The Council of the City of Ottawa met at Andrew S. Haydon Hall, 110 Laurier Avenue West, Ottawa, on 9 January at 1:30 p.m.
The Mayor, Bob Chiarelli, presided and led Council in prayer.
The National Anthem was sung by Eleanor Glantz.
Roll Call
ALL MEMBERS WERE
PRESENT EXCEPT COUNCILLORS P. HUME AND
R. CHIARELLI.
Declarations of Interest Arising
from Prior Meetings of Council and Committees
No declarations were filed.
Confirmation of
Minutes
The Minutes of the regular Council meeting of 12 December 2001 were
confirmed.
Communications
No Communications were filed.
Regrets
The
following members of Council advised that they will be absent from the Council
meeting on the date indicated:
Councillor P. Hume 9
January 2002
Councillor
R. Chiarelli 9
January 2002
Annual Address – Mayor
Chiarelli
MOTION NO. 25/1
Moved by Councillor M. Bellemare
Seconded by
Councillor A. Munter
That the Mayor’s Annual Address be printed in the City Council Minutes.
CARRIED
The text of
the Mayor’s Address follows:
At this time
I am pleased to have the opportunity to deliver the Mayor’s Annual Address to
Council.
First, on
behalf of Council and everyone in the administration I take this opportunity to
wish all the residents of Ottawa a happy and successful 2002.
Le Conseil et moi-même souhaitons à tous nos
concitoyens une nouvelle année remplie de succès.
And I also
take this opportunity to thank all the citizens of Ottawa for their reliable
and exceptional contributions to ensuring that Ottawa remains, arguably, the
best city in Canada in which to live and raise a family.
As I have
often said, we, the elected officials are merely temporary trustees of
decision-making. It takes decades and
generations to build a strong, vibrant and proud community.
To the extent
we have made progress and met our challenges this past year, it is you, our
community and business leaders, who deserve the credit. As a Council we try to facilitate, enhance,
and tap into that culture of leadership and to be faithful to the trust you
place in us.
And when we
speak of community excellence it is helpful to reflect on some of the leaders
we lost in 2001:
·
Hal Anthony
·
Gale Kerwin
·
Catherine MacLean
·
Don Reid
·
Malak Karsh
·
Ron Kolbus
If we have a
city to be proud of, it is because we have always been blessed with people who
care to help build it.
Il est reconnu que la Ville d’Ottawa est la
ville au Canada où on retrouve le plus grand nombre de bénévoles et de
personnes engagés et cela a toujours été le cas.
Depuis des décennies, c’est ce leadership
communautaire qui fait d’Ottawa une ville à succès et où il fait bon vivre.
We can
reflect on the fact that 12 months and 10 days ago our 12 municipalities were still
under the management of an appointed Transition Board, and our Council for the
New City of Ottawa had yet to be sworn in.
Thousands of
employees who lived through a year of uncertainty in the transition year 2000,
still faced months of uncertainty in 2001.
To those devoted public servants, we say thank you for your patience and
your commitment to our great city – our community owes all of you a debt of
gratitude.
Il n’y a aucun doute que le dévouement et le
professionnalisme de nos douze mille cinq-cents employés de la ville est la clé
du succès que nous avons connu pendant notre première année d’existence.
We can also
reflect on the reality that no one could ever have anticipated the calamitous
events of September 11. But we should
not have been surprised at the extraordinary leadership clearly demonstrated by
all of our emergency and protective services, police, fire, ambulance, and
paramedics.
The type of
high level performance and dedication that was demonstrated in the devastating
ice storm of 1998 was matched again after September 11. So our hats are off to General Manager Steve
Kanellakos and the entire Emergency and Protective Services Team.
That day’s
terror has touched each and every one of us. We have worked hard to put aside
our fear. We reached out; we comforted
one another and – in doing that- WE were comforted.
On behalf of
all residents I want to thank our inter-faith and community leaders for
enabling September 11 to bring our community closer together rather than tear
it apart.
Some of us
are hugging our kids more often and probably hugging them a little tighter. I
think we’ve learned new things about how important we ALL are to each
other. We may be redefining what
‘community’ means; we may be giving it new meaning.
I mention the
events of September 11 because, in the weeks since that terrible day, I have
been proud, and I have been comforted to be the Mayor of a city whose people
put aside their own fear to offer comfort to others, to seek understanding, and
to be part of a solution.
La tempête de verglas comme les séquelles du 11
septembre n’ont pas mis à jour nos faiblesses.
Au contraire, cela nous a plutôt permis de découvrir à quel point nous
étions vraiment forts.
Tragedy of
such immense proportions has not exposed our weakness – it has helped us
discover just how strong we really are.
We should not be surprised that this is so.
As mentioned,
the people of Ottawa demonstrated the same thing four years ago when we were
struck by the devastating natural disaster of the ice storm.
Then, as now,
we put aside our own worries. We were strong.
Most important, we worked together to get through some very difficult
weeks.
Today, I want
to talk about what we have accomplished in the past year by working together, a
strong experienced Council working with an involved and caring public.
Let’s reflect
on what the city has achieved just one year after amalgamation. And, what’s on our agenda for the year
ahead.
The list of
Council’s accomplishments and initiatives in our first year is impressive –
especially given that we were a new Council and a new administration which had
never worked together before – and given that we really couldn’t begin normal
Council business until April as we needed to establish committees and to staff
Council’s operations.
But first,
there’s an overview I want to give of achievements of the past year that may
not have come to your attention through the papers or nightly newscasts. These
are initiatives carried out in individual neighbourhoods. These things were done to meet specific
priorities, needs, concerns and desires of individual communities within our city.
A year ago,
in almost every speech, I spoke about how the new City of Ottawa would only be
as strong as its individual communities and neighbourhoods. I was determined then and I am determined
now to keep individual communities and neighbourhoods strong, as I believe each
member of Council does.
In a few
short months, we’ve acted in concrete ways to do just that. Here are just a few
things we’ve put in place, by way of examples.
In March, the
City tabled a report, ‘The Economic Impacts of Agriculture on the Economy of
the New City of Ottawa.’ It shows all
of us that we are not only the nation’s capital, not only a high-tech capital,
but that we are also a significant “farm capital” in Canada.
On any given night, close to 800 men, women and children in
this city are without permanent housing.
They live in
this city’s streets, in our emergency shelters. They sleep on mats on the floor
in places like the Union Mission, one of several agencies we should be very
proud of for their caring, for their hard work.
Taking action
on homelessness was one of the very first things we did in the new city of
Ottawa. In February, in partnership
with federal and provincial governments, we announced and managed the process
of more than $8 million in aid for more than 40 different organizations working
to prevent and end homelessness in Ottawa.
More than $1
million is from the City of Ottawa. We
are leading efforts to address the needs of this important and very vulnerable
group in our society.
All of these
initiatives – the major ones and the neighbourhood ones – show that this
Council is plugged into the very specific needs that together make us an
exceptional city.
It shows how
we are focusing on the big picture, but also that we are building strong
vibrant communities within the city.
We are
fortunate to be able to share a city that is alive, vibrant, and engaging and
in some respects we take progress and accomplishments in stride; I’d like to
mention a few more:
But let it be
said, loudly and clearly, despite the accomplishments of the first year, it has
not been a bed of roses; we’ve encountered many thorns on the way. The task of merging 12 planning departments
has created problems in development approvals; we will continue to work with
the industry to sort this out. We thank
the development industry for their patience and co-operation.
On the Human
Resources and office accommodation side we have had a year of uncertainty with
the Transition Board and a year with the new administration to re-position
approximately 12,500 full time employees.
This has been
an enormous challenge and the process has been unnerving and unsettling for
thousands of employees; on behalf of Council and the residents of Ottawa I want
to thank all of the employees of the new City for their professionalism and
patience, especially so since the most often heard praise of the first year of
amalgamation is that the level of services was by and large maintained and in
some cases improved.
It has been
said many times in many contexts that amalgamation is a three-year
process. Having survived the first
difficult year, Council will no doubt agree that year two will be no easier, in
some respects it will be more difficult.
The most
difficult and important decision for this term for Council and the community
will be the completion of our Growth Plan and Official Plan in the next nine or
ten months.
In the next
nineteen years we will see our population grow by 400,000 people (more that the
population of the City of Ottawa which came into amalgamation), we will see
over 190,000 more residential dwelling units, and an additional 200,000 cars in
our midst within the same geography.
Any mistakes we make now we will pay dearly for in the future.
Next, our
2002 operating and capital budgets will be challenging and difficult. I am asking Council and the administration
to ensure a tax freeze in order to enshrine last year’s 10% tax cut into our
base-operating budget. And I am asking
Council and the administration to exercise some patience in the scheduling of
our capital program.
Also, most amalgamated
municipalities have faltered on the issue of merging labour contracts; it has
proved to be their Achilles’ heel. When
compared to other merged municipalities, Ottawa has faired better to date.
We must be
determined, collectively, to resolve our new labour contract in a reasonable
manner. I am encouraging the management
and union teams to consider the mutually painful consequences of a failure of
negotiations.
Our
employees, management, and Council have a tremendous opportunity to move forward
in partnership, to mutually benefit from our City’s growing economy over the
medium term.
As well, we
will need to deal with the agenda of by-law harmonization. This will attract active and sometimes sharp
debate; we should be able to expect it will also attract the high quality of
debate our Council and our community is capable of.
I would like
to make several more remarks in conclusion.
Ø There is little room for complacency,
Ø There is little margin for error,
Ø That political partnership and respect must continue to supersede
political gamesmanship or expediency.
Thank
you. Merci.
Motion to Introduce
Committee Reports
MOTION NO. 25/2
Moved by Councillor E. Arnold
Seconded by
Councillor D. Thompson
That Emergency and Protective
Services Committee Report 13 and Planning and Development Committee Report 20,
be received and considered.
CARRIED
Emergency and Protective Services Committee
Report 13
1. Emergency
And Protective Services - Visual Identity Project
Committee Recommendation
RECEIVED
2. Taxi - Driver Standards: Training And Disciplinary Guidelines - Other
Housekeeping Items
Committee Recommendations
That Council:
1.
Approve the purchase of the City of Toronto - Ambassador and
Accessible Taxicab Training Courses at a cost of up to $125,000 and direct
staff to adapt, the City of Toronto Ambassador and Accessible Training Course
to better meet the needs of the City of Ottawa, Algonquin College and the
Ottawa’s Taxi Industry.
2. Direct staff to present its proposed disciplinary guidelines to the Taxi Advisory Committee for comment and report back to the Emergency and Protective Services Committee and Council and Council for consideration in spring 2002.
3. Approve, taxi related by-law amendments
to repeal the requirement for City Council approval of taxicab owner plate
transfers.
4. Approve, by-law amendments to allow
taxis licensed under either Nepean and Kanata by-laws to provide service within
the area covered by both by-laws.
CARRIED with Councillor J. Legendre dissenting on Recommendations 3 and 4.
3. City of Ottawa - Corporate Radio System - Agreement With the New City of
Gatineau
Committee Recommendation
That Council authorize staff to commence
negotiations with the new City of Gatineau to use the City of Ottawa Corporate
Radio System.
CARRIED
Planning and Development Committee Report 20
1. Official
Plan And Zoning By-Law Appeal To The Ontario Municipal Board – 2580 Walkley
Road |
Committee Recommendations
That Council:
1. Approve Amendment No. 50 to the Official Plan of the former
City of Ottawa, as it relates to 2580 Walkley Road, as detailed in Document 2.
2. Approve an amendment to Zoning By-law,
1998, of the former City of Ottawa, as it relates to 2580 Walkley Road, as
detailed in Document 3.
3. Direct Legal Services and Development
Services staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board Prehearing Conference and
Full Hearing concerning an appeal filed by the National Capital Commission
against the Official Plan and Zoning Application, of the former City of Ottawa
for 2580 Walkley Road, and further, that Council direct staff to support the
amendments as recommended by staff.
CARRIED
2. Zoning – 1119 Walkley
Road |
Committee Recommendations as Amended
That Council approve:
1.
An
amendment to the old City of Ottawa Zoning By-law 1998 to change the zoning
from UR, R1G, CS F(1.0), and CD4 F(1.0) to R4F with exceptions and a unit per
hectare suffix;
2.
That the
unit per hectare suffix is U(35.0);
3.
That
details 1 and 7 in Document 1 be deleted as they pertain to an apartment
building, as an apartment building is not a permitted use in the R4F zone; and
4. That, pursuant to subsection 34(17)
of the Planning Act, (R.S.O. 1990) no further notice be given in respect of the
proposed amendment.
CARRIED
3. Zoning
– 1159 Heron Road |
Committee Recommendation
That Council approve an amendment to the former City of Ottawa Zoning By-law, 1998 for property located
at 1159 Heron Road from R3A to CD4 F(1.0) to permit a food store.
CARRIED
4. Zoning
– 599 Smyth Road |
Committee Recommendation as amended
That Council
approve an amendment to Zoning By-law, 1998, as it applies to the L2-tp3[558]
Leisure Linkage zone and R5A[558] Low Rise Apartment zone designations for the
portion of lands at 599 Smyth Road, as shown on Document 2, to allow a parking
lot on a temporary basis, as detailed in Document 3, as amended by the
following:
1. That
Item 1 of Document 3 be amended to read “Permit the use of a temporary parking
lot and the associated right-of-way until January 31, 2003.”
CARRIED
5. Zoning
- 127 Catherine Street |
Committee Recommendations
That Council:
1. Refuse
the application to amend the former City of Ottawa Zoning By-law to change the
zoning for 127 Catherine Street from a general commercial CG8 F(3.0) to a
general commercial CG8 F(3.0) H(18.3) exception zone to allow a parking lot.
2. Approve
the application to amend the former City of Ottawa Zoning By-law to change the
zoning for 127 Catherine Street from a general commercial CG8 F(3.0) H (18.3)
to a general commercial CG8 F(3.0) H(18.3) exception Zone to allow a parking
lot, for a temporary period of three years.
CARRIED with Councillor G. Hunter dissenting.
6. Zoning - 775-777 Gladstone Avenue/138 Bell Street North |
That Council:
1.
Repeal By-law 174-96, a by-law to amend the former City of Ottawa
Comprehensive Zoning By-law.
2.
Recommend to the Ontario Municipal Board that Comprehensive Zoning
By-law, 1998, for the former City of Ottawa, as it applies to 138 Bell Street
North, as shown on Document 1, be amended from Neighbourhood Linear Commercial,
CN [597] F(2.0) H(10.7)* to Residential Multiple Unit, R4D.
3. Recommend to the Ontario Municipal
Board that Comprehensive Zoning By-law, 1998, for the former City of Ottawa, as
it applies to 775-777 Gladstone Avenue, as shown on Document 1, be amended from
Neighbourhood Linear Commercial, CN [597] F (2.0) H (18.3)* and CN [597] F
((2.0) H (10.7)* to CN F (2.0) H (18.3).
CARRIED
7. Zoning - Proposed Amendments To The Zoning By‑Law, 1998 |
Committee
Recommendation
That Council approve the
amendments to the former City of Ottawa Zoning
By-law, 1998, as detailed in Document 1.
CARRIED
8.
Zoning - To Replace the Existing
Zoning By-Law, 140-93, and Recognize an Existing Use for 33 Edgewater Street
for the Hazeldean Industrial Park, Former City of Kanata |
Committee
Recommendations
That Council:
1.
Approve a new
Zoning By-law to replace By-law 140-93 for the Hazeldean Industrial Park which
would change all imperial measurements to metric, move all general development
provisions to one section, and reword definitions and provisions to correspond
with other business parks;
2.
Permit an
Auto Body Repair Centre on 33 Edgewater Street;
3. Repeal Zoning By-law 140-93.
CARRIED
9.
Zoning, Monahan Drain – 5271
Fernbank Road, Kanata South Business Park |
Committee
Recommendation
That Council approve an
amendment to former City of Kanata Zoning By-law 135-93, to rezone a portion of
the Monahan Drain from Hazard, HAZ to an Open Space Type 1 Zone, OS1.
CARRIED
10. Zoning Amendment
Proposed for Two Conditionally Approved Lots on Conley Road, Former Township
of Goulbourn |
Committee
Recommendation as Amended
That Council approve the
zoning amendment, which creates an exception to the RU and W zone for
two conditionally approved lots on Conley Road.
CARRIED
11. Zoning – 7948 and 8004 Springhill Road |
Committee
Recommendation
That Council approve the
amendment to the former Township of Osgoode Zoning By-law to rezone from Rural
to Country Estate Exception for lands located at 7948 and 8004 Springhill Road.
CARRIED
12. Proposed Official Plan And Zoning
Amendments, 2545 Carp Road, Former West Carleton Township |
Committee
Recommendations as Amended
That Council approve amendments to both the former Township of West
Carleton Official Plan and Zoning By-law, to designate the site located at 2545
Carp Road, Rural Industrial and to zone the site “MR-27”- Rural
Industrial, Special Exception 27 Zone, to allow specific industrial and limited
commercial uses, and a reduced setback from Carp Road, as amended by the
following:
1.
That under Non-Residential Uses, the
use “a financial office” be amended by deleting the words “a financial”;
2.
That under Non-Residential Uses, the
use “a restaurant (maximum of 185 sq.m. for the entire site)” be amended to
delete “(maximum of 185 sq.m. for the entire site)”; and,
3. That
under Other special exceptions in the “MR-27” zone, Item 2, the words
“/landscaping area” be added after the words “planting strip”.
CARRIED with Councillors A. Cullen and E. Arnold dissenting.
13. Zoning – Farm Retirement Lot at 747 Huntmar
Drive, in the Former West Carleton Township |
Committee
Recommendation
That Council approve an
amendment to the former Township of West Carleton Zoning By-law, to allow the
lot area provisions for the retained portion of the site at 747 Huntmar Drive
to be as per the “RU-22 – Rural Exception” zone.
CARRIED
14. Zoning – 2000 and 2001 Scully Way and 1111 Valin Street |
Committee
Recommendation
That Council approve the
amendment to the former City of Cumberland Urban Zoning By-law to rezone 2000
and 2001 Scully Way, 1111 Valin Street from D-R (Development-Residential) to
R3D-x5 (Residential Row Dwelling and Semis) and R1G (Residential-Singles-Small
Lots) as shown in Document 1.
CARRIED
15. Amendment to Cumberland Urban Zoning By-Law 1‑84 to Permit
the Development of Single Detached and Row Dwellings and to Zone for Parks
and Open Space |
Committee
Recommendation
That Council approve an
amendment to the former Cumberland Urban Zoning By-law 1-84 for land located
east of Trim Road and north of the Hydro corridor from D-R Development
Residential to R1F-X6, R1G, R3D-X5 CON and OS to permit residential subdivision
development.
CARRIED
16.
Amendment
to Cumberland Urban Zoning By-Law 1‑84 to Permit the Development of
Single Detached, Row Dwellings, Stacked Row Dwellings and a High School and
to Zone for a Community Park |
Committee
Recommendation
That Council approve an
amendment to the former Cumberland Urban Zoning By-law 1-84 for land located
east of Tenth Line Road and south of the future Transitway from D-R/C
Development Residential / Commercial to R1H, R3D-X5, R5A-X1, R5A-X2, IS
IS/R3D-X5 and OS.
CARRIED
17. Petrie Island Beach and Marina Master Plan
Review - Update Report |
Committee
Recommendations as Amended
That Council endorse the Petrie
Island Master Plan Review report and authorize staff to proceed with public
consultation, as amended by the following:
1.
That People Services (Public Health) address water quality issues and
report back to Council on potential mitigating measures as part of the next
steps;
2. That staff be directed, in conjunction
with the relevant centres of excellence to undertake the Environmental
Assessment and public consultation for the Petrie Island Master Plan Review and
that the issue of water quality be thoroughly addressed, including
recommendations for action. And further
that, the results of the Environmental Assessment be brought forward to a joint
meeting of the Planning and Development Committee and the Health, Recreation
and Social Services Committee.
CARRIED with Councillor G. Hunter dissenting.
18. Cardinal Creek Storm Water Management Facility and Related Trunk
Storm Sewers – Development Charge Crediting Agreements |
Committee
Recommendations
That Council:
1. Approve the City entering into
Development Charge Crediting Agreements for the construction of a storm water
management pond and trunk storm sewers with several of the developers within
the Cardinal Creek watershed as described in this report;
2.
Approve
amending the funding for the 2001 capital project for this purpose from $11
million to be front-ended by developers to $1,500,000 from the Cardinal Creek
Development Charge Reserve Fund, $5,450,000 revenue from developers, and
$4,050,000 to be debt financed with all debt costs to be paid by development
charges.
3. Approve that the Cumberland Development
Charge By-law be amended to reflect the new project amount and new benefiting
area and inclusion of all carrying costs of the project so that all costs are
recovered through the area specific development charge.
CARRIED
19. Private Road Naming – 300 Hunt Club Road (Uplands /
Macdonald-Cartier International Airport) |
Committee
Recommendations
That Council:
1.
Approve an amendment to the former City of Ottawa By-law 115-80 (Old
City of Ottawa), respecting private roadways, by adding the street names identified
in Document 1 to Schedule “A” of the by-law when all conditions have been met.
2. Approve in principle, the street names
identified in Document 2, which streets are located in the former City of
Gloucester, and that a second report with the necessary conditions and an
enacting by-law be forwarded to Council once the new City of Ottawa has
received the legislative authority for the naming of private roadways in all
the former municipalities and a harmonized municipal addressing by-law has been
approved by City Council.
CARRIED
20.
Private Road Naming – 335 St.
Laurent Boulevard (Canadian Forces Base Rockcliffe) |
Committee
Recommendations
1.
That Council approve an amendment to the former City of Ottawa
By-law 115-80, respecting private roadways, by adding the street names
identified in Document 2 to Schedule “A” of the by-law when all conditions have
been met;
2. That an agreement be executed between
the City and the property owner as required by and containing all the standard
conditions of By-law 115-80.
CARRIED
21. Downtown
Revitalization Action Plan – Evaluation |
Committee
Recommendations as Amended
That Council:
1.
Approve the continuation of the Downtown Revitalization Action Plan
initiatives, including the Mayor’s Downtown Advisory Council as a forum for
consultation with a diverse group of business and resident stakeholders
interested in the vitality of the Downtown.
2.
Approve the following changes to the Action Plan fee exemption
initiatives:
·
Extend the exemption from residential and commercial building permit
and planning application fees and the residential cash-in-lieu of parkland levy
to that portion of Ward 12-Rideau-Vanier west of the Rideau River, as shown in
Document 1;
·
Extend waiving of the residential cash-in-lieu of parkland levy to
developments of more than 50 units;
3. Approve
the reduction of the residential parking requirements for the Central
Area east of the Rideau Canal and that section of Rideau Street outside the
Central Area by amending former City of Ottawa Zoning By-law, 1998, as outlined
in Document 3, and as amended by the following:
i) That all references in
Document 3 to the “elimination of residential parking requirements” be replaced
with “reduction of residential parking requirements”, and that this be implemented
through delegated authority.
4. Approve in principle the preparation of
a Downtown Urban Design Plan, with the terms of reference to be brought back to
Planning and Development Committee for approval in early 2002. Funding will be requested in the 2002 budget for
consultants to provide specialized urban design expertise.
CARRIED
22. Environmental
Advisory Committee - Work Plan 2002 |
Committee
Recommendations as Amended
That Council:
1. That
the Environmental Advisory Committee Workplan elements not requiring additional
funding (funding not already in the base budget) be approved, and;
2. That elements requiring additional
funding be referred, as part of the consideration of advisory committee
budgets, as follows:
a) $20,000 as outlined in the report to be
referred to the 2002 budget process;
b) $50,000 as outlined in the report to be
referred to the 2002 budget process;
c) $50,000 to be referred
to the 2003 budget.
CARRIED
23. New Site
Plan Control By-Law – Heritage Conservation Districts |
Committee
Recommendations as Amended
That
Council approve the following:
1. That the site
plan control by-law exempt from site plan control approval additions required pursuant to the Fire Protection and
Prevention Act;
2.
That the site plan control by-law exempt from
site plan control approval any deviation from any dimension respecting the
location of buildings or structures, provided the deviation does not exceed 0.5
metres and does not result in a violation of any by‑law of the City of
Ottawa; and,
3.
That the site plan control by-law exempt from site plan control approval the following in heritage
conservation districts:
1. the construction, erection or placing on land of
a.
a bed and breakfast, or building or structure
accessory thereto if the gross floor area of the building or structure
accessory thereto is not more than 30% of the gross floor area of the bed and
breakfast,
b.
a communication tower that is not more than 7.0
metres above ground level,
c. a
group home or building or structure
accessory thereto if the gross floor area of the building or structure
accessory thereto is not more than 30% of the gross floor area of the group
home,
d. a
one-unit dwelling or building or
structure accessory thereto if the gross floor area of the building or
structure accessory thereto is not more than 30% of the gross floor area of the
one-unit dwelling,
e. a
two-unit dwelling or building or
structure accessory thereto if the gross floor area of the building or
structure accessory thereto is not more than 30% of the gross floor area of the
two-unit dwelling,
2. the
making of an addition to,
a. a bed
and breakfast if the gross floor area of the addition
is not more than 30% of the gross floor area of the bed
and breakfast,
b. a
building or structure accessory to a bed and breakfast if the gross floor area
of the addition results in the building or structure having a gross floor area
of not more than 30% of the gross floor area of the bed and breakfast,
c.
a communication tower if the addition results in
the tower being not more than 7.0 metres above ground level,
d.
a group home if the gross floor area of the addition is not more
than 30% of the gross floor area of the group home,
e.
a
building or structure accessory to a group home if the gross floor area of the
addition results in the building or structure having a gross floor area of not
more than 30% of the gross floor area of the group home,
f.
a one-unit dwelling if the gross floor area of the addition is not
more than 30% of the gross floor area of the one-unit dwelling, or 55 square
metres,
g.
a building or structure accessory to a one-unit dwelling if the gross floor area
of the addition results in the building or structure having a gross floor area
of not more than 30% of the gross floor area of the one-unit dwelling,
h. a two-unit dwelling if the
gross floor area of the addition is not more than 30% of the gross floor area
of the two-unit dwelling,
i. a building or structure accessory to a two-unit dwelling if the gross floor area
of the addition results in the building or structure having a gross floor area
of not more than 30% of the gross floor area of the two-unit dwelling.
MOTION NO. 25/3
Moved by Councillor J. Legendre
Seconded by
Councillor E. Arnold
That recommendation 3.2.f be amended
to read “up to a maximum of 55 square metres.”
CARRIED
Item 23 of Planning and Development Committee Report 20 was then put to Council and CARRIED as amended by Motion 25/3.
MOTION TO ADOPT COMMITTEE REPORTS
MOTION NO. 25/4
Moved by Councillor E. Arnold
Seconded by
Councillor D. Thompson
That Emergency and Protective Services
Committee Report 13 and Planning and Development Committee Report 20, be
received and adopted as amended.
CARRIED
Motion to Introduce By-laws Three
Readings
MOTION NO. 25/5
Moved by Councillor J. Stavinga
Seconded by
Councillor G. Hunter
WHEREAS on July 11th, 2001, Council considered
and carried a report entitled, New City of Ottawa Development Approvals Process
– Final Report;
AND WHEREAS several recommendations in that
report addressed the issue of a Site Plan Control By-law, which was to be
prepared by staff and brought back for Council’s approval;
AND WHEREAS the proposed
Site Plan Control By-law is listed as By-law D at Item 11 of Council’s draft
Agenda;
AND WHEREAS Subsection 4 (1) of the proposed
Site Plan Control By-law defines certain classes of development that may be
undertaken without site plan control approval;
AND WHEREAS the intent of Subsection 4 (1) (c)
is to exempt from site plan control approval “the making of an alteration to a
building or structure that has the effect of changing the use of the building
or structure”;
AND WHEREAS based on new information that the
implications of Subsection 4 (1) (c) would entirely eliminate the ability of
local elected officials to work in partnership with their constituents, city
planners and the proponents to ensure that the site development in such
situations addresses the interests of the local community as historically
undertaken by area municipalities;
BE IT RESOLVED THAT Subsection 4(1)(c) of the
proposed Site Plan Control By-law be deleted;
AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT the deleted
Subsection 4(1)(c) be referred to the Planning & Development Committee
meeting of January 24th, 2002 for further refinement to reflect the importance
of community engagement in undertaking site development for such situations
as changes in use;
AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED
THAT, subject to the deletion of Subsection 4(1)(c) and any resulting
concordance changes, that By-law D (now By-law 2002-4) be enacted and passed.
CARRIED
MOTION NO. 25/6
Moved by Councillor E. Arnold
Seconded by
Councillor D. Thompson
That the following by-laws be
enacted and passed as amended by Motion No. 25/5.
2002-1 A by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend the Zoning By-law No. 16-1971, as amended, of the old Corporation of the Township of Osgoode, in Lot 31, Concession 8 – 7948 and 8004 Springhill Road.
2002-2 A by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend the Zoning By-law 1-84 of the old Corporation of the City of Cumberland – 2000 and 2001 Scully Way and 1111 Valin Street.
2002-3 A by-law of the City of Ottawa amending the Zoning By-law, 1998 of the old Corporation of the City of Ottawa – 1116 St. Laurent Boulevard.
2002-4 A by-law of the City of Ottawa designating the area within the limits of the City of Ottawa as an area of site plan control.
2002-5 A by-law of the City of Ottawa amending the Zoning By-law, 1998 of the Old City of Ottawa - 210 Clearview Avenue.
2002-6 A by-law of the City of Ottawa amending the Zoning By-law, 1998 of the old Corporation of the City of Ottawa - 1159 Heron Road.
2002-7 A by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend By-law No. 266/81, as amended, a by-law of the old Corporation of the Township of West Carleton – 747 Huntmar.
2002-8 A by-law of the City of Ottawa amending Rural Zoning By-law No. 64-82 of the former City of Cumberland to lift a holding zone in respect of Canaan Road.
2002-9 A by-law of the City of Ottawa to amend By-law No. 2001-468 (to appoint Municipal Law Enforcement Officers in accordance with the private property parking enforcement program).
2002-10 A by-law to dedicate and lay out certain lands as common and public highways in the City of Ottawa - Stanmore Street and Scottanne Street, and Regional Road No. 73.
2002-11 A by-law to dedicate and lay out certain lands as common and public highways in the City of Ottawa.
2002-12 A by-law of the City of Ottawa amending Zoning By-law No. 16-1971 of the former Township of Osgoode to lift a holding zone in respect of 2452 York’s Corners Road.
2002-13 A by-law to designate Blocks 10, 12, 14, 16 and 17, Plan 4M-1074 (Oakbriar Crescent and Marwood Court) as being exempt from Part Lot Control and to repeal By-law No. 2001 - 479.
2002-14 A by-law of the City of Ottawa to designate Blocks 74, 75 and 76 on Plan 4M-1121 (Wallsend Avenue and Halton Terrace) as being exempt from Part Lot Control
2002-15 A by-law of the City of Ottawa amending Zoning By-law No. 40-99of the former Township of Goulbourn to lift a holding zone in respect of Ottawa Street – Lot 20, Concession III.
2002-16 A by-law of the City of Ottawa amending Zoning By-law No. 40-99of the former Township of Goulbourn to lift a holding zone in respect of Ottawa Street – Lot 31, Concession II.
2002-17 A by-law of the City of Ottawa to designate 45, 47, 49 and 51 Mountain Ash as being exempt from Part Lot Control.
2002-18 A by-law of the City of Ottawa respecting the licensing, regulating and governing of owners of limousines and of the business of providing limousine service.
2002-19 A by-law of the City of Ottawa amending By-law No. 120-97 of the old Corporation of the City of Kanata.
2002-20
A by-law of the City of Ottawa
amending By-law No. 115-2000 of the old Corporation of the City of Nepean.
Motions (Of Which Notice Has Been Given Previously)
Moved by Councillor J.
Harder
Seconded by Councillor
R. Bloess
WHEREAS City Council formed eight Standing
Committees in January 2001;
AND WHEREAS the anecdotal evidence from the
first year of operation tends to indicate that certain Standing Committees
regularly met on a bi-monthly basis and considered hundreds of agenda items,
while other Standing Committees met less frequently and considered far fewer
agenda items;
AND WHEREAS staff is currently reviewing
various components of the City’s political infrastructure, including the Terms
of Reference of the Standing Committees, delegated authority matters and the
Procedure By-law;
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that staff include in
their review of the Standing Committee Terms of Reference an analysis of the
work loads of the eight committees, based on the past year’s experience, with
the goal of streamlining the overall number of committees and therefore
minimizing any related costs;
AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that staff report
back to the Corporate Services and Economic Development Committee early in 2002
with their findings, including possible committee structure alternatives, and,
if necessary, a process for reassigning displaced Members of Council.
LOST on a division of 5 YEAS to 14 NAYS as follows:
Yeas: (5) Councillors G.
Hunter, J. Harder, A. Cullen, S. Little, R. Bloess.
Nays: (14) Councillors D. Thompson, P. McNeely, H.
Kreling, D. Eastman, J. Legendre, A. Munter, C. Doucet, W. Stewart, G. Brooks,
E. Arnold, J. Stavinga,
M. Bellemare, D. Deans, M. Meilleur.
Motions (Requiring Suspension of the Rules of Procedure)
MOTION NO. 25/8
Moved by Councillor P. McNeely
Seconded by
Councillor D. Deans
That the Rules of Procedure be suspended to permit the introduction of
the following motion.
CARRIED
MOTION NO. 25/9
Moved by Councillor P. McNeely
Seconded by
Councillor D. Deans
WHEREAS an application has been filed with the City of Ottawa
for the purpose of establishing a Factory Type Hog Farm adjacent to the Village
of Sarsfield;
AND WHEREAS the City of Ottawa requires special legislation
or regulations to properly deal with this type of operation in order to protect
our citizens, especially in the wake of Walkerton;
BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Minister
of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, The Hon. Brian Coburn, MPP, be requested
to introduce regulations or legislation to permit municipalities to regulate
and prohibit the operation of factory type hog farms and to specifically
prohibit the factory type hog farm adjacent to the Village of Sarsfield.
CARRIED
MOTION NO. 25/10
Moved by Councillor G. Hunter
Seconded by
Councillor D. Deans
BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Rules of Procedure be suspended to permit the
introduction of a motion with respect to the granting of consents to Canadian
Waste Services Inc. and Waste Services Inc.
CARRIED
MOTION NO. 25/11
Moved by Councillor G. Hunter
Seconded by
Councillor D. Deans
BE IT RESOLVED THAT the General Manager,
Transportation, Utilities and Public Works be delegated the authority to
approve and execute consent agreements, pursuant to the City of Ottawa Act, section
12.14, to Canadian Waste Services Inc. and Waste Services Inc., such consents
generally in the form attached to the memo dated 7 January 2002 from the City
Solicitor and General Manager, Transportation, Utilities and Public Works but
with the final wording subject to the approval of the General Manager.
CARRIED
Notices of Motion (For Consideration at Subsequent
Meeting)
Moved
by Councillor C. Doucet
Seconded
by Councillor W. Stewart
WHEREAS the Glebe Community Association will be
holding its annual Dance and Social on Saturday February 23 between 8 p.m. and
12 a.m. (midnight) at the Glebe Community Centre (690 Lyon Street).
AND WHEREAS the Glebe Community Association
Dance and Social will be using amplified music and sound reproduction devices
during this event.
AND WHEREAS this annual event is meaningful to
the community.
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the provisions of
the Old City of Ottawa Noise By-Law 3-97 shall not apply so as to preclude the
Glebe Community Association’s Dance and Social, at the Glebe Community Center
on February 23, from using sound reproduction devices which
might disturb the peace and comfort of an area resident between 8 p.m. and 12
a.m.
Moved
by Councillor S. Little
Seconded
by Councillor D. Thompson
WHEREAS the
Encroachment By-law 167-73, of the former City of Ottawa, as amended, provides
for the issuance of temporary surface encroachment permits for outdoor cafes;
AND WHEREAS Section 5
of the “Regulations Governing the Issuance and Administration of Encroachment
Permits for Outdoor Cafes”, as adopted by Council on June 5, 1991, provides
that all new requests for outdoor patios must conform to the land use
separation distance of 30 metres (100 feet) from any property zoned for residential
or public use, and if this distance is not provided and maintained, the
application will not be processed further and the encroachment permit will be
refused;
AND WHEREAS
an application from 249 Richmond Road, for a temporary encroachment permit to
operate an outdoor patio, located within the Tweedsmuir Avenue road allowance
has been refused because the applicant’s restaurant is located within 30 metres
of a property zoned for residential use;
AND WHEREAS
after public consultation, the majority of residents in the area are supportive
of the operation of the patio at this location;
THEREFORE BE
IT RESOLVED THAT City Council waive the provisions of Section 5 of the
“Regulations Governing the Issuance and Administration of the Encroachment
Permits for Outdoor Cafes”; and
BE IT FURTHER
RESOLVED THAT the General Manager of Transportation, Utilities and Public Works
be instructed to issue a temporary encroachment permit to allow an outdoor
patio within the Tweedsmuir Avenue road allowance at 249 Richmond Road, to be
reviewed on a yearly basis and renewed subject to no complaints from the
community regarding this operation and subject to the same conditions which are
applied to all outdoor patios for which temporary encroachment permits are
issued, in addition to the following conditions:
1.
that this outdoor patio is
located a minimum of 3 metres (10 feet) from the Tweedsmuir Avenue edge of
pavement;
2.
that this outdoor patio shall
be closed at ___________ ;
3.
that the General Manager of
Transportation, Utilities and Public Works report to the Transportation and
Transit Committee if any noise related complaints are received regarding the
operation of this outdoor patio; and
4.
that in the event that the
permit is revoked or not renewed, the owner be required to reinstate the
portion of the public property occupied by the patio to the satisfaction of the
General Manager of Transportation, Utilities and Public Works.
Confirmation By-law
MOTION NO. 25/12
Moved by Councillor S. Little
Seconded
by Councillor D. Thompson
That By-law 2002-21 to confirm the proceedings of Council be enacted and
passed.
CARRIED
Adjournment
Council adjourned the meeting at 3:20 p.m.
|
|
|
CITY CLERK |
|
MAYOR |