Report to/Rapport au :

 

Planning and Environment Committee

Comité de l'urbanisme et de l'environnement

 

and Council / et au Conseil

 

29 November 2007 / le 29 novembre 2007

 

Submitted by/Soumis par : Nancy Schepers, Deputy City Manager

Directrice municipale adjointe,

Planning, Transit and the Environment

Urbanisme, Transport en commun et Environnement

 

Contact Person/Personne Ressource : Grant Lindsay, Manager / Gestionnaire, Development Approvals / Approbation des demandes d'aménagement

(613) 580-2424, 13242  Grant.Lindsay@ottawa.ca

 

Kitchissippi (15)

Ref N°: ACS2007-PTE-APR-0211

 

 

SUBJECT:

StrEet Closing - UNUSED PORTION OF BULLMAN STREET BETWEEN 261 and 263 HINCHEY AVENUE

 

 

OBJET :

FERMETURE DE RUE - sECTION INUTILISÉE DE LA RUE bULLMAN, ENTRE LE 261 ET LE 263 DE L’AVENUE HINCHEY

 

 

REPORT RECOMMENDATION

 

That the Planning and Environment Committee consider the objections received to the Road Closing application for an unused portion of Bullman Street, as shown on Document 1, and confirm the approval given by staff on July 19, 2007 under delegated authority, subject to the conditions included in Document 2.

 

RECOMMANDATION DU RAPPORT

 

Que le Comité de l’urbanisme et de l’environnement examine les objections reçues à la demande de fermeture de rue portant sur une section inutilisée de la rue Bullman, représentée dans le Document 1, et confirme l’approbation donnée par le personnel, en vertu des pouvoirs qui lui ont été délégués, le 19 juillet 2007, sous réserve des conditions incluses dans le Document 2.

 

 

BACKGROUND

 

A road closure application was initiated by the Real Property Asset Management Branch of the City of Ottawa for a portion of Bullman Avenue, as identified in Document 1. 

Subject to the Delegated Authority By-law 2005-503, the Program Manager for Development Approvals Central Unit approved the application, in principle, with the conditions as listed in Document 2. 

 

The Notice of Intent to close the road was advertised in a local newspaper having general circulation in the municipality on August 16, 2007 and direct notification was given to the abutting owners.  Written opposition and/or expressions of concern related to the proposed closure were received from several residents living in proximity to the subject property.  Therefore, as per the Delegated Authority By-law, a public meeting is required, to allow those in opposition and/or expressing concerns to make their views known to Committee and Council prior to a closure by-law being approved by Council. 

 

The part of the road to be closed is a portion of road allowance not used for road purposes, for the easterly portion of Bullman Street, east of Hinchey Avenue between 261 and 263 Hinchey Avenue.  The section of Bullman Street under consideration is approximately 536 square metres, 18.3 metres wide and 29.3 metres deep.

 

The subject property is in a Multiple Unit Residential (R4D) zone, which permits a mix of residential uses to encourage medium density development.  The purpose of this application is to create a residential lot between 261 and 263 Hinchey Avenue.  The Real Property Asset Management Branch of the City (RPAM) investigates untravelled portions of streets, with a review to their possible development for infill housing.  Before initiating this application for Bullman Street, a circulation was undertaken by RPAM to determine if there was any need to retain this road for road purposes or whether there was any other City requirement.  The City’s Housing Branch indicated an interest for affordable housing.  It is proposed that the lot created be used for affordable housing under the City's "Housing First" policies.

 

If the Housing Branch chose not to utilize the property for affordable housing, RPAM could sell the property if the closure was approved, where they would be required under the City Disposal Policy to offer the property for sale to the general public.

 

DISCUSSION

 

The part of the road to be closed is a portion of road allowance not used for road purposes. The lands are currently used to provide vehicular access to parking for the adjacent lands at 261 and 263 Hinchey Avenue and as a parking lot.

 

Various discussions between the Councillor’s office, the Planning Branch, the Housing Branch, the Hintonburg Community Association and the concerned residents resulted in the Community Association, an abutting property owner and a concerned resident removing their objections. 

 

Three residents did not remove their objections.  Staff have reviewed the correspondence received and have concluded that the concerns expressed and/or the opposition do not relate directly to the proposed closure, but rather relate to concerns with the potential development of the site.  Staff further notes that the R4D zoning of the subject property should determine the appropriate development of the site in conjunction with City policies for the disposition of City- owned lands. 

 

Remaining Objections

 

The concerns expressed and/or reason’s provided for objecting are stated within the objection correspondence contained in Document 3, and are summarized below:

 

Residents (not abutting subject property)

 

 

 

Abutting Property owner

 

 

Response to objections

 

 

 

Recommendation

 

The Road Closing application was given approval, in principle, for the following reasons:

 

1.                  The Strategic Directions of the Official Plan for transportation contemplates the closing of unused road allowances where those road allowances do not have a reasonable potential, in the short or long term, for use as a roadway, a transit or utility corridor, a pedestrian or cyclist link or, or a public access to the shore of a waterbody.

 

2.                  The subject portion of Bullman Street does not have a reasonable potential for use as a roadway, a transit or utility corridor, a pedestrian or cyclist link or a public access.  Lands located immediately to the east of the proposed street closure have been developed for residential purposes, eliminating the possibility of a future connection to Carruthers Avenue to the east. 

 

3.                  The use of the proposed portion of road to be closed for residential purposes meets the intent of the Official Plan, which encourages infill where development is compatible with adjacent neighbourhoods.

 

4.                  The City’s Housing Branch has indicated an interest in utilizing the property for an affordable housing project.  The Strategic Directions of the Official Plan encourages the creation of affordable and appropriate housing for all residents.  The intention of these Official Plan policies is to contribute to improving the supply of affordable housing.  More specifically, the Official Plan contemplates utilizing land that is surplus to the City’s needs and suitable for residential development and gives priority for those surplus lands to be used for the development of affordable housing.

 

5.                  The lands are used to provide vehicular access to parking for the adjacent lands at 261 and 263 Hinchey.  As part of the approval, the applicant will be required to confirm, with the adjacent owners, that access to their parking will be accommodated.

 

6.                  The property currently accommodates some utilities.  As part of the approval, the applicant will be required to confirm easement requirements and have them provided to these utilities.

 

CONSULTATION

 

Notice of this application was carried out in accordance with the City’s Public Notification and Consultation Policy.  The Ward Councillor is aware of this application and the approval in principle given by staff under delegated approval authority.

 

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

 

N/A

 

APPLICATION PROCESS TIMELINE STATUS

 

This application  was not processed by the “On Time Decision Date” established for the processing of an application that has Program Manager Delegated Authority due to determining appropriate responses to public comments.

 

SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION

 

Document 1      Location Map

Document 2      Conditions of Approval

Document 3      Objection Correspondence

 

DISPOSITION

 

City Clerk’s Branch, Council and Committee Services to notify the applicant, Sue Maisonneuve, RPAM, City of Ottawa, 5th Floor, 110 Laurier Avenue West, Ottawa, ON K1P 1J1 (Mail Code:  01-86)

 

Legal Services Branch to prepare and forward the Road Closure By-law to City Council in accordance with the conditions of approval set out in Document 2.

 

 


LOCATION MAP                                                                                                    DOCUMENT 1

 


CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL                                                                             DOCUMENT 2

 

1.       The street or lane closure shall be undertaken by enactment of a street or lane closure by‑law.

 

2.       If selling the closed road, the City is not legally obliged to offer for sale to an abutting owner all or a portion of the closed road.

 

3.       If selling the closed road, a conveyance of a closed road shall be at current market value in accordance with By-law No. 2002-38.

 

4.       The Applicant will be responsible for all costs of the road closure including the application fee (which includes the cost of advertising/giving notice), survey/reference plan, appraisal (if any), removal of encumbrances (if any), registration of documents, land transfer tax and GST (if applicable).

 

5.             Prior to enactment of the by-law (if the City is selling the closed road):

 

(a)     The Applicant shall have prepared and provided to the City Solicitor, a plan of survey/reference plan, showing the road, or portion thereof, to be closed, the parcels of land therein to be conveyed to all parties, any existing or required utility easements and a registerable legal description of all such parcels of land, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the City Surveyor;

(b)     The applicant/purchaser(s) of all closed portions of the road being sold shall have provided to the City Solicitor written confirmation that any zoning violation which may result from the closing will be the applicant’s responsibility to remedy; and

(c)     A binding Agreement(s) of Purchase and Sale shall have been entered into by the City and the applicant/purchaser(s) for the closed road.

 

6.       Should the conditions in Paragraph 5 above not be fulfilled within one (1) year of the date of approval of the street or lane closure application, the approval of the street or lane closure application shall be null and void.

 

7.       The Municipal Act provides that the closing by-law enacted by City Council does not take effect until registered on title.  If the City is selling the closed road, the by-law will not be registered on title until such time as the conveyance of the closed road is to be completed pursuant to an Agreement of Purchase and Sale.

 

SPECIAL CONDITIONS

 

8.       Hydro Ottawa and Bell Canada have advised of the need for easements.  The Applicant shall liaise with these utilities to confirm requirements and to provide for having their needs accommodated prior to the enactment of the closure by-law.

 

9.             The owners of the adjacent lands at 261 and 263 Hinchey have advised that vehicular access to their parking is accommodated from the section of Bullman to be closed.  The applicant shall liaise with these owners to ensure that their vehicular access needs will be accommodated prior to the enactment of the closure by-law.

 

OBJECTION CORRSPONDENCE                                                                  DOCUMENT 3

 

Objection 1

 

In response to your registered letter of August 1, 2007 I strongly object to the proposed street closure.

 

I've lived at 263 Hinchey Avenue for at least ten years. In response to the remark about the street being used as parking it should also be made known that any maintenance to the above mentioned street was done by myself and my family such as supplying crushed stone to and defects in surface and also clean up of all refuse such as leaves, garbage blown unto the property etc.

 

If this proposal goes through you can well imagine the impact it will have on the adjacent tenants of which I am one.  It would be the equivalent of closing the portion of Bullman between Hinchey & Pinehurst and erecting buildings in the middle of the street.  All access to parking if from Bullman.

 

The resale value of my home would drastically decrease but my property taxes would not drop accordingly.  If this should take effect then I may just as well sell my place as well.

 

 

Ruth Proctor

263 Hinchey Avenue

 

Objection 1 Response

 

Although abutting residents use the land for vehicular access to their properties and for parking it is not being used or maintained as a public road.  Access to abutting properties will be maintained through a condition of approval.

 

Objection 2

 

I object to more affordable housing here.

I have been living on Hinchey Avenue for 23 1/2 years and have seen a lot and I do not relish the thought of another low income residence just up the street. 

We have too many as it is, in the neighbourhood. 

I am tired of having break-ins and thief of my property.

As land is less expensive in the outer areas of Ottawa, why not target them.

I am a Real Estate agent and would be happy to supply listings of land for affordable housing projects.

 

 

Wanda Vaughan

 


Objection 2 Response

 

This application is for the closing of a road and not for the development of the land.  Development of the land would be subject to City of Ottawa’s Zoning By-law, which advances the policies of the Official Plan for residential development and affordable housing.

 

Objection 3a)

 


Objection 3b)

 

Please note that I am not prepared to remove my objection to the proposed Bullman and Hinchey closure.

 

During the time I first learned of this proposal from the Hintonburg Community Association, not the City of Ottawa, I have more than sixty (60) emails on the topic with many more recipients involved.  The matter has become increasingly complex and appears now to be only distantly related to the original proposal.  At the moment there are ongoing arcane discussions as to what constitutes a "roadway", "access", "parking" and the like.

 

I am hopeful that my appearance before the "Planning and Environment Committee" will, among other things, provide this potentially affected ratepayer with some clarity on the matter.

 

Please confirm that my 'Notice of Objection' - which I have chosen to call this email - has been duly received & its contents noted.

 

Thank you.

 

M. Lewis

 

Objection 3c)

 

Answers to the following would be most helpful.

 

1.      I understand that the proposed closure of a part of Bullman is in fulfilment of the City's "Housing First Policy".   Is this correct?

2.      I understand that under this Policy land cannot be sold; i.e. the any development of the land is restricted to the owner:  the City.   Is this correct?

3.      The Councillor's office (Ms. Leadman) advises that "Habitat for Humanity" has shown interest in the site in question.    [Email Cote to Lewis et al 30/10/07]     Is this correct?

4.      Is  "Habitat for Humanity" a private entity?   Is this correct?

5.      Should "Habitat for Humanity" be a private entity in what manner is the City able to grant "Habitat for Humanity" to build on City-owned land?        Please explain.

6.      What relationship is there between the Housing Branch - City of Ottawa / "Ottawa Housing" and "Habitat for Humanity"?   [See email as in # 3]    Please explain.

 

  I look forward to your response and thank you.

 

 

M.  Lewis.

 

Objection 3 Response

This part of Bullman Street is being closed because it is not required for road/traffic purposes and is surplus to City needs.  The Housing First policy is for surplus City lands. This policy enables the City to make available the sale of surplus lands to non-profit and private organizations for the development of affordable housing.


Depending on the type and tenure of housing proposed, the City may sell the land at market value, lease the lands for a limited term or sell the lands below market value. The Housing Branch has indicated an interest in these lands.

Under Housing First the City can sell the land for market value or below market value. If no person or organization is interested in developing the land for affordable housing, then the City may sell the land to anyone at market value. 

Habitat for Humanity has shown interest in this site. However, there is no guarantee that Habitat for Humanity will purchase the site. The City may choose a competitive request for proposals or other tendering process when and if the lands become available.

Habitat for Humanity Canada is not a private entity; it is a national, non-profit, faith-based organization. Habitat for Humanity has completed a number of successful projects in the City of Ottawa, mostly with strong community support.  

The City cannot simply grant Habitat for Humanity the land. As stated earlier there is no guarantee that Habitat will purchase the lands. They have only expressed an interest at this point.

Under the Housing First Policy, the Housing Branch posts potential surplus properties on the City website. Both the private and non-profit sector is encouraged to contact the City to express interest in a site. We do this to give an indication of the interest and capability of various organizations to develop a site. If we have no one express interest we may chose not to pursue development, if we have a large site for example and a lot if interest from both the private and noon- profit sectors then we would likely conduct a completive call for proposals.