IT’S ABOUT ACCOUNTABILITY Interim
and Annual Reporting Budget Documents
Plamondon &
Associates Inc.
IT’S ABOUT ACCOUNTABILITY Interim
and Annual Reporting Budget Documents September 27, 2004
Plamondon &
Associates Inc.
About
Plamondon & Associates Inc.
Plamondon & Associates Inc. is a leading Canadian
public policy research and consulting firm specializing in the reporting and
measurement of public finance, governance, and taxation,
Plamondon’s work has been internationally recognized
in journals, conferences and public legislatures. Landmark studies has led Bob
Plamondon FCA to make numerous appearances in the national media and before the
House of Commons Standing Committee on Finance and Economic Affairs.
Of note, the Canadian Institute of Chartered
Accountants selected Bob to be an Impact
CA, the group that represents the profession to Canada’s decision-makers,
and to serve as a judge for the Financial
Post awards for the best annual reports in Canada. In 2003, Bob was awarded
the designation of FCA by the Institute of Chartered Accountants in
recognition of a distinguished career.
Recent projects of interest include:
Finance Canada Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants Export Development Canada and Via Rail Canada Inc. Public Policy Forum Canadian Institutes of Health Research Canada Customs and Revenue Agency (Revenue Canada) Finance Canada |
Evaluation of the governance of Canada’s system for “Debt and
Reserves Management” Annual report, “Measuring Progress - The State of Federal Government
Finances” and “ Do the Right Thing - A Study of a National sales Tax System” Review of Governance Practices, Policies and Effectiveness of the
Board of Directors Author: Ten Steps to a Governance Checkup for Boards of Crown
Corporations and Government Agencies Ten Steps Author: Transforming Health Research in Canada: The Making of the
Canadian Institutes of Health Research Study and Reports: §
The Environment for Tax Administration in Canada before CCRA §
The Impact of the Implementation of the HST on Business Compliance
Costs §
Cutting the Costs of Tax Collection Down to Size: Estimating the
Magnitude of Compliance and Administrative Costs of Canada’s Tax Systems §
A Study of a National Sales Tax System Studies and Reports §
Compliance Issues - Small Business and the Corporate Income Tax
System (for the Technical Committee on Business Taxation) §
A Study of Tax Compliance (the underground economy) §
GST Compliance Costs for Small Business in Canada §
Personal Income Tax Co-ordination – The Federal-Provincial Tax
Collection Agreements |
502 Mayfair Avenue
Ottawa On K1Y 0L3
(613) 724-4400
Table
of contents
2.0 Fundamental Characteristics of Financial
Information
3.0 Recommendations – Budget Documents
4.0 Recommendations - Interim Financial Reports
5.0 Recommendations - Annual Report
6.0 Recommendations – Briefing and Orientation
Ottawa’s 20/20 vision
A Responsible and
Responsive City
Ottawa City Council
Motion extracts from 2004 on
Financial reporting and
accountability
Accountability is fundamental to good
governance. It is about monitoring and reporting performance, and taking
responsibility for the results achieved. When Council decides what results it
wants to measure, the City reveals to staff and residents its expectations,
priorities and vision.
The recommendations in this study will help Ottawa build on existing practices to become leaders in accountability by achieving excellence in financial reporting. This does not entail a significant investment of City resources as much of the information needed for accountability and decision-making already exists within the City’s systems. What is needed is a framework that delivers the most relevant and reliable information to Council at the right time and in the right form.
The specific areas of accountability covered by this
report are the reporting of actual financial results and information provided
by staff to support the budget process.[1]
The study is informed by:
q
Interviews with City staff, Councillors (committee chairs), the Greater
Ottawa Chamber of Commerce and the Canadian Federation of Independent Business;
q
Survey of municipalities across Canada;
q
Review of financial reports and budget documents for cities across
Canada;
q
Literature review and examination of relevant City documents; and,
q
Guidelines prepared by the Public Sector Accounting Board and the
Government Finance Officers Association
In many ways, this is a groundbreaking study. No other city in Canada has undertaken such a systematic study of financial reporting. It is also critical because the decisions that flow from this report are likely to lay the foundations for accountability for the decade that follows.
The recommendations contained in this report are segmented into four
areas.
Section
3: Budget documents
Section 4: Interim
financial reports
Section 5: Annual
financial report
Section 6. Briefing
and orientation
There are 36 recommendations in this report. Attached to most
recommendations is a reference to an actual report from another city that illustrates
a format that Ottawa could emulate. These reports were collected in the field
work phase of this study and have been given to City staff as reference
documents.
As a cautionary note, it will take time for City staff and Council to
develop the skills required to make maximum use of a new reporting and control
system. In particular, City staff will need time to select performance
indicators, prepare seasonal budgets, develop forecasting skills, and design
the format of reports.
To be useful, information must meet certain key tests of relevance and
reliability.
Information only has value if it has the potential
to impact on decision-making. Such decisions could include:
To be relevant, information must be
timely, clearly presented and readily understandable. Consistency is also
fundamental to the relevance of data; both in the way that information is
presented and by reporting the same information year over year.
To be reliable and credible, information must be free from bias. There
must be a commitment to report data whether a result is favourable or not.
Comparators make information more
useful. This could include comparisons with prior periods, similar
organizations, benchmarks and performance indicators.
Benchmarks are particularly important in a not-for profit environment
which, unlike the private sector, does not have market forces to provide near
instant feedback on performance and responsiveness to need. Performance
indicators are also an effective means of communicating expectations and
priority to staff.
The budget is an essential planning and control document in municipal
government. It also communicates the City’s priorities and expectations to
staff and residents. Actual results should always be presented with its associated
budget, and wherever possible using a format consistent with the budget.
Audited year-end financial statements do not include all data that
Council needs to make decisions. In addition, the statements are not fully
compatible with the format of the budget; the document with which Council is
most familiar. As a consequence, special reports and schedules are required to
provide Council with all relevant information.
The primary user for the City’s financial information is Council. While
there are other users with specific needs, Council must be given priority in
the design of the financial reporting system. Council can then determine if it
wants to provide streamlined or tailored data to meet the needs of other users.
In designing a financial reporting package, it needs to be recognized
that there is no single format that will work for all Councillors. Even
individual Council members can gain insight by examining reports that cover the
same area presented in a different way. For example, one report might show
expenses by department while another report could show expenses by function.
One report could segment revenues altogether, while another could net revenues
against relevant costs. While there may be a consolidated report that shows all
revenues and expenses, separate schedules are needed to provide relevant
details. What is important is that Council gets the information needed to make
decisions.
As much as consistency is valued, it is crucial that users be asked for
feedback each year on the quality and usefulness of financial information so
that improvement is a continuous process.
Finally, for the information to be useful, Council must be given every
opportunity to learn how it can best be used. It is unrealistic to expect that
all Councillors will have the financial skill and knowledge to interpret
information without adequate briefing or training.
These recommendations are comprehensive and are designed to provide the
City with an overall framework for financial reporting and its budget
documentation.
The City may already follow some of these practices, in whole or in
part. In most instances the recommendations will result in Council receiving
more financial information, which will be specifically targeted to their needs.
In other instances, the recommendations will mean that Council will receive
less information that they do at present, particularly where this data is
voluminous and not particularly relevant.
Budget decisions are made within an economic and social environment
that must be considered. This environment includes national, regional and local
conditions for economic growth, inflation, population, housing, poverty and
employment.
A budget is also based on assumptions, which should
be made explicit to Council to ensure they understand the various risks. While
many items in the budget are easy to forecast, and variances, if any, are
unlikely to be material, other items are more difficult to forecast. This includes
both revenue and expenses. Some risk relates to weather (e.g. costs of removing
snow or heating and air conditioning). Interest rate fluctuations can influence
both revenue and expense. Subsidies from other governments can be vulnerable to
external influences. Managing risk encourages contingency planning. It will
also influence the design of the reporting system that should keep track of
budget variances over the course of the year.
Third, the City should provide an analysis of its own financial condition.
This could include an examination of conditions and trends for the City’s debt
rating; burden of debt and interest costs; and trends in level of expenditures
and revenues.
Fourth, it would be useful to embed the key elements of the strategic
plan at the front of the budget document. This would remind Council of the
longer-term objectives they want to achieve. Where relevant, elements of the
strategic plan should also be incorporated into specific line items of the
budget.
Illustrations:
Calgary Section
on socio-economic overview
Winnipeg Overview
provides economic context
Toronto Strategic direction
throughout budget; Assumptions (page 27)
Given the sheer quantity of information
contained in the budget document, a well-crafted summary would help to ensure
that Council readily sees the “big picture”. Such a summary would also be
useful to residents that naturally have difficulty making effective use of a
500-page document.
The current four-page summary is too minimal. A more
robust section would be in the order of 10-20 pages.
To enhance understanding and permit
meaningful analysis, the summary should show revenues and expenses in a number
of different ways. For example the current budget does not reveal that expenses
by object (i.e. that 37% of all expenditures are for wages, 25% are materials
good and utilities, 24% are for capital purchases etc.). It does not readily
show how much the City collects in user fees or in grants from the provincial
government. There is also no historical review to show how the numbers have
been trending over the previous five years.
The summary should include the following
elements:
·
Revenue and expense totals
·
Revenue and expense by Department, with separate line items for major
categories (i.e. segment tax supported and rate supported, plus provide
additional line disclosure for major departments and identifiable operations)
·
Revenue and expenses by expenditure type (wages, purchased services
etc.)
·
Staffing levels
·
Key reference points (prior year, current-year forecast etc.)
·
Property tax impact
·
Capital budget summary
·
Five year summary of key numbers
·
Medium and long-term implications
The most important performance indicators should also be included in
the summary section (discussed later in this report). Consideration should also
be given to translating the performance indicators into a scorecard format in
which a grade or score is assigned by area and in the aggregate.[2]
Many governments help users understand the sensitivity of budget
numbers by providing a “ready reckoner”, a tool that reveals the consequence of
changes in tax rates. For example, what would be the impact on the budget from
each 1% increase or decrease in property taxes, or in parking rates, or
building permits etc. In regards to property taxes the distinction between tax
rates and assessment should be made clear. In other words, the percentage
change in taxes being collected from existing homeowners should be clearly
disclosed.
It is critical that the summary provides a clear overview of the budget
and highlights all key problem areas.
The summary should be made “user friendly” by incorporating graphs and
charts wherever possible.
Illustrations:
Calgary Excellent
summary (Pages 1-23) incl. property tax impact
Winnipeg Extensive
summary in overview
Burlington Gross
and net shown in overview
St. John’s Strong
summary
Vancouver Excellent
transition from highlights to details
Council and taxpayers look differently at services that are fully paid
for by user fees versus those that are funded by property taxes and other
sources.
There are only a few areas where the City provides
service where costs are fully recovered by users rather than from property
taxes. In most cases where user fee are charged, only a portion of the cost of
service is raised. For example, the 2004 operating budget for OC Transpo
targets a cost recovery rate of 50.4%, meaning that this service is
substantially supported through taxes.
Water and sewer are the only areas where rates are set, and accounts
rendered, to fully recover the cost of service and consumption. Effectively,
this means that changes in the cost of these services do not directly impact on
the level of property tax.
An additional reason for segregating water and sewer
revenue/expenditures is the magnitude. Ottawa’s 2004 budget projected revenues
and expenditures for water and sewer to be $178.5 million, some 20% of the total
property tax bill.
Winnipeg Utilities
in a separate section
Without relevant comparators, numbers in the budget can be almost meaningless. Currently Ottawa’s operating budget provides only the prior year budget and the dollar value change.
Reference to prior years to budget and actual amounts is essential to determining trends in the cost of service and in service level changes.
It would be useful to show both dollar and percent change from comparative figures.
Saskatoon Shows
two year actual and two years projected
Burlington Percentage
changes for base budget and prior budget
Vancouver Shows
two years of actual and budget # and % change
As much as organizations like to say they begin each
budget deliberation with a clean slate, often called a Zero Based Budget (ZBB),
the reality is that budget deliberations need a starting point, which is
usually current operations. Even when a ZBB is embraced, decision makers still
need to understand the current operations to determine the impact of their
decisions.
Council and residents understand a base budget more in terms of
services offered than dollars spent. That means that as prices for goods and
services change, the amount of funding similarly needs to change simply to
maintain current service levels. The price changes might be due to general
conditions, such as inflation, or specific changes, such as fluctuations in
market conditions such as has been seen recently in fuel and insurance. Changes
in the regulatory environment, such as new safety regulations, can also have an
impact on the cost to maintain base conditions.
Another issue that needs to be considered is “one-time” expenditures.
To establish base conditions these items should be removed from a prior year
budget.
Finally, the base budget should reflect any efficiency gains or losses
that were realized in the year. These gains or losses result from a number of
factors including technology and restructuring.
It is from a base budget that Council can contemplate service level
enhancements or reductions. Without knowing the true base budget, Council might
well be surprised to learn that even with an increase in funding a particular
service might well end up being reduced.
Hamilton Clear
presentation of the base budget
Calgary Section
on service delivery adjustments
Line item established base
budget
Hamilton For
enhancements and reductions
Thunder Bay Clear
explanation of service enhancements & reductions
Council focuses much of its budget deliberations on
expenditures; however, City revenues (not including property taxes) also warrant
attention. Apart from property taxes, the City generates revenues and subsidies
of over $1 billion each year.
Currently the budget allocates about one-half of its total revenues
against each associated line item of cost. While it is useful to show receipts
this way, particularly when neither a profit or full recovery of costs is
expected, it is still important for Council to see the overall flow of funds
that the City needs to manage. The City’s audited financial statement shows
revenues in this way (i.e. revenues as distinct from expenses).
There is no need to choose one format over another. Whenever a single
budget format does not meet user needs, alternative perspectives should be
presented.
It is recommended that the budget include a section that provides
details on the nature and extent of revenues.
Illustrations:
Saskatoon Revenues
segmented and shown in related area
Vancouver Section
on revenue details
Council needs performance measures to evaluate the efficiency,
effectiveness and economy of City operations. These indicators should be
incorporated into the budget, either as a separate section or, preferably,
embedded in the document against related budget amounts.
High-level comparisons with other cities can also give context to
budget amounts. While no two cities or sets of figures are truly comparable, at
a high level they show a level of proportion and magnitude can be useful.
Council should assume that these comparisons will be made by stakeholders if it
helps them to advance a particular cause. Many cities include comparisons in
their budget documents. Such analysis will help to answer questions about how
well the City is performing and whether tax levels are at appropriate levels.
A selection of performance indicators used in financial reports by
other cities and under Ontario’s Municipal Measurement Program is shown on the
following pages. Recognizing the performance indicators are only one tool in
evaluating performance, Council should reflect upon its strategic plan to
determine which indicators should be used and given prominence.
Illustrations:
Toronto Performance indicators
used extensively throughout budget document
Hamilton Summary
section
Calgary Section
on performance indicators
Calgary’s
Performance Measures Community Performance 1.
Population
growth 2.
Quality
of life (citizen survey) 3.
Parks
and recreation (citizen survey) 4.
Density
of new suburbs (statistic on housing units per acre in new communities) 5.
Rush
hour traffic (citizen survey) 6.
Use of
Transit -- Annual transit trips per capita 7.
Air
quality - % of time air quality index rated as good 8.
Residential
waste - tonnes per capita 9.
Poverty
– percentage of persons living in poverty - segmented by age 10.
Homelessness
– numbers – by age 11.
Unemployment
– by age 12.
Reported
crimes per capita – property and person 13.
Personal
and household victimization rates 14.
Youth
accused rate for criminal code charges 15.
Traffic
safety – collision rate per 100,000 population, segmented by fatal
collisions, personas killed, persons injured, property damage collisions,
total reportable collision rate 16.
Emergency
medical services response time – percent responding within 8 minutes –
total call volume 17.
Fire
response time – percent response within 6 minutes and response times by
community Corporate Measures 18.
Bond
rating – short and long term 19.
Expenditure
per capita (operating) – inflation adjusted, excluding one-time
contributions to reserves 20.
Value
for money of civic services (citizen survey) Note:
Performance measures are focused on outcomes and not process
1.
Operating costs for general government as a percentage of total municipal
operating costs. 2.
Operating costs for fire services per $1,000 of assessment. 3.
Operating costs for police services per household 4. Total
crime rate as defined by Statistics Canada. 5.
Operating costs for paved (hard top) roads per lane kilometre. 6.
Operating costs for unpaved (loose top) roads per lane kilometre. 7.
Operating costs for winter control maintenance of roadways per lane
kilometre. 8.
Percentage of paved lane kilometres where conditions are rated as good to
very good. 9.
Percentage of winter event responses that met or exceeded municipal road
maintenance standards. 10. Operating
costs for conventional transit per regular service passenger trip. 11. Number
of conventional transit passenger trips per person in the service area in
a year. 12.
Operating costs for the collection of wastewater per kilometre of
wastewater main. 13. Number
of wastewater main backups per 100 kilometres of wastewater main in a
year. 14.
Percentage of wastewater estimated to have by-passed treatment. 15.
Operating costs for water treatment and distribution of water per megalitre
treated. (Integrated System). 16. Numbers
of breaks in water mains per 100 kilometres of water main pipe. 17.
Weighted number of days when a boil advisory issued by the Medical Officer
of Health, applicable to a municipal water supply, was in effect. 18.
Operating costs for solid waste collection per ton(ne) or per household. 19.
Operating costs for solid waste diversion (recycling) per ton(ne) or per
household. 20.
Operating costs for solid waste management (all services including
collection, disposal and diversion) diversion per ton(ne) or per
household. 21. (a)
Number of days per year when a Ministry of Environment compliance order
for remediation concerning an air or groundwater standard was in effect
for a solid waste management facility, by site. (b) Total
number of solid waste management sites owned by municipality. 22. Number
of complaints received in a year concerning the collection of solid waste
and recycling materials per 1,000 households. 22.
Percentage of residential solid waste diverted. 23.
Percentage of new development with final approval, which is located within
settlement areas and the number of new lots, blocks and/or units. 24.
Percentage of land designated for agricultural purposes, which were
preserved, and number of hectares of land originally designated for
agricultural purposes, which was designed for other uses.
Ontario Municipal
Measurement Program
Local Government
Fire
Police
Roads
Transit
Wastewater (Sewage)
Water
Solid Waste Management (Garbage)
Land Use Planning
While Council approves one budget at a time, the decisions taken each
year inevitably impact future budgets.
There is also the possibility that staff can be
aware of a problem area that does not affect the current budget, but will
clearly impact on future budgets. An excellent example was the short term
“holiday” in OMERS premiums that provided short-term benefits to financial
relief to municipal governments.
Tax policy changes should also be taken into account when Council is
informed about pending budget pressures. .
Calgary calls its forward-looking budget a “shadow budget”. By
following a few key assumptions, the shadow budget projects what spending and
taxation levels are likely to be in the years ahead. This not only assists with
financial planning, but also gives Council greater insight on the implications
of the decisions they make in a given year.
Illustrations:
Calgary Shadow budget in budget
guidelines section
Winnipeg Provides
current year estimate, budget year plus one
Burlington Assumptions
disclosed in overview
Hamilton Provides
ten years’ of projected budget pressures
While it is useful to follow a consistent format in the budget document
for all departments, it is disproportionate to give the same coverage to $200
million to transit spending as the $750,000 spent on the Committee of
Adjustment.
One way to approach this issue would be to generally
give less detail for all areas while providing more content to the areas that
consume the most resources.
The minimal detail could include total program budget (with relevant comparators)
and staffing level. The next level of detail would be to show expenditures by
object (i.e. wages, supplies). Additional content for key areas could include
information about the nature and scope of operations, performance indicators,
comparisons with other jurisdictions, explanations of service level changes,
operational highlights, etc.
Illustrations:
Winnipeg Section
on utilities
Toronto: Program
details vary throughout
Calgary Segmented
by major area
The notes to the year-end financial statements
indicate that Ottawa took in close to $500 million in user fees and charges in
2003. While Council ultimately approves these fees through the budget process,
their presentation in the budget document is either nonexistent or lacking in
transparency.
It is recommended that a section of the budget be devoted exclusively
to user fees.
This information will make Council aware of the amount of taxpayer
support for each item on which fees are assessed (for example, the cost versus
the fee charged for ice time; recovery rates for OC Transpo etc.)
Illustrations:
Hamilton Full
section on user fees
Calgary Highlights
(page 5)
Making the budget document “user friendly” is all about understanding
the terminology and being able to find information quickly. That is why most
municipalities make extensive use of tabs in the hard copies of their budget
documents. Other “user friendly” budgets provide a substantive index and a
glossary of terms. In some areas Council would benefit by having “helpful
hints” provided about what a particular budget item includes.
Any terminology not used by Council should be
removed from the budget. This includes all “motherhood statements“ and “process
goals”, which Councillors indicated were not helpful.
The City should look carefully at the names it uses to describe city
services. For example, the initiated may think “Roads” is a better description
than “Surface Operations”.
Perhaps the best method of enhancing user friendliness would be to make
the budget accessible electronically. This would allow the execution of simple
search functions, possibly with a “drill down” feature that would
systematically reveal more detail about a department’s spending. Many cities
already provide a CD version of the budget, although, for the most part, these
are simply PDF files of what is produced “hard copy”.
Finally, all budget documents must be clearly labeled listing date of preparation,
status of Council review/approval, and some indication of when subsequent and
final versions of the budget will be released. A schedule summarizing changes
from previous versions of the budget would be helpful. Release of the final
budget at the earliest possible date would enhance its usefulness.
Illustrations:
Hamilton Extensive
use of tabs
Toronto Glossary
of terms (pages 242-245)
Vancouver Provides
summary of capital with operating budget
Saskatoon Includes a detailed
index at the back of book
Even if an elaborate and interactive version of the
budget was available online or on a CD, Council still needs a hard copy
version. These voluminous versions are costly to produce (more so than at
present if tabs and others methods are used).
Given its cost and size there is no reason why hard copies of the
budget document need to be made widely available. Beyond Council and senior
management, additional copies could be made available for reference at City
libraries and information centres. Of note, the City of Calgary charges $20.00
for copies of its budget documents.
Saving money and respecting the environment are good reasons to print
as few copies of the budget as possible, but access remains an important issue.
Most needs can be met by placing the full budget document on the City ’s Web
site. In addition, a simple CD version could be made available to key
stakeholders at minimal cost to the City.
The summary version of the budget should also be made available on line
and distributed to all staff by internal methods. A decision to print and
distribute the summary version could be made based on costs considerations and
feedback from budget consultations.
At the end of each budget cycle Council should be surveyed to determine
if improvements to the documents can be made.
Illustrations:
Mississauga CD
available
Region of Peel CD
available
Most municipalities provide separate documents for their capital and
operating budgets. This may be done for a number of reasons, including the
desire to ensure that new infrastructure needs receive adequate attention. It
may also be done because a single budget document would be too thick. The
capital budget may also be shown separately because the concepts and financing
are more difficult to understand
However, having two documents makes it less
convenient and more difficult to analyze.
Having two documents increases the risk that a disproportionate amount
of time will be spent on one document, usually the operating budget, to the
detriment of scrutiny on the capital budget.
At a minimum, a summary of the capital budget should be included at the
front end of the operating budget.
Ideally, the capital and operating budget should be integrated by
program area in a single comprehensive budget. Putting capital and operating
budgets together by area will make it much easier for Council to assess
alignment with the organization’s strategic objectives.
Toronto manages to accomplish this task in a document of only 250 pages
(Ottawa Operating and Capital Budget are a combined 525 pages).
Illustrations:
Toronto Summary
budget of 250 pages
Vancouver Includes capital
budget summary with the operating budget
Thunder Bay Includes tax-supported
capital and operating budgets in a single document
Perhaps the least understood segments of any
municipal budget are the operation of the capital budget, the issuance of debt
and the flow of money through the reserve funds. It may well be that only a few
people outside of finance professionals working in municipal government truly
understand the concepts and flow of funds.
Because this area of municipal finance is so unique, a “primer” on its
functioning should be included in each and every capital budget.
The identification of an expenditure as capital versus operating is
also a significant issue. Since borrowings can only be secured for capital
items (the City cannot budget for a deficit from operations) some worry that
many cities misclassify certain expenditures to gain access to debt financing.
To ensure the integrity of the capital account, the guidelines for inclusion in
the capital fund should be made clear in the budget document.
An explanation should also be included about the significance and
purpose of each reserve fund. This would include an assessment of the adequacy
of each reserve fund and some discussion about desirable levels.
To enhance understanding the City should also look at simplifying the
terminology and eliminating all unnecessary transactions between the capital
budget and reserve funds.
Illustrations:
Toronto Explanation of terms and
glossary (page 38, 242-246)
Winnipeg Summary
section on capital budget
There is a strong need and desire by Council to have a capital budget
and financing plan that extends up to ten years.
Beyond knowing if the City ’s infrastructure program
is sustainable, Council wants to know what major projects are planned and
whether the City will have the financial capacity to execute the plan. This
will include a careful review of current and projected debt loads.
Every city faces a rationing process for capital projects. There are
always roads that need to be fixed and community centres refurbished. There is
always a greater demand for sporting and cultural facilities than what exists
at present. But how is the line drawn between those projects that get funded,
those that get deferred and those that get rejected? The process currently used
by Ottawa Council is less formal and transparent than many would like. What is
sought is a listing of projects with a priority rating attached. The priority
rating should be based on predetermined criteria and an objective process of
evaluation.
The ability to evaluate a capital program, including whether adequate
investments are being made in infrastructure, would benefit from a long-term
view that goes backwards and forwards.
Illustrations:
Burlington Ten-year
capital budget
Winnipeg Current
year plus five
Calgary Five-year
detailed budget
There are 115 projects with $265 million in new capital authorities
described in Ottawa’s 419-page capital budget. The same coverage is given to
major road projects that cost $35 million as the $30,000 allocated to replace
an air conditioner in a library. These small dollar routine items need less
oversight than major capital works.
While there be a certain amount of “routine” capital spending that
could be shown in overall funding “envelopes”, major capital projects, such as
a new bridge, building or treatment plant will result in spikes in capital
spending that need to be highlighted in the long-term capital plan.
Council needs more detail on these large-scale capital projects than on
routine items.
Illustrations:
Toronto Categories
(page 37)
Burlington Categories
listed in overview
Calgary Shows
type for each capital project
City Council resolutions make it clear that it wants to receive periodic financial reports. What needs to be determined are the “when”, “what”, and “how” the information should be reported.
The Government of Canada publicly issues a six-page monthly financial
statement and report. Most cities also prepare periodic financial statements or
updates to Council, although at varying intervals. Some cities only issue
interim reports only to support budget deliberations.
Relative to monthly reports, quarterly reporting reduces cost while
still covering a meaningful period of time.
Some suggest that the first quarter report is only marginally useful
since cumulatively it only covers a short period. It has the other disadvantage
of needing to be prepared at about the same time as staff is working on the previous
year-end. While this is all true, there is also value in following a consistent
reporting timeline. A glimpse at first quarter results helps to set the mood
for council deliberations and provides another point of review and measure of
accountability.
It is recommended that the City produce financial statements on a
quarterly basis, issued not more than 45 days after the end of the period. This
should provide an adequate period for the production and review of the
statements, and for management to provide appropriate explanations and
commentary. The report itself should have a modest production quality. Most
other cities simply provide a photocopied document, prepared using word
processing software.
Because the activity on capital projects varies widely throughout the
year, a three-month accountability period may be too short to give meaningful
progress reports. Consequently, a financial report on capital projects and
reserve funds need only be prepared with the second quarter operating statement.
However, City staff should bring any problem areas on capital projects to
Council in any of the quarterly reports.
Illustrations:
St. John’s Report
produced 3-4 weeks after period end
Halifax 1
month after period end
Calgary 6
weeks after period end
Burlington 6
weeks after period end
Region of Peel Remaining
spending and reserve fund status
York Region Detailed
update on spending and status
Council has ultimate responsibility for the finances
of the City. Some suggest that, as a result, periodic reports should first be
presented to Council, or one of its committees, before being released to the
public. However, following this process may cause a delay in the release of the
information to the public of up to three weeks. We believe timeliness should
take priority.
Once City staff has prepared, reviewed and analyzed the quarterly
report, it should be sent to all Councillors via email. The report should be
available to the public the following day on the City’s Web site. A press
release could also be issued to draw attention to the report’s availability.
All reports should be kept on the City ’s Web site and not be deleted.
Management should accept full responsibility for the preparation of the
financial statements. The signatures of the City Manager should be affixed to
the report.
Illustrations:
All cities surveyed made reports public and posted on their Web sites.
Interim reports do not need to be at the same level of detail as the
annual report or budget documents. Nonetheless, the reports should follow the
same general format and terminology as other reports.
Each report should begin with a brief analysis from management
describing the highlights from the period.
Detailed comments should be given on performance issues and budget
exceptions.
Comparisons should also be made with prior periods and with the budget.
Illustrations:
Calgary Excellent
Executive Information
Hamilton Concise
Executive Summary.
Burlington Comparisons
with prior year
Council approves the annual budget without giving
direction on when funds are to be spent during the year.
Most of the City’s labour budget is spread evenly over the year making
it relatively straightforward to periodically determine if a program is within
its budget.
Other items vary by season, such as winter maintenance, or may be
discretionary as to timing.
It would be very helpful to the analysis that is prepared for quarterly
reports for the budget to be seasonally adjusted. Beyond permitting the
calculation of variances, it may also make City staff more mindful of where
they stand relative to approved budgets. Prior year results are very
informative in the preparation of a seasonal budget.
Illustrations:
Halifax Prepares
a monthly budget
Sudbury Prepares
quarterly budget
The periodic report should provide an accountability of staff
performance and an indication if the year-end targets will be met. This means
that there should be no surprises at year-end.
The seasonal budget, which is likely to have been prepared well before
the beginning of the year, provides insufficient guidance on whether year-end
targets will be met. The direct knowledge and insight of city managers offered
during the course of the year is required to establish whether year-end targets
are likely to be met.
The report must provide actual numbers along with a forecast of
revenues and expenditures to the end of the year. Explanations should cover
both favorable and unfavorable variances for both revenue and expenses.
Whatever remedial measures are contemplated to address the variances should be
disclosed.
It is unlikely that a forecast prepared after only three months of
operations would be particularly accurate or instructive. A forecast prepared
mid-way through the year would establish how well the year is proceeding, and
the third quarter forecast would help inform budget deliberations.
Illustrations:
Hamilton Includes
summary and analysis of variances
Saskatoon Details
on projections and variances
Council should also receive the most recent quarterly financial reports
from City owned entities; namely, Ottawa Hydro and Ottawa Housing.
These reports would be furnished directly by each entity and should
include a complete financial statement.
Illustrations:
Kitchener Water
utility statements
Currently the City of Ottawa’s annual report consists of its year-end audited financial statements. While the audit is typically complete sometime in April, the financial statements are tabled with Council in June, at which point approval has been given on consent. This is far from a complete or timely reporting.
Most cities, including those much smaller than Ottawa, produce a robust, professional annual report that documents their city’s activity over the preceding year.
Whereas an interim report provides a brief snapshot of how the city is
managing its budget throughout the year, the annual report provides an account
of how well the city fared in meetings its objectives. It is also contributes
to the historical record of the city.
It is recommended that the City of Ottawa produce a professional annual report to document financial and other results in a manner that renders accountability to Council and taxpayers.
It is vital that the report be an accountability document. It should be
factual, unbiased and free from statements that seek to minimize problems or
exaggerate accomplishments. It should not be designed to make Council or staff
look good or bad; it should simply provide a faithful representation of what
actually happened over the previous year.
Some cities use their annual report as a promotional document for the
city. We disagree with this approach. Any document designed to make the city
look favourable has a bias.
To be relevant and timely, the report should be released no later than
April 30 of each year
The annual report would not be as detailed or voluminous as the budget document. It should include data that can be compared with relevant benchmarks. Special reports and schedules should be prepared in areas where detail is required.
For credibility and usefulness, it is critical that the same data and
measures be used each year.
A good test of an annual report is meeting the guidelines for
excellence established by the Government Finance Officers Association. This
should be considered as the starting point to good financial reporting.
All cities of reasonable size in Canada produce an annual report, most
of which are professionally printed in full colour and on reasonable stock.
External production costs for various city reports were disclosed as follows:
Calgary $35,000 York region $25,000
Halifax $16,000 Region of Peel $14,300
Mississauga $11,000 Kitchener $ 8,000
Business groups offer no objection to an investment
of funds in an initiative designed to educate Council and taxpayers about city
finances. They believe there is a much higher cost to pay when inadequate or
inaccessible information leads to poor decision-making.
Making maximum use of the online version of the report can minimize
costs. Wherever possible, users should be encouraged to download and print the
report from their own computers.
Quantities of the hard copy should be sufficient to provide
distribution to the City’s key contact list, senior management, media outlets,
libraries, and Council. Each Councillor should be given about 50 copies of the
report for distribution to community leaders in their ward. Based on what other
cities produce, Ottawa should print between 3,000 and 5.000 copies of the
annual report. A CD version of the annual report should also be produced.
Illustrations:
Winnipeg: High
gloss – very promotional
Calgary: Professional
quality
Burlington: Lower
quality of production but still professional
Saskatoon: GFAO
award (Introduction)
Stewardship and performance evaluation implies that
financial and other results are evaluated against a plan.
The strategic plan sets out the vision for the city, elements of which
should be included in the annual report. Where possible, actual results should
be specifically related to the corresponding element in the strategic plan.
For reference purposes, much of the material about the economic health
of the city included in the budget document should form part of the annual
report.
Illustrations:
Burlington: Strategic
plan (page 3)
Region of Peel: Business
and labour review (pages 45-47)
Every city that prepares an annual report includes a section where the
Mayor and City Manager provide a brief letter or statement describing relevant
highlights over the preceding year.
Such statements are useful reminders to residents of the roles that elected and non-elected officials occupy and of the importance that staff has in contributing to the city’s quality of life.
An annual report is a useful place to document how Council and staff is
organized. A section on governance could list details about the various
committees of Council and the City ’s administrative structure.
An element of good governance is the acceptance of responsibility for
financial reports by senior leadership. The signatures of the Mayor, Audit
Committee chair, City Manager and Treasurer should be affixed to the report
accepting their responsibility for the completeness of the annual report.
Illustrations:
York Region Mayor
and CAO (pages 6 & 7)
Winnipeg Responsibility
(pages 30 & 32); Council and staff (page 55)
Saskatoon Council
(page 1) and staff (page 2)
The cornerstone of any annual report is the year-end audited financial
statement. A key challenge is taking a statement designed to meet accounting
rules set by the Public Sector Accounting Board and making it understandable
and useful to Council. This can largely be accomplished by providing schedules
of information.
In addition, explanations need to be provided about
financial statement amounts that do not appear in the budget. Specifically this
includes adjustments to non-cash amounts like accruals for employee benefits,
landfill closure costs, and net long-term and capital leases.
While aggregated information is useful for evaluating the overall financial condition of the city, there are a number of relatively self-sustaining activities that operate as separate business units, with specific cost recovery targets, or operate with relatively greater independence than a city department. There are also units that are of such size or importance that their activities should be segregated and not shown only as part of a department or category. Separate schedules should be included in the annual report that disclose the financial results for these units and enterprises.
Illustrations:
Saskatoon: Audited
statements with budget (page 21)
Saskatoon Extensive
use of schedules (pages 35-65)
Calgary: Operating
and capital expenditures by area (pages 36&37)
The numbers by themselves do not adequately describe what transpired
over the year. It would be unusual in the extreme if actual results
corresponded exactly with the budget and if every expectation materialized.
This is why the City Manager or Treasurer should include a reasonably
detailed “discussion and analysis” of actual results, including a summary of
any changes in service levels over the preceding year.
This section should also include management’s
assessment and opinion on the City’s financial condition, provide highlights of
revenues and expenditures, offer explanations of key variances, indicate how
the City is managing risk, and comment on the adequacy of reserves.
Illustrations:
Burlington: Treasurer’s
Report (pages 10-19)
Calgary Chief
Financial Officer (pages 29-34)
To increase user understanding of the nature of City finances,
expenditures should be shown by both function (i.e. department) and nature
(i.e. wages, material, purchased services etc.)
Many municipalities disclose this information in a note to the
financial statements, although a more prominent disclosure in a separate
schedule would highlight this information more effectively.
To make the high level numbers more meaningful, they should also be
shown on the basis of an average or median household. Disclosure on a per
capita basis may also be helpful in making comparisons with other cities.
Illustrations:
Region of Peel: By object
(page 41)
Saskatoon By
object (page 60)
In addition to showing revenue and expense for the
capital fund by department, disclosure should be made of investments made in
specific major capital projects over the course of the year.
It would also be helpful to identify major capital projects on which work has yet to commence.
Insight into the long-term capital plan would also be beneficial.
Illustrations:
York Region Page
29
An annual assessment or report card is routine for employees. It should
also be routine for the City.
Staff and Council should reflect on the City’s strategic plan and
identify the measures that define success and the expectations that define excellence.
These measures should be faithfully and consistently reported in the annual
report.
Performance indicators that are translated into a scorecard are much
easier for people to interpret. Technically, this would involve setting
standards for poor and excellent performance with actual results revealing a
score, say out of 10, that is high when excellence is achieved and low when
results do not meet the minimum standard.
Illustrations:
Burlington Disclosure
of provincial data (pages 101-104)
Hamilton Various
indicators (page 23)
Calgary Various
(pages 9-31)
Most annual reports provide an assortment of statistics covering a
five-year period. Typically the data includes financial, demographic and economic
statistics.
The data reveal trends and informs debate. At a minimum it helps to
ensure a common starting for those that want to cite past results. Examples
include:
Illustrations:
York Pages
52-53, 56
Winnipeg Pages
50-53
Calgary Pages
74-75, 78-79
Most annual reports for Ontario cities include a
section listing all staff with earnings in excess of $100,000.
If such a schedule is not provided in the annual report then reference
should be made as to where the information can be readily accessed.
Illustrations:
Region of Peel Pages
39-40
York Region Pages
54-55
Hamilton Pages
31-32
As a way of reminding elected officials and
residents of the importance that various organizations have on City finances
and its economy, many cities disclose in their annual report a list of major
taxpayers.
Either assessment or number of employees can determine the relative
size of an organization.
Illustrations:
York Region Eleven
disclosed (page 56)
Region of Peel Top
thirty employers (page 46)
Saskatoon Twelve
disclosed (page 66)
Most annual reports include a section listing the
various contact names and numbers that can be used for information or city
services.
An annual report can always be made better, especially for those
outside Council who are unfamiliar with City finances. It should be made easy
for those who want to make suggestion by enclosing a detachable addressed
“comment card”. An email address should also be provided for comments. The
on-line version of the report should also provide a simple means of providing
feedback.
Research should be conducted with each annual report to ensure that
best practices are being met and that all practical improvements are
implemented.
Illustrations:
Winnipeg Page
56
Region of Peel Page
50
Hamilton Page
27 of Community Report
The first few
months in office for most Council members are overwhelming. It may take a year
or more before new Councillors gain enough knowledge to meaningfully contribute
to debates on City finances. To accelerate this learning process it is
recommend that an extensive orientation session be developed. Returning
Councillors may also partake in some or all of these sessions.
Of
note, Councillors report receiving a more rigorous orientation in some of the
former municipalities than is available today with the City of Ottawa. Some
sessions were reported to last a full week, with new Councillors being exposed
to all senior staff, each of whom gave a presentation and then responded to
questions. Nowhere is this orientation more important than in the area of
finance.
Illustrations:
Calgary Holds extensive briefing
after every election.
York Region Holds briefings and workshops. Each Commissioner
provides overview on their area, including key initiatives
Even
the best financial information is useless if it is not understood by
decision-makers. It is also unreasonable to expect Council to be financial
experts on municipal finance without adequate orientation and briefing
City staff has
generally taken a reactive stance in dealing with the needs of Council for
information. For the most part, Councillors get information by asking questions
of individual staff members. While Council appreciates this “one-on-one”
access, this is not the most effective or economical learning environment.
It is
recommended that City staff take a more pro-active and efficient approach to
briefing Council.
Illustrations:
Calgary Holds annual sessions to
brief media
[1] Study objectives are listed in Volume II to this report. Also included in Volume II are a detailed methodology and the results from survey of municipal governments.
[2] The Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants scorecard on the financial condition of the Government of Canada follows a format that the city might consider for the purpose.