10.    SITE PLAN CONTROL - 1890, 1900, 1920 WALKLEY ROAD, 2980, 3000, CONROY ROAD,
2500, 2502, 2510 ST. LAURENT BLVD. AND 2425 DON REID DRIVE


PLAN D'IMPLANTATION - 1890, 1900, 1920 CHEMIN WALKLEY, 2980, 3000 CHEMIN CONROY, 2500, 2502, 2510 BOUL ST. LAURENT  ET 2425 PROMENADE DON REID

 

 

Committee recommendation as amended

 

That Council approve that the Ontario Municipal Board be requested to defer its consideration of the Loblaw site plan to a date subsequent to the OMB hearing of February 27, 2006, to allow City staff to review the following concerns related to the site plan:

 

a)   The traffic implications of the location of the gas station

b)   The truck access to the stores and gas station fronting onto Walkley Rd.

c)   The turning radius of transport trucks servicing the gas station;

d)   The implications of traffic on Don Reid Drive, and on the Cornerstone Child Care Facility and the Early Years Centre and recommendations pertaining to traffic calming measures on Don Reid Drive;

e)   The potential of a full north/south spine road and the deletion of the east/west spine road;

f)    Relocation of the Loblaw store from the back of the site to front onto Walkley Road;

g)   The need for a second gas station and car wash on Walkley Road in the same block as one that already exists;

h)   A full review of the landscaping to ensure that it is in accordance with the Business Park Landscape and Building Design Guidelines;

i)    A review of the building elevations to ensure that they are in accordance with the Business Park Landscape and Building Design Guidelines.

 

 

Recommandation modifiée du Comité

 

Que le Conseil approuve qu’on demande à la Commission des affaires municipales de l'Ontario de reporter l’examen du plan d’implantation de Loblaw à une date ultérieure à l’audience de la Commission du 27 février 2006, afin de permettre aux employés municipaux d’examiner les préoccupations suivantes reliées au plan d’implantation :

 

a)   les incidences de la circulation à l’emplacement de la station essence;

b)   l’accès des camions aux magasins et à la station essence donnant sur le chemin Walkley;

c)   le rayon de braquage des camions de transport desservant la station essence;

d)   les répercussions de la circulation sur la promenade Don Reid ainsi que sur la garderie et le centre de la première enfance de Cornerstone (Cornerstone Child Care Facility and the Early Years Centre), et les recommandations concernant les mesures de modération de la circulation sur la promenade Don Reid;

e)   la possibilité d’une voie d'accès principale entière nord-sud et la suppression de la voie d'accès principale est-ouest;

f)    déménagement du magasin Loblaw de l’arrière de l’emplacement à l’avant sur le chemin Walkley;

g)   le besoin d’une deuxième station essence et d’un poste de lavage d’automobiles sur le chemin Walkley dans le même pâté que celui qui existe déjà;

h)   une étude complète de l’aménagement paysagé pour s’assurer qu’il est conforme aux lignes directrices sur l’aménagement paysagé des parcs commerciaux et la conception des bâtiments;

i)    un examen de la hauteur des bâtiments afin de s’assurer qu’elle est conforme aux lignes directrices sur l’aménagement paysagé des parcs commerciaux et la conception des bâtiments.

 

 

Documentation

 

1.         Deputy City Manager's report (Planning and Growth Management) dated
22 November 2005 (ACS2005-PGM-APR-0258).

 

2.         Extract of Draft Minute, 22 November 2005.



Report to/Rapport au :

 

Planning and Environment Committee

Comité de l'urbanisme et de l'environnement

 

and Council / et au Conseil

 

22 November 2005 / le 22 novembre 2005

 

Submitted by/Soumis par : Ned Lathrop, Deputy City Manager/

Directeur municipal adjoint,

Planning and Growth Management/Urbanisme et Gestion de la croissance 

 

Contact Person/Personne ressource : Karen Currie, Manager / Gestionnaire

Development Approvals / Approbation des demandes d’aménagement

(613) 580-2424 x 28310, karen.currie@ottawa.ca

 

Gloucester -Southgate (10)

Ref N°: ACS2005-PGM-APR-0258

 

 

SUBJECT:

SITE PLAN - 1890, 1900, 1920 WALKLEY ROAD, 2980, 3000 CONROY ROAD, 2500, 2502, 2510 ST. LAURENT BLVD. AND 2425 DON REID DRIVE - D07-12-04-0084

 

 

OBJET :

Plan d'implantation - 1890, 1900, 1920, chemin walkley, 2980, 3000, chemin conroy, 2500, 2502, 2510, boulevard st‑laurent et 2425, promenade don reid

 

 

REPORT RECOMMENDATION

 

That the Planning and Environment Committee recommend that Council endorse the following position at the Ontario Municipal Board hearing for the property located at 1890, 1900, 1920 Walkley Road, 2980, 3000 Conroy Road, 2500, 2502, 2510 St. Laurent Boulevard. and 2425 Don Reid Drive:

 

That the revised Site Plan (Revision 9 prepared by Turner Fleischer Architects Inc., dated Nov. 15, 2005 and received on November 18, 2005) as shown in Document 2 and accompanying Landscape Plan and Servicing Plans be supported subject to approval of the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment applications and to Site Plan conditions and minor modifications as may be requested by the Director of Planning and Infrastructure Approvals. 

 

 


RECOMMANDATION DU RAPPORT

 

Que le Comité de l’urbanisme et de l’environnement recommande au Conseil d’appuyer la position suivante à l’audience de la Commission des affaires municipales de l’Ontario concernant la propriété située au 1890, 1900 et 1920, chemin Walkley, au 2980, 3000, chemin Conroy et au 2500, 2502 et 2510, boulevard St-Laurent ainsi qu’au 2425, promenade Don Reid :

 

Que le plan d’implantation modifié (Modification 9 préparée par Turner Fleischer Architects Inc., datée du 15 novembre 2005 et reçue le 18 novembre 2005), tel qu’indiqué dans le document 2 et accompagnant le plan d’aménagement paysager et les plans de services, soit appuyé sous réserve de l’approbation des demandes de modifications au Plan officiel et au Règlement de zonage, des conditions du plan d’implantation ainsi que des modifications mineures que le directeur de l’Approbation des demandes d’aménagement et d’infrastructure pourrait demander.

 

 

BACKGROUND

 

Applications have been submitted for two Official Plan Amendments, a Zoning By-law Amendment, and Site Plan Control approval to allow for the re-development of a parcel of land located southwest of the intersection of Walkley Road and Conroy Road.  The Official Plan Amendment applications are for amendments to both the old and new Official Plans of the City of Ottawa.

 

The site is 7.1 hectares and currently contains four separate, commercial and office buildings that will be demolished to allow for the proposed development.  The site is bounded by Walkley Road to the north, Conroy Road to the east, St. Laurent Boulevard to the south and Don Reid Drive to the west.

 

Proposed Development

 

The proposed development includes a 16,260 square metre retail food store, two separate stand-alone retail buildings and a gas bar with a car wash.  As illustrated in Document 2, the large format retail food store is proposed to be located in the south portion of the property adjacent to Conroy Road and St. Laurent Boulevard, while the gas bar and retail buildings will be located in the northwest portion adjacent to Walkley Road and Don Reid Drive. The loading and service area for the grocery area is located at the rear south east corner of the store adjacent to St. Laurent Blvd.  Total parking for the site includes 862 spaces for automobiles as well as provisions for bicycle parking.

 

On May 10, 2005, Planning and Environment Committee recommended approval of the two Official Plan Amendments and Zoning By-law Amendment applications.   On June 8, 2005, City Council voted to refuse the Official Plan Amendments and Zoning By-law Amendment applications.  The Site Plan Control application did not form part of the staff report as the approval, at that time, was staff-delegated, and staff were still in the process of reviewing and commenting on the site plan. Subsequently, the proponent appealed the decision of City Council with respect to the Official Plan Amendments and Zoning By-law Amendment to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB).  An appeal was also filed by the applicant in respect of the failure of the City to approve the Site Plan within the statutorily dictated time frame of its having been submitted to the City. 

 

All three appeals have been consolidated into one Board Hearing which begins on February 28, 2006. Prior to the hearing, the City is to take a position on the Site Plan application which will be presented at the hearing.  The Ward Councillor has removed Delegated Authority approval and furthermore, has introduced and Council has carried, a direction to put the subject site plan before Committee on November 22, 2005 and Council on November 30, 2005.  Normally upon withdrawal of Delegated Authority on Site Plan applications, the application rises to Committee only and not forwarded to City Council.  However, as Council has approved the directive the application must subsequently rise to Council.

 

 

DISCUSSION

 

Official Plan and Zoning Considerations

 

As noted, Official Plan Amendments and Zoning By-law Amendment applications to permit the proposed development have been submitted and are now before the OMB. The Site Plan was reviewed in light of the proposed Official Plan designation and zoning and it was found that the proposed development is consistent with the proposed Official Plan policies and in full compliance with the zoning as recommended by staff.  A site plan condition will be included that approval of the site plan will only come into effect once final approval of the Official Plan Amendment and zoning have been given by the Ontario Municipal Board.

 

Site Plan

 

Staff have been in the process of reviewing the site plan and recommending revisions in light of staff's analysis and comments received from technical agencies and the public.  As well, throughout the process the applicant has introduced revisions that have resulted in positive changes to the plan.  Due to recent changes to the plan that were discussed and supported by staff, a revised site plan was prepared and submitted on November 18, 2005. Although staff have not had sufficient time to review the latest submission in detail, staff are generally in a position to support the recently revised site plan and recommend it be approved, subject to minor modifications and site plan conditions. Ultimately the Owner will be required to enter into a standard Site Plan Agreement consisting of standard and special conditions should the proposed development be approved 

 

Design and Built Form

 

The proposed development is compatible with the character of the existing surrounding retail and business park uses.  The location, height and scale of the buildings which front onto existing streets respects the existing scale and location of adjacent buildings.  The shared parking areas of the development are contained to the interior of the site where they are buffered by buildings and landscaping.  The food store's loading area is well separated from the remaining development as well as being well screened from adjacent business park uses.  Building elevations are to be very contemporary with many design elements which are compatible with the surrounding business park uses.  Staff have identified some minor concerns with the elevations and may recommend further revisions once the review is complete.

 

Road and Pedestrian Network

 

A Traffic Impact Study in support of the proposal has been approved by City staff.  Through this study and several public and private meetings, the traffic consultant has advised that the site location on two arterial roads is ideal for site access and minimizing traffic impacts to the surrounding area.  The site also benefits from six existing entrances.  Three of these will be retained in their current location and three will be relocated to accommodate the proposal.  One new entrance will be added along Walkley Road resulting in seven vehicular entrances and one separate food store truck loading entrance.  This number of entrances will maximize efficient traffic distribution and minimize vehicular/pedestrian conflict and impact on adjacent roads.  The site has been designed with two major east-west drive aisles which traverse the entire width of the site separating the food store from the retail uses.  The most northerly of these drive aisles allows vehicle access to both the food store and retail parking areas, without the need to travel along building entrance areas thus reducing pedestrian / vehicle conflict.            Tractor-trailer access to the food store is proposed via an exclusive entrance loop to and from St. Laurent Boulevard.  This isolates the majority of site truck traffic thereby reducing conflict with vehicles and pedestrians while maximizing separation from the only proximate residential area northwest of the site.

 

The site benefits from eight walkway connections to the surrounding public sidewalks and two main internal walkways that traverse the entire site crossing in the centre and connecting all existing and proposed retail buildings.

 

The Cornerstone Children’s Centre and Heatherington Nursery School that is located across from the site at the southwest corner of Don Reid Drive and Walkley Road has raised concerns about traffic generated by the proposal and has requested all accesses to Don Reid Drive be eliminated from the site plan.  Clients of the Centre and School have concerns about traffic speeds behind them as they slow to enter the Centre site.  They have also noted difficulty in exiting when vehicles heading north are stacked past the Centre exit awaiting the traffic light at Don Reid and Walkley.

 

Staff have responded to this request by advising that the entrances onto Don Reid provide an important site circulation function by allowing traffic from the north and west to connect directly to the site’s main east and westbound drive aisles.  These are also critical exits for the same customers to return to the north and west points of origin.  It is important to note that the businesses previously operating on these lands with these accesses could be redeveloped and intensified under the existing zoning so as to generate higher traffic volumes on Don Reid Drive than expected from the proposed development. 

 

In response to the Centre’s concern, the applicant has recently amended the site plan to extend the right-in, right-out from Walkley Road directly to the main east-west driveway thereby relieving Don Reid of some of the traffic entering the site.  The traffic consultant has also advised that the Centre's parking entrance should be relocated further to the south. This would significantly improve the existing traffic concerns of the Centre because the added distance from the intersection would provide more approach time for vehicles to slow down and signal their intentions while reducing the likelihood of conflict between vehicles exiting north and those stacked at the intersection.

 

City staff generally support the proposed site design and access locations and do not support the Centre’s request to close the Don Reid accesses.   The only traffic related concern of staff is associated with the existing design of the Don Reid and St. Laurent intersection.  Staff are encouraging intersection modifications so the north-bound movement from St. Laurent onto Don Reid becomes a full stop thereby increasing site distance and reducing traffic speeds approaching the southern-most Don Reid site access.  

 

Landscaping

 

Staff have reviewed the proposed landscape plan for the site and are generally in agreement with what is being shown.  It appears as though approximately one-third (1/3) of the existing plant material will be protected or relocated within the site.  Saving and protecting as many of the existing trees as possible is seen as beneficial to the overall impact of the development. Particular focus has been placed upon buffering parking areas from surrounding streetscapes, screening the rear building service areas, accentuating building facades and entrances areas, and providing shade cover, where feasible, to the parking areas. Although, staff are generally supportive of the landscape submission provided on November 18, 2005, the plan should be thoroughly reviewed to ensure that the Business Park Landscape and Building Design Guidelines are being adhered to as closely as possible. Following the review, staff may have additional landscape revisions.

 

Servicing

 

Staff are satisfied with the Site Servicing and Grading Plans submitted for the proposed development.  All storm water will be dealt with in accordance with the City's stormwater   requirements. 

 

 

CONSULTATION

 

Notice of this application was carried out in accordance with the City’s Public Notification and Consultation Policy.  The Ward Councillor is aware of this application and the staff recommendation. Correspondence and phone calls, both in support and against the proposal, were received including from area residents, the Ottawa Hawthorne Business Park Association and Canterbury Community Association.  A community meeting in the Canterbury community was held on August 12, 2004 and separate meetings were held with representativies of the Business Park Association, Cornerstore Children's Centre, the applicant and the City. A summary of the main issues identified through letters, email and the community meeting was discussed in the staff report dealing with the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment.   

 

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

 

Direct costs to the City would be comprised of the cost of Legal Services Branch staff preparing for and attending the OMB hearing to defend the City's position.

 

 

SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION

 

Document 1 - Location Map

Document 2 - Site Plan

Document 3 - Landscape Plan

 

 

DISPOSITION

 

Planning and Growth Management Department to forward Council position to the applicant and the Ontario Municipal Board.


Document 1

 

LOCATION MAP                                                                                                                            

 


Document 2

 

SITE PLAN                                                                                                                                       

 


Document 3

 

LANDSCAPE PLAN                                                                                                

 



            SITE PLAN CONTROL - 1890, 1900, 1920 WALKLEY ROAD, 2980, 3000, CONROY ROAD, 2500, 2502, 2510 ST. LAURENT BLVD. AND 2425 DON REID DRIVE

PLAN D'IMPLANTATION - 1890, 1900, 1920 CHEMIN WALKLEY, 2980, 3000 CHEMIN CONROY, 2500, 2502, 2510 BOUL ST. LAURENT  ET 2425 PROMENADE DON REID

ACS2005-PGM-APR-0258                                           GLOUCESTER-SOUTHGATE (10)

 

Ms. Karen Currie, Manager, Development Approvals, Planning and Infrastructure Approvals Branch, Planning and Growth Management Department (PGM), introduced Ms. Louise Sweet-Lindsay, Planner, Development Approvals, Planning and Infrastructure Approvals Branch, who gave the Committee an overview of the staff report.

 

Ms  Sweet-Lindsay provided background information on the Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments approved by the Planning and Environment Committee in May 2005, a decision overturned by City Council on 8 June 05.  The applicant appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) on the grounds that the City failed to render a decision in the prescribed timeframe.  Ms. Sweet-Lindsay indicated that the OMB hearing is scheduled for 28 February 06 and the City must take a position on this matter.  The most recent version of the site plan was received on 18 November and staff is prepared to support it.

 

The Committee then heard from Mr. Alan Cohen, representing the applicant, who introduced Messrs Brian Casagrande, Planner, Fotenn Consultants, and Ron Jack, Traffic Consultant, DelCan.

 

Mr. Casagrande described the changes to the 27 September site plan as fairly minor.  He noted there have been ongoing discussions with representatives from the Cornerstone Children's Centre and Heatherington Nursery School located at the corner of Don Reid Dr and Walkley Rd to address their concerns about vehicular access to the site.  To this end, an east-west thoroughfare (spine road) to the main access is proposed, providing a viable, easier alternative to patrons who might previously have used Don Reid Dr.  Mr. Casagrande highlighted other changes, such as improvements to design buffers and increased landscaping components.

 

Mr. Jack began by stating that, from a transportation perspective, this site plan is porous and works well.  The Market Study indicated that 40% of the market would come from the south, and traffic through and from the south will have a signalised intersection.  The Loblaw store will be located on St Laurent Blvd at Conroy, eliminating the need for supply trucks to drive through the rest of the community.  Mr. Jack pointed out that Don Reid Drive is a collector road in the Official Plan, as is St Laurent Blvd, and these roads are designed to provide access to properties and move traffic.  Commenting on the suggestion that there be no access from Don Reid Drive, Mr. Jack felt this would contribute to the site not working well and lead to additional tie-ups and delays.  He posited that the spine road would minimize on-site conflicts and ensure that Don Reid Drive is better used.

 

At this time, Councillor Bellemare introduced a Motion calling for Council to request the OMB defer its consideration of this matter until a number of outstanding issues can be resolved.

 

Mr. Cohen pointed out that most of the concerns listed in the Motion are not site plan issues and it would not take a competent planner like Ms. Sweet-Lindsay three months to resolve.  He added that a request from City Council to adjourn the OMB hearing would bring about an objection from his client and result in a multiplicity of hearings, as well as tedious, time consuming and costly delays.

 

The ward Councillor, Diane Deans, asked for clarification about the revised site plan, namely the addition of a drive-through pharmacy which she said was not on the September site plan and the relocation to the front of the site of a gas bar and car wash.  She also alluded to the absence of traffic calming or roadway modifications to mitigate traffic. Mr. Casagrande indicated that the pharmacy is a feature of Loblaw's developments.  Speaking to the traffic calming and mitigation issues, Ron Jack said this could occur on Don Reid Drive if there was a need and appropriate treatment, and also off-site subsequent to development if there are problems warranting mitigation.  Mr. Cohen confirmed that his client agreed to provide up to $100,000 for traffic calming where and when necessary.

 

On the question of process, Councillor Deans pointed out that the revised site plan was received on November 18th and that the staff report had just been tabled before the Committee earlier this morning.  She inquired of Legal Counsel, Mr. Tim Marc, Manager, Planning Law, to confirm that he needs from Council a request to the OMB to defer consideration, along with a list of the areas of concern.  Mr. Marc said he did need Committee and Council to identify their concerns, and that he would accept their instruction to seek deferral if it was given.

 

Councillor Gord Hunter asked whether the OMB would ask for a roll-up of the three items, site plan, official plan amendment and zoning amendment.  Mr. Marc said it was particularly late at this stage in the process since the site plan revisions that the City needs to take a position on have already been submitted to the Board.


Joan Gullen, representing the Heatherington Nursery School, spoke about traffic concerns which she did not believe have been fully addressed in the latest site plan proposal.  She suggested that the east-west spine road be changed to a north-south spine road, and that the proponent consider scaling down the project.  Ms. Gullen said the bottom line was safety, and she asked that all other goals be balanced against the safety of children. 

 

Ms. Elsie Chan, Andrew W. Fleck Child Care Centre, pointed out that 1200 families and 1400 children use the facilities that have been at this location since 1994.  She expressed a desire to see the access roads eliminated to give consideration to the clients.

 

Ms. Isobel McKenzie invited Committee members to visit Cornerstone and to see for themselves the vitality of the organization and how a big development would interfere with it.

 

Committee Discussion

 

Councillor Deans inquired of staff when they had seen the changes to the site plan for the first time.  Ms. Karen Currie said that numerous versions of the plan were received, but not all went out for circulation.  The relocation of the gas bar and the car wash was shown on the most recent plan.  As for the drive-through pharmacy, it may have been part of the plan originally but this is not seen as a substantial issue.

 

Speaking to the Motion put forward by Councillor Bellemare, Councillor Deans said it basically takes the two approaches described by Legal Counsel at the same time.  She said the number one area of concern is the east-west spine road and the impacts of traffic on the child care facilities and the nursery.  Councillor Deans said these issues needed to be explored in more detail, and she asked that the Committee support the resolution before it.

 

In reply to questions from Councillor Rainer Bloess, Mr. Marc said that the meeting of 30 November presents the last opportunity for Council to identify its concerns, as there are is no regular meeting in December.  In addition, staff needs time to prepare witness statements for mid January in order to meet the OMB hearing date of 28 February.

 

Speaking to the deferral Motion, Councillor Hunter urged Committee members to turn it down.  Because of City Council's actions in reversing the Committee's recommendation, the City will have to put itself at further expense.  The Councillor thought the site plan could be back on the Committee's agenda in January 2006 and through waiver of the Rules, the item could be forwarded to Council the following day to take a position. 

 

Councillor Diane Holmes felt it was inappropriate to bring forward site plan revisions at the last minute.  Consequently, she supports deferral and providing Legal Counsel with an outline of the City's concerns.

Moved by M. Bellemare

 

BE IT RESOLVED that the Ontario Municipal Board be requested to defer its consideration of the Loblaw site plan to a date subsequent to the OMB hearing of February 27, 2006, to allow City staff to review the following concerns related to the site plan:

a)         The traffic implications of the location of the gas station

b)         The truck access to the stores and gas station fronting onto Walkley Rd.

c)         The turning radius of transport trucks servicing the gas station;

d)         The implications of traffic on Don Reid Drive, and on the Cornerstone Child Care Facility and the Early Years Centre and recommendations pertaining to traffic calming measures on Don Reid Drive;

e)         The potential of a full north/south spine road and the deletion of the east/west spine road;

f)          Relocation of the Loblaw store from the back of the site to front onto Walkley Road;

g)         The need for a second gas station and car wash on Walkley Road in the same block as one that already exists;

h)         A full review of the landscaping to ensure that it is in accordance with the Business Park Landscape and Building Design Guidelines;

i)          A review of the building elevations to ensure that they are in accordance with the Business Park Landscape and Building Design Guidelines.

 

                                                                                                CARRIED