Local Architectural Conservation Advisory Committee

Comité consultatif sur la conservation

de l’architecture locale

 

Minutes 36 / Procès-verbal 36

 

Tuesday, 7 October 2003, 6:00 p.m.

le mardi, 7 octobre 2003, 18 h

 

Richmond Room, 110 Laurier Avenue West

Salle Richmond, 110, avenue Laurier ouest

 

 

Present / Présents:     R. Bellamy, J. Critchley, A. Keith, C. Marple, H. McArthur, L. McGovern, W. Morris (Vice Chair), G. Obagi (Chair / Président), G. Shemdin, P. Stumes, B. Warren, È. Wertheimer

Non-voting / sans droit de vote : P. Dobbing, B. Myslinski

 

Absent / Absents:       J. Curry

Regrets / excuses: A. Jones, S. Ricketts

 

 

 

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

DÉCLARATIONS D’INTÉRÊT

 

No declarations of interest were filed.


 

 

 

Confirmation of minutes

ratification des procÈs-verbaux

 

Minutes 35 and Confidential Minutes 3 of the Local Architectural Conservation Advisory Committee meeting of 16 September 2003 were confirmed.

 

 

 


DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT

SERVICES D’AMÉNAGEMENT

 

PLANNING AND INFRASTRUCTURE APPROVALS BRANCH
DIRECTION DE L’APPROBATION DES DEMANDES D’URBANISME ET D’INFRASTRUCTURE

 

1.         APPLICATION TO DEMOLISH 105-107 ST. ANDREW STREET IN THE LOWERTOWN WEST HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT AND APPLICATION FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION AT 105-107 ST. ANDREW STREET IN THE LOWERTOWN WEST HERITAGE CONSERVATION DISTRICT

DEMANDE DE DÉMOLITION DU 105-107, RUE ST-ANDREWS DANS LE DISTRICT DE CONSERVATION DU PATRIMOINE DE LA BASSE-VILLE OUEST ET DEMANDE DE CONTRUCTION D'UN NOUVEAU BÂTIMENT AU 105-107, RUE ST-ANDREWS DANS LE DISTRICT DE CONSERVATION DU PATRIMOINE DE LA BASSE-VILLE OUEST

ACS2003-DEV-APR-0214

 

Sally Coutts, Heritage Planner provided an overview of the departmental report outlining the design of the new construction and the materials, which will be used.  She noted that a variance was granted at Committee of Adjustment related to the permitted height under the heritage overlay provision.  Ms. Coutts explained that the design guidelines encourage the use of a fence on the front property line.  The applicant was asked to keep the height of the fence at one meter in order to meet the requirements of the new Fence By-Law and the district design guidelines.  Ms. Coutts also requested that the cornice be lowered in keeping with the area and that certain lights on the front façade be omitted from the final design. Member J. Critchley spoke in favour of the fence, citing his personal experience as a homeowner in Centretown.

 

Chair G. Obagi noted that an email correspondence dated October 3, 2003 was received from Lucie Fontein and is on file with the Committee Coordinator.

 

François Latreille, the applicant was in attendance and provided a detailed written submission (on file with the Committee Coordinator) outlining the application.  Mr. Latreille answered questions from members of the committee pertaining to the use of materials, building footprint, and proposed fence.  He agreed to lower the cornice, but noted that the proposed lights on the front façade will showcase the new building and appeal to homebuyers.

 

Member A. Keith moved the following motion: “That the design of the new construction be amended in order to remove three exterior lights on the front façade excluding the light adjacent to the door and to lower the cornice by 2 courses of brick as agreed to by the applicant.”  Member L. McGovern requested that the two matters be voted on separately.

 

Moved by Member A. Keith:

 

That the design of the new construction be amended in order to remove three exterior lights on the front façade excluding the light adjacent to the door.

 

                                                                                                CARRIED

 

YEAS (10):      R. Bellamy, J. Critchley, A. Keith, C. Marple, H. McArthur, G. Obagi, G. Shemdin, P. Stumes, B. Warren, È. Wertheimer

 

NAYS (1):       L. McGovern

 

Moved by A. Keith:

 

That the design of the new construction be amended in order to lower the cornice by 2 courses of brick as agreed to by the applicant.

 

                                                                                                CARRIED

 

Moved by A. Keith

 

That the Local Architectural Conservation Advisory Committee recommend Planning and Development Committee and Council:

 

1.                  Approve the demolition of 105-107 St. Andrew Street;

 

2.                  Approve its replacement with a new three storey tri-plex, according to the plans submitted on August 29, 2003, as amended by the following:

·        The removal of three exterior lights on the front façade excluding the light adjacent to the door;

·        The lowering of the cornice by 2 courses of brick as agreed to by the applicant.

 

                                                                                                CARRIED as amended

 

 

2.         DESIGNATION OF THE FORMER MARCH HOUSE RESTAURANT, 806 MARCH ROAD, UNDAER PART IV OF THE ONTARIO HERITAGE ACT

DÉSIGNATION DE L’ANCIEN RESTAURANT MARCH HOUSE, SITUÉ AU 806 CHEMIN MARCH, AUX TERMES DE LA PARTIE IV DE LA LOI SUR LE PATRIMOINE DE L’ONTARIO

ACS2003-DEV-APR-0114

 

Sally Coutts, Heritage Planner provided an overview of the departmental report outlining the structure’s context, reason for designation and City of Ottawa policies as they relate to City owned heritage structures.  She suggested that when the building is moved, it remain within the same intersection in order to preserve its historical context.   Ms. Coutts noted the associated costs to move the building.  She responded to questions from members related to the exact location the building will be moved to, cost for the move, current and former uses, and ownership.

 

The following correspondence was received and is on file with the Committee Coordinator:

·        M. Leboldus, March House Historical Society,

·        D. Flemming, Heritage Ottawa, 5 October 2003.

 

Bob Gregory, resident of Kanata urged the City to proceed with designation of the March House, an important meeting place for the Community over the years as a post office, grocery store and restaurant.  He noted that the March House is an important part of a grouping of heritage buildings in the South March area, including the former townhall, schoolhouse, farmhouse, St. Isodore Church and nearby log house.  He indicated the Community is worried about the future of the March House, one of only a few remaining stone buildings in the area.  He noted that the space could be used for meeting space, which is very much needed in Kanata.  Mr. Gregory also suggested that once the building is moved, it could also be sold to private interest.  He suggested that the budget for the road widening might include funds to move the building.

 

With respect to repointing the stone, Ms. Coutts suggested that such work be done once the structure is moved.  She referenced the engineer’s report, which states that the building can be moved in its present condition.

 

David Jeans, Heritage Ottawa referenced the memorandum submitted by David Flemming, President of Heritage Ottawa strongly supporting the designation of the March House.  He reiterated that the building is of significant heritage value in terms of its context.  He suggested that LACAC should not study the financial implications of moving the building, rather it should focus on its designation and preservation.  He reiterated Heritage Ottawa’s position, which is that the building be protected and adequately repaired until a proper use can be found.

 

Moved by G. Shemdin:

 

That the Local Architectural Conservation Advisory Committee recommend that Planning and Development Committee and Council approve the designation of the former March House Restaurant, 806 March Road, under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act in accordance with Statement of Reason for Designation attached as Document 4.

 

                                                                                                            CARRIED

 

 

Heritage Advisory Committee

Comité consultatif sur le patrimoine

 

3.         OTTAWA REGISTRY OFFICE AND RIDEAU CENTRE REDEVELOPMENT

BUREAU D’ENREGISTREMENT D’OTTAWA ET RÉAMÉNAGEMENT DU CENTRE RIDEAU

 

The following correspondence was received and is on file with the Committee Coordinator:

·        D. Flemming, Heritage Ottawa, 6 October 2003,

·        Heritage Advisory Committee memorandum to the General Manager of the Rideau Centre, 6 October 2003.

 

Bob Gregory, Chair, Heritage Advisory Committee (HAC), noted that the goal of this presentation was to keep LACAC informed on issues of common interest, including HAC’s lobbying efforts with respect to the Registry Office.  He reviewed HAC’s letter to the General Manager of the Rideau Centre.

 

David Jeanes, Heritage Ottawa, noted the historical and architectural importance of the Registry Office.  He stated that it would be inappropriate to move the building as suggested.  He noted that the façades should not be hidden in the expansion of the Rideau Centre and noted successful examples of modern malls that have incorporated heritage buildings in their design and construction.

 

Member G. Shemdin strongly supported the Heritage Advisory Committee and Heritage Ottawa’s positions on this matter.  She agreed that it could easily be integrated in the design of the expanded mall.  Member P. Stumes touched on the historical significance of the Registry Office.

 

Moved by G. Shemdin:

 

That the Local Architectural Conservation Advisory Committee recommend that in the planning of the expansion of the Rideau Centre, the Registry Office building be conserved on its site preserving its fabric, context and historical significance.

 

                                                                                                CARRIED

 

Moved by G. Shemdin:

 

That the Local Architectural Conservation Advisory Committee:

 

1.                  Receive a presentation from the Heritage Advisory Committee on this matter; and,

 

2.         Endorse the Heritage Advisory Committee’s position and recommend that in the planning of the expansion of the Rideau Centre, the Registry Office building be conserved on its site preserving its fabric, context and historical significance.

 

                                                                                                            CARRIED as amended

 

 

 

NEW BUSINESS

NOUVELLES QUESTIONS

 

4.         OVERVIEW OF THE PROCESS TO DESIGNATE HERITAGE PROPERTIES AND CONSERVATION DISTRICTS UNDER THE ONTARIO HERITAGE ACT AND CREATION OF A SUB-COMMITTEE

VUE D’ENSEMBLE DU PROCESSUS DE DÉSIGNATION DES BIENS PATRIMONIAUX ET DES DISTRICTS DE CONSERVATION DU PATRIMOINE AUX TERMES DE LA LOI SUR LE PATRIMOINE DE L’ONTARIO ET CRÉATION D’UN SOUS-COMITÉ

 

Sally Coutts, Heritage Planner provided an overview of the process to designate heritage properties under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act.  She indicated that a presentation on the designation of heritage districts would be provided at a future meeting.  She noted that persons interested in designation should first write to Ned Lathrop, General Manager of Development Services.  LACAC, Community members, and property owners can request designations.  All applications to designate are first reviewed by LACAC before final approval by Planning and Development Committee and Council.  Ms. Coutts noted that a property could be designated for its architectural, historical or contextual significance.  She stated that she and Carol Ruddy are preparing a pamphlet on designation.

 

In response to questions from members of committee, Ms. Coutts indicated that the owner’s permission is not required to pursue designation and that staff are very willing to work with the Community and LACAC members to prepare a designation.  Member È. Wertheimer reference the federal Historic Places Initiative and possible funding opportunities.

 

Moved by W. Morris:

 

That the Local Architectural Conservation Advisory Committee:

 

1.                  Receive a presentation from staff on LACAC’s role as it relates to heritage designation under Part IV and V of the Ontario Heritage Act (OHA); and,

 

2.                  Include in the 2004 Workplan, the creation of a OHA Designation Sub-Committee.

 

                                                                                                CARRIED

 

 

5.         UPDATES FROM SUB-COMMITTEES

MISE À JOUR DES SOUS-COMITÉS

 

Chair G. Obagi reminded sub-committee leads to provide a brief explanation of each sub-committee’s work over the last year to include in the annual report.

 

Bus Tour

Chair G. Obagi noted that the tour is scheduled for October 18, 2003 and distributed a map of the event.  He asked members to confirm their attendance by contacting the Committee Coordinator.  He noted that lunch was not provided.  In response to a question from Member A. Keith, Mr. Obagi noted that Jeannie Smith of the Cumberland Historical Society and Cumberland Heritage Village Museum Board would lead the tour.

 

Heritage Day Prize

Lead B. Warren discussed poster distribution.

 

HODI Liaison Group

Member P. Stumes explained that Heritage Ottawa Development Inc. (HODI) was founded in 1978 with funding from the Province of Ontario ($80,000) and the former City of Ottawa ($50,000).  He stated that a contract was signed between HODI and the former City of Ottawa in order for HODI to provide funding to property owners for restoration projects.  He added that the contract also required HODI to report annually to LACAC on its activities and a member of LACAC must also serve on the Board of Directors of the organisation.  Mr. Stumes urged LACAC to take a leadership role in HODI in order to utilise the funds currently available, which he estimated at $50,000.  He undertook to organise a meeting of LACAC’s Chair, HODI’s President, and the Liaison Group.

 

Moved by P. Stumes:

 

That the Local Architectural Conservation Advisory Committee receive updates from its sub-committees.

 

                                                                                                RECEIVED

 

 

 

ADDITIONNAL ITEM

POINT SUPPLÉMENTAIRE

 

6.         COUNCIL DISPOITION - 486 HAZELDEAN ROAD

SUITE À DONNER DU CONSEIL – 486, RUE HAZELDEAN

 

Moved by J. Critchley:

 

That the Local Architectural Conservation Advisory approve the suspension of the rules of procedure (Section 82 (3)) of By-law 2002-247 to consider the addition of this item.

 

                                                                                                CARRIED

 

Sally Coutts, Heritage Planner noted that Councillor Alex Munter met with the applicant, Member J. Critchley and herself prior to the meeting in order to incorporate some of LACAC’s suggestions in the design.  She suggested that the amendments approved by Planning and Development Committee (PDC) and Council point to the value of having a member of LACAC present at PDC meetings to address the committee’s recommendations.

 

Moved By J. Critchley:

 

That the Local Architectural Conservation Advisory Committee receive this item for information.

 

                                                                                                RECEIVED

 

 

 

other business

autres questions

 

October 21, 2003 Meeting

Chair G. Obagi reported that no reports were coming forward from staff for the October 21, 2003.

 

Moved by C. Marple:

 

That the Local Architectural Conservation Advisory Committee cancel its October 21, 2003 meeting.

 

                                                                                                            CARRIED

 

 

Sponsorship of Heritage Ottawa Workshops

Member P. Stumes explained that Heritage Ottawa is organizing workshops for owners of heritage buildings.  He noted that Heritage Ottawa requested that LACAC sponsor the workshops and that no financial contribution would be required.  Members agreed to participate.

 

 


 

Adjournment

LEVÉE DE SÉANCE

 

The meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m.

 

 

 

 

 

Original signed by                                                     Original signed by

Robbie Tremblay                                                        George Obagi                                                

Committee Coordinator                                             Chair