additional
recommendation as follows:
WHEREAS the existing Festivals, Fairs, Special Events Programs
supports major local festivals, fairs and special events that have a City wide
impact, are held for 2 consecutive days or more and have a budget of over
$30,000;
AND WHEREAS there
are large community events which take place across the City including local
Canada Day Events;
THEREFORE BE
IT RESOLVED that staff be directed to develop and implement a pilot funding
program for large Community events in 2007 with report back to Council;
BE IT FURTHER
RESOLVED that $25,000 be redirected from the $650,000 proposed allocation for
Fairs, Festivals and Special Events for this purpose;
BE IT FURTHER
RESOLVED that staff consult with non-profit community groups that operate large
special events to determine needs and bring back to Committee a report with
recommendations for large community events prior to the 2008 budget.
The councillor referred to what is considered a large community event
and she inquired how such festivals would get to be considered under the current
definition. She further asked whether
staff have discussed how they would bring on new festivals and how they would
be declared official. In response, Ms.
Hendrick advised that the existing program does not have eligibility for small
local celebrations; however, as they expand, they would be eligible to apply
for festival and special events funding.
She believed the amount referred to in the motion could be accommodated
through the recommended funding for festivals.
Chair Deans wanted a sense of how much direct upper tier dollars the
City could expect to leverage by this investment. Ms. Hendrick advised that the intent is to close the $15M revenue
gap and part has to be addressed by the City’s contribution as well as federal,
provincial and private sector funding.
The asked that before this item rises to Council, that staff provide an
estimate of what the City can expect from the upper tier governments as a
result of their investment. She
referred to the special meeting scheduled for Monday, 5 February to consider
the OMBI report and noted that the numbers in the OMBI report are different in
terms of where Ottawa ranks and she asked if staff could provide some clarity
on this matter. Mr. Kanellakos advised
that what OMBI projects and what the AIS propose is a per capita. He explained that OMBI is the first step in
identifying performance measurements and comparing municipalities across the
country. However, compared to the
measurements used by the OMBI, the main differences that are not in the municipal
measures are the instructional programs and the archives. Those two programs are included in the
City’s costs, but are not in the other municipalities because arts and culture
is not standardized in terms of where it is in the city (i.e., some are planned
as part of their parks and recreation budget and some are funded from within
other departments). He indicated that
the more appropriate figures are in the AIS report and the report is about
funding the Strategy and is not about funding the other programs in the
Department.
In considering her Motion, Councillor Feltmate indicated it is
important to her community and she referred to the large Canada Day event the
community plans each year. Prior to
amalgamation, the City of Kanata and partners, shared in the funding for this
event, but such funding was lost through amalgamation. However, it was resurrected by volunteers
and still draws huge crowds. Her
concern is that smaller community events have been left out and there does not
seem to be a strategy to provide funding assistance to those small, but
important, community events. She
explained that this festival attracts families that may not necessarily want to
go downtown late at night and she was looking for support for those kinds of
events that have the potential to expand the festival network across the
community. She hoped the Festival
Steering Committee would not see this as taking away from what they have, but
instead, look at it as an opportunity to build and spread out across the city,
to other community groups who can learn and build on their expertise.
While he was in agreement with the intent of the Motion, Councillor
Bédard could not support it, stating it is the wrong time and place for
considering such a Motion. He
reiterated the fact made earlier that this report deals specifically with major
events and does not refer to community-based special events. He believed staff would come back to the
Committee with regards to how to manage the community events and he urged
Committee members not to ‘dilute’ this strategy by taking away from the
festivals - from groups that have already said they are starving for financial
support. He believed that even when
what is proposed is a relatively small amount, it will have a large impact on
these organizations.
Councillor Holmes acknowledged that all wards had things cut or reduced
through amalgamation. She believed the
community want to have pride in their community again and assisting with the
smaller events is one way to do that.
And, while she also agreed that the Committee should not be cutting from
this budget, she was prepared to do so in order to allow those communities to
start believing that their events are as important as those in other areas.
In response to a question posed by Councillor Leadman, Ms. Hendrick
advised that there was no current program being put in place to address small
events, but indicated that there have been discussions amongst councillors
about the need for such a program. The
City does have a community funding program, but special events funding is not
eligible under the existing framework.
The councillor believed the Motion referred to something that is more a
grass roots component that takes place in communities and which might develop
into a larger festival. Therefore,
until there is an opportunity to provide that funding, she would support the
Motion.
Councillor Qadri questioned that if funding for small events is not a
provision in this Strategy, then how are they expected to become major
festivals? He believed that without
that opportunity, the City cannot expect to develop and grow these events. And so, while he was a big supporter of
funding for arts and culture, he was cognisant of not forgetting other parts of
the city that celebrate as other festivals do in the downtown.
Councillor
Cullen indicated that the terms of reference given to staff to prepare the
Strategy, did not include having to deal with community events and he
emphasized that what is before the Committee is something that is long overdue
and must be addressed, without taking away any portion of that funding.
Moved by P. Feltmate
WHEREAS the existing Festivals, Fairs, Special Events Programs
supports major local festivals, fairs and special events that have a City wide
impact, are held for 2 consecutive days or more and have a budget of over
$30,000;
AND WHEREAS there are large
community events which take place across the City including local Canada Day
Events;
THEREFORE BE
IT RESOLVED that staff be directed to develop and implement a pilot funding
program for large Community events in 2007 with report back to Council;
BE IT FURTHER
RESOLVED that $25,000 be redirected from the $650,000 proposed allocation for
Fairs, Festivals and Special Events for this purpose;
BE IT FURTHER
RESOLVED that staff consult with non-profit community groups that operate large
special events to determine needs and bring back to Committee a report with
recommendations for large community events prior to the 2008 budget.
YEAS (7): M. Bellemare, R. Chiarelli, D. Holmes, P. Feltmate, C. Leadman, S. Qadri, D. Deans
NAYS (2): A. Cullen, G. Bédard
Committee
members spoke unanimously in support of the report recommendations and the more
salient comments noted were as follows:
·
the City provides limited support for local artists
and it should assume more responsibility to support them; additional support
must also come from the province
·
the report speaks to a vision, with a bleak
alternative if not supported
·
there is a strong level of support from the private
sector and when there is support at the municipal level, that support goes a
longer way; the business community can play a role in this too
·
this report is the result of a direction given by
the previous Council and staff have responded by bringing forward a Strategy
that will bring Ottawa to the median of other Canadian cities
·
investing in this Strategy will address the
challenges of dealing with a thriving and expanding city
·
while some may argue that arts are not part of the
City’s core services and should therefore not be supported, the argument can
also be made that there is no difference between supporting arts or supporting
recreational activities
·
the balance of a city depends on a high quality of
life and supporting the arts community is a key ingredient because it will help
to create a more dynamic city
·
there is a need to build on what exists in the city
today, in order to create more and more cultural opportunities for people
thinking about moving here and for businesses thinking about establishing
themselves in the National capital
·
an investment in the arts sector is a tremendous
boost to the tourism industry and any investment that goes to the arts is
helping to further diversify the City’s local economy
·
the recommendations for funding, which will be
drawn over several years, are modest, especially when the objective is to be
competitive with other cities across Canada
·
the strategy recommends that the City
provide a sustainable and lasting commitment to the arts; this is important in
terms of fostering a belief that Council values the work that artists do in the
community
·
it is important to recognize the
ability for arts organizations, when supported at the municipal level, to
leverage funding from other levels of government; Toronto and Montreal have
leveraged millions of dollars in federal and provincial funds to revitalize
their theatres, cultural institutions and to attract talented people to their
communities
·
this Strategy changes the way Council
looks at the money it puts into the arts; in the past, Councils have regarded
spending on the arts as an expenditure; however, today’s participation of the
community reminds Council to look at it instead as an investment
·
Council should put the creativity of
arts organizations at the heart of the economic development strategy for
Ottawa.
That the Community and
Protective Services Committee recommend that Council:
1. Support the overall Arts Investment
Strategy (Document 1) and Festivals Sustainability Plan (Document 2), which
include the following components:
·
increased municipal arts, festival, fair and special event funding;
·
expanded advocacy directed to senior levels of government and aimed
to increase provincial and federal funding for local arts and festival
organizations;
·
increased cultural partnerships that include the local arts and
festival sector, the National Capital Commission, the City of Gatineau and
federal cultural institutions in Ottawa;
·
increased partnerships between local arts, festival, fair and
special event organizations and the private sector;
·
analyze the feasibility of developing an Arts Stabilization Project
for Ottawa, and an Ottawa Arts Investment Service including an Arts Endowment
Fund;
·
increased integration of Ottawa’s local festivals, fairs and special
events into Ottawa Tourism’s annual destination marketing program;
·
development of a policy for “in-kind” and invoiced services provided
to festivals, fairs and special events; and
·
amendment to the City of Ottawa’s current sponsorship policy to
accommodate community requests.
2. Consider, during the 2007 budget
process, an increased municipal funding plan of $2.5M for local arts,
festivals, fairs and special events over a four-year time period, in order to:
·
meet existing and emerging community needs;
·
achieve average competitiveness with Canada’s six other largest
single cities and;
·
achieve the greatest capacity of leveraging investment from other
levels of government and alternate sources in a timely manner.
·
2007 - $1.5M (to be allocated as follows: $650,000 for Festivals,
Fairs and Special Events and $850,000 for Arts Investment)
·
2008 - $400,000
·
2009 - $400,000
·
2010 - $200,000
4. That the Festival, Fairs and Special
Events funding program ($713,000) be reinstated, as identified in, and subject
to approval of, the 2007 Draft Budget.
5. Identify opportunities and advocate for
increased provincial and federal allocations for Ottawa’s local arts/festival
sector.
6. Identify opportunities to increase
cultural partnerships that include the local arts and festival sectors, the
National Capital Commission (NCC), the City of Gatineau and federal cultural
institutions located in Ottawa.
7. Increase private sector support of the
arts by implementing an ArtsVest matching grants program in Ottawa in 2008, in
collaboration with the Council for Business and the Arts in Canada.
8. Build partnerships between the local
business and local arts sectors in collaboration with the Ottawa Chamber of
Commerce, le Regroupement des gens d’affaires, the Council for the Arts in
Ottawa, Arts Ottawa East and Ottawa Festivals.
9. Analyze the feasibility of developing
an Arts Stabilization Project for Ottawa and an Arts Investment Service,
including an Arts Endowment Fund, in support of Ottawa’s local arts sector in
collaboration with the Council for the Arts in Ottawa, the Department of
Canadian Heritage, the Ontario Trillium Foundation and other local arts service
organizations.
10. Direct Cultural Services
staff to work with Business Development staff, Ottawa Festivals and Ottawa
Tourism to ensure that the City’s Festivals, Fairs and Special Events are
integrated wherever possible into Ottawa Tourism’s annual destination marketing
program.
11. Direct Events Central
staff to continue tracking the City of Ottawa’s “in-kind” services and
“invoiced” services in 2007 to provide an analysis and a report back prior to
the 2008 budget respecting a policy for “in-kind” and “invoiced” services.
12. Direct Events Central
staff to report back with an amendment to the City of Ottawa’s current
sponsorship policy to accommodate community requests including requests from
Fairs, Festivals and Special Events seeking City sponsorship.
CARRIED,
as amended
YEAS (9): G. Bédard, M. Bellemare, R. Chiarelli, A. Cullen, D. Holmes, P. Feltmate, C. Leadman, S. Qadri, D. Deans
NAYS (0)
[1] Montreal - 2002 merger of 28 municipalities
[2] Vancouver - single city, part of GVRD (21
municipalities + 1 electoral area)
[3] Winnipeg
- single city, part of Winnipeg Metro (12 municipalities
[4] Edmonton - single city, part of Greater
Edmonton (24 municipalities)
[5] Calgary
- single city
[6] Toronto
- 2001 amalgamation of 7 municipalities
[7] Ottawa
- 2001 amalgamation of 12 municipalities - 2003 population revised based on
new, official year-end figures for 2002-2005, released in 2006