2. Ottawa 20/20 arts
and heritage plan Plan pour les arts
et le patrimoine d’Ottawa 20/20 |
Committee Recommendations as Amended
That Council
approve the following:
1.
Adoption
of the five Strategic Directions contained in the Ottawa 20/20 Arts Plan, and
outlined in this report;
2.
Adoption of the three Strategic Directions contained in
the Ottawa 20/20 Heritage Plan, and outlined in this report;
3.
Adoption of the 10 Policy Statements included in the
Ottawa 20/20 Arts Plan as outlined in Attachment A; and
4.
Adoption of the 27 Policy Statements included in the
Ottawa 20/20 Heritage Plan as outlined in Attachment B.
5. That
p. 34 of the Heritage Plan “Policy Statement: The City will foster development
of a museums network be amended by adding to “Action (High Priority-Long
Term):”
1. Develop
Ottawa’s Heritage Gateway after the adoption and successful implementation of
the strategy that ensures the long-term, ongoing financial viability of the ten
local museums supported by the City.
6. WHEREAS the identification of
numerous small community-based initiatives has been prioritized in the Arts and
Heritage 20/20 Plan, and;
WHEREAS funding for the rental of space, maintenance of existing spaces and
creation of new spaces in which to run community-based initiatives have plagued
the City’s ability to implement policy initiatives in the past, and;
WHEREAS proposals coming forward
in the Facility Needs Study suggest the elimination of small spaces, creating
even more difficulties in implementing the priorities outlined in the Arts and
Heritage Plan for community programming;
BE IT RESOLVED that the strategies identified (on April 3, 2003) will take
priority in terms of City funding of community spaces and that the Facility
Needs Study will be in conformity with the 20/20 Plan.
7. WHEREAS
community level programming is identified as a priority in the Arts and
Heritage 20/20 Plan, and:
WHEREAS the recent staff response to the request for funding for
community-based initiatives reflected a need for more than $6 million worth of
program development and assistance, and;
WHEREAS only $1.1 million was available to assist the delivery of these
community-based projects, and;
WHEREAS the shortfall of $5 million reflects an un-addressed need for funding;
BE IT RESOLVED that staff be directed to develop and report back to the Health,
Recreation and Social Services Committee with recommendations for the
implementation of strategies to close the funding gap in programming at the
community-based level.
8. WHEREAS arts and heritage policy
statements mean little without a funding strategy;
BE IT RESOLVED that the 20/20 Arts and Heritage Plan include an investment
direction based on the following:
(a)
Increasing the per capita funding for arts and heritage on an annual
basis until Ottawa’s per capita arts funding is on a competitive basis with the
six (6) other large Canadian cities.
Recommandations ModifiÉes du ComitÉ
Que le
Conseil approuve ce qui suit :
1. l’adoption des cinq
orientations stratégiques contenues dans le Plan pour les arts d’Ottawa 20/20
et décrites dans le présent rapport;
2. l’adoption des trois
orientations stratégiques contenues dans le Plan pour le patrimoine d’Ottawa
20/20 et décrites dans le présent rapport;
3. l’adoption des dix énoncés
de principes présentés dans le Plan pour les arts d’Ottawa 20/20 et décrits
dans l’annexe A; et
4. l’adoption
des 27 énoncés de principes présentés dans le Plan pour le patrimoine d’Ottawa
20/20 et décrits dans l’annexe B.
5. Que la p. 34 de l’énoncé de
principes du Plan pour le patrimoine : « La Ville favorisera la
création d’un réseau de musées » soit modifiée par l’ajout de « Mesure (Haute priorité-long
terme) : »
1. Élaborer la Porte du patrimoine
d’Ottawa après l’adoption et la mise en oeuvre réussie de la stratégie assurant
la viabilité financière à long terme et suivie des dix musées locaux soutenus
par la Ville.
6. ATTENDU QUE la désignation des
nombreuses et modestes initiatives communautaires a été effectuée en priorité
dans le Plan pour les arts et le patrimoine Ottawa 20/20, et;
ATTENDU QUE le financement de la location et de l’entretien des espaces
existants, de même que celui de la création de nouveaux espaces pour la tenue
des initiatives communautaires a diminué la capacité de la Ville à mettre en
oeuvre des initiatives d’orientation dans le passé, et;
ATTENDU QUE les propositions présentées dans l’étude sur
les besoins en équipements font état de l’élimination des petits espaces, ce
qui créerait davantage de difficultés dans la mise en oeuvre des priorités
exposées dans le Plan pour les arts et le patrimoine en matière de programmes
communautaires;
IL EST RÉSOLU que les stratégies décrites (le 3 avril
2003) seront traitées en priorité dans le financement de la Ville des espaces
communautaires et que l’étude sur les besoins en équipements sera conforme aux
termes du Plan 20/20.
7. ATTENDU QUE les programmes
communautaires sont désignés comme prioritaires dans le Plan pour les arts et
le patrimoine 20/20, et;
ATTENDU QUE la réaction récente du personnel de la Ville à la demande de
financement d’initiatives communautaires traduisait une demande équivalant à
plus de 6 millions de dollars en élaboration de programmes et en assistance,
et;
ATTENDU QUE seulement 1,1 million de dollars ont été débloqués pour aider à la
réalisation de ces projets communautaires, et;
ATTENDU QUE le manque à gagner de 5 millions de dollars correspond à un besoin
de financement non pris en compte;
IL EST RÉSOLU que du personnel soit chargé d’élaborer des recommandations sur
la mise en oeuvre de stratégies visant à combler l’écart financier des
programmes communautaires, et de faire rapport à ce sujet au Comité de la
santé, des loisirs et des services sociaux.
8. ATTENDU QUE les énoncés de principes
sur les arts et le patrimoine sont sans effet sans la mise en place d’une
stratégie de financement;
IL EST RÉSOLU que le Plan pour les arts et le patrimoine 20/20 comprenne une
orientation d’investissement fondée sur les éléments suivants :
(a) Augmenter le financement par habitant
des arts et du patrimoine sur une base annuelle jusqu’à ce que le financement
par habitant consacré aux arts à Ottawa soit comparable à celui des six (6)
autres grandes villes canadiennes.
Documentation
1. People Services Department, General Manager’s report dated 24 March 2003
(ACS2003-PEO-IDP-0006).
2. The following submissions were received and are attached:
a) Correspondence received from Nathan Hauch, Ottawa Youth Cabinet Representative (Somerset Ward)
b) Correspondence received by e-mail 03 April 2003 from Bob Gregory,
Chair, Heritage Advisory Committee
(See Item
1 for Extract of Draft Joint Minute, 3 April 2003)
Report to/Rapport
au:
Health, Recreation
and Social Services Committee
Comité de la santé, des loisirs et des services
sociaux
and Council/et au Conseil
24 March 2003/ le 24 mars 2003
Submitted by/Soumis par: Jocelyne St Jean, General Manager/Directrice générale
Contact/Personne-ressource: Colleen Hendrick, Director/
Innovation,
Development and Partnership
Directrice, Innovation, développement et
partenariat
|
|
Ref N°: ACS2003-PEO-IDP-0006 |
SUBJECT: OTTAWA 20/20 ARTS AND HERITAGE Plan
OBJET: PLAN POUR LES ARTS ET LE PATRIMOINE D’OTTAWA 20/20
REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS
That the Health, Recreation and Social Services Committee
recommend Council approve the following:
1. Adoption of the five Strategic Directions contained in the Ottawa 20/20 Arts Plan, and outlined in this report;
2. Adoption
of the three Strategic Directions contained in the Ottawa 20/20 Heritage Plan,
and outlined in this report;
3. Adoption
of the 10 Policy Statements included in the Ottawa 20/20 Arts Plan as outlined
in Attachment A; and
4. Adoption
of the 27 Policy Statements included in the Ottawa 20/20 Heritage Plan as
outlined in Attachment B.
(The document entitled ‘The Ottawa 20/20 Arts and Heritage Plan’ has been forwarded previously to members of Council under separate cover.)
RECOMMANDATIONS DU RAPPORT
Que le Comité de la santé, des loisirs et des services sociaux recommande
au Conseil d’approuver :
1. l’adoption
des cinq orientations stratégiques contenues dans le Plan pour les arts
d’Ottawa 20/20 et décrites dans le présent rapport;
2. l’adoption
des trois orientations stratégiques contenues dans le Plan pour le patrimoine
d’Ottawa 20/20 et décrites dans le présent rapport;
3. l’adoption
des dix énoncés de principes présentés dans le Plan pour les arts d’Ottawa
20/20 et décrits dans l’annexe A; et
4. l’adoption des 27 énoncés de principes
présentés dans le Plan pour le patrimoine d’Ottawa 20/20 et décrits dans
l’annexe B.
(Le document intitulé Plan pour les
arts et le patrimoine d’Ottawa 20/20 a déjà été acheminé aux membres du
Conseil sous pli séparé.)
Over the next 20 years, it is estimated that Ottawa’s population could potentially increase to 1.2 million. It is also anticipated that the city’s job base will experience an expansion in the range of 250,000 jobs by the year 2020. If realized, this degree of growth will undoubtedly result in significant changes to the physical, economic, social and cultural dynamic within the city. The question of how the City intends to effectively manage this anticipated growth is the basis of the Ottawa 20/20 initiative.
The overall growth management strategy is contained in five interrelated plans: The Official Plan, the Human Services Plan, the Economic Strategy, the Arts and Heritage Plan and an Environmental Strategy. As a collective, the Ottawa 20/20 plans form a comprehensive, integrated blueprint for securing the future of our community’s quality of life.
The purpose of the Arts and Heritage Plan is to provide
long-term strategic direction by which the city can realize the vision and
principles adopted for Ottawa by City Council in June 2002. The Arts and Heritage Plan is the first
comprehensive plan for the future of arts and heritage in the new City of
Ottawa. The plan provides a strategic
framework for growth in the arts and heritage sectors over the next 20 years,
related policy statements and a five-year workplan.
A strong
local arts and heritage sector is essential to realizing Ottawa’s vision for a
liveable, prosperous and sustainable city.
Local arts and heritage are grounded in the community, in the actions of
individuals, collectives and community-based organizations as well as City
departments, working both independently and inter-dependently. The Arts and Heritage Plan presents
strategies and initiatives within the areas of arts and heritage development,
public art, heritage preservation, community arts, cultural facilities
development, cultural industry, marketing and tourism.
The Arts Plan Discussion Paper and the draft Heritage Plan
were released in December 2002, and have formed the basis for extensive public
consultation, collaboration and debate over the past three months. The Plans presented today were informed and
developed bythrough these consultations
and collaborations.
The Arts
Plan affirms the City’s capacity as a leader in nurturing and sustaining the
local arts. Most local artistic
activity is delivered by expert community partners. The Arts Plan aims to spark and support this activity, as well as
help connect it to other sectors, other partners and other audiences for
development purposes.
The Arts
Plan protects and builds upon current arts services and programs that, through
extensive consultation, citizens have told us they value. The Plan aims to encourage and provide
opportunity over the next 20 years for new creators, new forms, new partners,
new audiences, new alliances, new participants, new ways of operating, new
resources and new sources of support.
The Arts Plan identifies five strategic directions, which will guide the City and its partners over the next 20 years. These strategic directions are:
· Broaden Public Access to the Local Arts
· Keep Ottawa’s Artists Here
· Build Creative Capacity
· Revitalize Public Places and Natural Spaces Through the Arts
· Realize Economic Potential of Local Cultural Sector
Strategic Direction One:
Broaden Public Access
A healthy and sustainable local arts sector translates into substantial individual and collective benefit for Ottawa’s residents. Ottawa’s local arts sector has excellent potential, strong promise and committed people to carry it forward. Currently, however, inadequacies in the sector’s infrastructure limit the ability of arts organizations to deliver services to the public.
Strategic Direction One aims to ensure that residents of Ottawa can benefit from a vibrant and sustainable local arts sector in 2020. Broad public access means affordable ticket prices, reasonable tuition and participation fees, safe and accessible venues, easy access to information, and opportunities to learn about Ottawa’s artistic heritage. In order for the local arts sector to deliver within these areas, the Arts Plan presents essential strategies related to funding, facilities, marketing and collecting/preserving.
Strategic Direction Two:
Keep Ottawa’s Artists Here
Currently, many artists in all disciplines (literary, media, performing and visual arts) are leaving Ottawa and bringing their talent to those Canadian centres that have greater infrastructure and support for the local arts sector. These cities are receiving the economic and social impact and benefit produced by the artistic talent that grew up and began to develop in Ottawa.
Strategic Direction Two aims to keep Ottawa’s artists here so that they can contribute to the development of their neighbourhoods, their disciplines, the city and its residents. The Arts Plan presents strategies that focus on increasing opportunities for Ottawa artists to work and to present their work.
Strategic Direction Three:
Build Creative Capacity
Creativity is about new ideas, and the discipline of developing, sharing and applying them. The creative process helps to break barriers, broaden linear thought and impart invaluable life skills. The creativity of children, youth, adults and seniors can be developed through practice and exposure to the arts and to practicing artists.
The seeds for the development of significant creative capacity are present in Ottawa, through programs (delivered by community partners and directly by the City) that focus on community arts, arts education and training. In order to achieve substantial results, however, attention and resources must be focused on this area in a co-ordinated manner and with an integrated approach.
Strategic Direction Three aims to bring together local health, education, childcare, recreation and arts sectors to continue important work in this area, and to connect the arts more intimately with community and individual development. Strategies around diversity, distinct communities, lifelong learning, special needs, arts education and training are presented in the Arts Plan.
Strategic Direction Four:
Revitalize Public
Places and Natural Spaces
Cities often position the arts at the center of urban, suburban and rural revitalization efforts. Throughout North America and around the world, the arts have been employed to beautify and animate particular areas, helping to make communities and neighbourhoods more liveable and vital. Tangible results include enhanced property values, safer and more attractive geographic areas, an extension of the hours during which an area is active, increased employment for artists, and increased arts opportunities for residents and visitors.
A vibrant focus can also be established and maintained in natural areas, contributing in a meaningful way to an area’s environmental integrity, through creative green environments and gardens, land art, art pathways that follow existing green corridors, natural site-specific art etc.
Strategic Direction Four aims to bring the local arts to the
table as a key player and contributor to the enrichment of the public
landscape, and to the development of a diverse, stimulating and
ecologically-sound environment. The
arts can contribute significantly to city planning, design, environmental
management and local revitalization efforts.
The Arts Plan presents strategies around public art (integration of permanent,
site-specific works of art into municipal buildings, natural places, public
spaces and structures;
commissioned through a community design process that includes artists,
architects, citizens and city planners) and
arts/cultural districts.
Strategic Direction Five:
Realize Economic Potential
Links between creativity, diversity, talent and technology are now driving the economic growth of Canada’s city-regions. City-regions in Canada that are leading centres of arts and immigration are blossoming as centres of technology-based industry. The two most striking features that these cities share are a thriving local arts scene and a highly diverse, tolerant social character.
The cultural sector in Ottawa is beginning to be recognized as an emerging and valuable component of the local economy – a seed cluster. This sector is growing in importance in the world economy, and is firmly linked to arts and cultural development. It includes artists of all disciplines as well as others working in creative professions and industries, the not-for-profit arts sector, the arts education sector and arts industries that produce or distribute products, content and services rooted in the arts.
Strategic Direction Five aims to capitalize on the links between culture, creativity and innovation. It focuses on developing, sustaining and advocating for Ottawa’s local cultural industry, and the creative talent/workforce that supports it. The Arts Plan presents strategies around linking creative, cultural talent with employer, and developing one-stop cultural industry support shops.
Heritage stewardship is a dynamic process that acknowledges that each generation has a responsibility to care for non-renewable heritage resources and hand them on intact to future generations. It benefits both present and future generations. The community expects that the City will be the principal steward of Ottawa’s history and heritage, meaning that:
· Heritage preservation, presentation and promotion is a core municipal function.
· The City will lead by example in the preservation, presentation and promotion of local heritage.
· The City will foster the development of the local heritage sector through the creation of policy and legislation, the provision of advice, funding and facilities, the protection of resources, demonstration of best practices, and program delivery.
· The City is responsible to the people of Ottawa and works in partnership with individuals, entrepreneurs, local heritage organizations and businesses facilitating and enabling the development of community-based initiatives.
The Heritage Plan identifies three strategic directions, which will guide the City and its partners over the next 20 years. These strategic directions are:
· Identify, Collect and Preserve
· Research, Interpret and Promote
· Build Capacity
Strategic Direction One:
Identify, Collect and Preserve
Identification, collection and preservation of Ottawa’s documentary and material history, built heritage, archaeological resources, cultural heritage landscapes, cemeteries and burial grounds, are core heritage functions.
Documentary records are primary sources that are used to research and interpret local history. Material history objects, or artifacts, are tangible evidence of times past. As well as serving as reminders of where we have come from as a society, museum and archival collections provide inspiration for future creation and innovation. Designation and preservation of cultural heritage resources such as buildings, structures, sites, archaeological resources, rural and urban cultural heritage landscapes, areas and environments protect Ottawa’s unique heritage environment and are discussed in some detail in the Official Plan but are also addressed in the Heritage Plan.
Strategic Direction Two:
Research, Interpret and Promote
The city’s rich local heritage is often overshadowed by its identity as The Nation’s Capital. Yet there are multiple layers to Ottawa’s local heritage: aboriginal, multicultural, rural, urban, ancient, recent. Although much valuable local history has been undertaken, it is still necessary to conduct extensive primary research to identify and explore important themes in local history and to address gaps in collections and programs.
Research is the cornerstone of effective heritage designation, collections development and interpretive programming. In order to increase awareness of the importance of local heritage particularly among young Ottawans and recent immigrants, the heritage community needs to develop programs targeted to these audiences. There is a growing public interest in cultural and heritage tourism, but there has been little investment to date in marketing and promotion of local heritage attractions and events, and there is insufficient public awareness of existing resources. As well as improving heritage programming, we need to get the word out that local history and heritage is important in helping us to understand our place in the world today.
Strategic Direction Three:
Build Capacity
Strengthening the overall capacity of the City and its community partners to collect, preserve, and interpret local heritage is absolutely necessary. Volunteers within community-based heritage organizations undertake much of the critical heritage work. The contributions of these individuals and heritage organizations must be recognized, fostered and further developed in order that it will continue and grow.
Current financial resources are inadequate to maintain existing heritage facilities and programs, let alone to introduce new, innovative activities. Additional dollars, expertise and human resources are required to meet professional standards of heritage preservation and interpretation and to begin to tell the story of Ottawa as a city. However, since the funds required to implement this plan, particularly to establish additional heritage facilities and programs, may not be found entirely within the municipal budget, the City and its community partners will have to collaborate to identify new sources of funding that may be directed towards heritage.
Implementation
of the Arts and Heritage Plan
It is anticipated
that an Ottawa 20/20 Implementation Plan will be completed subsequent to
Committee and Council approval of the five growth management plans. It is further anticipated that a Corporate
Strategic Plan will be developed during 2003-2004 to provide the internal
administrative processes required to support the Ottawa 20/20 Plans. These plans will be driven by the strategies
included in the Arts and Heritage Plan.
It is in City Council’s approval of its annual budget and
its long-term financial plan that the commitment to the direction of the Arts
and Heritage Plan will be realized. The
justification for each annual budget submission will indicate the contribution
it makes to the strategic directions contained in these plans.
A number of priority initiatives have been identified that will help “kick-start” the implementation process over the next year. These initiatives have been chosen because they exemplify the City’s commitment to the strategic directions expressed in the Arts and Heritage Plan, and they offer an opportunity to begin the process of public engagement in implementation of the plans. These include:
· Developing a new, city-wide Visual Art Policy that harmonizes existing
policies and develops a comprehensive municipal framework around art
acquisition and purchase, collections management, conservation, exhibitions,
galleries and public art;
· Developing guidelines for self-help projects to allow community groups
and corporate sponsors to donate labour and materials towards the maintenance
and restoration of city-owned heritage buildings and resources;
· Developing a five-year Cultural Facilities Strategy to support the
development and improvement of local arts and heritage facilities;
· Developing a city-wide Arts and Heritage Marketing Plan;
· Supporting the
School-based Ottawa Heritage Fairs;
· Developing
and implementing a three-month Artist in Residence project at a City community
centre – a collaborative, conceptual visual art project that links an
established contemporary artist with at-risk youth.
Monitoring these
indicators over time will allow the City to respond to changing circumstances
and continuously improve on the effectiveness of the Arts and Heritage
Plan. Targets will be adopted for those
indicators that lend themselves to such treatment.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS
Approval of the Arts and Heritage Plan along with the other Ottawa 20/20 Plans will assist in increasing the preservation and integrity of our natural and built environment. The Environmental Advisory Committee has been involved in the Arts and Heritage Plan’s consultation and collaboration process.
RURAL IMPLICATIONS
The Arts and Heritage Plan takes into consideration the provision of services to persons living and visiting the rural areas of Ottawa, recognizing the uniqueness of our rural communities and in keeping with the principles adopted within the Ottawa 20/20 growth management framework.
Arts
Early in December, the Arts Plan Discussion Paper was officially released for the purposes of public consultation and collaboration. The Discussion Paper, which was mailed or picked up by over 1,500 local individuals and organizations, had itself been prepared from broad consultation including:
a) public meetings and open houses as part
of Ottawa 20/20 (February 2002);
b) municipal, cross departmental
staff retreat focussed on the arts (February 2002);
c) Building a Creative City Forum (June 2002);
d) full working sessions with Ottawa’s Arts Advisory Committee and municipal arts staff (October 2002);
e) Ottawa 20/20 Tier One workshops and consultations (September to November 2002); and
f) ongoing feedback from Ottawa 20/20 website and on-line chats.
The Arts Plan Discussion Paper put forward a draft Arts Plan framework, vision, mission, goals and strategies.
Eight separate focus groups held in mid-December brought together 100 people - a diversity of expert Ottawa residents, artists, stakeholders, community partners, municipal staff from various departments and branches, and representatives from other government levels and agencies. Each focus group worked collectively within one Arts Plan strategic area, in order to validate, rework and prioritize suggested strategic actions.
In January, the focus group results were brought out for public consultation. Four public consultations, co-hosted by the City of Ottawa Arts Advisory Committee and the Ottawa 20/20 Arts Plan team, were held in different locations across Ottawa – west (Kanata), downtown Ottawa, east (Orléans) and south (Manotick). Approximately 200 residents participated and worked in pairs or small groups to rate the 24 short-term actions that had been previously defined by the focus groups.
The prioritization results of all four public consultation groups combined with 35 written, e-mailed, and faxed submissions from residents and various advisory committees form the basis for the final draft Arts Plan.
Heritage
Early in December, the draft Heritage Plan
was released for public consultation.
Over 1500 copies of the Plan were mailed or picked up by individuals and
organizations. Individual
presentations, attended by approximately 500 participants overall, were made to
32 heritage and community organizations representing over 5,000 members. The January 11th
public consultation attracted 100 residents.
In addition, 26 written submissions were received from individuals and
organizations.
The input from all of these consultations has
been used to prepare the final draft Heritage Plan.
FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS
Approval of the Arts and Heritage Plan does not impact on the existing 2003 budget authorities. Implications for 2004 and subsequent years will be brought forward as part of the regular corporate budget process. It is anticipated that approval of the Ottawa 20/20 plans will enable a revision to the Long Range Financial Plans (capital and operational); however, any revisions will be brought forward for Committee and Council deliberation and approval.
The City will work with partners to develop and sustain municipal,
corporate and other public investment in the local arts sector in order to
provide adequate and diversified support and resources.
The City will spearhead a partnered drive aimed at greater access for
Ottawa artists, audiences and community to a new and improved network of
well-linked, adequately distributed and appropriately-supported venues for the
local arts.
The City will engage in partnered efforts
that make it easy for residents and visitors to access information about
Ottawa’s dynamic local arts scene.
The City will develop a strengthened and more
cohesive approach to the collection, protection, preservation and showcasing of
Ottawa’s irreplaceable local artistic heritage.
The City will work with partners to increase
opportunities for Ottawa artists to work and to present their work.
Strategic Direction Three:
Build Creative Capacity
The City will strengthen and support
multidisciplinary community arts programs and will develop a multi-sectoral
support system aimed at building creative capacity within Ottawa’s distinct and
diverse communities.
The City will engage in partnered efforts to
educate and train people of all ages in the arts, and to strengthen the role of
the arts in Ottawa’s diverse educational system.
Strategic Direction Four:
Revitalize Public Places and Natural Spaces Through the Arts
The City will develop and implement a
comprehensive municipal public art policy that results in:
a)
the integration of permanent, site-specific works of
art into municipal buildings, natural places, public spaces and structures; and
b) expanded partnered efforts to integrate public art into all major, new and re-development projects in Ottawa.
The City will spark and sustain urban and neighbourhood revitalization through the partnered development and nurturing of arts and cultural districts.
Strategic Direction Five:
Realize Economic Potential of Local Cultural Sector
The City will engage in partnered efforts to develop, sustain and advocate for Ottawa’s local artistic and creative talent as a workforce for local industry.
The City will maintain a City Archives with a corporate and community mandate.
The City will foster development of a museums network.
The City will establish and follow Collections Policies.
The City will provide the necessary storage facilities to house archival, museum and archaeological collections.
The City will provide resources to ensure the preventive conservation of City-owned collections.
The City will create Documentation Plans and Collections Plans for archival and museum collections.
The City will lobby the provincial government to improve relevant provincial legislation such as the Ontario Heritage Act.
The City will preserve distinct built heritage, streetscapes, and cultural heritage landscapes that serve as landmarks and symbols of local identity in both urban and rural districts as outlined in the Official Plan.
The City will identify and protect marked and unmarked or abandoned cemeteries or burial grounds.
The City will protect significant historic, pre-historic and underwater archaeological sites.
The
City will establish a comprehensive commemorative policy.
The City will develop a new Public Art policy that is sensitive to local history and heritage.
The City will enhance programming at community and City-run museums and archives, particularly curriculum-based educational programs, special events, temporary and permanent exhibitions and virtual productions.
The City will expand programming beyond museums and archives to promote programs and activities in heritage environments as well as non-traditional spaces such as malls, festivals and other public venues.
The City will take the lead in the development of city-wide heritage programs and events, temporary and permanent exhibitions, and virtual productions.
The City will encourage people to research and write about Ottawa history and heritage.
The City will develop a Marketing Plan to effectively market the city’s heritage facilities and programs.
The City will collaborate with commercial tourism operators and the non-profit sector to improve the quality, accessibility and impact of heritage activities.
Strategic Direction Three:
Build Capacity
The City will maintain appropriate Citizen’s Advisory Committees to advise and assist on heritage matters.
The City will establish guidelines for community involvement in municipal heritage initiatives.
The City will provide professional advice and guidance to community-based groups involved in heritage preservation and interpretation .
The City will create formal volunteer programs within museums and other heritage organizations.
The City will establish Heritage Awards in several categories and expand the number of awards as warranted.
The City will provide necessary funding to preserve and maintain its designated heritage buildings and those buildings used for heritage programs and activities.
The City will increase funding available to community-based heritage groups and individuals through its Heritage Funding Program.
The City will explore possibilities of external funding for enhancement of heritage programs and activities.
The City will become more entrepreneurial in its approach to heritage programs and activities.
Submission to the HRSS Regarding the Arts Plan
Nathan Hauch
Ottawa Youth Cabinet Representative (Somerset Ward)
Below are some thoughts about the need for strong investment in local arts.
1.
Art as Expression
There is little debate over the fact that Arts are beneficial for the City. Not only does the expansion of public art provide beautification, but also significantly, helps give the City its soul. For if the City truly belongs to its citizens, those citizens must have a wide range of venues available in which to express themselves. As well, more artistic expression allows for the greater expansion of diversity in general. A City that better celebrates diversity is therefore attractive for youth to live and make their living.
2.
Art as Employment
The expansion of public art also revitalizes downtown cores. This not only makes these areas more aesthetically pleasing, but also helps attract more businesses. The expansion of more businesses, notably local ones, also provides for more employment. More employment opportunities, particularly for youth, are both needed and encouraged.
As well, Ottawa has a wealth of local talent. However, as the Arts Plan mentions, many artists leave Ottawa as there are not enough employment opportunities for artists in the City. Given that Canterbury High School, which trains many emerging artists, is renowned for its Arts program throughout Eastern Ontario, it only makes sense that Ottawa work towards ensuring that more artists have more venues so that they may continue making positive contributions to their communities.
While the need for public space is clear, we must also note that some venues must be just that: public. There are young local artists who would appreciate more venues outside of the realm of corporate sponsorship. This point of view has been expressed to me by a number of young artists in Somerset Ward.
3.
The Need for More Arts-Oriented Education
If there is one part of the Plan that I would particularly like to stress, it is the dire need for more arts-oriented education. I was a student of the Literary Arts Program at Canterbury until two years ago. While I was there, the Program was constantly under the threat of greater funding cuts, thereby limiting the quality of the program as a whole. This proved to be tremendously stressful for much of the Arts student population, as programs such as these were seen as beneficial to their quality of life.
For it must be noted that education in the Ar6s is not a strictly academic exercise. It teaches people different ways of expressing themselves and provides a global perspective of the human experience. Through this perspective, many people learn to become more attuned to the needs of their fellow citizens, and to develop a greater awareness of civic issues. Speaking personally, I do not think I would be as involved in my community as I am unless I had a strong arts background that taught me that, no matter how daunting the odds at time, one person can make a difference.
Thus, a strong investment in the Arts, both in the creation of more venues for artists (and therefore employment opportunities) and in Arts-oriented education by all levels of government, allows for the development of a strong, engaged citizenry for years to come.
Respectfully Submitted,
Nathan Hauch
Nathan.hauch@sympatico.ca
Property Taxes & Heritage Buildings
Submitted by
Bob Gregory, Chair, Heritage Advisory Committee
When the public hears the heritage community complain about the “tax incentive for parking lots”, they usually think that we are merely referring to the fact that demolition usually entails a substantial reduction in assessment, because of the removal of the building.
That it unquestionably true; and it does represent a significant incentive for demolition. But the subject doesn’t end there – far from it.
The other part of the complaint is that even where assessments are identical, parking lots pay less. There is no way around it: they get preferential treatment. The following are actual figures. In the new City of Ottawa, City Council changed the rates last year for walk-up apartment buildings and other “multi-res”, because it was stridently discriminatory. A heritage building which was used for walk-up apartments would pay property tax at a rate which was 1.57 times the rate pegged for parking lots; in other words, a landlord in a heritage property assessed at one million dollars would be paying 57% more property taxes than the parking lot operator who owned property of identical assessed value.
This discrepancy was offset, in part, by other methodological differences; and City Council has now taken corrective action (for multi-res, but not other categories). The following are figures from the City’s Manager of Revenue, Corporate Services Department, as relayed by Stuart Lazear:
Assuming a constant assessment (CVA) of $1,000,000, here are the property taxes payable in the following classes:
1) Parking lot: $ 31,972.70
2) Multi-residential (pre-2000, before a new pro-housing bylaw was introduced): $ 32,903.10
3) Industrial (fully occupied, no vacant units or excess land): $ 57,054.00
4) Commercial (not office, fully occupied no vacant units or excess land): $ 48,688.70.
There you have it. Four investment properties of identical appraised value; the parking lot gets the best treatment.
That is not parity; and preferential treatment for parking lots does nothing to promote the revitalization of Ontario’s heritage. Even if the re-use of heritage property does not get preferential treatment or “incentives”, it should at least enjoy a level playing field.
Before closing, I should mention it is not unusual for the person, who undertakes a laudable heritage restoration, to be “rewarded” with a galloping property tax increase. Although this increase is arguably consistent with Market Value Assessment, it is perceived by owners as a disincentive to improve a run down heritage building.
One longstanding governmental response is to rebate the increase in property tax arising from improvements to heritage property. A study at Rutgers University called it the most widespread and politically acceptable measure of its kind in North America. It is called “Tax Increment Financing” (TIF) in the U.S., the “moratorium technique” in Western Canada, and a “grant-back” in some parts of Ontario. It was used, for example, as part of Perth’s revitalization strategy, and we can see the results.
The problem is not its feasibility – it is feasible under the legal status quo and several Ontario municipalities are currently using it; the problem is publicity and understanding. With some outstanding exceptions like Perth, many Ontario municipalities have simply failed to grasp the potential. Stuart is very knowledgeable in such matters, and I hope that City Council will give this sort of idea its fullest support.
Our point is that individuals and developers will usually do what is economically most prudent for them to do. Currently property taxes promote the demolition, rather than the preservation and restoration of built heritage.