CITY OF OTTAWA PESTICIDE REDUCTION STRATEGY
FOR PRIVATE PROPERTY
SUBMISSIONS TO THE HEALTH, RECREATION AND
SOCIAL SERVICES COMMITTEE
NOVEMBER 21, 2002
Public Delegations
Debra Sine (resident of
Baseline Ward)
·
the
spraying of pesticides prevents the speaker and her daughter access to public
places and this is contrary to human rights laws which prohibit discrimination
on the basis of disability;
·
chemically-sensitive
people have the right to be free from chemical assault;
·
the
staff report ignores and belittles the legal duty on the City to protect its
most vulnerable citizens;
·
the
education program will help but will not stop people from using pesticides to
the detriment of others;
·City Councillors must accept their legal and moral
responsibility to protect all citizens.
John Ladds, Field Operation Manager, Turf Management Systems, Head Office of
Weed Man, Mississauga and Co-chair of the Environmental Coalition of Ontario:
·
pesticide
by-laws represent the views of a vocal minority: the silent majority feel this
is a freedom of choice issue or they have not engaged in the debate;
·
enforcement
is a major issue;
·
Integrated
Pest Management (IPM), a solution presented by industry, appears to be more
sustainable and has helped reduce the use of pesticides;
·
the
Hudson (Quebec) by-law has shifted the use of the product from the professional
to the homeowner and contributed to killing the industry; not one homeowner has
never been charged;
·
the
industry is sympathetic to people with sensitivities but want to know why they
push for a by-law that masks where products are being used;
·
the
industry committed to the IPM Accreditation Program because it offers a
practical solution to a cutting-edge issue;
·
it
is committed to the continuing development of rigorously tested non-pesticide
technologies;
·
pesticides
still remain a vital tool the industry requires to sell its product, which is a
healthy lawn;
·
the
industry is willing to work with municipalities to encourage reductions at the
homeowner level;
Tom Sommerville, Pesticide Industry Council (non-resident of Ottawa)
·
the
speaker described the agricultural industry's IPM Accreditation Program,
through the Plant Health Care IPM Council of Ontario;
·
the
Council includes 20 groups: municipalities are represented through the Ontario
Parks Association, Hydro One, golf superintendants, Ontario Vegatation
Management, Sports Turf, Crop Life, Urban Pest Management, Landscape Ontario,
Professional Lawn Care Association of Ontario, Environmental Coalition of
Ontario: the technical advisors are from the Guelph Turf Grass Institute and
the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture;
·
the
Council is developing the best management practices, promoting IPM through
education and training, developing an IPM manual and implementing a
province-wide web-based pest monitoring system;
·
the
Council is a resource for public information and education, providing training
opportunities in IPM and setting standards for the accreditation process.
(Written submission provided).
Grant Crack, Branch Manager, Green Lawn Care (Ottawa), former Mayor of Alexandria (Twp. of Glengarry)
·
Many
positive changes in the industry in recent years, industry doing its part to
reduce the amount of chemicals used;
·
make
every effort and have high quality, knowledgeable and well trained technicians,
who are fully aware of the concerns about
pesticides;
·
ensure
equipment and vehicles are in good order, that all application equipment is
well-calibrated to apply safe and accurate rates;
·
regularly
analyse customers' lawns and make recommendations for care, educate customers
about safe products and safe practices;
·want to continue working
with the City to educate citizens.
Bob Shane, operator, Weed Man lawn care company and homeowner in
Cumberland Ward
·
the
Ottawa Environmental Coalition companies provide IPM based lawn care to over
40,000 residents and employs another 350 residents of the City;
·
the
science behind PMRA is world renowned;
·
he
and his colleagues have a wealth of knowledge in the industry: they are not in
the pesticide business, they are in the business of healthy lawns;
·
banning
liquid application and allowing granular application is not supported: liquid
applications let the applicator zero in on the target while granules generally
require blanket operation, thereby negating reduction in use;
·
a
common complaint is that the City is infringing on people’s property rights;
·
people
are concerned about their lawns looking like the City's parks and boulevards;
·
only
industry professionals will be affected by the by-law.
Steve Schofield, resident of
West Carleton, PhD in Entomology
·
expressed
disappointment with the views expressed by some Councillors and felt that, at
best, their opinions reflect a degree of scientific ignorance;
·
commended
the report authors for a relatively balanced and progressive document and
expressed the hope Council will adopt these proposals;
·
reduction
to zero use of pesticides very optimistic;
·
support
recommendations but do not feel the report provides a balanced view of
pesticides, their evaluation, the risks attendant on their use and the full
complement of risk reduction approaches;
·
comparing
the risks of the urban use of pesticides to smoking without the right context
is not appropriate, there are fundamentally different risk paradigms;
·
suggesting
a ban on spray versus granular application must be based on sound science;
·
concept
of using pesticides in response to West Nile virus is not sound: public health
considerations must prevail;
·
report
does not recognize the conservatism factored into the Federal Regulatory
System: it points out the shortcomings without identifying the intense scrutiny
that pesticide review entails;
·the City would be
well-advised to draw on the vast amount of local expertise to develop a Pest
Management Advisory Committee and call upon expert resources as needed.
Mike Christie, Co-Chair, Health Dangers of the Urban Use of Pesticides, an
advisory group to the Health Department
·
In
1991, a poll of municipal candidates showed a majority of support for
restrictions on the use of pesticides on private property and for measures to
be in place by 1995;
·
the
solution is a by-law, not a total ban but only on cosmetic use;
·
the
use of pesticides for public health purposes can be supported;
·
the
list of stakeholders consulted for the report contains predominantly industry-related
groups;
·
the
staff report says 200,000 homes are not using pesticides and this fact needs to
be celebrated;
·
fifty-five
municipalities in Quebec have by-laws and support for the Halifax by-law grows
every year;
·
the
IPM approach was rejected in Quebec because it did not show results for
homeowners;
·
many
people say they will not change their behaviour until a by-law is in place;
·
the
industry representatives go to hearings such as this all across the Province;
·
the
City's Environmental Advisory Committee reviewed the report, asked why a by-law
was not being recommended since there is support for this approach.
Shiv Chopra, Health Canada
Scientist
·
many
medical specialists will tell you that pesticides cause a lot of harm: all
these products kill small cells, reproductive cells, and many turn into cancers
that take years to develop;
·
operators
of lawn care businesses admit there are alternatives and they can modify their
operations accordingly;
·
the
companies that get product approval are not in the room: the information they
submit to Health Canada is not available to the public, it can't receive third
party evaluation; the public has the right to know under the Charter of Rights
and Freedoms;
·
there
is only an imaginary difference between granular and pesticide application;
·
as
legislators at the municipal level, councillors have to carry out their
responsibilities: if they don't, they are equally liable since all these
matters can come under criminal investigation.
Barbara Leimsner, resident of River Ward, representing the Ottawa Allergy and Environmental Health Association
·
urged
the Committee to show moral leadership by rejecting the staff report and giving
strong support to the by-law;
·
the
Association's 300 members have a high stake in the outcome of the vote:
approximately 15% of the population have mild to severe environmental
sensitivities and suffer a range of immediate adverse effects from exposure to
pesticides at low levels;
·
prudent
avoidance is not an option for people who can't hide from pesticides;
·
it
is a myth that Ottawa is not ready for a by-law;
·
the
sooner the products are banned, the sooner people will look for alternatives;
·
the
by-law should include an immediate ban on applying pesticides within 50 feet of
people whose doctors say it is harmful to their patients.
Douglas Perkins, D. P.
Environmental Consulting
·
fourteen
years’ expertise on non-toxic and least toxic alternatives;
·
staff
report is about the failure of city to protect the health of its citizens; it
ignores the voice of the people;
·
pesticides
used for cosmetic, non-essential purposes only mask the problem; once applied,
the killing process cannot be reversed;
·
children,
pregnant mothers, seniors, chemically-sensitive people, pets and wildlife are
extremely vulnerable to lawn and garden products;
·
staff
report is riddled with flaws and needs to be re-written immediately;
·
scientists,
doctors and others in the city should be enlisted to help staff write the
report;
·
pesticides
are not as safe as Landscape Ontario wants people to believe; a report from the
Ministry of Environment and Energy states that pesticides can cause serious
illness and can kill.
Linda Luneau, a citizen of
Ottawa
·
have
all either personal experience with cancer or know someone who suffered from
cancer;
·
Canadian
Cancer Society concerned about the use of potentially carcinogenic substances
to enhance the appearance of lawns and calls for a ban on the use of any
pesticide for any ornamental purposes that has not been scientifically
demonstrated to be non-carcinogenic;
·
do
not know how many of these chemicals have been tested;
·
is
tragic to see the high number of young people with cancer, doctors are linking
leukemia with pesticides;
·
breast
cancer in women is prevalent and pesticides are linked to that;
·the speaker asked Council to
ban the non-essential use of pesticides.
Michel Gaudet,
Coalition for Alternatives to Pesticides (Quebec)
·
the
Coalition’s membership is approximately 25,000 people;
·
called
pesticides "weapons of mass destruction";
·
the
Quebec government keeps track of the sale and usage of pesticides: it is easy
to see that what the industry says is different than what it does: in 2001, the
data showed that alternatives are rarely used and that pesticides were being
used almost 100% of the time;
·
the
sale of lawn care pesticides claimed as "last resort" have not
diminished;
·
Quebec
government has decided to apply the "precautionary principle" by
placing human health above all other considerations: this was also recommended
by the Quebec National Institute of Public Health;
·
no
need to use chemicals to have a healthy lawn, there are alternatives and they
work;
·
sound
science versus to bad science: it was sound science that introduced DDT and
Dursban, some of the products removed due to their toxicity;
·
fifty-five
municipalities in Quebec have by-laws: Ottawa as the Capital of the country has
a lot of catching-up to do;
·
enforcement
of by-law is relatively easy and works on a complaint basis: it is also
inexpensive;
·
majority
of citizens are law-abiding and will obey the law;
·
IPM
is next to impossible to enforce: the best way to protect the health of
citizens is to adopt a by-law.
Robert McFettridge, educator and science manager, Canadian Museum of Science and Nature, resident of Osgoode Ward
·
emphasized
that pesticides are toxic, pernicious, and generally synthetic, toxicity only
varies over time, concentration and the relationship to other chemicals in the
environment: none are species specific;
·
they
all cause collateral damage in the ecosystem and to human and other health;
·
cosmetic
pesticides are a threat to human health; people and pets suffer adverse effects
when coming in contact with them;
·
no
research to support stating pesticides are benign to human health;
·
pesticides
are not tested on people, nor are they tested as part of a complex of
applications, yet it is that complex that is the ecological reality in which
society lives;
·
sometimes
the testing has been carried out by the manufacturers themselves.
·
in
spite of the consultative process it undertook, staff heard people but did not listen to them;
·
the
RCMP have indicted people for the tainted blood fiasco, including scientists
from Health Canada;
·
the
three arguments against pesticide control are that it is a federally regulated
substance, it will cost too much and that there is no absolute proof, quoting
from the Kreever Inquiry, said was inappropriate to require proof of causation
beyond a reasonable doubt before taking steps to avert a threat;
·
complete
knowledge not a pre-requisite to public health measures;
·
urged
the Committee not to get bogged down in whether pesticides cause cancer, they
cause a host of other problems.
Sandra Schwartz, Director, Toxic Substances Program , Pollution Probe Ottawa (resident Glebe Ward)
·
few
issues have provoked the intensive debate across Canada that pesticides have,
has become fact versus fiction, emotion versus science;
·
is
a myth that pesticides have no harmful effect on us or on the environment; they
are toxic by design;
·
provided
a list of articles cited along with the health impacts observed from the use of
lawn and garden pesticides;
·
pesticides
are not safe to use; pesticides are registered for sale and are deemed safe by
the federal government, however the federal Minister of Health has publicly
recognized municipalities' ability to further restrict pesticides to by-laws as
a complementary approach to the federal government's regulation of these
chemicals;
·
provided
a number of examples of tests that are not required by the pesticides industry,
in terms of regulation;
·
pesticide
industry cannot voluntary reduce usage to acceptable levels: Pollution Probe
believes that voluntary action is possible, but in order for this to work,
there needs to be threat of regulation;
·
difficult
if not impossible to reliably measure whether this is being done;
·
citizens
across the country asking municipal governments to ban pesticides as a
precautionary measure.
Andy Xhignesse, Appleseed
Organic Lawn Care
·
called
this is a really challenging issue for everyone;
·
expressed
the hope Councillors will listen to their constituents;
·
in
1987, organic lawn care is all Appleseed Lawn Care offered; this is still the
case and the company is growing;
·
thousands
of chemicals are used regularly, with impacts for plant, insect, animal and
human life;
·
time
for a change, to bring us to a new place.
·
noted
she is made very ill by pesticides; experience flu symptoms for up to 24 hours;
·
exposure
to pellets produces similar symptoms, except that reaction takes longer;
·
no
signs required if granular applications were permitted, also make it harder to
avoid exposures;
·
pesticides
known to be one of the main causes of chemical injuries;
·
many
people with these problems too ill to make their voices work;
·
appalled
by the information being brought forward by the pesticide industry;
·
low
doses not necessarily better than higher doses;
·
pesticides
are not helpful to allergy sufferers: incidence of grass allergy is higher than
weed allergy;
·
public
education not a sollution: people started using seat belts when legislation was
introduced;
·
need
a by-law now.
Terry Besner, Cerus
Incorporated
·
many
corporations realize the benefits of green spaces and incorporate them in their
facilities: these spaces improve mental health, speed recovery, increase
productivity and generally improve the living and working environments;
·
Perfectly
Natural combines good cultural practices with state-of-the-arts products: these
include natural lawn and garden products, fertilizers, soil enhancement products
and weed contol technology made entirely from food and feed grade ingredients;
·
believe
an educated approach to gradually reduce the use of pesticides through programs
that assist in the development of a well-disciplined and thoroughly monitored
program is the best approach;
·
working
with the industry and helping them adopt a Perfectly Natural approach for their
current and potential customers, to go pesticide free;
·
provided
an information package on Cerus' solutions.
Shannon
Coombs- Canadian Consumer Specialty Products Association
·
Her
organization works with the federal, provincial, territorial committee, which
is made up of all the provincial regulators and Health Canada and looks at
pesticides
·
Have
devised an action plan for the urban use of pesticides
·
Have
a healthy lawn priority, of which education is a key component
·
Developed
brochure that will be in stores called “ A responsible approach to pest control
in and around your home” to be available in stores like Home Depot and Rona,
Spring 2003
·
Recommended
including the establishment of an advisory committee that would include
homeowners, Council, city staff and lawn care professionals,
·
Report
respectful of citizen’s right to choose on their private property
·
CCSP
committed to work with the City to assist with this
·
Detailed
his personal experience with an accidental spraying.
·
Home
is in close proximity to the river and several homes in his neighborhood were
sprayed
·
Spoke
about water quality in Britannia
·
Not
a lot of defense in the public for cosmetic use of pesticides
·
Better
to be safe than sorry
·
In
his community tried public education and voluntary action
·
Was
successful down from 10 to 2 people on the street who persist in using
pesticides
·
Cannot
tell the difference between who uses pesticides and who does not
·
Asked
that Council help out by enacting a bit of a threat to get to zero pesticides
·
Suggested
that self regulation by lawn care companies is not possible
·
Had
same concerns about his family’s safety
·
Challenged
industry individuals affirmations that fewer pesticides are being used, and
that they are safe
·
Holds
a degree in biology and ecology from McGill University
·
Spoke
in support of the bylaw option
·
Her
group is comprised of Health Professionals Concerned about the Environment
·
Also
representing the Partnership for Pesticide Bylaws, a collaboration of: Ontario
College of Family Physicians, Canadian Environmental Law Association,
Registered Nurses Association of Ontario, United Steelworkers of America,
Humane Society of Canada, Great Lakes United, Breast Cancer Prevention
Coalition, Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment, Association
of Early Childhood Educators of Ontario, Women’s Healthy Environment Network,
Toronto Environmental Alliance, Pesticide Free Ontario
·
Pesticides
are designed to kill by interfering with biological processes, these also
affect humans
·
Child
exposure, extremely dangerous, through ingestions, being in close proximity to
the spray
·
Concerns
about ill effects from exposure to low-levels of pesticides, linked to cancers
such as non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma
·
Dangerous
to neurotoxins, adverse effects on brain development and cognition
·
Unexplained
explosion of Autism, Attention Deficit Disorder, necessary to remove all
possible causes
·
Can
cause abnormal genitalia effects, could be caused by hormone disrupters
·
Children
exposure to pesticides is greater than adult exposure, development can be
thrown off track if they are exposed to neurochemicals
·
Concerns
for applicators who don’t feel that they are unsafe
·
Claimed
to be a better environmentalist than most anti-pesticide people because he is a
cyclist/walker and does not use motor vehicles
·
Gas
worse than pesticides
·
Leakage
of gasoline exceeds total of all pesticides used in Ontario
·
Sense
of proportion between gas/pesticides
·
Can
refute almost every article about
·
People
attribute one pesticide effect to all i.e.: DDT
·
Canine
lymphoma, arose through flawed methodology (junk science)
·
Cornell
University study dispelled myth that causes Breast Cancer
·
Allergies
and Asthma are caused by natural environment
·
Precautionary
approach is voodoo science, can be used to ban anything
·
Broad
leafed herbicide are not truly poisonous as others
·
Pesticide
spraying deeply affects her health
·
Against
final recommendations, but feels that staff has captured public opinion and
have produced a balanced report
·
We
do not live in a society where we can do what we want in our own homes
·
Stories
show that Medical Science and Governmental recommendations often lag behind
·
seeks
the banning of pesticides
Carmela Graziani, Resident, Bay Ward, Coalition for
a Healthy Ottawa,
·
She
listed her numerous allergies to foods, trees, pollens, and to pesticides
·
Irresponsible
for lawn care companies to dispense medical advice
·
No
advocacy for spraying pesticides to avoid asthma
·
The
longer a bylaw is postponed, the longer people will be ill.
·
Historian
with experience in Medical Research
·
Need
specific program with specific targets with appropriate by-law
·
By
law could serve as means to educate
·
Nation’s
Capital should lead, not follow
·
The
opinion of those with financial interests will not be changed
·
Pesticides
threaten well-being
·
In
Hudson a skin specialist was encouraging Council to ban pesticides
·
Young
families were insistent that pesticides be banned
·
Law
care business indiscriminate, anyone could do this, some were mixing chemicals
with “fantastic results”
·
By
law was developed after two years of investigation
·
While
the federal government did not assist, the Québec government was very helpful
in defining “pesticide”
·
By-law
has cost $68,000 to date to enforce
·
Community
had been well served by the bylaw
·
Refuted
earlier reports that the bylaw was not working in Hudson, they are erroneous
suppositions, bylaw is working well
·
Lawn
bylaw was challenged only by the lawn care companies
·
In
Hudson, Golf Courses were equated with Agriculture and given 5 years to reduce
usage.
·
Provided
information on the Pest Management Regulatory Agency
·
Old
pesticides being investigated by American EPA, PMRA has only evaluated 17 of
the 450 ingredients over three years.
·
6,000
pesticides are not properly screened, no monitoring of the toxic contamination
in bodily fluids and hairs
·
Canada
had no data on pesticides sales, basic requirement for assessing use and safety
·
PMRA
has abdicated responsibility and thus cities across Canada taking steps to
eliminate pesticides
·
80%
are now in favor of the City’s bylaw for no pesticides on public property (City
Polling)
·
Resident
of Chelsea, which has a ban on the cosmetic use of pesticides
·
As
a risk analyst, he feels that must consider the negative effects of a
particular decision
·
Showed
graph of acceptable risk threshold as it relates to the magnitude of the
negative effects.
·
Also
have to weigh the potential positive outcome because it increases the risk
threshold
·
Argued
that possible negative health effects of pesticides are large and the possible
positive effects are relatively small, which means that the acceptable risk
threshold is significantly low.
Frances McInnes, Resident
·
Suffers
from Environmental Illness: Headaches, Chronic Fatigue, Short-term memory loss
·
Detailed
her personal encounter with pesticides at a neighbour’s home
·
Wants
a bylaw immediately
Dee Cashem, The Weedman,
owner-operator from Uxbridge
·
Licensed
pesticide applicator, Integrated Pest Management Specialist
·
Mother
is a Breast Cancer survivor
·
Active
with community, volunteer projects, employs 8 people
·
Considerate,
call in advance when spraying
·
Lawn
care is a controversial issue in Uxbridge
·
Have
been harassed by environmentalists
·
Voluntary
turf grass committee to advise Council and Parks and Recreation Department
·
Implemented
best practices, recommended seeking alternatives
·
Representative
for Durham Region on the Environmental Advisory Committee.
·
Landscape
Ontario represents 200 plus member companies in all aspects of the green
industry in Ontario; incl; nurseries, garden centers, landscapers and lawn care
·
Provide
courses and seminars to educate members and encourage professional development.
·
Educate
members on new products, techniques and equipment
·
Particularly
with development and training of IPM
·
Involved
in IPM Council, as well as Golf Courses, Parks Associations and Structural
Applicators
·
Spoke
about freedom of choice
·
Agreed
with expansion of public education of IPM
·
Believes
it is only alternative to lessen pesticide use
·
Referenced
Supreme Court Decision that enables Municipalities to enact bylaws so long as
they do not interfere with existing laws
·
No
scientific basis for justification
·
Cannot
stop sale of bylaws, people will apply themselves, will kill industry
·
Customers
will not be satisfied with lawn care applicators
·
Education
is better
·
Neighbours
are not exposed, when spraying.
Jim
Bauer, Horticulturist and Owner of Landscape Maintenance Company,
Founder
of Landscape Ontario, Manotick
·
Spoke
about freedom of choice
·
Other
chemicals dispersed daily
·
He
has had 30 years of exposure and he is fine
·
Does
not believe that the concern is based on knowledge
·
There
are chemicals in foods
·
Her
employer is Canada’s largest owner/operator and developer of golf course
properties, owning 26 golf course properties in Ontario and Quebec, including
Greyhawk and Kanata located in the City of Ottawa
·
Golf
Clubs are valuable contributors to the local economy
·
Supportive
of community approach taken in the pesticide reduction strategy
·
Balanced
approach toward education, should have equal representation from both sides of
the issue
·
Critical
to define essential and non-essential.
Golf courses are not using pesticides purely for esthetic purposes when
there are alternative products or methods available
·
Fungicides
are critical to operations of Golf Courses
·
Organization
supports research at the University of Guelph
·
Fiscally
and environmentally responsible to use pesticides only when the turf is in
jeopardy
·
Make
IPM accreditation mandatory for all courses
·
Recommendations
are a step in the right direction
·
Detailed
warnings on pesticide products that were on City’s website as alternative to
chemical pesticide
·
There
are risks to everything including Vinegar, Boric Acid
·
Alternatives
not necessarily safer than chemicals
·
No
examples of the City using these alternatives
·
Mosquito
repellents, anti-bacterial soaps, flea collars all contain pesticides, greater
exposure risk
·
activists
assume that only lawn care pesticides are unsafe
·
We
are reliant on pesticides to keep us safe, ie: through water treatment system
·
Why
is it acceptable for kids to use bug repellant and not to walk on a lawn that
is applied with pesticides, this is hypocritical
·
Said
that caffeine is more toxic
·
Bylaw
is political not scientific
·
Stopped
using pesticides as a courtesy to his neighbours
·
Unable
to control his lawn, was hit by grubs
·
Re-sodding
would cost approximately $5000.
·
Reapplication
from the lawn care company is about $263
·
Major
expense, pays $5000 in property taxes and is angry that those dollars will
going to a bylaw that will make him unable to care for is property
·
Ottawa
has too many bylaws
Jill
Fairbrother, Director of Stakeholder Relations for Scott’s Canada
·
Her company
manufactures lawn and garden products for homeowners
·
This includes, seed,
soil, fertilizer and pesticides.
·
The organic
alternatives are available as pesticides
·
80% prefer to use
pesticides themselves
·
Produce materials that
educate about alternative methods and care
·
Synthetic and natural
chemicals are given the same warning
·
Tobacco has no
benefits (carcinogen) while pesticides are not
·
Products are specially
formulated for homeowner use
·
Products are still
selling despite bans
·
Half
of lawn care customers in Toronto wrote letters to their Councillors
·
Consider
the limitation of those with allergies and the elderly
·
Company
is a member of Landscape Ontario
·
After
Board of Health Meeting he and his staff outfitted trucks with hand pumps,
educated customers about proper practices, how to fix spots on their lawns
·
Continue
to service customers implementing IPM
·
Cut
insecticides by 50% in 2001 but not in 2002, because of infestation
Nancy
and Gary Mulhall, Kitchener Ontario, Members of Landscape Ontario
·
Aware of all the
dangers in her environment, health fiend, saw a clinical ecologist
·
Not logical that
companies could bribe scientists
·
Logic won out over
being part of a distrustful subculture, now much healthier
·
Son was in a soccer
tournament, fields in deplorable condition, obviously City cannot maintain its
own turf
·
Has a landscape
exterminator’s license and years of experience in the field
·
Provide many
alternatives
·
Ottawa will influence
Kitchener, lawn business made up of many families
·
Environmentalists are
fear mongers
Bernard
Walke, Biologist
· Numerous studies have examined the long term effects of pesticides
· Long term effects from even small doses
· Education on its own will fail
· Used the example of smoking
· Lawn care industry cannot be trusted to regulate themselves
· City is responsible to make health and safety of its citizens
· Pesticide companies are concerned solely with the sale of pesticides just like tobacco industry
· Ban is necessary, supreme court has given the authority to do so
· No ban sends the message to the public that everything is fine
·
In
his job at the PMRA he evaluated human health implications of pesticides
·
Pesticides
are the most tested chemicals on the planet, more than pharmaceutical products
·
The
database submitted to PMRA, includes toxicology on a product specific basis
·
Includes
environmental fate in food and non-food uses
·
Data
are updated on an ongoing basis in response to data call-ins from various
regulatory agencies world-wide, particularly from EPA
·
PMRA
employs over 200 scientists dedicated to looking at all of this data, and are
responsible solely for ensuring that pest control products can be used with a
minimal or negligible risk
·
Chemical
industry has shifted towards reduced risk products which are now finding their
way in to our lawns
·
No
human activity is devoid of risk
·
This
year PMRA, put out a document outlining risk assessment strategies, which
incorporated the most advanced methods of risk analysis and risk management
·
Epidemiology
is not a reliable science.
·
Drew
comparisons to smoking dangers that went unheeded for years
·
Has
chemical sensitivities
·
Bylaw
necessary
·
Health
Canada admitted that there has never been any extensive testing to determine
results of mixing chemicals
·
Canadian
government relies on manufacturers to supply such evidence
·
Survived
non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, no history of cancer in family, was exposed to
pesticide
·
Individuals
with chemical sensitivities do not use chemicals with pesticides in their home
Gayle Morehead and
Margaret Hartshorn, Kanata Environmental Network
·
Awareness
group, formed in 1999, and to promote practice of sound environmental practices
in their community
·
Have
worked on raising public awareness about alternatives
·
Support
implementation of bylaw to be phased in over the next 3yrs
·
Disputed
the notion in staff report that public has only recently become concerned about
health and environmental risks
·
Questioned
why no recommendation from staff for bylaw when 56.9% of public at consultation
were in support of this while only 25.5% supported maintaining the status quo
·
According
to surveys, most pesticide users willing to try alternatives and most residents
support a ban
Lynn Lewis,
Resident of Ottawa
·
Comfortable when
neighbor sprays, company is very open
·
If
a ban is in place he will continue to use the chemicals, but he will not be
familiar with how to apply or dispose of on his own
·
She
fears that this would negatively impact on their relationship, bylaw will set
neighbours against one another
·
She
has the right to decide what will be done on her property
·
Noted
that she had been ‘harassed’ by an environmentalist, she feels they are not
interested in the spirit of co-operating
·
Staff
report has middle ground
·
Entitled
to the quiet enjoyment of her property
Tom Manley – Chair
, Ottawa Regional Chapter of Canadian Organic Growers.
·
Mission
is to promote organic growing among farmers, gardeners and consumers
·
Organic
growing is popular
·
Why
are synthetic chemical pesticides so popular? –Largely the product of chemical warfare
·
Their
design and development have been paid for by budgets for warfare and industry
has been putting them to use and continuing that research
·
Society
is preoccupied with quick fixes as opposed to long term prevention
·
Interested
in treating visual symptoms instead of seeking the root cause
·
Agri-chemicals
are big business, which involves barrier to market entry, which reduces
competition among these products which have market dominance and price controls
and provides good return on investment
·
Those
coming from industry to present to committee are paid to do so
·
Organic
approach is knowledge and management intensive and obliges the user to
understand eco-systems
·
They
are also cheap and readily available, making for easy market entry and lots of
competition which would mean low prices and margins for all
·
Detailed
the benefits of using products like limestone, but education not always
possible and is needed to know what products to use, hinders this
·
Should
choose ecosystems over business interests
Larry Maydonik, Burlington,
President, Nutrilawn Ecology Friendly Lawn Care
·
Offers
pesticide-free organic lawn care programs and traditional programs, and have
been doing so for 15 years
·
Objective
of company and industry is the same as that of Committee, reduction of
pesticides, if at all possible
·
He
is in the business of creating healthy and beautiful turf, does not solely use
pesticides, uses them minimally, according to instruction
·
Recommended
that answer to reduction was in three areas 1) homeowners 2) Industry 3) Retail
outlets.
·
Unless
a ban is enforced and applicable to all these areas it will not be effective in
reducing pesticides
·
Embark
on a program to cover all three areas: (1) incorporates education that will
prevent over-application, teach people to read labels (2) lobbies the
provincial authority to ensure proper education and IPM accreditation, for
anyone who sells or applies pesticides (3) work with federal authorities to
remove all blanket applications from retail outlets, great opportunity for
non-essential lawn care pesticide reduction
·
Solution
is not in a ban, or a ban that only limits one aspect of the industry.
·
Expressed
concerns about a bylaw that would lump together people’s concepts of cosmetic
pesticides with pro-active and preventive based tree, lawn and plant health
care products
·
Failure
to distinguish between two kinds of pesticide application endangers City’s
trees which are a valuable asset
·
Arboriculture
is the science of trees, complete ban would remove the essential tools from the
arboricultural industry
·
Could
not treat Dutch Elm Disease, Long Horn Asian Beetle, Ash and Birch Spore to
name a few
·
Without
responsible management options these pests can deplete an entire tree
populations
·
Trees
are essential to oxygen production, pollution reduction and noise management,
an intrical component of our existence
·
Evaluate
the impact on the future health and well being of the trees
·
Apply
as a preventative measure
·
Alison
detailed the problems she experiences when she is exposed to pesticides
including: inability to concentrate, food intolerance, mood swings, fatigue
·
Linda,
her mother noted that she also has chemical hypersensitivities. She detailed her problems when she is
exposed to pesticides. Which include:
tremors, difficulty thinking and breathing, liver pain and congestion.
·
Her
daughter has developed tremors and is unable to metabolize the poisons,
required an oxygen tent
·
Pesticides
inhibit the production of collenestrays (sp) which are an enzyme that have a
crucial effect on an individual’s ability to handle toxins as well as their
immune systems
·
15%
of the population are adversely affected by chemicals, expected a to climb to
60% by 2020
·
No
treatment other than avoidance.
Dr.
Richard Van derJagt, Hematologist and Chair of the Canadian Leukemia Study
Group
· 800 different chemicals sold in thousands of mixtures as pesticides
· Some cause birth defects or Cancer after chronic exposure, affect hormone systems and may be altering the basis of life
· Some inhibit colenestrays which is a neuropeptide
· Children are especially vulnerable as their body size is smaller than an adult and their immune systems are less well developed
· Time to take proactive action
· Was approached by a company willing to pay him to speak in favour of the use of pesticides
· The supreme Court has upheld a community’s right to protect the health of its’ citizens by banning pesticides
· Risks continue to be discovered, chemical dumping in to our environment
· Clearly documents studies of pesticide exposure which demonstrate links of exposure to Parkinson’s, Breast Cancer, Bladder Cancer, Hematological malignancies such as childhood Leukemia and Lymphoma
· FDA in US has taken a zero tolerance stance on pesticides, Quebec has banned the use of pesticides
· Toxic waste is difficult to detect, link to pesticides is strong
· Ottawa should lead, not follow
·
Pesticides
are associated with an increased incidence of childhood neuroblastoma; this has
been found in studies in peer-reviewed journals
·
Should
move towards immediate banning
·
How
many deaths are acceptable
·
Spoke
about Relative Risk, even if data was absent, he would feel as a pediatrician
that it was important to ban pesticide use
Richard
Patten, M.P.P., Ottawa Centre
·
Spoke
from the perspective of a legislator, father, a person who had Lymphoma B,
Non-Hodgkins Cancer
·
Most
vulnerable members of the community are our children and we do not get to hear
from them
·
Any
toxicologist that claims there are no links to illness and health, is not being
truthful
·
Spoke
about his Bill (208) which addresses concerns about the legal costs of dealing
with the question of true impacts of chemicals and pesticides on human health
·
Will
examine the impact of pesticides on wildlife
·
Parliamentary
Committee on the Environment and Health recommended that they perform their own
studies as they only currently review what is given to them by the chemical
companies
·
Cancer
is on the increase in Canada especially with children; he feels this is due to
chemicals we ingest
·
Act
will give municipalities the right to enact the prohibition of pesticides
Eric
Thomas, resident of Ottawa
·
Feels
that the repot is weak as it avoid setting specific reduction targets
·
Akin
to giving applicators a blank cheque
·
A
ban is the only viable solution, even Toronto has recognized this and is
preparing a bylaw
·
IPM
will not protect or prevent pesticide abuse
·
PRMA
and companies have claimed that some pesticides, that have since been banned
because of causing nerve damage and toxic enciphilopathy and auto immune system
damage, were safe
·
Federal
commissioner of the environment said that Canada’s record on regulating
pesticides is disturbing and the record of the pest management regulatory
agency is inadequate
·
PMRA
research is based on science bought by companies
·
Craven
Laboratories was fined and sentenced for falsifying pesticide residue data
·
No
database to track adverse reactions at PMRA and no medical doctors on staff
·
Majority
of people in Ottawa support pesticide ban (Decima Research Poll found 82%
support pesticide – free policy on public property
Lynn Pressly, resident, rural homeowner
·
Installed
tertiary septic system as she resides on the Rideau River
·
Lawn
was full of weeds, tried to weed it, used pesticides from the co-op
·
Family
was not harmed in any way by the pesticides she used
·
Concerned
about the amount of money that was spent on the study.
·
Believes
that the committee has a duty to uphold staff report, after spending her hard
earned tax dollars
·
Her
property is her own and she will spray it with or without a by-law
·
Was
on the Board of Directors of the Ontario Golf Course Superintendents
Association, responsible for Research and Education, determined where research
dollars went and how to educate
·
Spoke
to many Golf courses owners, who want to know about IPM and alternatives to
chemical applications
·
Different
biological controls considered by the OGCSA.
·
Donated
funds to a researcher at Guelph University for her to continue her studies on
IPM and alternatives
·
No
mention of golf course superintendents in the report; they should be actively
involved in any decisions that are based on a reduction strategy for golf
courses
Dr.
David Lean, University of Ottawa Professor, Research Chair in Ecotoxicology
·
Ecotoxicology is
primarily focused on the inner relationships between organisms;
exotoxicologists also study toxic chemicals, and attempt to determine whether
or not they are safe
·
50% of what is in Fish
that we eat is DDT
·
Chemicals can travel
hundreds of miles
·
Need to consider all
potential pathways, does not necessarily only last a few days and their
breakdown products can be as toxic as the original chemical
·
If we do not have the
answers we should be very cautious about cosmetic use in Ottawa
·
Can now look at how
this disrupts endocrines, sexual function
·
The greatest reason
for not using pesticides is that they were not necessary in the first place
·
We live in a toxic
city, arboretum is an example of this
Dr.
Joe Reisman, Chief of Pediatrics, CHEO, Pediatric Respirologist
·
Works with
approximately 55 full time and 40 part time physicians who are all in support
of the position he is advocating
·
Need to be aggressive
and eliminate the cosmetic use of pesticides
·
Need to remember that
industry representatives’ primary responsibility is to be an advocate for the
enhancing of shareholder value and an advocate for their business, this is done
through selling more product
·
We have heard from
eco-environmentalist, researcher and adult oncologist
·
There are those who
claim that evidence is not strong, ample well researched article, showing twice
greater chances for neurological malignancies
·
Not a case of innocent
until proven guilty, have good reason to be concerned, evidence shows this
·
Not a case of waiting
until we are happy with all the evidence, it is a case on acting on what we
have now
·
No advantage to
waiting, health risk is cumulative and can last for years
Bruce
Lofquist, International Institute of Concern for Public Health
· Advocate on behalf of children’s health
· Must clearly identify who the presenters are representing, how will they benefit from a particular policy decision
· The strategy of volunteerism has not worked in other arenas like smoking, seatbelts, bike helmets, Canadian Industry Packaging Stewardship Initiative
· Volunteerism reflects an abdication of public responsibility, is the flip side of deregulation
· Why would companies voluntarily do what they object to under legal and regulatory obligation
· Industry-spawned voluntary initiatives undermine public regulatory and public health institutions
· Healthy children and chemical lawns cannot co-exist, there is enough compelling evidence linking illness to children to warrant a by-law
·
Cost for childhood
cancer is $509,000 US per case
Jordan
Lavin, Lawn Care Company Operator, Woodstock,
· Sits on IPM board and practices IPM
· Sells organic packages
· IPM is solution
· Need to educate public, retail sales and enforce IPM through an independent body
· Will never change desire to have a beautiful lawn; give them the tools to do so properly, this is education
Derek
Devost, non-resident, Licensed Turf Technician:
· Helps, educates his customers and their neighbours
· Does not use pesticides liberally
Jody
McInnes employee of Nutrilawn since 1993
·
His job is education,
speaks to hundreds of customers in doing estimates
·
Without tool
(pesticides) many lawns will be lost
·
Feels safe using and
recommending pesticides
·
Gives his employees
proper knowledge so that they can better educate and serve their customers, he
meets with technicians individually on a weekly basis to monitor techniques
(provincially legislated), these weekly meetings are recorded
·
Support staff report
Dr.
Frank Cedar, PhD., Chemistry, 12 years experience as a pesticide regulatory evaluator
and a resident of Ottawa
·
Has been involved in
the banning and regulating of many chemicals
·
Part of CFC banning
·
The risk has been
considerably reduced, particularly in the home and garden area.
·
Active ingredients
have been eliminated and concentrations have been considerably reduced
·
Fewer pesticide
products available to home gardener now than ever before in the history of
Canadian pesticide use
·
Talked about 24D
studies, showing no adverse effects and claimed that pesticides do not smell
bad
·
Allergic to organic
pesticides, and he avoids them
·
Need more research
Jeff
Calderwood, Executive Director of the National Golf Course Owners Association, representing
over 1000 Golf Courses in Ontario. Resident of Ottawa
·
Golf course Industry
Supports the intention of what is being prescribed here
·
Generally speaking the
staff recommendations are not far off the reasonable solutions needed to settle
this complicated issue
·
Has some reservations
about staff recommendations
·
Willing to work with
City Staff on public awareness and education
·
Golf specific issues:
pesticide use is essential within golf industry, winter fungicide is an example
of this
·
IPM is an evolving
standard; organic alternatives will continue to be used
·
3rd party
study found that pesticides were not hazardous
Joanie
Flynt, J. Flynt Landscaping
·
Has been involved in
the promotion of non-chemical growing practices for almost 30
·
Runs a lawn care
company that has never used a single artificial fertilizer or toxic chemical of
any kind, and is still a successful company
·
Elected members should
be in agreement of this
·
Noted Jan Harder’s
comment about the quiet majority who she professes do not want a ban and
dispelled this
·
Even those people who
use chemicals have enough of a conscience to know that what they are
doing/saying is shameful
·
Ms. Harder claims that
PMRA is responsible; but how to put faith in corporation that once offered DDT
as a viable option
·
More than half of the
chemicals she studied in University for use on crops have since been banned
·
Granular or liquid
spray poison is poison
·
Staff report is
watered down and should use the proposal put forward by the coalition for a
Healthy Ottawa
Robin
Wentzel, Partner in Habitat Enviroscaping and Property Maintenance (Organic
Company)
· We pollute more and exterminate more species every year
· What we do in our backyards affects our neighbours, and what is done in the neighborhood effects the City and what we do in this City affects our Environment
· People have been persuaded to believe that pesticides are the only way to have a nice lawn
· Pesticide companies are selling us a product that we don’t need; they get us hooked on it, as soon as you discontinue usage, your lawn will experience a withdrawal period
· Money is the reason why pesticide industry is here today is money
· We do not live in isolation, our actions have repercussions
· Start taking action now, and our environment will benefit
Andrea
Peart, Resident, Somerset Ward, Co-ordinator for the
Campaign for Pesticide Reduction
· Coalition of several environmentally friendly organizations
· Noted discrepancy in report stating that the Sierra Club of Ottawa endorsed the report, no representative had met with the City of Ottawa Corp.
· The Hudson decision and the Federal Minister of Health have expressed that Municipalities have the right and the responsibility to protect the Health of their citizens
· Science is in the community that indicates Health risks and environmental problems
· CPR is looking to the City of Ottawa to set an example as Canada’s Capital
· Children are at a greater risk for pesticide exposure
· Health Canada will not explicitly state that pesticides are safe.
· Other viable options exist therefore no rational reason not to restrict the cosmetic use of pesticide
Dr.
Meg Sears, a resident of West Carleton
·
Concerns about staff
report with respect to the individuals supposedly consulted.
·
Certain organizations
(Health Dangers of the Urban Use of Pesticides Group) were not properly
consulted
·
Were given a list by
the Coalition for a Healthy Ottawa, of individuals they could consult; none of
these people were approached, including Doctors
·
Staff have spent the
majority of their time with Landscape Ontario, the people who apply pesticides
·
Staff qualifies
everything by stating that once they have irrefutable proof, then they will
move ahead.
·
Speaking to the Senate
Committee about the new Pest Controls Product Act
·
Can’t put confidence
in the PMRA
·
Cannot afford not to
do this; risks outweigh the benefit.
·
Cannot make 24D
without dioxins
Larry
Peg. Ecoview
·
What is the cheapest
way to implement a ban, worth considering
·
Noted the plan for a
sports project to increase activity in Citizens
·
Feels chemicals are
gathering in the fatty tissues of people and animals and this could cause an
increase in cancer
·
Part of a project to
educate people about water usage and storm water management
·
Pesticides are flowing
unchecked in to our bodies of water, according to former RMOC
·
Pesticides are a
poster child for numerous environmental problems, as a nations capital we
should step forward and make a decisive choice
·
Developed Ultimate
Frisbee park that was playable and Pesticide free, did this through good lawn
care practices
·
Spoke about good lawn
care practices, not overusing a lawn
Nicole
Richer, resident of Orléans, former farmer
·
Parents never used
pesticides on their land
·
Tried to respect the
integrity of the environment; does not use pesticides because they threaten the
integrity of the environment and endangers health
·
Her lawn was
erroneously sprayed with pesticides by a local chemical lawn company
·
They were told the chemical that was sprayed
was safe, when they investigated they found that it causes strokes, paralysis,
disrupts the nervous system and causes strokes. The manufacturer of the product had voluntarily agreed to phase
it out because of the risks to health and to the environment
·
The technician that
sprayed their lawn could not tell them with any certainty where they sprayed
the lawn
·
She had concerns as to
what would have happened had not left an invoice or sign, they would not have
been liable
·
Some chemicals are
lethal to kids, pregnant women and babies
·
Noted that there are
many cities that have outlawed pesticides including Quebec, who found that a
municipal bylaw was effective as education without regulation is not effective
·
City has a public ban,
why would they differ in terms of private property
Sophia
Giaconne, grade 6 student at Manordale Public School
·
Her generation will be
affected by this decision, it is essential to make decisions to preserve nature
·
Her family has stopped
using pesticides
·
They are linked to
many health and environmental hazards
·
Hopes that one day
will live in a pesticide free environment
Nancy
Jennings
·
Called herself “an
environmental canary”
·
Relayed an incident
several years ago where a sewer pipe overflowed on her street after a flood
·
During the cleanup,
she got illness
·
Was told that chlorine
bleach they were spraying was safe
·
Total load and
cumulative effects of toxins, cumulative effects took over.
·
She grew increasingly
ill and she had no energy
·
Gave further details
about her and her son’s illness which included nose bleeds, fatigue, wheezing,
allergies
·
The cumulative effects
of toxins is disastrous
Nelson
Conroy, Lawn care applicator, London
·
Explained the process
that took place in London, where they instituted IPM as opposed to a ban
·
This has worked well
in the London area
·
How will City enforce
an aggressive ban like this?
·
Easier in smaller
communities
·
Not aware of what
people really want to do
Stephanie
Govan, homeowner, Cumberland Ward
·
Works hard with her
husband at maintaining her lawn
·
Find a more effective
solution
·
Concerned about the
land and natural resources
·
She recycles when she
can and employs proper growing practices
·
If lawns and trees are
destroyed it will effect our property values
·
A bylaw will increase
pesticide bylaw
·
Linked occasional
consumption of alcohol and LCBO provides education about excessive consumption
·
Lawns provide safe
place for families and pets
Christopher
Ralph homeowner,
· Staff report is balanced and fair
· Doesn’t need people telling him how to conduct his business
· If there is to be a ban it should be in a reasonable way
· Not maverick user of pesticides
· Disputed the effectiveness of the bylaw in Hudson
· Detailed properties that look poor because of the bylaw
Dr.
Jennifer Armstrong
·
Member of the field of
environmental medicine
·
Sees patients that
have reached their total load for chemicals
·
Does not feel all the
facts have been presented
·
She has seen patients
affected by this that have fibromyalgia and chemical sensitivities
·
Granular may be a good
compromise but it also has it issues
·
A five year old has
already absorbed 35% of the maximum allowable pesticides for his lifetime
·
Very happy to see that
City has set an example on its private property
·
She believes that
environmental health illnesses linked to pesticides, not simply her own belief
Lee
Radcliffe, plant health care technician
·
In his line of work,
he is out in the community making it a more environmentally viable place
through proper use of cultural practice and sensible use of low risk pesticides
when needed
·
Activists mistakenly
believe that pesticide free means it is environmentally sound
·
Not used for cosmetic
reasons but for improving the environment, noted the benefits of a healthy lawn
including purification of air.
Bob Baxby, Owner of
Franchise of Nutrilawn in Kingston
· Educates clients about proper practices
·
Lawn
care consists of typically 4-5 visits. 1) Aerate and feed the lawn 2) Fertilize
and spot spray the weeds, no blanket spraying 3)Again apply fertilizer, spot
weed control is not applied because of heat 4)Spot treat and fertilize to
resist insect and weeds 5) Winter fertilizer
·
Only
treat with consent from customer
·
Merit
grub treatment has the same ingredients as Advantage flea treatment, which is
more concentrated, also used as vegetable pesticide. So therefore can feed it
to family, put on pets but not spray in spots on lawn
·
Lawn
care professionals have greater exposure to people on a daily basis to educate,
would cost City exorbitant amount of money to do the same and be effective
Chris
Urqhart, non-resident, Owner of Lawn and Tree Company in Ottawa,
Member of the Environmental Coalition of Ottawa
·
Coalition made up of
members of the Lawn and Tree Care industry in Ottawa and members of the
community
·
They
are Environmental Stewards promoting customer education for years, and have
been offering organic services since 1986
·
Misconception
is that spraying lawns is totally covering them with pest controls, is actually
liquid fertilizer, spot treat later.
·
Only
infested areas are being treated
·
Supportive
of City recommendations, educated and representative of the residents
·
Personally
researches products he uses
·
Does
not agree with 100% reduction
Tom
Davies, Hamilton Resident Member of the Environmental Coalition of Ontario
·
All lawn care pest control
substances are considered pesticides by definition.
·
No
company is going to spend money to get products licensed for use
·
Organic
alternatives are just as dangerous but not a pesticide so they are not
regulated in usage, signage or training
·
Came
from Hamilton to tell us that they have used a beet juice product there as a
fertilizer when it is really a pesticide
·
This
bylaw would allow backyard chemistry to take over again
·
He
is afraid that he will one day be giving his employees a product to use that is
unlicensed, unregistered and untested.
·
Bylaw
undermines existing federal and provincial legislation
·
Alternative
products are sold as fertilizer products but used as a pesticide and this
sidesteps the law
·
Employed by the
industry for 15 years
·
Forestry
technician graduate and accredited trainer
·
Believes
that viable alternatives are available is misinformed, leads people to believe
that industry has a choice between the two
·
Best
way to control pests is to promote and maintain plant’s health
·
Only
alternative to pesticides is improvement and implementation of IPM
·
Must
ensure that products and services are effective, they rely on PMRA to do this
·
Alternatives
are not being registered by Health Canada and are not required to show proof of
efficiency, this is a shortcoming
·
Violation
of federal and provincial law to apply a product without the specific labeling
to support the specific use of the product
·
This
is to prevent home-brew products, but many of the products touted by activists
fall in to this category
·
If
alternatives were viable, why are they not being used to control pests now, and
why are they not advertised
·
Viable
product alternatives to federally registered pest control products do not exist,
natural products are not registered
·
Strives
to educate all customers on the use of lawn care products
·
Only
use pesticides when absolutely required, merely a tool
·
City
billboards and website are miles behind what Nutrilawn has been doing
·
Ensures
that discuss all options with customers
·
Nematodes
are a good option if customers are diligent with watering but many do not have
the time
·
Personal
contact with customers for techniques to improve lawns
·
Not
in a position to ban the retail sale of pesticides
·
Need
support of all stakeholder for ban or reduction
·
Sale
of products to homeowners will increase the use of pesticides
·
Eighty
percent of home lawns that use lawn care do not carry warning signs
·
IPM
is the answer and will minimize the use
·
Promote
healthy lawn strategy and promote the healthy lawn care strategy
·
He
has a large organic customers base over 40% of his customers, and promotes
aeration and top dressing together with recommendations
·
Customers
request pesticides
·
Homeowners
will not know how to apply
Bob
Rudock, Bachelor of Science in Agriculture, Horticulturist, Landscape Artist, Operator
of Ottawa Branch of Greenspace.
·
Congratulated
the City staff for report
·
Employed
in Montréal during the ban
·
Had
to explain to customers why lawn care companies could not utilize pesticides
but that they could purchase on their own
·
Witnessed
improper handling and mixing of products by customers who purchased at retail
outlets without protection to themselves
·
Improper
storing of chemicals
·
Training
phase for lawn care applicators
·
The
lawn care companies advise customers and keep them and their neighbours safe
·
Restrictive
by law will not work
·
The
industry is already well regulated by the federal and provincial government
·
No
evidence to the contrary that pesticides are safe
·
People
do not want anymore regulation in their life
·
Why
give a voice to a dishonest minority, this is a democracy and majority rules
·
Not
possible to prevent people from doing it themselves
·
Where
will city find money for this endeavor
·
Should
we also ban perfume, gas?
·
Pesticides
necessary
·
Companies
only use a few pesticides not hundreds
·
Skunks
and raccoons tear up lawns for grubs, they carry rabies
·
Lawn
care industry has matured and adheres to high standards
·
Makes
sense to work with stakeholders to promote responsible usage of pesticides
·
Customers
have indicated they will purchase and use pesticides in the event of a ban
·
Need
all the information to make decisions
·
Presented
reports that indicated the safety of 2-4-D including those from the World Health
Organization and Health Canada and Harvard University
·
Education
program compliments a well-balanced, factual and unbiased information campaign to relieve some of the
unneeded apprehension
·
Opposed
to any policy that takes a hard line approach against any group
·
People
differ about the sort of policy that should be implemented with respect to
·
Supportive
of IPM
·
Activists
claim that side effects are harmful but this cannot be proven
·
If
issue is raised as a health issue there are no grounds for the bylaw
·
Should
not have by law, just ensure they are being used properly
·
82%
of all lawn care pesticides are sold in retail outlets, this number will rise
with the implementation of a bylaw
·
If
pesticides are safe enough to apply on food and golf courses, why are they not
safe enough to apply on lawns?
·
Greenscapes
look poor in his home town of Halifax
·
Overall
homeowners lawns look poor
·
Halifax
has bylaw officers which is a major cost to taxpayers, who are ineffective in
stopping individuals from treating their own lawns
·
Let
professionals do their jobs
·
Member
of the Audubon sanctuary system of Canada and involved in the composting council
of Canada
·
Property
he manages has integrated drainage systems, watershed control, settlement
ponds, positive for the
·
Pesticides
undetectable in the water well
·
Tested
creek that runs through the property, water quality improved in its exit of the
property
·
Uses
compost
·
Fundamentally
believes in the reduction strategy, but not in a total ban
Don McQueen, Owner Operator of
Nutrilawn Ecology Friendly Lawncare,
Greater Toronto Area
·
Ergonomic
processes will generally keep a good lawn in shape but not possible to shape up
a weed infested property with out pesticides if other practices fail to deliver
result
·
Weeds
in Oakville caused the cancellation of sporting events
·
Oakville
has had to spend $150,00 on resodding blvds.
·
Judicious
use of pesticide necessary for infestations
·
Healthy
lawns provide oxygen, weed infested lawns do not
·
Purifies
polluted air, reduce noise level and cool property
·
Increases
value of home by 17%
·
Industry
is ahead of City on pesticide reduction
Martin Williams, Lawn Care Operator, Greater Toronto Area
·
Graduate
of post-secondary school for turf grass studies
·
He
is a case study for practical eco-lawn care.
·
Has
converted 40% of IPM customers to a 100% chemical free program
·
Need
tools when necessary to fulfill the needs of the customers
Duncan Atkinson, Resident of Bruce County, Employed in pesticide industry for 24 years
·
Allergies
happen when body mistakenly believes a harmless substance as harmful
·
Childhood
asthma increasing, drain on health care system
·
Asthma
society states that 20% of people have environmental sensitivities and only 1%
of these are to pesticides
·
Harvard
U says that pollen levels and thus allergens will increase due to toxins in the
environment
·
People
with EI will be unable to go outside if pesticides are banned
·
Medication
for allergies has unbearable side effects
Dwayne McLeod, Resident, Ottawa South
·
Detailed
devastation of grubs to Hunt Club
·
Does
not want to have to deal with the problem of weed infestation
·
In
the event of a ban he will purchase and do it himself
·
In
agreement with reduction of pesticides but not ban
Tom Merner, Grey County
·
Media
are telling people that they want organics
·
Brochure
from City endangers people by advising that they use manure- could cause
Walkerton like crisis
·
Choices
will affect everyone
·
CTV
news reported show that 10% of food is organic and cause 80% of the food borne
illnesses
Sharon Smithers, front line receptionist for Nutrilawn in Ottawa
·
Has
never spoken to someone who asks for their lawn to be made green
·
Gave
examples of customers dealing with infestation
·
Older
customers cannot take care of their lawns
Kyle Tobin, Owner of Lawnsavers Plant Health Care, Greater Ottawa Area
·
Lawn
care professionals are well educated and trained
·
Compared
their treatments as being done in the same manner as a doctor would
·
Do
not make money on unnecessary applications
·
Individuals
do use chemical free package but like to have the option of going back and
forth
·
Signs
are for safety
Rosemary Taylor, Homeopath
·
Soil
becomes resistant to pesticides, insecticides, fungicide
·
Downfall
in global and local ways to provide food and health
·
Genetically
based evolutionary selection creates chemically resistant organisms
·
The
genetic basis of pesticide resistance is in the insect and organism pathogens
·
There
is a drawback in using as they exterminate all bugs not just the invaders
·
Other
resistant pests will come in and repeat the cycle
·
Showed
examples of pesticides that can be used as alternatives
·
Member
of a community garden that uses these products
·
Seek
a sensible, long range approach, phase in over 3 years so that Ecology and
Industry have time to adjust
·
Proposed
phasing in of banning
·
Strongly
recommended immediate action
Brian Shane, Member of the Horticultural Industry, Resident Baseline Ward
·
Employs
85 people
·
Supports
alternative practices and education which has the biggest impact on results
·
Company
is best at these things
·
5
out of 7 visits to a property are for non-pesticide use; they combine many
factors and approaches
·
Pests
can overtake turf
·
Pesticides
an important and necessary tool
·
Employ
college and University students
·
Residents
oppose this, complain that this infringes on their rights as property owners
André Lebrun, Lawn Care Professional
·
Congratulated
staff for their balanced educated rational and reasonable recommendation
·
Balanced,
not biased education
·
Practice
what you preach
·
City
does not have a good track record, cited some examples from the website
·
He
is ready to compromise and go with City staff suggestions
·
He
will not support a bylaw. He does not agree
with 100% reduction.
Alex Hay, Community Garden Network of Ottawa
·
The
CGNO is an umbrella organization connecting and representing community gardens
across Ottawa.
·
Supports
and promotes the dozen community gardens in Ottawa
·
More
than 400 people participate
·
Do
not agree in a voluntary reduction
·
Feel
that the by-law is necessary
·
Named
org’s supporting a bylaw, inc: Registered Nurses of Ontario, The Ontario
College of Family Physicians, The Ontario Public Health Organization
·
Community
gardeners committed to the elimination of pesticides as they feel they pose a
threat to human health
·
Pesticide
free gardens are safer
·
Sensible,
informed self interest
·
Using
pesticides puts neighbors at risk so the CGNO supports a bylaw
Larry Branscombe, Owner, Enviromasters Lawn Care in Kingston
·
Disputed
the claims of environmental illnesses and pesticide sensitivity,
·
Noted
that they are falsely used to claim 20% of people are allergic to pesticides in
order to further their cause
·
Many
homeowners have allergies to pollens, banning pesticide increases allergens
·
Some
activists make up stories to further their cause
Don Dankowich, Resident of Toronto, Director of the Weedman Franchises
·
His
company owns rights in the US, have sold 120 franchises
·
They
are creating employment and exporting material expertise to the US Market
·
Must
see if by-law has actually been effective, how can it be when pesticides are
still sold at the retail level
·
Residents
of Hudson are still applying pesticides. The effect of the bylaw has been to
transfer pesticide application from the hands of lawn care professionals to
inexperienced non-professionals.
·
In
response to pressure from special interest groups other municipalities have
enacted by laws that are based on emotion and not science
·
By
laws can restrict practice of IPM, backed by scientific and practical
experience, only way to significantly reduce the use of pesticides and preserve
the health of lawns
·
Cannot
consider a bylaw without looking at IPM
Ann Coffey, Canadian Biodiversity Institute
·
In
order to have a sustainable City, must consider all factors that make life
enjoyable or difficult
·
Pesticide
sensitive people have difficulties
·
Health
of the whole should be the bottom line
·
Agent
Orange is an example of a herbicide that was used as a biological weapon to
defoliate forests in Vietnam
·
Pesticides
are designed to kill
·
Biological
weapons when used are considered terrorism, what is it when they contaminate
air and water or harm citizens, she considers it ecological terrorism
·
Cannot
trust federal or industry studies as the past has demonstrated, we must use
common sense.
·
Pesticide
do not only affect private property but others as well via water and air
·
Cataracts
and autism are on the rise and linked to pesticide use.
·
Canada
has the most polluted animal on earth, the Beluga Whale, when washed up dead it
is treated as hazardous waste, with high bioaccumulations of pesticides in
their body fat, the same goes for overweight children
·
DDT
has been found in the artic, where there are no lawns
·
They
have been implicated in damage to the reproductive systems of many species
including humans
·
If
industry failed to respond to the current anti-pesticide movement that has been
a long time coming, it is no-one’s fault but their own
·
Our
health should not be compromised because of their inability to adapt to change
Rob Bourne, Resident, Homeowner and Landlord
·
As
a young entrepreneur has concerns about how this will affect the value of his
properties
·
Does
not have time to take care of his lawns personally
·
Satisfied
with the lawn care company’s work
·
Feels
a healthy lawn ensures increase in the value of his properties, which is
supported by the CMHC website
·
As
a young entrepreneur, understands the importance of maintaining investments
·
Costs
of re-sodding exorbitant
·
Supports
education and IPM
Chris Villeneuve Resident, Barrhaven
·
Father
of two small children
·
Shame
on City for coming in to his back yard to legislate pesticides approved by his
Government on his lawn
·
Staff
has done its job in determining what people want
·
The
proceeding has been dominated by one Councillor (Cullen)
·
Come
down to Mr. Cullen vs. the Homeowner
·
Staff
has come with the people’s voice and then Mr. Cullen’s voice
·
Showed
sign that was anti-Cullen
Ken Pavely, Co-coordinator of the IPM Council, Toronto Resident
·
Showed
a power-point presentation
·
Talked
about IPM Council Accreditation process
·
Endorsed
by the Ontario Federation of Agriculture who has also endorsed the province
taking over the program
·
Feels
it is important for Council to understand where the Industry is at, notes this
will not be a voluntary process , all will be required to follow this program
·
Its
objective is to verify compliance with the code of practice through a two-part
practice with audits, which consists of a desk review.
·
Stages
of implementation are as follows: 110 Companies have successfully written the
exam and are finalizing the pesticide reduction audit components
·
Phase
1 commences in 2003, Phase 2 in 2004. Council will be granting accreditations
beginning in 2003
·
Auditors
will be Canadian Environmental Auditors, Members will be given time if they are
deficient to correct these.
·
If
they chose not to they will then lose accreditation
·
The
auditors are credited by the Standards Council of Canada, as program must be
credible in every sense of the word
·
Management
will be handled by Ridgetown College who already handles the Ministry of
Environment Pesticide Program as well as a number of other similar programs
·
Have
engaged manufacturers to notify only accredited companies will be able to
purchase pesticides from commercial distributors; therefore cannot operate
·
Cannot
make in any stronger than this; have urged the MOE to implement this across the
province; would like it to become law
·
This
is the most leading edge of this type of program in North America
Emil Remark, homeowner,
·
Former
member of the Social Housing Advisory Committee and assisted staff in Whitby
and Durham to assist with the downloading of housing so he has appreciation for
work in this regard
·
Managed
two projects and owns and operates a lawn care company, husband and wife
·
Raised
on a farm, trained early in the value of tree and plant life
·
Saw
devastation from death and disease
·
Decisions
are being watched by other Municipalities and he felt it important to be a part
of it
·
Recommendations
are reasonable, optimistic that this can be achieved without a by-law
·
Education
will help public, applauds Loblaws for removing pesticides
Darlene McInnes, Nutrilawn employee since 1992, Resident of Cumberland
·
Husband
a certified pesticide applicator
·
Has
witnessed IPM since its inception
·
She
is a information and technical coordinator, ensures dialogue with customers
·
Has
worked as Tom Bourne’s Asst. for the Ottawa Environmental Coalition, and as
such has reviewed material for both sides
·
Worked
with City staff to provide information requested, pros and cons
·
Does
not totally agree with report but have captured the essence of what home-owners
want
·
Will
never get 100% elimination and should form a Committee with Industry and
Councillors, Staff to implement targets
·
Organic
customers have increased in her company
·
Could
not give a number that she agreed with for a target, simply that it is more
than 10% and not 100%
·
Education
is going to be the solution
Kevin Cross
·
Said
that women appeared to have greater affects from pesticides
·
Health
Canada has best scientists in the world
·
PMRA
is improving and being educated as the rest of the world
·
Citizens
will be making their own pesticides
·
24D
is not a Carcinogen, not proven
·
Precautionary
principle is not valid
·
Introduction
of alternatives – not necessarily safer
·
IPM
could be totally ignored if bylaw is enacted.
·
Scare
mongering gives Councillors the opportunity to enact new and sweeping powers on
private and public property
·
Leave
pesticide use to the professional individuals at PMRA
Roger Mongeon, President of Weedman,Ottawa
·
The
largest concern from staff was how to effectively implement a by-law when 20%
are unaware that they are using pesticides
·
Enforceability
and costs are impossible
·
Hudson
by-law ineffective
·
In
12 years there has not been one citizen fined in Hudson because they are not
enforcing the bylaw
·
The
only city enforcing the bylaw is Beaconsfield, which has 2 inspectors full time
in the summer for 25,000 lawns, City inspector has to issue permits.
·
To
equate this by law to Ottawa that would mean 30,000 by laws which would mean
approximately 30 inspectors
·
How
can one look at a bylaw without considering its costs; making a mockery of all
discussions if enact by-law
·
Staff
report founded in logic, public education important
·
When
they request permit, there is an inspector present to conduct inspection, this
works but the system costs money
Tom
Bourne, owner of Nutrilawn
·
Pesticide Industry has
been blamed, only uses 6-10 different pesticides
·
No evidence has been given
to show that they are a health risk
·
There was evidence to
the contrary
·
Do not use DDT
·
Goal for companies is
lawn care reduction, accept the challenge from the City of Ottawa
·
People have spoken
must heed this
·
Want to accept the
challenge of a working relationship, made commitments
·
People will use
pesticides regardless of a bylaw
·
Each product is
different
·
Lawn Care Companies
are goal oriented
Chris
Lemke, Pest Control Safety Council
·
Scientists do not have
a problem with chemicals but will tell the risks associated\
·
Do not have the money
to fund people to come and argue in favour of pesticides
·
They are federally and
provincially regulated
·
Pesticides are a very
large group
·
DDT is not used in
lawn care
·
Experts don’t come to
meetings because they do not want to be involved in a political dispute
·
Salt in chemical
applications can burn grass
·
Not supportive of a
bylaw
Thomas
Welch, owner of a Golf Course in Ottawa
·
Required to be
licensed in order to apply pesticides
·
If City finds it
necessary to enact a by-law pests and fungicide will still pose a problem
·
It is false to believe
that these can be controlled without pesticides
·
Consider actions
carefully, pesticides necessary to his livelihood
·
Organic components are
not a viable alternative
John
R. Monteith, graduate of Glasgow University in Scotland of Applied Chemistry,
resident of Ottawa for 30 years
·
Disagrees with report,
not based in scientific fact
·
Daughters allergies
have doubled since the spraying of pesticides
·
Amounts of spray; very
low exposure rate
·
Worked in pesticide
industry on the production floor from 59-72
·
Has been exposed to
many pesticides
·
People are only
exposed 2 or 3 times a year, he worked 14hours a day and has experienced no
adverse affects
·
Epidemiological study
needs to be done on producers in pesticide industry
·
Need to tell whole
story
Amy
Kempster, Greenspace Alliance:
·
Supportive of a bylaw
on numerous grounds
·
This will help
preserve greenspace
·
Must prevent
inadvertent destruction of plant and animal life
·
Pesticides cause
degeneration of the diversity of life
·
Spreading affect, not
merely on one lawn
·
Does not use
pesticides on her lawn
·
If reject the bylaw,
then consider banning near parks, schools and daycare
Ann
Kelley
·
Encouraged councils to
take responsibility as elected officials and ensure that a bylaw is enacted
·
From Rockliffe Park,
worked house by house to stop use of pesticides, this approach worked and
people are ready for a bylaw
·
Can effect change
immediately as they are not anonymous back benchers
·
Round up is a
carcinogen and a mutagen, decreases sperm count
·
Supportive of
restrictive use of pesticides
·
Lawn care companies
will not lose business, will have to make changes
Dr. Libuse Gilka, Physicians
for a Healthy World
· Spoke about comparisons between motor skill reduction in kids exposed to pesticides and those not exposed
· There is still a battle between the two groups, medical profession and pro-pesticide groups.
· Cancer was non existent in her former country as the communist government could not afford it
· Very few cases of childhood cancer until pesticides used
· We share basic blue prints with other life forms
· Biochemical similarities are so common that they test on organisms and extrapolate for human beings, the same can be said for pesticides
Alexei Pidtchenko, concerned
parent and resident of Ottawa:
·
Daughters were exposed
to pesticides and had very adverse effects
·
Confirmed that they
were poisoned by their doctor
·
Older child suffered
headaches and a fever for 7 days because of this
·
Were told to avoid
lawns
·
Asked Condo Corporation,
and they responded that they will continue to use pesticides until a City by
law is approved.
·
In support of bylaw
·
Each time lawn is
sprayed they have to take their children away, they feel unsafe in their own
city and country
·
Children is are unable
to enjoy summer
·
Pesticides used on NCC
Golf Course
Dr.
John Molot, Environmental Medicine Practitioner
·
Results of a poll
taken in 1990 said the family physician was the most trusted: of these, only 4%
felt they were educated enough to give advice on environmental sensitivity
issues;
·
Family physicians are
being taught about the potential for affecting health and that there are
cumulative, life-time risks;
·
They are also being
taught to study the environmental history of their patients;
·
The incidence of
amnio-lateral sclerosis (ALS) and dementia is going up;
·
Spraying for cosmetic
purposes may cause risks;
·
Everyone has
measureable levels of pesticides in their blood.
François
Savard
·
Is a science teacher,
pressing for a total ban and not in support of the staff report;
·
Teaches chemistry and
biology and even though education is a good thing, some people don’t want to be
educated;
·
Has worked with the
Pesticide Management Review Agency in the past and is aware of some of its
shortcomings.